
Israel asks the US to pressure Libya and other countries to accept Palestinians from Gaza
According to two informed sources cited by Axios, Mossad chief David Barnea told White House envoy Steve Witkoff that Israel is holding private talks with Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Libya in hopes of reaching arrangements to resettle hundreds of thousands of Palestinians outside Gaza.
The report said the Israeli government is promoting this plan as a form of 'voluntary relocation,' while legal experts consider it a potential war crime, as international law prohibits the forced displacement of protected populations.
No official comment has been issued by the White House regarding the content of the discussions. However, sources indicated that the Trump administration is approaching the proposal cautiously, amid fears of an angry international backlash if the plan moves forward. Tags: USA Israel Gaza

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Technical.ly
3 days ago
- Technical.ly
Map: Where PA's $90B AI and energy money is going — and what doesn't match up
Some of the headline-grabbing investments announced at this month's Energy and Innovation Summit in Pittsburgh don't match what companies have actually pledged. National energy and tech CEOs joined Sen. Dave McCormick and other elected officials at Carnegie Mellon University on July 15 to announce more than $90 billion for various data center and energy generation projects. While many executives at the summit credited the Trump administration for paving the way for these investments, reporting from WESA found that several of the Pennsylvania-based projects were already underway before the second Trump administration began in January. A deeper dive into the full list of investments released by McCormick's office reveals that some of those figures do not align with the pledges companies actually made in their own announcements, either. For example, the release from McCormick's office says Constellation Energy will spend $2.4 billion to increase power generation at the Limerick nuclear power plant, but the company would not confirm that amount. McCormick's office did not respond to request for comment. That's just one of the discrepancies that found. Keep reading for a breakdown of the pledges made at the summit and where those investments currently stand.


Technical.ly
3 days ago
- Technical.ly
As Trump admin promotes AI plan, experts consider next steps for regulation
As the debate over artificial intelligence regulation intensifies, the divide over how and whether to rein in the technology is becoming increasingly stark. That dilemma was on display yesterday at Broadband Breakfast's latest weekly live virtual session, where a panel of experts debated competing visions for the future of AI. The panel aired the same day the Trump administration announced its AI action plan, a series of policy recommendations that pushed scaling back regulations and eliminating what a statement called 'ideological bias' in AI. The plan outlines priorities including expanding data center infrastructure and promoting American AI technology in both government and private sectors. The online discussion was moderated by Drew Clark, CEO of Breakfast Media and a longtime advocate for broadband expansion. As part of the organization's work to cover tech developments and broadband issues, Clark regularly hosts the weekly panels, which cover a wide range of topics related to internet policy. The most recent discussion touched on issues such as federal versus state AI regulations and the potential impact of AI on jobs. Here are a few key takeaways from the discussion. Best regulator remains unclear Since the president's reconciliation bill dropped a proposed AI moratorium, which would have barred states from regulating AI for 10 years, experts differ on how to best approach AI regulation. Sarah Oh Lam, senior fellow at the Technology Policy Institute, emphasized the need to strike a balance between protecting state interests and fostering AI innovation. She noted that while many existing state laws are narrow and sector-specific, targeting areas like employment or judicial proceedings, recent legislation in states like Colorado and California takes a much broader approach. 'I think it's more art than science … coming to the right balance of being able to set a floor to protect innovation and advancement of frontier models, but also letting states have some local jurisdiction,' Lam said. Chris Chambers Goodman, a professor at Pepperdine Caruso School of Law in Los Angeles, also acknowledged the downsides of a patchwork of state laws, warning that inconsistencies in definitions and regulatory scope could lead to compliance challenges and legal uncertainty. At the same time, she argued that states should serve as laboratories for experimenting with new regulations. The scholar, whose work focuses on equal protection issues including algorithmic bias, is concerned about the shift from the Biden administration's focus on safety and privacy to the Trump administration's push for rapid AI acceleration. 'We're supposed to let the states try things out, come up with rules and regulations, and then after studying if these have been effective, Congress could decide on legislation that was actually based on best practices,' Goodman said. How Trump's plan influences competition with China The experts also debated the role of China in shaping US AI policy, offering sharply contrasting views on whether the United States should treat artificial intelligence as a geopolitical race. While some panelists called for urgency and limited regulation to stay ahead, others warned that framing AI development as a race with China could lead to risky, short-sighted decisions. Adam Thierer, senior fellow at the free market-focused R Street Institute, argued that the US is locked in a 'stiff competition with China,' where leadership in AI has national security and ideological implications. He supported the Trump administration's new plan as a step toward fostering innovation and asserting American leadership in emerging technologies. 'It's not just about money and commerce,' Thierer said. 'It's also about values.' Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law took a more cautious view. While he agreed that the US should remain competitive, he pushed back against the 'race' narrative, questioning what winning actually means in a fast-evolving field where breakthroughs are quickly matched. Arbel warned that racing ahead without proper safeguards could create harms that are difficult to undo, especially as AI systems become less transparent. 'I don't love the race metaphor, and I think it leads us down a very dark road where we have to win no matter what the price is,' Arbel said. The people's role in responsible AI use Goodman warned that AI use in government services can impact due process. She cited Covid-era welfare benefits systems that used algorithms to flag people as fraudulent based on frequent address changes, which were common due to the instability of the pandemic. 'The government owes its citizens and residents the right to due process,' she said. 'And when decisions are made by AI technologies that are infringing on those rights, then we really do have a big issue.' Lam also pointed out how humans still play a role in deploying and interpreting AI tools and how that can affect liability moving forward. 'Officials have choices between different models,' Lam said. 'So one pushback is: How is AI different from just software liability?' Maria Eberhart is a 2025-2026 corps member for Report for America, an initiative of The Groundtruth Project that pairs emerging journalists with local newsrooms. This position is supported in part by the Robert W. Deutsch Foundation and the Abell Foundation. Learn more about supporting our free and independent journalism.


Libya Observer
19-07-2025
- Libya Observer
Israel asks the US to pressure Libya and other countries to accept Palestinians from Gaza
Axios revealed on Friday that the head of Israel's intelligence agency (Mossad) visited Washington, D.C. this week in an effort to rally the Trump administration's support for persuading Libya, Ethiopia and Indonesia to accept large numbers of displaced Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. According to two informed sources cited by Axios, Mossad chief David Barnea told White House envoy Steve Witkoff that Israel is holding private talks with Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Libya in hopes of reaching arrangements to resettle hundreds of thousands of Palestinians outside Gaza. The report said the Israeli government is promoting this plan as a form of 'voluntary relocation,' while legal experts consider it a potential war crime, as international law prohibits the forced displacement of protected populations. No official comment has been issued by the White House regarding the content of the discussions. However, sources indicated that the Trump administration is approaching the proposal cautiously, amid fears of an angry international backlash if the plan moves forward. Tags: USA Israel Gaza