logo
Inside the ‘forgotten' estate where £20m of Labour funding promises to bring a change in fortune

Inside the ‘forgotten' estate where £20m of Labour funding promises to bring a change in fortune

Independent14-06-2025
A rumpled security guard walks out of the sliding entrance doors of a Morrisons supermarket in southern Bristol. The worker looks up at the cloudy sky, then leans back against the railings and lights a rolled-up cigarette.
'Have you seen the news?' a shopper eagerly asks. 'No,' signals the guard with a shake of the head. 'We're going to be getting twenty million quid,' declares the customer, smiling from ear to ear.
Hartcliffe is more than 120 miles from Westminster, but news that the post-war housing estate is one of 25 'trailblazer neighbourhoods ' announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves ' spending review is already on everyone's lips.
The details of the plan are vague.
Four paragraphs in the published policy paper state that each neighbourhood will get up to £20m funding for community-led regeneration, as well as a 'direct link' to Whitehall for investment.
The term 'trailblazer' suggests a new idea. Although, the Tories' post-Brexit Levelling Up Fund promised - and arguably failed - something similar.
And as Labour wrestles against a surge in support for Nigel Farage 's Reform UK in working-class areas amid unpopular reforms to the welfare system, critics could argue there are wider goals for Sir Keir Starmer here.
But any political pessimism fails to dampen the spirits in Hartcliffe on a soggy Thursday morning, less than 24 hours after the announcement.
'I was like 'wow' you don't very often see things like that for people like us,' says mother-of-two Kirsty Green, who recently took over the management of Hartcliffe Community Centre, a short five-minute walk from the Morrisons supermarket.
The shabby-looking centre was built through a community fundraiser not long after the estate opened in the 1950s - and it's now showing its age.
'Like everything here, we don't get nothing so we have to find a way ourselves,' says Ms Green, who runs the venue with her sister-in-law Leanne Heyward. 'This is the first time I think I've seen we've got money like this - it's amazing because we are always left behind.
'Because we've never had a nice reputation, the money seems to always to go elsewhere.'
The cash promised by Labour is something the centre would like to get a slice of, says Ms Green, who points toward three plastic buckets collecting water dripping through holes in the roof in one of the three rooms inside.
'There's so much potential here for the community, but as you can see, we need the money,' says Ms Green, who has plans for a children's holiday club and a cinema.
Across the main road and down a street lined with discoloured concrete homes is the South Bristol Methodist Church.
In the main hall, a weekly morning Coffee Time is taking place. Three women and a man sit around a set-up table, drinking from glass cups and sharing a packet of digestive biscuits. It's usually busier, but the rain has kept people at home.
'We've just been talking about the news,' says Charlotte Gardiner, an 85-year-old pensioner, when asked about the funding announcement. 'It's about time we're getting something - we've been neglected and forgotten from the moment the last brick was laid on this estate.'
Mrs Gardiner was aged 10 when she arrived here with her parents.
The new estate was initially sold by planners as a ' Garden City ' primed to get a cinema, swimming pool and five youth clubs - but the blueprint was scaled back through changes in governance. Even the homes were said to have been built to a lesser standard than first designed.
Of the five promised, three youth clubs opened, with just one remaining today. A swimming pool and cinema were never built.
Donna Webster, 77, a retired community transport driver, says a lack of investment has led to problems faced on the estate today.
Hartcliffe, and neighbouring Withywood, are in the top 10 per cent of most deprived areas in the country, with 39 per cent of children living in poverty.
Crime levels are high, with 73 per cent of people recently telling a city council survey that antisocial behaviour was a problem.
Ms Webster says: 'The money is good news, but I worry it'll quickly be spent on something that won't make any difference.'
Former city councillor Paul Smith wrote in his book Hartcliffe Betrayed that, once built, the area, located some five miles from Bristol city centre, became 'Bristol's largest cul-de-sac... on the edge, out of sight and often out of mind'.
His book explores the dangers of rapid house-building projects - lessons that can be learned today as Labour forges ahead with its ambitious target for 1.5m new homes within five years.
A former long-time resident of Hartcliffe, Mr Smith warns £20m 'won't touch the sides' in Hartcliffe, but hopes it will provide a platform for future investment in facilities and improved housing.
'I'm pleased Hartcliffe has got the money,' he says. 'The area really desperately needs it, and it needs to make sure it is very wisely spent. I'm aware that £20m can disappear really quickly, and so it's really important it's used to make lasting change and it involves people in the area who deserve this.'
Back at Morrisons, Labour councillor Kerry Bailes sits finishing a coffee in the half-empty cafe. She, like everyone else, first found out about the announcement through Ms Reeves' spending review.
'It's fantastic news,' she says. 'As someone who has lived here all my life, I know, as a community, we feel left behind and used to having things forced on to us with no control. This is about giving control to the community on how they want the money to be spent.'
Outside the store again, as rain continues to lash down, a CCTV van parks up at the entrance, a response to shoplifting and years of antisocial behaviour.
Nearby, the shut-down council rent office stands like an ugly fortress, while shutters are down on an empty unit along a short row of shops featuring a betting shop, bakery and tanning salon.
A lack of major investment is clear, but finally, residents have good news to talk about.
Time will only tell if government promises can match Hartcliffe's undoubted strong community spirit and resilience.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rolls-Royce aims to become UK's biggest company by market value
Rolls-Royce aims to become UK's biggest company by market value

Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Times

Rolls-Royce aims to become UK's biggest company by market value

Rolls-Royce, Britain's engineering champion, is chasing a target of becoming the country's largest company by market value. The company's chief executive Tufan Erginbilgic said that that could be achieved by a take-off in demand for small modular nuclear reactors for local power stations being commissioned to build to secure the nation's energy sovereignty. The ambition of Erginbilgic, who took over at the Derby-based group in 2023, would need to see Rolls-Royce nearly double its market capitalisation to overtake AstraZeneca, the pharmaceuticals group worth just shy of £172 billion. Rolls-Royce's market capitalisation is £92 billion. If it is to claim the scalp, Rolls-Royce would need to pass several other colossi of the UK corporate scene on the way: HSBC, Europe's biggest bank, is valued on the stock market at £163 billion, oil and gas major Shell has a value of £155 billion and Unilever, the consumer goods group, is at £110 billion. British American Tobacco currently remains marginally ahead of Rolls-Royce at £93 billion. Erginbilgic said Rolls-Royce has the 'potential' to become top dog because of its pivot into civil nuclear, using its technology developed for Britain's nuclear submarine fleet to build out local power stations with small modular reactors (SMRs). It has already signed deals with the UK and Czech governments. 'There is no private company in the world with the nuclear capability we have,' Erginbilgic told the BBC. 'If we are not market leader globally, we did something wrong.' He said Rolls-Royce is chasing a $1 trillion-plus market in SMRs which he reckons will see 400 of them installed worldwide by 2050 at a current cost of £2.2 billion apiece. The Rolls-Royce boss said the need for SMR installations is becoming particularly acute because of the need to power the data centres that will facilitate mass adoption of artificial intelligence. Rolls-Royce shares have already risen tenfold since Erginbilgic took over in January 2023 with the stock rising from 93p to the current £10.82. The chief executive famously called the company a 'burning platform' when he arrived and set about turbocharging the reforms of the company begun under his predecessor Warren East, who had weathered the Covid-19 crisis. Other storms have swept the business, including record fines for bribery and corruption across five continents; and billions of pounds to repair design and durability issues with the Trent 1000 engines for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Erginbilgic swept out much of the previous management and set about creating a regime in which the company would refuse to accept second best on pricing power for its engines for Boeing, Airbus and business jets, or on manufacturing efficiency. Since he took over Erginbilgic has seen Rolls-Royce overtake in market capitalisation terms the likes of his old oil and gas employer BP, fellow defence company BAE Systems, Barclays bank and Rio Tinto the miner.

David Lammy faces £2,500 fine for fishing without licence with JD Vance
David Lammy faces £2,500 fine for fishing without licence with JD Vance

Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Times

David Lammy faces £2,500 fine for fishing without licence with JD Vance

The foreign secretary could be facing a fine of thousands of pounds for going fishing with the vice-president of the United States without a licence. David Lammy and JD Vance were pictured last week with rods in the grounds of Chevening, the grace-and-favour country estate used by foreign secretaries, during the vice-president's family holiday to the UK. The two men confirmed they had been fishing for carp, along with their children, but said that the adults had failed to catch anything. At the start of their meeting, Vance said: 'Unfortunately, the one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught fish, but the foreign secretary did not.' It is a requirement in England and Wales for individuals over the age of 13 to hold a rod licence to fish, even on private land. It is understood neither Lammy or Vance held a licence at the time. People caught fishing without a rod licence can face fines of up to £2,500 from the Environment Agency, the government's environmental watchdog. Lammy has since purchased the relevant licence retrospectively and referred himself to the agency. The Foreign Office has said that 'administrative oversight' meant that the licences were not properly organised in advance. A spokesman said: 'The foreign secretary has written to the Environment Agency over an administrative oversight that meant the appropriate licences had not been acquired for fishing on a private lake as part of a diplomatic engagement at Chevening House last week. 'As soon as the foreign secretary was made aware of the administrative error, he successfully purchased the relevant rod fishing licences. He also wrote to the Environment Agency notifying them of the error, demonstrating how it would be rectified and thanking them for their work protecting Britain's fisheries.' Vance is continuing his family holiday with his wife and three children in the Cotswolds after visiting Lammy at the country estate as part of a series of engagements for the vice-president since arriving in the UK. • Jane Austen was in the air as this bromance novel began All the fish caught were returned to the waters after the group had finished. A Labour source said: 'There's nothing fishy to see here. The foreign secretary isn't much of a fisherman but he landed a big diplomatic catch getting the vice-president to stay for the weekend at Chevening. 'As soon as he learnt of the administrative error he got the relevant licences and notified the Environment Agency to avoid getting caught up.' The Environment Agency said: 'Everyone who goes fishing needs licence to help improve our rivers, lakes and the sport anglers love. We understand the relevant licences have been purchased.'

The fundamental reason Europe will struggle to escape its growing irrelevance
The fundamental reason Europe will struggle to escape its growing irrelevance

Telegraph

time15 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The fundamental reason Europe will struggle to escape its growing irrelevance

Never does a country's capacity for reinvention matter more than during periods of economic, geopolitical, and political transition – like now. When the world is shifting and voters reward leaders who tackle practical, real-world challenges rather than recite yesterday's catechism, the key question is simple: can your party move with the times? Across much of Europe, the answer has typically been 'not really'. The grand old parties in the UK, France and Germany have tended to confront change by diminishing or mislabelling voter concerns. They have acted as closed exclusive clubs for party veterans, with a habit of closing ranks whenever challenged by outsiders. Given that the existing political architecture of Europe has tended to reward continuity over adaptation, key insurgents – like Nigel Farage, Marine Le Pen and Alice Weidel – have had to build new parties from scratch. Now compare with the US party system. The Democrats and Republicans may also have old imposing brand names and both parties maintain permanent national committees in Washington. But unlike most European parties, they do not hand-pick candidates or crack the whip. They do little more than coordinate, fundraise and share data. Crucially, nominees for election are chosen in the open by voters in primaries and caucuses, not anointed in back rooms. That single procedural choice drains power from the centre and pours it into thousands of local contests. Layer on federalism. Elections run under 50 distinct state regimes (plus DC and the territories), each with its own calendar, ballot rules and political subculture. That yields 50 semi-autonomous state parties and countless county committees. Add America's single-member, first-past-the-post districts, which reward broad, catch-all coalitions, and you are left with two giant party umbrellas instead of a dozen boutique brands. The objective is to assemble a wide – often unruly – alliance that can win from Miami to Anchorage. No national centre, however grand its headquarters, can command and discipline the patchwork required. True, the UK also has a first-past-the-post system, which is one reason Westminster politics also rewards big-tent parties. But a continent-sized federation of 50 states forces a much larger tent. Now consider how US candidates rise. Because primaries empower voters rather than party boards, campaigns are candidate-centred. Ambitious politicians build their own machines; donors route cash through candidate committees and independent groups; outside organisations – unions, advocacy groups, super-PACs – operate alongside parties rather than beneath them. In effect, US parties are brands you lease, not clubs for life; they function like pop-ups, rebuilt each cycle. A persuasive outsider can 'take over' a party by winning voters, not pleasing an executive committee. Donald Trump is the most vivid case study – but not the first and he will hardly be the last. Many commentators confuse constant US political volatility with weakness. In fact, it is a source of strength. American politics is constantly rewired: policy agendas are road-tested in primaries, new coalitions assembled, ideas that resonate are adopted and scaled. So US politics lives in permanent beta mode. Messy, yes, but the constant feedback loop makes it consistently quicker at developing new ideas and putting them into practice than less grassroots-oriented (less democratic) systems. Even more important is the system's circuit breaker. The same decentralisation that fuels innovation and ventilation of voter frustration also limits extremism. Because power is split across Congress, the courts, the states, the media and civil society, even a peak-power president must bargain through rival centres of authority. The Founding Fathers wisely built it that way, believing an 'inner despot' lurks in all of us. So governing is meant to be hard: the friction prevents any faction from freezing the system in its preferred shape for long. When Democrats overreached, voters clipped their wings; if Team Trump tries the same, the mechanism will bite again. Switzerland may be the only country that does it better – and it helps when you are only nine million strong. In the rest of Europe, power is much more centralised. Central offices recruit, train and discipline; manifestos bind MPs; loyalty is rewarded, apostasy punished. So adaptation to voter sentiment is a lot slower. In Berlin, parties can feel like guilds. In London, even after Brexit restored legal sovereignty, ministers often still behave as if awaiting permission from Brussels. And in Paris, the Elysée's gravitational pull remains immense: even after heavy electoral losses, Emmanuel Macron has found ways to let those with the old guard mindset run the government. The forms are republican but the smell is decidedly regal. Back to the US and the 'Trump question'. Love him, loathe him or call him a mixed bag – Trumpism will endure only as long as it is seen as mirroring the majority's priorities. The moment a rival ticket better fits the national mood, voters will hand over the lease. What works will be quietly kept; what doesn't will be reversed. So doom-mongers can put the smelling salts away. None of this denies that the American model can be exhausting; the noise is real. But the voter-politician feedback loop is far more direct than in Europe. Since even inside the establishment, political success depends on continually listening to the people that politicians always claim to serve. Which is why, foibles and all, the US is the clear frontrunner in today's global recalibration. Even more so now than during previous transition periods since much of Europe – especially the EU – has doubled down on centralisation, breeding the usual statism. Sure, the US is less stately, but also more self-correcting. The element of trial-and-error really is more pronounced, not only in politics but for closely connected reasons in industry, too. The restlessness is not a bug in the system. It is the system. This is why the US capacity for reinvention really is unparallelled. As the still-young AI revolution rewires whole sectors – and society itself – that edge will matter more, not less. Mark Brolin is a geopolitical strategist and the author of 'Healing Broken Democracies: All You Need to Know About Populism'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store