
Exclusive: Fed's Barkin: No rush to cut, can't dismiss inflation risks from tariffs
WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) - Richmond Federal Reserve President Thomas Barkin said on Friday there's no rush to cut interest rates given the still-unresolved risk that new import taxes might raise inflation, and with the U.S. job market and consumer spending holding up.
"I don't think the data gives us any rush to cut...I am very conscious that we've not been at our inflation target for four years," Barkin said in a Reuters interview, noting that businesses in his district still expect price increases to come later in the year as new tariffs take effect, and the fact that import duties may rise even further in coming months.
In addition, he said, the jobless rate remains low at 4.2%, and firms don't appear on the cusp of major layoffs that would undercut the Fed's other goal of maintaining maximum employment.
Spending "is holding up fine. It's not frothy. It's not weak."
"Nothing is burning on either side such that it suggests there's a rush to act," Barkin said in his first public comments following a Fed meeting this week at which the central bank held its policy rate steady in the current range between 4.25% and 4.5%. "I'm not in a mood to ignore a spike in inflation were it to come...We'll have to see if it comes.
"I'm comfortable with where we are...Core inflation is still over target. Being modestly restrictive is a good way to address that."
Barkin's comments come at a moment of exaggerated uncertainty for the Fed and the U.S. economy, with tariffs already higher on some goods and potentially increasing again as soon as next month when the Trump administration has set a July 9 deadline for other nations to either strike trade deals with the U.S. or face possibly exorbitant taxes on their goods.
Only one deal has been struck so far, leaving the Fed in a muddle over what the final tax rates might be, and how they might be divided among foreign producers, U.S. importers, and the retail price charged to consumers. There's debate as well about whether any price impact will be a one-time shock or create more enduring inflation, and whether it could lead to supply chain issues that slow growth and increase joblessness.
The Trump administration says the tariffs will ultimately help the U.S. economy, and the president has demanded the Fed slash rates immediately.
New Fed economic projections this week, by contrast, anticipate slower growth and higher inflation.
Yet those projections also showed policymakers still anticipate rate cuts later in the year - a sign they do feel tariffs will raise prices but not in a persistent way.
Barkin noted the close split of opinion, with 10 policymakers seeing two or three quarter-point cuts this year, and nine seeing one or none.
"There are two perfectly reasonable views that are articulated there," Barkin said, based on expectations about the economy and inflation, and Fed officials' sense of which risks are more worrisome.
The median projection is for two quarter-point cuts this year.
But Barkin said that, in his mind, there are several compelling narratives for what might happen in coming months, from tariffs being passed along fully to consumers and raising prices, to businesses trying to absorb them through job cuts that raise unemployment.
With key tariff decisions still pending, "I don't have a lot of conviction about where (trade) policy is going to be. I just have to accept that," he said. "I also don't have conviction on what the impact is going to be on our mandate variables" of inflation and unemployment.
"There will be some inflationary impact. It's hard to know how much."
Businesses in his district, which runs from Maryland through South Carolina, tell him they are wrestling with the same questions, and remain largely on the sidelines when it comes to both capital investment and major labor market decisions, a static environment that could slow growth but also keep the unemployment rate relatively stable in a "low-hiring-low-firing" equilibrium.
Sentiment has improved since April, he said, when massive and since-delayed tariffs on China put businesses in a tailspin wondering about access to products and product inputs.
But the final outcome remains up in the air.
"I'd say the overwhelming reaction we're still getting is wait and see," Barkin said. "Wait and see is not put your foot on the brakes. It's just not put your foot in the gas."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla completes first fully autonomous Model Y delivery ahead of schedule
June 27 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab CEO Elon Musk said on Friday that the first fully autonomous delivery of Model Y from the factory to a customer's home across town was completed a day ahead of schedule.


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Oh, Canada! Trump cuts off all trade talks with US's northern neighbor citing ‘blatant attack on our country'
President Donald Trump on Friday said he was suspending all trade talks with Canada — and making plans to force Americans to pay high import taxes on its goods — after the northern ally's finance department confirmed plans to collect a digital services tax. The late afternoon move quickly caused markets to spiral amid fears of a return to t he president's self-inflicted trade war. In a post on Truth Social, the president complained that he had 'just been informed' about the Canadian government's decision, which will see it require payment of a 3-percent tax on revenue collected from Canadian users of digital platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and X, above $14.6 million in a calendar year retroactive to 2022. The tax could saddle American technology companies with bills as large as $2 billion for the first retroactive payments. Although it is meant to apply to any company that provides digital services and takes in profits from selling advertising or user data, Trump groused that it amounted to Ottawa 'putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies' and called the move 'a direct and blatant attack on our Country.' 'They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also,' wrote Trump, who added that the result of the 'egregious tax' would be the U.S. 'hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately.' The president concluded his post with an unsubstantiated claim that any tariffs on Canadian goods would be paid by the government of Canada (rather than by American importers and consumers), writing: 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.' Trump's threat to punish Canada by taxing Americans comes just weeks after a group of House members wrote to him urging 'a swift government response' to any attempt by Canada to collect what they called an 'unprecedented, retroactive tax' that would 'set a terrible precedent that will have long-lasting impacts on global tax and trade practices.' 'Allowing Canada to proceed with this unprecedented, retroactive tax on U.S. firms would send a signal to the rest of the world that they have the green light to proceed with similar discriminatory cash grabs targeting our firms, workers, and tax base,' they said. According to the U.S. Trade Representative's office, U.S. goods trade with Canada totaled roughly $762 billion last year, making Canada one of the country's two largest trading partners. Earlier this month, Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced an agreement to set a July 21 deadline for a new trade agreement at the Group of Seven summit hosted by Carney in Alberta. Ottawa has been pushing for Washington to stand down from the 50 percent tax currently charged on steel, aluminum and automobile imports as well as other taxes Trump has unilaterally imposed on Americans with the aim of purportedly punishing Canada for not doing enough to stop fentanyl trafficking. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court for International Trade had previously ruled that Trump's use of tariffs for such purposes was illegal but that ruling is on hold pending an appeal.


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
J.M. Smucker plans to remove artificial colors from its jams and other products by the end of 2027
J.M. Smucker Co. plans to remove artificial colors from its products by the end of 2027. Orrville, Ohio-based Smucker said Thursday it will also remove synthetic dyes from foods sold to K-12 schools by the 2026-2027 school year. Smucker said the majority of its products – including its Uncrustables sandwiches – are already free of synthetic dyes. But some products still have them, including sugar-free jams and ice cream toppings. Smucker said some products from Hostess, which it acquired in 2023, also contain artificial colors. Twinkies are made with Red 40 and Yellow 5, for example, while Snoballs snack cakes are made with Red 40 Lake, a dye combined with aluminum to keep it from dissolving in water. Smucker joins a growing number of big food companies that have announced plans to eliminate artificial dyes. Earlier this week, Nestle and Conagra Brands — the parent company of Duncan Hines — both said they would phase out synthetic dyes. Kraft Heinz and General Mills made similar pledges last week. The federal government has stepped up its scrutiny of artificial colors in recent months. In January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the U.S. regulators banned the dye called Red 3 from the nation's food supply, nearly 35 years after it was barred from cosmetics because of potential cancer risk. In April, Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would take steps to eliminate synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, largely by relying on voluntary efforts from the food industry.