'It stinks' - Weary Grey District locals gear up for another round in dump fight
Photo:
LDR/Lois Williams
The Grey District Council will need to spend at least $60,000 to make its case against the
latest resource consent application by the Taylorville Resource Park
.
Mayor Tania Gibson says the council will not give up the fight against what it sees as a future threat to its $20-million water supply from the private landfill.
TRP Ltd has applied to the Regional Council
for consent to discharge contaminated water - a mix of stormwater and landfill leachate - from a retention pond to land, and groundwater outside the dump site.
The discharge site sits above a water supply intake, which supplies drinking water to Greymouth.
The application is being processed on a limited notification basis, and only the GDC, Te Runanga o NgatiWaewae and two neighbours of the landfill are considered affected parties with the right to formally oppose or support it.
One of those neighbours is WCRC chair, Peter Haddock.
"Tonkin and Taylor have given us an estimate for the work the council will have to do for our submission, and we'll need to present at the hearing , then our lawyers are involved, that's why we've said $60,000 and it could be more."
That was a cost to the community that ratepayers could ill-afford, Gibson said.
"No-one's coming to save us but ourselves. But it's just diabolical to have to fight this when we don't want them discharging to water and land above our water treatment plant. "
The mayor met with Taylorville residents on Tuesday, to tell them what the council was planning to do, she said.
"They are pretty devastated and upset. But we have to fight this with facts, not emotion. We are going to go in with as much specific technical information as we can and we will need to engage someone with that knowledge. "
The GDC's independent water testing had shown contaminant levels rising in the road drains and groundwater near the dump, Gibson said.
TRP Ltd is about to apply for a more comprehensive resource consent
, for a Class 2 landfill, which would allow it to expand and take a wider range of waste materials as of right and has asked for that application to be publicly notified.
It had applied for the current consent as an interim measure last September but the council was only now getting around to processing it, a company spokesperson said.
For residents living near the dump, the prospect of fighting the major Class 2 consent is daunting.
Adrian and Christine Van Dorp, who can see the operation from a bank on their lifestyle block, are considered affected parties.
"We've been sent three hundred pages of stuff to wade through to make a submission and I can't see how we're going to stop this, but we can at least try to stop them expanding."
The application states that any effects on groundwater will be less than minor and it would be impossible for contaminants to find their way into the Grey River.
But the Van Dorps say it's beyond belief that the dump was ever consented in the first place.
Adrian Van Dorp neighbours the Taylorville Resource Park, a private landfill, which has applied to the regional council for consent to discharge contaminated water.
Photo:
LDR
When former Regional Council Andrew Robb subdivided his adjoining farmland five years ago, neighbours were given no warning that the land would become a landfill, Adrian Van Dorp said.
The current Regional Council chair, Peter Haddock also owns undeveloped land next to the landfill and is considered an affected party.
"We're all interested to see what he submits," Adrian Van Dorp said.
"There are 28 of us living around here and the damn thing is a blight on the neighbourhood. It's affected property values and it literally stinks.
"When the winds blowing one way we get it - and the smell makes you feel sick. When it blows the other way our neighbours across the terrace get it. "
Haddock was asked for his views and told LDR the submission period on the short-term consent had been extended and he was considering the available information.
The company in its application submits that any discharges would have less than minor effects on waterways.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Kirsty Cameron and Stephen McCabe Part 1
Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Kirsty Cameron and Stephen. First up, new data shows reading and writing levels for school children are dire. The Education minister Erica Stanford unveiled a new government strategy aimed at reversing the downward trend and imporving handwriting. And they also discuss the pros and cons for nuclear power, particularly now data centres for AI demand huge amounts of power. has nuclear power's time come? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Disability groups fear vital travel subsidy could be capped
Fears are growing in the disability community that a vital travel subsidy scheme could be capped. The Total Mobility Scheme that is co-funded by the government helps disabled people who cant use buses trains or ferries get where they need to go in subsidised taxis. The scheme has been under review for the past two years, with no official word on any changes. Disability groups fear the subsidy will be cut or overall funding capped, seriously restricting options for people who use the scheme. Auckland academic Dr Sally Britnell spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Legislation to implement Three Waters replacement passes third reading
'Local Water Done Well' is replacing Labour's Three Waters. (File photo) Photo: 123RF The government's final piece of legislation to implement 'Local Water Done Well' , replacing Labour's Three Waters, has passed its third reading. National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the legislation, and said "hello localism, and choice" while Te Pāti Māori MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi called it "an atrocious piece of work." The government has said the Local Government (Water Services) Bill and the Local Government (Water Services) (Repeals and Amendments) Bill provide a "flexible" framework for local councils to address challenges related to drinking-water, waste-water, and stormwater services. NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate, calling it the government's "urgently required" plan to "address challenges with New Zealand's water services." "Simply put, chronic underinvestment and the lack of sustainable management of local government water services has come home to roost." Costello said councils would be able to choose the best structure for "financially sustainable water services that meet regulatory requirements and local needs." NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate. (File photo) Photo: VNP / Louis Collins "I want to keep repeating that Local Water Done Well will maintain local ownership, choice, and decision-making. "That gives councils the best shot at identifying their most pressing problems and the right approach to solving them." National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the passing of the government's Three Waters replacement. "Goodbye Three Waters, hello Local Water Done Well. Goodbye co-governance, hello locally chosen and designed options. "Hello localism and choice." NZ First's Jamie Arbuckle highlighted the removal of "co-governance" in the legislation. "Isn't it great to get rid of co-governance from this piece of legislation? Get rid of it! We are about New Zealanders. We are about Kiwis." But the opposition slammed the legislation, with Labour's Megan Woods saying it "shifts the financial risk" to councils and ratepayers. Labour's Megan Woods slammed the legislation. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone She criticised the government's response to Three Waters, and said it had got rid of the economies of scale and "the money that could have been saved", allowing for a "proliferation" of water service entities. "What the government said was 'oh no there's two few entities, there's not enough room for local decision making under the previous government plans'." But she said the changes had led to an average increase in water charges for households. Tangi Utikere, Labour's spokesperson for local government, echoed her, and said there was no adequate financial support to those councils for the changes the government was seeking to implement. Te Pāti Māori's Mariameno Kapa-Kingi criticised the government for "ignoring the role of Māori in the delivery of water services." "Removing these provisions is not progress, it is reform, it is regression and it is deeply and only racist." She said the bill in its thinking and design ignored and dismissed how "tangata tiriti get to live here", referencing Te Tiriti o Waitangi. She implored the government to "get the education" and concluded by saying "what an atrocious piece of work." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.