logo
The puzzling architectural marvels of Mamallapuram

The puzzling architectural marvels of Mamallapuram

The Hindu18-07-2025
You've all solved puzzles by putting together jigsaw pieces, or unscrambling jumbled letters. When historians research things about the past, it is also like solving a puzzle — using the pieces of what is left, and piecing together the missing information. But a few centuries ago, the Pallavas — a flourishing South Indian dynasty who ruled for many centuries — built an entire town of stone monuments, which has puzzled historians over generations.
Mamallapuram (or Mahabalipuram), is located around 50km from Chennai. The Pallavas made valuable contributions to architecture and sculpture, and Mamallapuram was the centre of their building activity. The town, now a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is filled with structures of historical importance including cave temples, sculptures on stone called bas reliefs and stand-alone temples.
One of the most unusual and highly visited set of monuments are the 'Pancha Pandava Rathas', built between 630 to 670 CE. When you look at these five structures, it may strike you that each has a different style. One looks like a hut, one has a vaulted semi-circular roof, some have pyramidal towers, and one has a curved back like an elephant. Some of them have elements from older Buddhist structures. Why were they built this way?
Finding answers
One theory is that the town of Mamallapuram was like a workshop or school for sculptors. Artisans built these 'full-size models', tried different methods of carving, and perfected their techniques — all to decide the patterns that future temple builders could use. Each ratha has a shrine inside to different deity, but they were not fully completed, and never used for worship; possibly supporting the theory that they were model pieces. But their true purpose remains an enigma.
These rathas, along with many structures in Mamallapuram, remain one of the finest examples of stone architecture and sculpture of the period. In fact, four of these rathas are guessed to be carved out of one massive rock that was slowly chipped away and carved into separate temples.
Another puzzle is their names. They are named after the Pandavas from the Mahabharata — Dharmaraja Ratha, Arjuna Ratha, Bhima Ratha, Nakula-Sahadeva Ratha and Draupadi Ratha. But no actual connection has been found between the rathas and the Pandavas, and we don't know when and how these names originated.
Mamallapuram is a site with many such mysteries, in its art, sculptures and architecture. In the children's book Mysteries of Mamallapuram, writer Ashwin Prabhu takes readers through the many of riddles and concludes, 'there doesn't have to always be one story, because there is so much in the past that we don't know yet!'
History is something that experts are still uncovering. Take a trip for yourself and find out what parts of the Mamallapuram puzzle you can solve!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How chicory came to be added to coffee
How chicory came to be added to coffee

The Hindu

time9 hours ago

  • The Hindu

How chicory came to be added to coffee

While the dark-roasted coffee beans are the stars of South Indian filter coffee, the often-overlooked and even maligned sidekick, chicory, plays a crucial role. Some even believe that it is the quiet soul of filter coffee! Chicory's relationship with coffee began with wars, economic depressions and bans that led to a coffee shortage. The Europeans, who were familiar with chicory's flavours, noticed its similarities with coffee and began mixing the two. The blend was not only economical but also surprisingly delicious, and people developed a lasting taste for it. What started as a necessity soon became a preference. In South India, coffee was grown locally since its arrival in the 1600s. But it was not drunk by Indians until the turn of the 20th century. Chicory made its way to India through the British Army's 'Camp Coffee'. Indian soldiers and civilians developed a taste for it, and roasters began to produce a significantly cheaper blend of coffee and chicory. Aided by the affordability and taste, when brewed in a traditional metal filter and served with hot milk and sugar, its popularity in Chennai and surrounding areas exploded. Soon, all but the poorest were drinking it. Unfortunately, chicory is perceived as an adulterant, especially by coffee connoisseurs. Initially all Indian filter coffee had European-imported chicory. In the late 1950s, cultivation was tried in the south but the output was poor. But it picked up in U.P. and Gujarat due to suitable climate and soil. Today, these states account for 90% of India's chicory production. Upto 10 times cheaper than coffee, chicory blend in filter coffee can range from 10% to 40%. Here's the best part: while filter coffee is 'South Indian', the chicory root from U.P. and Gujarat makes it a truly national drink. Secret Hero Chicory (Cichorium intybus) is a hardy leafy vegetable. The edible leaves have a bitter flavour and are used in salads, paired with cheeses, nuts, and fruits and also lend themselves to sautéed and roasted preparations. The plant is native to Africa, Asia, and Europe. It has beautiful blue flowers and a thick taproot that — when dried, roasted, and brewed — creates a drink with notes of chocolate, nuts, and caramel. It is caffeine-free and also substituted for coffee altogether. The Egyptians cultivated it as early as 5000 years ago as a medicinal plant, and the ancient Greeks and Romans used it as a vegetable and in salads. The Europeans consumed its brew for its supposed medicinal benefits. An extract from the root is used as a sweetener in food manufacturing.

Column by Devdutt Pattanaik
Column by Devdutt Pattanaik

The Hindu

time11 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Column by Devdutt Pattanaik

On the top of many Hindu temples, one finds the image of a head looking down on the people below — his eyes protruding from its sockets, his mouth wide open, his tongue out. This is called the Kirtimukha, the Head of Glory, or Vajramukha, the Eternal Head. There are many stories to explain its origins. The most popular is that of a goblin who was created by Shiva to kill demons. But when the demons apologised, Shiva forgave them. Now, the goblin was hungry and asked the lord for food. Shiva said, 'Why don't you eat your own body?' The creature began eating his hands, legs, and body, until there was nothing left. Impressed by his obedience, Shiva declared that his head would be placed on top of all temples, a symbol of insatiable hunger, devotion, and how useless the head is without the body — a counterpoint to when Brahmins claim they rose from the head of the Vedic Purusha, the primal man. There are other stories of this head. In goddess temples of North India, one finds the image of Bhairava (a fierce form of Shiva) holding in his hand the head of Brahma. It is said that at the dawn of time, the deity had four heads facing the four directions. But then he saw the goddess Shatarupa (the multi-formed one, the first woman) and grew a fifth head on top, expressing his desire for her. Disgusted by this, the goddess called upon Rudra to protect her, and thus Bhairava was born. He chopped off Brahma's fifth head, and he still holds it in his hand. According to some lore, this head can be detached only when he goes to the city of Kashi and washes his hand in the Ganga. Beheading sons and fathers In Shiva temples, one finds the image of Veerabhadra holding a head in one hand. This is the head of Daksha Prajapati, who neither understood nor recognised the greatness of the lord, leading Veerabhadra, a terrifying creature born of Shiva's hair, to behead him. Daksha was also the father-in-law of Shiva — the one whose daughter, Sati, chooses the lord as her husband against her father's wishes. But tensions between her father and her husband lead to Sati taking her own life, angering Shiva, who, in the form of Veerabhadra, beheads his father-in-law. It is the head of the man who realised the power of Shiva when he lost control over his own body, the source of his own prejudices. Folk versions of the Mahabharata speak of a great warrior (known as Bilalsen in Nepal) who had taken a vow to always fight for the losing side. He was extremely strong. Krishna feared that such a person, who would keep switching sides, would prevent any war from coming to an end — especially the war being fought at Kurukshetra between the Pandavas and the Kauravas. So, Krishna asked the warrior to give him his head in alms. The warrior, who never refused requests of charity, cut off his own head and gave it to Krishna on the condition that it would be kept alive and allowed to witness the Mahabharata war. In Rajasthan, this warrior is called Barbarik and is considered the grandson of Bhima, the son of Ghatotkacha by a Naga princess. The same story is told in other parts of India, such as Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Malwa, Bundelkhand, Garhwal, and Himachal, where he is considered to be Bilalsen, the son of Bhima. His head was placed on top of a mountain, and every time it laughed, it produced such force that the armies of the Kauravas and the Pandavas were pushed in opposite directions, unable to fight. So the head was brought down and placed on the ground by Krishna. When Krishna wept like a widow Another such head appears in South India — in the story of Aravana, Arjuna's son by the Naga princess Ulupi. Aravana was an extremely strong warrior who was sacrificed on the eve of the Mahabharata war. He did not want to die a virgin and begged to be given a wife before his sacrifice. Since no woman wanted to marry him, Krishna took the form of a woman, married him for the night, enabling his sacrifice at dawn. For him, Krishna wept like a widow. Aravana's head was also placed on top of a tree so that he could witness the war. While everyone believes the Mahabharata to be a war between the Pandavas and the Kauravas, Aravana realises that it is actually a war orchestrated by Krishna so that the blood of kings can quench the thirst of the Earth goddess, who is exhausted by their ambition and greed. The head atop the temple thus forces temple devotees to look at life from a different perspective. Everything is not about us. Devdutt Pattanaik is the author of 50 books on mythology, art and culture.

ASI Says Humayun's Tomb In ‘Perfect Condition' After Six Killed In Roof Collapse Near Monument
ASI Says Humayun's Tomb In ‘Perfect Condition' After Six Killed In Roof Collapse Near Monument

News18

timea day ago

  • News18

ASI Says Humayun's Tomb In ‘Perfect Condition' After Six Killed In Roof Collapse Near Monument

Last Updated: Six people died in a roof collapse at Patte Shah Dargah near Humayun's Tomb. The ASI confirmed Humayun's Tomb is unaffected. Twelve people were rescued, six fatalities reported. After six people were killed due to the roof collapse of a dargah near Humayun's Tomb complex, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on Friday said that the Tomb, which is part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site, in Delhi's Nizamuddin area, is in 'perfect condition". The ASI also clarified reports of a collapse incident in South Delhi, saying that the dargah was not related to the monument. However, it expressed regrets over the 'unfortunate" incident at 'an unprotected structure", adjacent to the 16th-century monument. According to the officials, a total of 12 people were rescued from the debris and rushed to nearby hospitals for treatment. DCP Southeast said in a latest statement that of those rescued, nine were admitted to AIIMS Trauma Centre, Hindustan Times reported. 'One male patient was admitted to LNJP Hospital and one female patient was admitted to RML Hospital," the DCP added. The official stated that one rescued woman was unharmed in the collapse and therefore did not require hospital treatment. 'Of these, so far, reports of death of six of the above victims have been received from the respective hospitals, 3 male and 3 female," the DCP added. Early reports suggested that part of a dome at the tomb had collapsed. In a post on X, the ASI clarifies the reports and affirms the safety of Humayun's Tomb. It said, 'The unfortunate incident, in the Patte Shah Dargah, at Nizamuddin area of Delhi, is deeply condoled." 'The Archaeological Survey of India regrets the unfortunate incident at an unprotected structure, abutting the WH monument of Humayun's Tomb, but due to its nearness to the site could reach out as aides to those trapped in the accident," it said. The ASI further said, 'The WH monument of the Humayun's Tomb is in perfect condition, and this news does not pertain to the monument." Humayun's Tomb is an iconic monument in the national capital, attracting hundreds of domestic and international visitors every day. Humayun's Tomb was inscribed on the UNESCO list in 1993, with a minor boundary modification in 2016, the website adds. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store