logo
Some 45% of Gen Z Say They'd Rather Cut Savings Than Give Up Eating Out — Have Spending Priorities Gone Off Track?

Some 45% of Gen Z Say They'd Rather Cut Savings Than Give Up Eating Out — Have Spending Priorities Gone Off Track?

Yahoo17-05-2025

In an era of rising prices and economic uncertainty, it might come as a surprise to learn that many young Americans are prioritizing "fun" over funds. A recent Intuit Credit Karma study finds that 45% of Gen Z would rather reduce long-term savings than give up dining out — a trend that raises questions about spending habits and financial resilience.
The Credit Karma survey asked 2,074 U.S. adults which non-essential items they'd still happily pay for, no matter their cash flow. A striking 87% of Gen Z (ages 18–28) say they consider certain non-essentials "necessities," compared with 84% of millennials (ages 29–44). In other words, things like streaming services, skincare products, and dining out have become budget line items, not luxuries.
Don't Miss:
Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm —
Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
When pressed on cutting back if money gets tight, nearly three-quarters of Gen Z, or 74%, say they'd strongly consider trimming non-essential expenses — still lower than the 82% of millennials, 86% of Gen X (ages 45–60) and 87% of baby boomers (ages 61–79) willing to do the same.
Perhaps the most eye-opening stat: just over half of millennials (51%) and 45% of Gen Z would opt to shrink their long-term savings rather than sacrifice lifestyle experiences such as eating out, travel, or gym memberships. This suggests a "live for today" mindset, where the immediate payoff of a night out or a weekend trip outweighs the abstract benefit of a beefed-up retirement account.
Trending: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target –
Several factors may be at play:
Social Media Influence: More than half of millennials, or 60%, and over half of Gen Z, or 53%, report that social media has shaped their view of what's "necessary," nudging them toward spending on trending services and experiences.
Safety Nets: Approximately 22% of Gen Z say they haven't tightened their budgets for a possible recession because they rely on a financial cushion, such as parental support.
Acclimated Budgets: With living costs high, many young people may have already adjusted their baseline expenses, treating certain non-essentials as routine rather than optional.
"It's not entirely surprising that young people today are choosing to find comfort in spending on the things they enjoy, even amid economic uncertainty," says Courtney Alev, consumer financial advocate at Intuit Credit Karma.She recommends a simple audit: setting aside a small, regular amount—say $20 a week—into an emergency fund. "It's not about cutting out everything that brings you joy, but more about creating a financial cushion. Even the smallest steps could mean less stress and fewer tough choices in the near future."
With nearly half of Gen Z willing to tap savings for lifestyle perks, it's clear that attitudes toward money are evolving. Are these young adults simply redefining what makes life worth living, or have spending priorities truly gone off track? As prices and expectations both remain high, the choices today's consumers make could shape their financial well-being for years to come.
Read Next:
Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year —
'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones.
Image: Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Some 45% of Gen Z Say They'd Rather Cut Savings Than Give Up Eating Out — Have Spending Priorities Gone Off Track? originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither
Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither

A highly public feud between Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump took the world by storm last week and sent shares of the electric vehicle company lower. As the feud continues on, here's a look at where Benzinga readers stand. What Happened: A back-and-forth between Musk and Trump across social media platforms saw the two well-known individuals escalate a feud related to differences on the "Big Beautiful Bill." Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — The feud comes after Musk left his White House position working for the Department of Government Efficiency to spend more time working on his other companies, such as Tesla. Benzinga recently asked readers who they side with in the battle, which includes Musk criticizing the new debt the country will take on if the bill that Trump supports is passed by Congress. "In the feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who are you more likely to publicly support?" Benzinga asked. Here are the results: Neither: 44% Elon Musk: 25% Donald Trump: 17% Both: 14% The poll found that a near majority said they would publicly support neither Trump or Musk in the feud between former friends. Of the two well-known candidates, Musk received the largest support with 25% of the poll, ranking ahead of Trump at 17%.Why It's Important: Over the weekend, the battle between Musk and Trump minimized some with the Tesla CEO deleting some of his tweets that brought some claims against the current president. Tweets about ending the SpaceX Dragon program were also deleted. A battle between Trump and Musk over the long run could see many losers, including the country's space program and the launch of robotaxis, with Musk a leader in both sectors and Trump able to slow down progress made by the billionaire. Tesla stock saw its largest one-day market capitalization drop last week on the heels of the feud. Tesla stock trades up 1.61% at $299.72 at publication on Monday versus a 52-week trading range of $167.42 to $488.54. The stock has fallen 15% over the last five days and is down 22% year-to-date in 2025. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? The study was conducted by Benzinga from June 5, 2025, through June 9, 2025. It included the responses of a diverse population of adults 18 or older. Opting into the survey was completely voluntary, with no incentives offered to potential respondents. The study reflects results from 259 adults. Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither originally appeared on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage
Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage

June 10 (UPI) -- The federal minimum wage would rise to $15 per hour, with annual cost-of-living increases based on inflation, in a proposed bipartisan measure. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Peter Welch, D-Vt., co-sponsored the bill that they have named the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act" and would increase the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 per hour for non-exempt workers. "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said on Tuesday in a joint press release with Welch. "One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day," Hawley added. Welch said inflation and rising costs are making it too hard for families to afford basic necessities. "We're in the midst of a severe affordability crisis, with families in red and blue states alike struggling to afford necessities like housing and groceries," Welch said. "A stagnant federal minimum wage only adds fuel to the fire," he continued. "Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table -- $7.25 an hour doesn't even come close." "Times have changed, and working families deserve a wage that reflects today's financial reality," Welch added. Hawley said the current federal minimum wage is less than what a worker earned in 1940 when adjusted for inflation. If the proposed federal minimum wage increase is passed into law, it would take effect on Jan. 1 and allow cost-of-living increases that match inflation in subsequent years. Many states have respective minimum wage laws that exceed the current and proposed federal minimum wage, but a dozen still were at the federal minimum wage in 2024. Many large employers also have higher minimum wages, including Walmart, which has paid its workers at least $14 an hour and often more since 2023. President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the federal government to pay contract workers at least $15 an hour. California lawmakers in 2022 raised the state's minimum wage for many fast-food workers to up to $22 an hour.

U.S. Airline Passengers Get 'Warning' About Personal Information
U.S. Airline Passengers Get 'Warning' About Personal Information

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. Airline Passengers Get 'Warning' About Personal Information

If you fly with a major U.S. airline this year, the Department of Homeland Security might just have your personal information. Airlines Reporting Corporation, a company that focuses on ticket transaction settlements, has reportedly sold access to customer records information to the Department of Homeland Security and its Customs and Border Protection division. This deal was first reported by Wired. According to Wired, the information that ARC sold includes passengers' names, full itineraries and financial details. The Customs and Border Protection (CBP) division wants this data to "support federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to identify persons of interest's US domestic air travel ticketing information." "CBP is committed to protecting individuals' privacy during the execution of its mission to protect the American people, safeguard our borders, and enhance the nation's economic prosperity," a CBP spokesperson told Wired. "CBP follows a robust privacy policy as we protect the homeland through the air, land and maritime environments against illegal entry, illicit activity or other threats to national sovereignty and economic security." For what it's worth, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines are all shareholders for ARC. "The big airlines—through a shady data broker that they own called ARC—are selling the government bulk access to Americans' sensitive information, revealing where they fly and the credit card they used," U.S. senator Ron Wyden said. "ARC has refused to answer oversight questions from Congress, so I have already contacted the major airlines that own ARC—like Delta, American Airlines, and United—to find out why they gave the green light to sell their customers' data to the government." CBP hasn't released a follow-up statement on this matter. U.S. Airline Passengers Get 'Warning' About Personal Information first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 10, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store