Texans Warned of Health Insurance Premium Rise in 2026
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Texas is set to see a major increase in the cost of health insurance in 2026, an issue being faced by states nationwide.
As enhanced tax credits for Affordable Care Act (ACA)-compliant plans are set to expire at the end of the year, premium costs are projected to increase by an average of 18 percent across the country, with some states experiencing much higher increases.
"It's the highest rate increase proposed since 2018," Allison Hoffman, a professor of law and of medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, told Newsweek.
In Texas specifically, carriers in the state have increased their rates by an average of 33 percent for the individual marketplace, the Texas Department of Insurance told Newsweek.
"This is partly a reflection of the loss of the expanded subsidies for 2026, medical cost trends, and a reaction to marketplace predictions nationwide," the department said.
Why It Matters
The rise in premium costs has led some experts and insurance marketplaces to warn that many could forgo health insurance, which will not only worsen health outcomes but also ramp up premiums even higher.
This is because those who are more likely to drop health insurance tend to be younger and healthier, meaning that those left using health insurance will be more expensive to insure, requiring more complex care.
File photo: the Marquee of Seminole Hospital District's Memorial Hospital in Seminole, Texas.
File photo: the Marquee of Seminole Hospital District's Memorial Hospital in Seminole, Texas.
Julio Cortez/AP
What To Know
The enhanced tax credits were originally implemented by former President Joe Biden for those using ACA marketplaces to help more Americans get access to health care coverage. He extended them to the end of 2025.
However, as the Trump administration has given no indication it intends to renew these subsidies, likely because they come at a steep cost to the taxpayer, they are currently set to expire at the end of the year.
When the enhanced tax credits expire, "people who do not anticipate needing a lot of medical care may decide not to renew their coverage, increasing the average cost per insured," Hoffman said.
"Insurers may preemptively try to increase premiums out of concerns about tariffs or other federal regulations that might make it more expensive for insurers to operate marketplace plans," she added.
However, while the increase in prices for 2026 is higher than in previous years, rises in premium costs are "routine," Richard Scheffler, a professor of health economics and public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, told Newsweek. "As health care prices go up, so do insurance rates."
There are also a number of other factors impacting the cost of premiums, including inflation, labor costs, and "especially, the cost of high-priced drugs such as GLP-1 drugs used for weight management," Hoffman said.
What People Are Saying
The Texas Department of Insurance told Newsweek: "Premium costs will increase for individuals buying health insurance on the federal marketplace. Premiums in Texas will be tempered by federal tax subsidies and increased cost-sharing reductions (CSR) loading required by Texas statute and rule."
Professor Allison Hoffman told Newsweek: "These increases plus the expiration of the enhanced federal subsidies will mean more people will be unable to afford their premiums and will be uninsured. They are more likely to go without necessary care. These changes will also have an impact on hospitals, who will treat more uninsured patients. And when premiums rise, the cost of federal subsidies go up, so the federal government will pay more to insure fewer people."
Professor Richard Scheffler told Newsweek: "Florida has had an increase in prices as has California and Texas so rates go up but they go up more in states that have a less competitive insurance market with one or two insurers having a dominant position and a large share of market."
He added, "Health insurance plans differ in what benefits are covered and payments like deductibles and co payments. The underlying risks of population using care often differ, e.g. if your plan has a higher percentage of elderly people, their use of care will be higher and the costs will be as well."
What Happens Next
The proposed increases are for the 2026 calendar year, and many are concerned about the impacts they will have on Americans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
33 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Have We Forgotten How to Accept Ourselves?
Even in the uncertainty of 2023—when inflation weighed heavy and families tightened their budgets—plastic surgery in the United States still saw a 5 to 7 percent increase, depending on which reports you trust. That means, while Americans delayed vacations or skipped dinners out, many still prioritized cosmetic surgery. And these numbers only reflect U.S. data; when you consider the countless people who travel abroad for cheaper procedures, the global increase is likely much greater. The question is: why? Some argue it's Zoom culture: staring at our faces on endless calls. Others blame Instagram filters or TikTok beauty standards. And while these may play a role, the deeper truth is harder to ignore. We are a society increasingly convinced that altering our outsides will heal what is restless on the inside. I stumbled down this rabbit hole myself online. One minute I was reading about mRNA, the next I was watching a woman describe how fat injections in her buttocks were decaying, releasing the smell of rotting meat. People in the comments accused her of being unhygienic, but the truth was simpler: when too much fat is injected and the body can't supply enough blood, the tissue dies and begins to rot. And as a farmer, I know that is a smell you don't ever want to encounter. From there, I couldn't stop scrolling. Women stacked surgeries on top of surgeries—breast implants, ab implants, butt lifts, nose jobs—until their bodies hardly looked human. My mind recoiled, not because of beauty standards, but because it no longer registered as natural. What level of disconnection from family, faith, and purpose does it take to risk your health in pursuit of a body unrecognizable to nature itself? Even when I lived in Los Angeles and was running restaurants, I saw the same thing in person. A customer would sit down with a face so altered by surgery and fillers that it was distracting. I would work hard not to let my expression betray what I was thinking, but it was difficult to listen deeply. Instead of hearing their story, I was caught analyzing how uneven the work looked, how the face no longer made sense to the human eye, and how much it pulled me away from seeing their soul through their eyes. The human-to-human connection was interrupted. I've also watched girlfriends begin with breast implants or lip fillers in their early twenties, then quickly move on to face injections. The irony is that these procedures, meant to keep them looking young, often made them look older—faces puffed up and filled before age had even begun to soften their natural beauty. If women in their 20s are chasing this look, what happens by the time they reach their 50s? Do their husbands look back at photographs of them before the surgeries with longing? The most shocking part is how dangerous some of these procedures really are. Take the Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL). For years, it held the title of the deadliest cosmetic procedure, with a mortality rate estimated at 1 in 3,000 surgeries—a risk far greater than abdominoplasty, which is closer to 1 in 10,000 to 13,000. Even with improved techniques, more recent studies still put the BBL death rate between 1 in 2,351 and 1 in 6,241—numbers that remain alarmingly high. Yet the procedure is booming in popularity, particularly among medical tourists seeking a cheaper price tag overseas. In fact, from 2009 to 2022, at least 93 U.S. citizens died in the Dominican Republic after traveling there for cosmetic surgery, with deaths spiking in recent years. So the question becomes: Why is one of the riskiest surgeries gaining more popularity than ever? Along the way, I also discovered something else: breast implants can impact breastfeeding. While most women can still nurse their babies, especially if the implants are placed under the muscle, certain procedures—like those done through the nipple—carry a risk of damaging milk ducts or reducing supply. And while the majority can breastfeed successfully, why risk it at all? Breastmilk is foundational to human health. This contradiction troubles me. We argue, rightly, that children shouldn't be pushed into gender surgeries—that God doesn't make mistakes, and we aren't born in the wrong body. But if that is true, why don't we question the culture that pushes women and men alike toward ever-more extreme cosmetic procedures? Why isn't there the same level of alarm about a society cutting into perfectly healthy bodies out of dissatisfaction with the mirror? My mother used to say, 'Don't put makeup on the mirror.' Whenever I wanted to change something outside of me to fix how I felt inside, she reminded me the work was internal. Wherever you go, there you are. Surgery won't change that. Of course, there are exceptions. Plastic surgery saves lives after accidents, restores dignity after trauma, and, in small doses, can offer people confidence. I don't deny that. I've even had it myself—after my earring was ripped out on a Super Bowl Sunday, I waited too long in the ER, and the initial repair didn't take. Doctors eventually had to cut into the interior of the earlobe and re-stitch it. That's plastic surgery too, and I'm grateful for it. But what troubles me is the cultural obsession with total reinvention, as though we could stitch our way into peace of mind. Underneath it all, I believe this obsession comes from the same root as so many of our modern crises: our disconnection from nature. When we are cut off from healthy soil, from true food, and from the basic rhythms of God's design, we lose our grounding. We feel alone, unmoored, and disconnected from who we really are. And in that emptiness, we look for comfort in the mirror, in the surgeon's office, or in the endless scroll of social media—rather than in creation, community, or the Creator Himself. Here's the truth: altering our bodies may give us confidence for a season, but it cannot fix what is emotionally broken. It cannot substitute for faith, family, or purpose. Only we can do that inner work. And only God can give us the lasting acceptance we crave. Until we remember that, we will keep filling operating rooms—hoping a new face or figure will finally make the mirror smile back.
NBC News
35 minutes ago
- NBC News
CVS holds off adding Gilead's new HIV prevention shot to drug coverage lists
CVS Health, which runs the largest U.S. pharmacy benefit manager, will not add Gilead Sciences' new HIV prevention drug to its commercial plans for now, a spokesperson told Reuters, despite the medicine's proven effectiveness. CVS based the decision on clinical, financial, and regulatory factors, spokesperson David Whitrap said in an email. It also will not cover Yeztugo under its Affordable Care Act formularies, since its ACA preventive program follows recommendations and mandates from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Whitrap said. Current HIV prevention recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), which is supported by HHS, include only three older drugs. A source familiar with the situation suggested that Gilead is still negotiating with CVS over Yeztugo, a twice-yearly injection with a U.S. list price of more than $28,000 a year. The decision by CVS is 'a grave disappointment and frankly a missed opportunity,' said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS nonprofit AVAC. 'It does reflect a price that is too high and a U.S. pharmaceutical pricing structure that is frankly not sustainable.' He and other AIDS activists have said Yeztugo could be a transformative tool in ending the 44-year-old epidemic that infects 1.3 million people a year and is estimated by the World Health Organization to have killed more than 42 million. Gilead said it is 'extremely pleased' with progress in its conversations with payers, most of whom continue to cover HIV prevention products with no cost sharing or coverage barriers. The company said it is on track to secure 75% U.S. insurer coverage of Yeztugo by year-end and 90% coverage by June 2026. Pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, act as middlemen between drug companies and consumers. They negotiate volume discounts with drug manufacturers on behalf of employers and health plans based on coverage terms. The three largest — CVS Caremark, UnitedHealth Group's OptumRX and Cigna's Express Scripts — control about 70% of specialty drug prescriptions in the U.S. Optum said Yeztugo will be reviewed for coverage in the coming weeks, while Express Scripts did not respond to requests for comment. U.S. government health care programs, including the Veterans Administration and the Medicare program for people over age 65, have already added Yeztugo to coverage lists. Gilead said earlier this month that several state-run Medicaid plans, including California and New York, were covering the drug. Gilead, its investors, and AIDS activists have high hopes for Yeztugo. Approved in June for people at high risk of HIV, the drug was shown to be nearly 100% effective at preventing infection in large trials, fueling fresh optimism about limiting the spread of the deadly virus. Some analysts have warned that a recent Supreme Court ruling affirming broad HHS authority over the USPSTF could affect coverage prospects while Robert F. Kennedy Jr is in charge of the agency. Medical groups have expressed alarm about reports that Kennedy could replace members of the task force. The 16-member task force reviews evidence and public input, then recommends preventive services that catch disease early or prevent worsening, which insurers must cover without patient cost-sharing. For HIV prevention, it endorses daily PrEP pills Truvada, which is available as a generic, and Gilead's Descovy, as well as ViiV Healthcare's bimonthly shot Apretude.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
FACT FOCUS: A look at RFK Jr.'s misleading claims on US dietary guidelines and Froot Loops
The food pyramid that once guided Americans' diets has been retired for more than a decade, but that has not stopped President Donald Trump's health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., from regularly criticizing the concept. He often highlights the pyramid, misrepresenting dietary standards and criticizing health initiatives of the Biden administration. Such claims were featured in a video aired Tuesday, before his appearance on Fox News' 'Jesse Watters Primetime.' Here's a closer look at the facts. KENNEDY: 'The dietary guidelines that we inherited from the Biden administration were 453 pages long. They were driven by the same commercial impulses that put Froot Loops at the top of the food pyramid." THE FACTS: The original food pyramid did not mention any specific products. But at the very top, it recommended that oils, fats and sugar be consumed 'sparingly.' Grains such as bread, cereal, rice and pasta were on the bottom tier, where six to 11 portions a day were recommended. The current dietary guidelines are 164 pages long, not 453. They were released in December 2020 during Trump's first term, along with a four-page executive summary. A scientific report used to develop the dietary guidelines is published every five years by an advisory committee. The latest report, released in December by the Biden administration, is 421 pages long. Trump's first administration released an 835-page scientific report in July 2020 that informed the current guidelines. 'The dietary guidelines include several documents, including a scientific report which summarizes the scientific evidence supporting the dietary guidelines,' said Laura Bellows, an associate professor of nutritional sciences at Cornell University. 'It can be long due to the comprehensive nature of the document. That said, these findings are distilled down into concise guidelines that are foundational to the creation of consumer information and educational materials.' 'It's a bit trickier than just one grouping,' Bellows said in an email. She said Froot Loops 'would fall more in foods that we should 'moderate' ... but does contribute to the grain group.' The cereal is high in sugar, she added, but does have fiber and other key nutrients. The Agriculture Department introduced an updated pyramid guide in 2005 that incorporated new nutritional standards. It retired the pyramid idea altogether in 2011 and now uses the MyPlate concept, which stresses eating a healthy balance of different foods based on factors such as age and sex. MyPlate recommends making half of the grains one eats in a day whole grains and cutting back on added sugars. Similar to the food pyramid, this puts Froot Loops, which has whole grains and added sugars, in both categories. 'MyPlate, not the Food Pyramid, has been the visual graphic for the US Dietary Guidelines since 2011,' said Bellows. 'So, referring to the 'top of the pyramid' is a dated reference.' The agency said Kennedy is committed to ensuring those guidelines 'are grounded in gold-standard science and reflect a clear focus on healthy, whole, and nutritious foods.'
