Oil edges up on stalled Russia-Ukraine peace talks, strong US demand
Brent crude futures were up 56 cents, or about 0.8%, at $67.40 a barrel at 12:08 p.m. EDT (1608 GMT), having hit a two-week high earlier in the session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 53 cents, or 0.9%, at $63.24 a barrel.
Both contracts climbed over 1% in the prior session.
The path to peace in Ukraine remained uncertain, turning oil traders cautious after a selloff over the past two weeks on hopes that U.S. President Donald Trump would soon negotiate a diplomatic end to Russia's war with its neighbor.
Both Moscow and Kyiv have since blamed each other for stalling the peace process. Russia on Thursday launched a major air attack near Ukraine's border with the European Union, while Ukraine claimed to have hit a Russian oil refinery.
"Some geopolitical risk premium is slowly being pumped back into the market," oil trading advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates told clients on Thursday.
The uncertainty in the peace talks means that the possibility of tighter sanctions on Russia has resurfaced, said Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates.
Oil prices were also supported by a larger-than-expected drawdown from U.S. crude stockpiles in the last week, indicating strong demand.
U.S. crude stockpiles fell 6 million barrels in the week ended August 15, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported on Wednesday, while analysts had expected a draw of 1.8 million barrels.
Investors were also looking to the Jackson Hole economic conference in Wyoming for signals on a possible Fed interest rate cut next month. The annual gathering of central bankers begins on Thursday, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell scheduled to speak on Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Can investors buy in to Big Law? Burford Capital bets on it
Aug 21 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to opens new tab.) What would it take for outside investors to own a stake in a major U.S. law firm's business? It's a question that's gaining new urgency, after litigation finance giant Burford Capital (BURF.L), opens new tab revealed it is in talks to take such a step. Publicly traded Burford is already among the largest third-party backers of individual lawsuits or litigation portfolios, which it funds in return for a share of potential settlements or judgments. Now, according to Burford chief development officer Travis Lenkner, it is in "meaningful discussions" with U.S. firms to partner with them more directly. Burford is exploring two paths, Lenkner said: Investing in firms through Arizona's alternative business structure (ABS) program and backing firms via managed service organizations (MSOs), a model that legal ethics experts and deal advisors said has been gaining traction. "This is law firms seeing what's happening in other jurisdictions, in other professions, and responding to the competitive challenges in their own market, and looking for a solution to the otherwise inefficiency of the partnership structure," Lenkner said. He said Burford has fielded interest from firms of different sizes and expects to deploy capital "relatively soon," though he did not name specific firms or provide a timeline for its U.S. plans. Outside the United States, Burford in 2020 acquired a 32% stake in a U.K.-based litigation firm. Ethical rules in nearly every U.S. state prohibit non-lawyers from owning U.S. law firms or receiving a percentage of their fees. Arizona in 2020 became the first U.S. state to implement a workaround, creating an ABS program to allow co-ownership with court approval. Earlier this year, KPMG became the first of the Big Four accounting firms to win approval from Arizona's Supreme Court to launch a law firm in the state. Under a managed service organization model, a law firm's back-office operations—billing, IT, marketing—are spun off into a separate MSO entity. That entity, funded by outside investors, provides services to the law firm for a fee. The MSO doesn't share in the firm's profits, sidestepping the provisions against non-lawyers owning law firms or receiving a cut of legal fees. "It has the promise of modernizing the practice of law in a really material way,' said Trisha Rich, a partner at Holland & Knight who is advising both law firms and investors on MSOs. Rich said such arrangements can help lawyers shift time from administrative tasks to their practices. She said she's currently working on 10 such transactions and has closed others, though she declined to name clients. Lucian Pera, a partner at Adams & Reese and legal ethics expert who has advised on both MSOs and ABS arrangements, said interest in MSOs is 'exploding.' While most deals involve a single MSO serving a single firm, there's room for other structures, he added. Despite the appeal, MSOs face constraints. Existing ethics rules mean an MSO could not charge law firms a percentage of their revenue or profits as a fee, said Paul Haskel, a Crowell & Moring partner. Lawyers also can't sign non-compete agreements, Rich said, meaning investors must accept that key talent can walk away at any time. While not specific to MSOs, some attorneys have balked at efforts to expand the financial stakes of non-lawyers in the legal profession. Programs like Arizona's have stalled or been rejected in California and other states after critics warned that client interests could be harmed by the influence of investors or corporations that are not bound by attorney ethics rules. Ethics aside, some experts said law firm partners might resist an arrangement like an MSO for business reasons. Bruce MacEwen and Janet Stanton of law firm consultancy Adam Smith Esq predicted "the great majority will reject the notion of an MSO for their firm for (misplaced) fear of its diluting their control of the law firm as a business." "We see no reason an MSO interest would taint or dilute zealous client representation," they said in an email, since the MSO would not dictate management of the firm. These structures have been used in other professions, such as healthcare and public accounting, Burford's Lenkner said. He said law practice traditionally didn't require significant upfront investment, but that has changed with the pace of technological change and heightened competition for talent. 'It's not clear why law has been left for last, but it is clear why firms are now realizing the need for these structures,' Lenkner said. – The Justice Department's bankruptcy watchdog has asked a federal judge to set a trial date in its case challenging legal fees awarded to law firm Jackson Walker by a former bankruptcy judge David Jones, whose undisclosed romantic relationship with one of the firm's partners sparked an ethics scandal and cast uncertainty over the firm's fees in dozens of cases. The Office of the U.S. Trustee's request was included in a Friday filing in opposition to an individual settlement reached by Jackson Walker with a bankruptcy client whose case was overseen by Jones. The U.S. Trustee said the proposed settlement with Seadrill Partners would "prematurely and improperly short circuit" its effort to hold the firm accountable. Five similar proposed settlements totaling more than $2.3 million are now pending before U.S. District Judge Alia Moses, who is overseeing a legal effort by the U.S. Trustee to force Jackson Walker to disgorge all of the fees it was awarded by Jones. Instead of weighing those individual deals and others that are in the works, Moses should schedule the matter for trial, the Trustee said. "A full trial is necessary to ensure the Court can consider all evidence and remedies within a single proceeding," the U.S. Trustee said. – A U.S. judge in Alabama this week approved more than $759 million in legal fees and expenses for lawyers at 38 firms who secured a $2.8 billion antitrust settlement with Blue Cross Blue Shield on behalf of a class of health care providers. Chief U.S. District Judge R. David Proctor on Tuesday granted the request for $657.1 million in fees and at least $102 million in expenses as part of the settlement, which resolved claims that hospitals, physicians and other health professionals were underpaid for reimbursements. Read more: US legal jobs are rising again, but gains are mixed Optum picks new fight to kick law firm Motley Rice off opioids case Lawyers face objections to multimillion-dollar fees after no-cash settlement with Schwab
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump attorney Alina Habba has no ‘lawful authority' to serve as New Jersey's top prosecutor, judge says
Donald Trump's former personal attorney Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as New Jersey's top prosecutor, according to a federal judge. Habba, whose appointment to the role sparked a legal showdown between the Trump administration and the state's federal judges, has been serving as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey 'without lawful authority' for more than a month, according to District Judge Matthew Brann. 'Faced with the question of whether Ms. Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not,' he wrote on Thursday. 'Because she is not currently qualified to exercise the functions and duties of the office in an acting capacity, she must be disqualified from participating in any ongoing cases,' he added. The judge is pausing any outcome from his decision, however, to allow the government to fight his order in a federal appeals court. Last month, New Jersey's federal trial judges named their own nominee to replace Habba at the end of her 120-day term as the state's acting U.S. Attorney. But hours later, Attorney General Pam Bondi not only blocked the judges' nominee but 'removed' her from the office entirely. That prosecutor, Desiree Leigh Grace, who has spent a decade fighting crime at the U.S. Attorney's office in Newark, said she was prepared to take the job and would show up for work 'in accordance with the law.' Bondi fired her, publicly rebuked the judges, and promoted Habba to the role of acting U.S. attorney — preserving her role as the state's top federal prosecutor. Despite the New Jersey judges using their lawful authority to appoint Grace, who was hired by Habba to serve as her top assistant, Justice Department officials have accused them of advancing a politically motivated attempt to force Habba out of the job. The judge's ruling on Thursday stems from a challenge brought by New Jersey defendants challenging the legality of Habba's tenure and the charges she brought against them. They argued that Habba did not have the authority to bring charges against them after her 120-day term expired in July. They have a 'constitutional right to be prosecuted only by a duly authorized United States Attorney,' and 'the illegitimacy of Ms. Habba's appointment undermines … fundamental due process rights,' attorneys wrote in court filings. A lack of clarity over the future, and legality, of Habba's leadership has thrown her office into chaos, with New Jersey prosecutors admitting in court that some upcoming trials and other procedural matters would have to be adjourned altogether. The Independent has requested comment from Habba's office. The Justice Department's claims of political maneuvering within the federal judiciary follow years of allegations of Habba launching politically motivated stunts of her own. After she briefly served as 'counselor to the president' at the White House, Habba was sworn in as acting U.S. attorney in her home state on March 28. Shortly after her appointment, she told a right-wing media outlet that she plans to 'turn New Jersey red.' 'So, hopefully, while I'm there, I can help that cause,' she said. In April, Habba told Fox News that her office had launched an investigation into New Jersey's Democratic Governor Phil Murphy and Attorney General Matthew Platkin over a directive to local law enforcement instructing them against cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. The following month, she announced on Fox News that her office was bringing criminal charges against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka after a scuffle with federal agents during a congressional oversight visit at an immigration detention center. She later abruptly dropped trespassing charges against Baraka 'for the sake of moving forward' — and then criminally charged Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver with assault. The judge overseeing the case against Baraka criticized Habba's about-face in open court and questioned why prosecutors even brought the charges in the first place. To stay on permanently, Habba needs to be confirmed by the Senate, but it's unlikely her name will come up for a vote any time soon. Opposition from New Jersey's Democratic senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim have effectively killed off any imminent chances of a confirmation vote.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Judge rules ex-Trump lawyer unlawfully serving as US attorney in New Jersey
A federal judge ruled on Thursday that Donald Trump's former lawyer, Alina Habba, has been unlawfully serving as the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey. In his order disqualifying Habba from prosecuting three defendants who challenged her appointment, chief US district judge Matthew Brann wrote: 'The Executive branch has perpetuated Alina Habba's appointment to act as the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey through a novel series of legal and personnel moves. 'Along the way, it has disagreed with the Judges of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and criminal defendants in that District about who should or may lead the office. Faced with the question of whether Ms Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not.' The judge found that Habba's term as the interim US attorney ended in July, and the Trump administration's maneuvers to keep her in the role without getting confirmation from the US Senate did not follow procedures required by federal law. Brann said he is putting his order on hold pending an appeal. Habba, who unsuccessfully defended Trump in his New York fraud trial, also served as a frequent campaign surrogate for him in 2024. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion After being appointed to the interim role in March, she said the state could 'turn red', a rare overt political expression from a prosecutor, and said she planned to investigate the state's Democratic governor and attorney general. She then brought a trespassing charge, which was eventually dropped, against Newark's mayor, Ras Baraka, stemming from a confrontation with federal agents during his visit to an immigration detention center. Habba later charged a Democratic representative, LaMonica McIver, with assault for resisting the detention of the mayor in the same incident, a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress other than for corruption. McIver denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. In late July, when Habba's four-month temporary appointment was coming to a close, it became clear that she would not get support from home state senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats, meaning her chances of Senate approval were nil. Trump then withdrew her nomination, and federal judges in New Jersey exercised their power under the law to replace Habba with a career prosecutor when Habba's temporary appointment lapsed. The attorney general, Pam Bondi, retaliated by firing that prosecutor and moved to re-install Habba as acting US attorney. Associated Press contributed to this report
