Has the son of Helms-Burton just been conceived?
The Canada-U.S.-Cuba nexus has once again raised its ugly head. Only this time it comes at a particularly delicate time for Prime Minister Mark Carney, and leaves him with some very difficult decisions to make.
Since Canada capitulated to U.S. pressure to deep-six the digital services tax, it's only fair that Washington should terminate its new Cuba policy of embracing third country economic sanctions. Now, what do you think the chances of that are?
Reportedly, the new Cuba regulations are part of a national security memorandum signed by U.S. President Donald Trump in late June. According to the White House directive, the executive branch seeks to end 'economic practices that disproportionately benefit the Cuban government or its military, intelligence, or security agencies or personnel at the expense of the Cuban people.' The Miami Herald is also claiming that U.S. sanctions will apply to any company (foreign or otherwise) providing 'direct or indirect support to companies directly or indirectly owned by the Cuban military.'
U.S. President Donald Trump, right, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, center, appear to be putting a new squeeze on countries — like Canada — doing business with Cuba. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, left, looks on during a cabinet meeting at the White House, July 8.
These so-called 'secondary sanctions' will punish foreign (read Canadian) companies from doing business with the Cuban government.
More specifically, it prohibits Canadian companies from engaging in commercial activities with Cuba's Revolutionary Armed Forces and its corporate affiliates GAESA (a conglomerate of companies) and Gaviota (a tourism company). But if they do so, and thus violate the new Trump measures, those businesses will then be subject to stiff financial penalties.
The chief objective is to disincentivize foreign investment in Cuba, to discourage tourism travel to the island, to cut off badly needed dollars to Havana (by going after tourism receipts) and to put foreign governments with ties to Cuba on notice. A policy such as this comes from the same U.S. place that spawned the damaging Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 and the anti-Cuba Helms-Burton Act of 1996.
There is no doubt that the principal driver of this tougher Cuba policy is the anti-Cuba hawk and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It's a given that he will utilize every single waking moment trying to squeeze the life out of the island's population. This latest policy iteration is just another manifestation of America's long-standing Cuban economic strangulation strategy.
It doesn't hurt that Trump undoubtedly believes that tightening the screws on Cuba plays well politically to the Cuban-American crowd in south Florida. And that is particularly important at this moment in time as boatloads of Haitians, Venezuelans ad Nicaraguans — many facing deportation and an extraordinarily difficult future — are fighting mad at Republican members of Congress and rapidly jumping off the Trump electoral ship.
As far as I can tell, though, the new 'National Security Presidential Memorandum 5' regulatory changes to strengthen U.S. Cuba policy will negatively impact Canadian travel companies, airlines and hotels (typically joint ventures with the Cuban government). It will also target Toronto-based Sherritt International Corp. — Canada's largest foreign investor on the island — which has substantial interests in nickel mining, energy production and tourism.
Like the Helms-Burton Law, the Trump administration's new 'maximum pressure' campaign will further undermine already strained diplomatic relations with Canada and countries of the European Union. National governments will then have little choice, as they did in the mid-1990s, but to respond with reciprocal punitive measures of their own and to bring this matter before the World Trade Organization.
But how will Ottawa's response to Trump's extraterritorial application of U.S. regulations to Canada — or the 'externalizing' of the U.S. blockade of Cuba, if you will — impact the ongoing bilateral trade and security negotiations with Washington? More to the point: Can Carney seriously talk about 'elbows up' and all that while Canada effectively sits on its fanny and does nothing in the face of Trump's effrontery to Canadian sovereignty?
Weekday Evenings
Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening.
I am worried that Carney's non-action in deference to Trump will undermine not only Canada's constructive and independent relationship with Cuba, but also our relations with the wider region. If Carney balks, he will wrongly differentiate himself from other Canadian prime ministers who stood up to the Americans on matters involving Cuba.
At any rate, I'm certain that someone in official Washington is thinking that this is the perfect policy prescription given Cuba's current dire economic and financial situation. They've no doubt convinced themselves that these new sanctions will push struggling Cubans over the edge and thus precipitate the gradual demise of the Cuban government. Indeed, the U.S. presidential memorandum doesn't even bother to hide the fact that this 'maximum pressure' strategy will remain in place 'until a transition government in Cuba' takes power.
There is no question that these tougher measures will make everyday life more miserable for the Cuban people. But they could also prove to be counterproductive: by pushing Cubans to seek greener pastures in the U.S., by galvanizing public support around the Cuban government and by isolating the U.S. from its Western allies and friends.
Anyway, I doubt that Trump really cares.
Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
16 minutes ago
- CBC
How should Canada respond to U.S. tariff increase?
As U.S. President Donald Trump bumps up import tariffs on non-CUSMA-compliant Canadian goods to 35 per cent, the Power & Politics panel of party insiders discusses how Canada should respond and whether there should be an expiration date on negotiations.
Winnipeg Free Press
17 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Disappointment mixed with cautious optimism, resolve in Manitoba as Trump makes good on tariff threat
Manitoba business and labour leaders expressed disappointment Friday after U.S. President Donald Trump hiked his tariff on many Canadian goods to 35 per cent, bringing further economic uncertainty. They remained hopeful ongoing trade talks between the two countries will strike the right deal for Canada's economy. 'We were hoping to avoid this escalation in our current trade tensions with the U.S.,' said Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Loren Remillard. 'We remain confident, in time, we will find common ground with the U.S. administration. The most important thing is getting the right deal for Canada, not necessarily getting it done right now.' MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS FILES The steel-producing city of Selkirk, just north of Winnipeg, is bracing for potential impacts. Trump increased the tariff (on imports not compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA) after a deal wasn't struck before a deadline he imposed. Manitoba Federation of Labour president Kevin Rebeck agreed no deal is better than a bad one for Canada. 'I think there are a lot more businesses that are watching this with great uncertainty and unease, and that's not good for anyone, but we can't let the U.S. just dictate a deal that's only good for them and hurts our economy,' he said. 'I'm glad our prime minister (Mark Carney) is working towards a deal that puts Canadians first.' Rebeck said tariffs are hurting both countries' economies, with about 200 Manitobans — largely in the steel sector and some in food production — on work-sharing measures or laid off. Alan Arcand, the Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters' chief economist, said the U.S. is Manitoba's No. 1 trading partner, with 80 per cent of the province's exports going to its southern neighbour. Manitoba's exports to the U.S. were down by 30 per cent between January and May, he said. 'That's definitely a huge problem for the Manitoba economy,' Arcand said. 'It's been a challenge the entire year, and increasing the tariff rate from 25 per cent to 35 per cent adds on to those difficulties.' Arcand said CME supports the federal government's decision to 'remain firm' and pursue a better deal. Canada's automotive, steel, aluminum, copper and softwood lumber industries have been most affected by the trade war, he said. In Manitoba, the advanced manufacturing sector could be among the most affected by the increased tariff, Remillard said. He said a vast majority of Manitoba's exporters is compliant with CUSMA and therefore will not be subject to the increased tariff, but a significant percentage will be impacted. Remillard said he expects eligible companies that haven't filled out the necessary paperwork will make a 'significant move' to become compliant in the coming days. He said Trump's changing trade policy has had a chilling effect on business. Arcand said it has been nearly impossible for businesses to plan. While some groups or politicians encouraged Ottawa to retaliate, Remillard said the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce is hoping 'calmer approaches' by the federal government continue, and it doesn't take any action that will hurt Canadians. All levels of government should provide supports or resources to affected sectors to help them weather the storm, he said. Trump already applied 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. The move left the steel-producing city of Selkirk, just north of Winnipeg, bracing for potential impacts. 'You just can't do business at a 50 per cent tariff. It's just out of the question,' said Mayor Larry , who's been monitoring Brazil-based Gerdau SA's steel mill in Selkirk. 'Every time I go by there, I'm looking at the yard to see how many employees' cars are parked there, and how many trailers are there loaded with steel and ready to go. 'Of course, it's been very, very busy before this latest increase to the tariffs. We were seeing a lot of double trailers loaded with steel coming out of the mill.' Johannson said he saw some trailers — destination unknown — ready to go when he drove by Friday morning. 'We're seeing back and forth in there, and that's a good thing. Honestly, as mayor, I just can't see doing business with a 50 per cent tariff,' he said. 'Fifty per cent tariffs is not a fair rate. It's a ludicrous rate.' When Premier Wab Kinew visited the mill in March, he said the Manitoba government will source Canadian steel for all its infrastructure projects and relevant equipment purchases. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. Johannson, whose father and grandfather worked at the mill, is hoping that approach is mirrored across Canada. 'We want Manitoba steel to have equal opportunity in any projects in Canada,' he said. 'We can supply the steel.' In the meantime, Johannson wants negotiations between Canada and the U.S. to be 'ramped up.' 'We have to get (the tariffs) down,' he said. 'I wish I could lock the door until they come out of there with a good deal that is beneficial to both.' Chris KitchingReporter Chris Kitching is a general assignment reporter at the Free Press. He began his newspaper career in 2001, with stops in Winnipeg, Toronto and London, England, along the way. After returning to Winnipeg, he joined the Free Press in 2021, and now covers a little bit of everything for the newspaper. Read more about Chris. Every piece of reporting Chris produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Calgary Herald
17 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Impact of latest round of tariffs on Calgary dims economic outlook say experts
The latest round of tariffs imposed by the U.S. won't affect Calgarians and their businesses, but the resulting volatility has dimmed their economic outlook as further investments are paused as a result of the most recednt tariff announcement, experts say. Article content U.S. President Donald Trump once again slapped additional tariffs on many countries, including Canada, whose exports, barring products under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, will now be taxed at 35 per cent instead of 25 per cent. The levy and the exemption do not include sector-specific tariffs that were imposed in the spring. Article content Article content Article content Trump justified the import duty, which will be passed down to the U.S. consumer, by citing the flow of illegal fentanyl from Canada into the country, a claim that has been debunked by official reports. Article content Article content The trade agreement comprises most industries, and some companies that aren't included have voluntarily decided otherwise, said Mike Holden, chief economist at the Business Council of Alberta. Article content 'There's a bit of an administrative burden for companies to register as being compliant under the agreement,' Holden said. 'And some haven't usually been a part of it because the tariff that had previously been in place was around two per cent.' Article content As a result, he added, 'It's not going to affect too many companies in the Calgary area.' Approximately 85 per cent of Canadian exports qualify under the agreement, according to RBC. The real number is difficult to pin down. Article content Article content However, the announcement deals another blow to companies that are yearning for stability in the trade relations between the two countries. Article content 'It's hard to believe that it's only been about six months since all this has happened. I mean, it has been chaos,' Holden said. Article content By 'all this,' Holden refers to the saga of geopolitical uncertainty ushered in by Trump's return to the White House. Article content It began with a threat in February to impose a 25 per cent tariffs on all Canadian exports entering the U.S. with a reduced levy of 10 per cent on energy products. Trump reversed his plan a day after imposing them on March 4, citing Canada's renewed promises, including investing in more security at the border. Article content That, however, didn't prevent Trump from implementing tariffs on specific sectors, including steel, aluminum and auto-imports, industries that are linked to several others. For the next several months, the U.S. president kept waffling on his pledges to impose duties, only to reverse course and then reimplement them.
