Missouri Supreme Court upholds Prop B on St. Louis County ballots
ST. LOUIS – The Missouri Supreme Court has issued a ruling to allow Proposition B on St. Louis County ballots this spring.
The decision upholds an April 2025 ballot measure that, if approved by voters, would grant the St. Louis County Council the authority to remove department heads with a 'super majority' vote, or approval from five of the county council's seven members.
Legal battles around Prop B have pitted the council against County Executive Sam Page and various county department directors. Critics have argued the ballot language is misleading, inefficient and unfair.
On Wednesday, the Missouri Supreme Court disagreed with a challenge from County Counselor Dana Redwing, issuing a ruling that allows Proposition B to remain on the April ballot and for votes to be counted.
Developer picked to demolish Millennium Hotel, revamp site
County council members say Proposition B is necessary to hold the county's executive branch accountable and ensure 'that no one branch of government holds unchecked power,' according to a news release from Council Chairwoman Rita Heard Days. She also pointed out that many municipal boards have similar authority to remove department heads.
Executive Sam Page shared a statement in a previous FOX 2 story acknowledging that, while the measure will proceed, he feels the language is confusing and his administration is exploring legal options moving forward.
According to a St. Louis County sample ballot, Proposition B currently reads:
'Shall Section 2.190.3 be added to and Sections 4.020 and 5.020 of the Charter of St. Louis County be amended to restore checks and balances, oversight, and accountability of the executive branch by authorizing removal of the St. Louis County Counselor or any Department Director by five of the seven Councilmembers as set forth in Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 29,241, on file with the St. Louis County Administrative Director and the St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners? The cost of legal counsel authorized if this amendment passes has no fiscal impact on taxes.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Kansas abortion clinic leader was ready for Missouri abortion ban, fears it won't be short-lived
Kathryn Boyd, the new CEO and president of the Wichita-based abortion clinic Trust Women, appeared on the Kansas Reflector podcast to discuss how Missouri's abortion ban might affect Kansans. (Submitted) TOPEKA — In May, as Kathryn Boyd began her new role as president and CEO of the Trust Women clinic in Wichita, one of the first conversations she had with the clinic's leaders was how to deal with a new ban in Missouri and what it might mean for Kansas. A late-May decision from a Missouri judge triggered an all-out ban on abortion in the state, but that wasn't much of a surprise to Kansas abortion providers who were preparing for the worst. The majority of abortion patients in Kansas already come from out of state, and now, Trust Women is making its physicians more available and expanding its hours to brace for an influx. 'This is a case of lawmakers who, despite what Missourians voted for, have decided that they're going to just throw that out the window and do what they want anyway,' Boyd said on the Kansas Reflector podcast. 'So I think my first reaction was like, OK, here we go again.' 'Before the ban, Missourians were able to receive abortion care in major cities, reversing years of restrictions implemented by state lawmakers. Those rulings came after voter approval of a constitutional amendment in November enshrining reproductive freedom in the state constitution. All of that was undone in a two-page ruling last month from Missouri Supreme Court Chief Justice Mary Russell, who ordered Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Jerri Zhang to vacate the December and February decisions and reevaluate the case, restoring a ban on abortions and restricting facility licensing. Health centers in Missouri provided care to people who wouldn't have to travel as far as they do now, Boyd said. Following the anger, fear and worry in the wake of the decision in Missouri, Boyd said the primary focus of Trust Women is to expand access. The clinic's message, she said, is, 'We're still here.' 'We're still providing care. We need to expand, and we need support. You know, that's really what it comes down to. And I think that that is a similar story of many, many providers throughout the country, regardless of what state they're in,' Boyd said. However, her fear is that the ban won't be short-lived. Boyd, who has worked in the field of abortion and reproductive care for years, entered the top job at Trust Women about a year after intense turmoil within the clinic. Reports of mass resignations and multiple leadership shakeups led the clinic to temporarily close its doors. Boyd, though she wasn't working at the clinic at the time, describes it as 'very, very hard' for the organization. 'Coming in after a culture shock like that can be really challenging for any leader,' Boyd said. 'Making sure that I come in with that in the back of my mind, I don't want that trauma to, like, dictate what we do going forward, but it definitely is like a side dish.' Her goal is to create a culture of transparency and collaboration, and that requires building back trust and listening, she said.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
City Council OKs budget, puts project of resident on hold
The approval of a new budget, a rundown of the 2013 bond projects, and a balcony over a city right-of-way were discussed by the Tahlequah City Council during a meeting earlier this week. The Council approved the FY2025-2026 budget at the June 3 meeting, and in the absence of Mayor Suzanne Myers, Treasurer Marty Hainzinger commented on the final numbers. "This budget prioritizes all of the essential services such as public safety, infrastructure, community development, while holding all the operational spending in line with revenues," Hainzinger said. A balance of $2,241,550 carried over from FY 2024-2025; projected revenue is $14,271,113, bringing the total available to appropriate to $16,512,663, states the budget summary. Projected expenses are $12,886,330 and total projected carryover is $3,626,333. A 10% carryover of reserves is $362,633; and a projected general fund total to appropriate for FY 2025-2026 is $16,190,758. Before the budget was voted on, Ordinance No. 1389-2025 was considered and approved because of how the proposed ordinance could affect the budget, said City Administrator Taylor Tannehill. "This is the second shot of this version of this ordinance; it is drastically different than what was proposed at the last meeting," Tannehill said. "The gist of it is in May of each year the finance director will certify projected revenues for next year and during budget time we would only appropriate 95% of those revenues into the next year's budget." The remaining 5% would go to a stabilization fund and as that grows to 15% of any given year's projected revenues, the city would budget more than the 95%, Tannehill said. City Attorney John Hammons clarified what the ordinance would do. "We would build into the revenue stabilization fund until such time as the revenue stabilization fund reaches 15%; thereafter, that 5% would be allocated to a special cash fund and that could be allocated for whatever purpose the City Council found to be appropriate," Hammons said. Dr. John Uzzo compiled a list of projects proposed for completion with the 2013 bond and asked the city to comment on their progress. Tannehill said all have been completed, are funded or are in the works. "There were 20 projects listed on the ballot to be completed, and of those 20, it's safe to say that 17 have been completed," Tannehill said. "One of the three remaining is South Muskogee, so we anticipate that wrapping up later this year." Two other projects not completed from that bond issue are the North Grand Road project and the East Allen Road project, Tannehill said. "Each one of the 20 items there [has had money spent on them]," Tannehill said. "The money spent on East Allen Road and North Grand has been engineering, and we are currently doing right-of-way acquisitions for East Allen Road and will continue to see those expenditures rise in those columns as we proceed." Ward 1 City Councilor Danny Perry asked if there was a timeline for completion of the construction on South Muskogee. "When we had the bridge change order that [timeline] was about eight weeks from that time, and it's been two or three weeks since then," Tannehill said. On May 30, the manhole relocation and construction of a sewer line under the bridge next to Lowry's Discount Furniture was almost complete. The crew was finishing up the project and the cones and traffic barriers were being pulled back. James Murray and Kenna Beckett, owners of property at 334 N. Muskogee Ave., presented a request to the Council to build a balcony over city right-of-way over a sidewalk along Morgan Street, across from Norris Park. Tannehill said Murray approached the city to do this project but no decision was made. A few weeks later, Tannehill sent an email to Murray that there was interest in the project, and Murray took it to the Board of Adjustment for a variance, which was not authorized. "The city does allow for the construction in the city of right-of-way with the Council's blessing; that's why this is before you today," Hammons said. "I've had numerous conversations with the applicant and we have a draft version of the agreement, which largely meets with my approval." Hammons said a policy provision in the agreement, on which he had no position, is the nature of termination of the agreement if it was approved by the council. Ward 3 City Councilor Stephen Highers said the council was not voting on whether the balcony could be built or not, but whether the mayor is allowed to negotiate an agreement with the property owners. Murray had submitted a packet explaining the project, with examples of other businesses in that same area that had balconies and bollards to stop traffic from crashing into the buildings. Murray said they have spent $50,000 on improvements that didn't need approval and plan to put another $50,000 into it if the city approved their request. "We are trying to make this consistent with the rest of the area, and from my property, I can throw a rock and hit three of them that have posts in the sidewalk," Murray said. "And I'm just asking to let me do that as well." Hammons said the only thing left for him was the policy question that the Council needed to address – that it not remove the structure within five years. Highers said this project is what Tahlequah is looking for, which is bringing investment and housing downtown. The item was approved, but with a caveat initiated by Ward 2 City Councilor Keith Baker – that the couple return to the next Council meeting with a revised agreement that reflects the time period the "license" with the city for these changes could be revoked, if needed. After the meeting, Murray and Beckett expressed their frustration at the numerous delays in the city's giving approval. Karen Murphy, communications and marketing director for the city of Tahlequah, said after the meeting that the administration wanted to make a statement for publication by TDP on the matter. "The city is excited to work with this couple and really pleased with the improvements that have been done," Murphy said. "We apologize for the frustration and understand it, but we want to make sure we are doing our due diligence and going through the right steps." Murphy said Myers is ready to start the negotiations as soon as possible. "It is frustrating, but the city has to do what's right," Murphy said. "If there is concern about safety, we just want to make sure we are protecting our citizens and their property." What's next The next Tahlequah City Council meeting is July 7, 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers at the City Administration Building.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
TenHaken talks time as mayor, future plans
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — Paul TenHaken has been leading Sioux Falls for seven years, but he plans to take time away from politics after his final year as mayor. 'There's a lot of people announcing for different offices, so, it's coming up a lot in conversations. And, for the sake of that, I wanted to get it out there and let people know, hey, I'm not running for governor. I'm not running for Congress. Senate. I just want to focus on this last year in office, and finish well,' said Paul TenHaken, mayor of Sioux Falls. TenHaken says he plans to bring his focus back to entrepreneurship. But he doesn't have anything specific planned yet. 'It's really buttoning things up. You're really not starting anything new. You're landing the plane. And I use that analogy a lot,' said TenHaken. 'You know, we're going to be opening the Jacobson Plazas of the world for projects like that, where you have a lot of big infrastructure projects that we're working on, and we're going to finally break ground on the 85th and I-29.' As his mayoral chapter comes to a close, TenHaken has a lot of accomplishments to look back on. 'During the last seven years, I think one of the things I'm most proud of, and this is going to seem really nebulous, is really just keeping the wheels on the bus during a time when the world was kind of falling apart,' said TenHaken. And despite the unknown timing of the next election, TenHaken is looking ahead to what the city's next leader will bring to the table. 'Keeping up with housing, dealing with the challenges of homelessness, ensuring crime stays manageable as we grow. Those are very real challenges. And so, the next mayor is going to have to be a leader, a consensus builder, someone who's run large organizations, large leadership teams, and can unite a community that's increasingly diverse,' said TenHaken. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
