logo
Why is the BBC not talking about Scottish concerns?

Why is the BBC not talking about Scottish concerns?

Yahoo6 hours ago
Welcome to this week's Media Watch! Remember you can get this newsletter for free in your inbox every week by clicking the banner above.
Earlier this month, an Ipsos poll for STV showed that for Scots, immigration was not on their top 10 list of things which sway them at the ballot box.
So in the newsroom on Friday when we were discussing ideas for the day, it seemed mighty curious the UK-France deal aimed at tackling small boat crossings across the Channel had been high up in the BBC Radio Scotland morning news agenda almost every day last week.
Listening back, we found the build-up to the visit by French president Emmanuel Macron and the agreement itself had been in the Good Morning Scotland bulletin every day from Tuesday to Friday, and on two of those days it was considered the top story.
In the Ipsos survey earlier this month, Scots had considered all sorts of subjects to be more important to them than this. Healthcare, education, crime, poverty, cost of living and housing were all of bigger concern.
In focusing largely on whether the new 'one in, one out' deal would act as an effective deterrent, SNP MP Pete Wishart accused the BBC of presenting a 'skewed debate' on immigration to Scots which is contrary to their interests.
READ MORE:
'When we get into the realms of a debate and discussion about immigration, what tends to come out the UK-led debate about this is absolutely totally contrary to Scotland's interests,' he said.
'All we hear about is curbing migration, what we can do to make life as difficult as possible for the poor souls that make it here, whereas Scotland, just to keep our population up – which is already at crisis levels – we are totally dependent on immigration.
'What the BBC are serving us is a debate which is skewed to be against the Scottish interests."
The 'one in, one out' deal will see asylum seekers who arrive in England by small boats sent back to France, while allowing some in France to be sent to Britain if they have ties to the UK.
On Friday's Good Morning Scotland programme, the focus was on critics who believe it will not be enough of a deterrent, with a clip of shadow home secretary Chris Philp (below) being played during the 8am bulletin where he called the scheme a 'gimmick'.
(Image: Lucy North) That was followed by a five-minute interview with an expert in British and French immigration politics. She was asked about who will be selected to be returned, how big a deterrent 'this could actually be' and what action could be taken to reduce the 'pull factor' of the UK.
The way this story was pushed by BBC Scotland seemed even stranger after speaking to Emile Chabal, a professor of contemporary history at Edinburgh University who has published widely on the politics of immigration.
He told The National there is a 'stark difference' between how Scotland and England view the issue of immigration.
READ MORE:
'From all the policy and research work we have over the last 10 to 20 years, we know that immigration is just a less salient issue for Scots in general,' he said.
'We know that the Scottish Government has a different approach to the question of immigration, which is often characterised as either pro-immigration or pro-certain kinds of immigration. There's certainly an idea that Scotland doesn't have enough people and therefore having more is not necessarily a problem.
'Both at a kind of popular and policy level, Scotland is different to England.'
He went on: 'It seems clear to me that most Scots feel that immigration would be a positive thing for the Scottish economy and they feel it would be beneficial demographically for Scotland. This is especially true in perhaps rural areas in a way that it isn't in England where rural areas are often places which have a high degree of anti-immigrant sentiment.'
Tom Chivers and Tom Mills – of the Media Reform Coalition – both said the way in which the small boats issue was focused on by BBC Radio Scotland was an example of the corporation 'reflecting the agenda of Westminster politicians' instead of honing in on what is important to its audiences.
Mills, chair of the Media Reform Coalition and author of The BBC: Myth of a Public Service, said: 'Looking at news in Scotland is revealing I think because it shows the extent to which BBC news reflects the agenda of Westminster politicians and the right-wing national press, rather than the priorities of its audiences.
'In the end the BBC is accountable to politicians, not to its audiences. That's the root of the problem and it needs to change."
News is news, of course, and the issue of immigration is clearly important to many people across the UK.
But the BBC surely has regional radio stations for a reason, and the way this story was thrust on people driving to work – who are likely more interested in how much their food is costing or whether they can get a doctor's appointment – certainly does seem very telling about where the broadcaster's priorities lie.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves Faces City in First Major Speech Since Commons Tears
Reeves Faces City in First Major Speech Since Commons Tears

Bloomberg

time37 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Reeves Faces City in First Major Speech Since Commons Tears

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves will highlight plans to spur homeownership by easing access to mortgages in her flagship annual address to the City of London, a key moment for Britain's finance minister as she seeks to bounce back from a rocky period that included a market-moving tearful appearance in the House of Commons. Reeves, who has been under pressure since a U-turn over planned welfare reforms and an emotional showing in Parliament that caused traders to sell off gilts and the pound, will announce a permanent mortgage guarantee scheme and more home loans for people on lower incomes, according to a statement from the Treasury. Reeves will reveal the measures at an event in Leeds on Tuesday, before traveling down to London for the famous Mansion House address.

ICE declares millions of undocumented immigrants ineligible for bond hearings
ICE declares millions of undocumented immigrants ineligible for bond hearings

Washington Post

time44 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

ICE declares millions of undocumented immigrants ineligible for bond hearings

The Trump administration has declared that immigrants who arrived in the United States illegally are no longer eligible for a bond hearing as they fight deportation proceedings in court, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post. In a July 8 memo, Todd M. Lyons, acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told officers that such immigrants should be detained 'for the duration of their removal proceedings,' which can take months or years. Lawyers say the policy will apply to millions of immigrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border over the past few decades, including under Biden.

Schools to teach anti-misogyny lessons in bid to tackle ‘manosphere'
Schools to teach anti-misogyny lessons in bid to tackle ‘manosphere'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Schools to teach anti-misogyny lessons in bid to tackle ‘manosphere'

Children will be taught how to combat misogyny and resist so-called incel culture under new guidance for schools published on Tuesday. The guidance on relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) focuses on helping boys find positive role models amid the increasing spread of sexist online content from 'manosphere' influencers such as Andrew Tate. It also stresses the need to avoid 'stigmatising boys for being boys'. As well as lessons on so-called incel (involuntary celibate) culture, secondary schools will be required to provide young people with greater awareness of AI, deepfakes and links between pornography and misogyny. The guidance comes as the Department for Education (DfE) warned that misogynistic attitudes had reached 'epidemic scale' among young people, with 54% of those aged 11-19 saying they had witnessed misogynist comments. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'Before I was elected to Parliament, I managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence, so I have seen first-hand the devastating impact when we don't foster healthy attitudes from the youngest age. 'I want our children to be equipped to defy the malign forces that exist online. Schools and parents alike have a vital role to play, helping children identify positive role models and resist the manipulation too often used online to groom impressionable young minds.' In its manifesto last year, Labour pledged to halve the rate of violence against women and girls in 10 years. And earlier in 2025, Sir Keir Starmer praised the Netflix drama Adolescence for highlighting how misogyny had 'taken on a different form' and said he wanted a discussion on what could be done to stop young boys 'being dragged into this whirlpool of hatred and misogyny'. Margaret Mulholland, of the Association of School and College Leaders, welcomed the new guidance and its focus on finding positive male role models for boys, saying it was 'important that we don't simply tell boys what is wrong'. The previous Conservative government proposed changing the guidance on RSHE in May last year, with then-prime minister Rishi Sunak expressing concern children were being exposed to 'inappropriate' content. The draft guidance, which was open to a nine-week consultation, proposed clear age limits on the teaching of certain topics to ensure children were not 'exposed to too much too soon'. It said sex education should be taught no earlier than Year 5, when pupils are aged nine to 10, and that what is described as the 'contested topic of gender identity' should not be taught at all. The proposed guidance said schools should 'at minimum' show parents a representative sample of teaching resources they plan to use and that schools 'should respond positively to requests from parents to see material that has not already been shared'. While Tuesday's revised guidance includes the requirement to provide parents with teaching materials, the new Government has scrapped the proposal to prescribe specific ages at which individual topics are taught. The DfE said there would be a 'strong new emphasis on age-appropriate' teaching, and a 'clear dividing line' between primary and secondary school. But the guidance would allow teachers to 'sensitively respond to topics that children might have seen online or heard from their friends', with research suggesting 22% of primary school-aged girls had seen 'rude images online'. Tuesday's guidance also includes requirements on helping children with their mental health, including working with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention 'in an age-appropriate way'. Children will be taught the importance of 'grit and resilience' in order to help them 'feel able to take on challenges and risks'. Andy Airey, Mike Palmer and Tim Owen – who founded suicide prevention charity 3 Dads Walking in memory of their daughters – said: 'Giving schools permission to talk about suicide prevention means more young people can be supported to open up about difficult feelings and know where to find help. 'We know, from painful personal experience, how much this matters. This change will save lives.' Schools will be able to implement the guidance from September this year, and must follow it from September 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store