JD Vance to host Robert Jenrick at Cotswolds manor house
Mr Jenrick was put in touch with Mr Vance by Dr James Orr, an associate professor of philosophy of religion at the University of Cambridge and a prominent conservative thinker.
Mr Vance has a friendship with Mr Orr and visited him with his family in Cambridge. Mr Jenrick has known Mr Orr since they were lawyers and spoke at a conference he hosted earlier this year.
The two politicians have voiced concerns about similar issues, including the need for a tough stance on mass migration and fears about the erosion of free speech. They are also both tipped for future leadership runs in their respective countries.
As vice-president, Mr Vance is well-placed to secure the Republican presidential nomination at the next election in 2028 as the US constitution bars Mr Trump from a third term in office.
Jenrick tipped for Tory leadership
Mr Jenrick is widely tipped by colleagues to seek the Tory leadership when it becomes available again. The next general election will be held in 2029 at the latest.
Mrs Badenoch is still less than a year into her premiership as Tory leader, but her party is languishing in third place in opinion polls, situated behind Labour and Reform UK, which has surged into the top spot.
Last month, The Telegraph revealed that Mr Vance had asked Lord Mandelson, the British ambassador to the US, about Reform's jump in support from UK voters.
The vice-president has a long-standing interest in British politics, with George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor, once hosting a gathering for Mr Vance when he visited.
Mr Jenrick used to be viewed as a supporter of the Tory modernisation project overseen by Lord Cameron and Mr Osborne before moving his policy positions to the Right in recent years.
Mr Vance's trip to the UK has involved a mix of business and pleasure.
He held talks on Ukraine with Mr Lammy at Chevening, the Foreign Secretary's official country retreat, before a meeting between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, in Alaska on Friday.
On Sunday, Mr Vance and his family also enjoyed a guided tour of Hampton Court Palace, the former home of Henry VIII, which was closed to the public during the visit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
22 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour MP is forced to resign as UK's trade envoy to Turkey over ‘unacceptable' Northern Cyprus trip
A LABOUR MP has been forced to resign as the UK's trade envoy to Turkey amid controversy over a visit to Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus. Afzal Khan, who represents Manchester Rusholme, had stepped down from his position on Friday, a government spokesman has told the BBC. Mr Khan said the trip to the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which is not recognised by the UK Government, was to visit his nephew and to receive an honorary degree. He said he had paid for the trip himself. The act of freelance diplomacy riled the official Cypriot government in the south who described his actions as "absolutely condemnable and unacceptable". Turkish troops have occupied the northern section of the Mediterranean island since 1974. Shadow foreign minister Wendy Morton told the BBC that she welcomed Mr Khan's resignation, but said Sir Keir Starmer should have sacked him earlier. 1
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Nearly nine in ten voters support deporting foreign sex offenders
Almost nine in 10 voters think foreign sex offenders should be deported, a new poll has revealed. A huge majority of Britons across all ages and political parties agree that migrants who commit a sexual offence should be kicked out. It comes amid a wider debate about the impacts of mass migration and controversy over alleged crimes perpetrated by asylum seekers. The survey, by Find Out Now, also found that almost four in 10 people favour restricting immigration from countries with poor women's rights. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has vowed to increase the rate of deportations and limit the avenues foreign criminals have to appeal against their removal. Earlier this year, she announced that any migrant placed on the sex offender register would be automatically prevented from claiming asylum in the UK. The pollsters asked more than 2,000 voters whether they supported the deportation of non-UK citizens who have been convicted of sex crimes. More than 87 per cent said they either 'strongly' or 'somewhat' supported removal, compared to just three per cent who said they opposed it. In total, 85 per cent of Labour voters, 96 per cent of Conservative supporters and 97 per cent of Reform backers said they favoured deportation of this kind. Find Out Now also asked the public whether they would support restricting immigration from countries 'where women have few legal rights and protections'. Just under 39 per cent of all voters said they would back such restrictions, compared with a little over a quarter who said they would oppose them. Support for tougher measures was voiced by 30 per cent of Labour voters, 52 per cent of Conservative backers and 74 per cent of Reform supporters. A total of 38 per cent of Labour supporters said they would oppose such measures. Finally, the pollsters also asked Britons whether they 'believe that immigration levels impact women's safety in your area'. Overall, 47 per cent said they believed that was the case, versus 23 per cent who did not. In total, 29 per cent of Labour voters, 58 per cent of Conservative supporters and 84 per cent of Reform backers said they felt less safe. Additionally, 43 per cent of Labour supporters said they believed their area was less safe as a result of migration. The poll was commissioned by the Women's Safety Initiative, a group set up 'to expose the dangers of uncontrolled immigration'. The group says it provides 'a space for women to voice concerns about safety, culture, and national identity without fear of censorship or judgment'. Anna McGovern, the deputy director, said: 'This data confirms what women across the country have been telling us for years – they feel less safe and they want action. I've spoken to so many women who have shared their experiences of feeling unsafe, and I include myself in that. 'Our leaders cannot continue to ignore these concerns or dismiss them as unfounded. Women's safety must be prioritised above political convenience, and this is the moment to start taking decisive steps to protect women everywhere.'
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Scotland's fiscal calamity is a harbinger for all of Britain
It should be noted that this particular tax break was much cited by Labour when defending its decision last autumn to make farms subject to inheritance tax. What are they complaining about, some ministers said, when farms can still be handed down from father to son tax-free via the seven-year rule? Now, even this concession seems to be in the Chancellor's crosshairs. Wealth and aspiration are under attack across the UK as a whole, not just in Scotland. But it's even worse north of the border, where higher-rate taxpayers pay significantly more than their English counterparts on a greater proportion of their income. The quid pro quo for a more highly taxed economy is meant to be better public services, but you'd be hard-pressed to argue this is the case in Scotland. Total public spending last year at 52pc of GDP is at Scandinavian levels, but without Nordic-style welfare and services. NHS waiting lists are longer than much of the rest of the UK, social services are a disgrace, life expectancy is lower and even educational standards – once the highest in the UK – have slipped badly under Scotland's high spending regime. State education in Edinburgh is so poor that one in four families makes the financial sacrifices needed to send their children to privately funded independent schools, far higher than the UK average. Now they face the additional cost of VAT on school fees, though that one is down to Westminster, not Holyrood. And to be fair, also down to Westminster is the completely insane decision to essentially close down the North Sea oil and gas sector in pursuit of the net-zero pipe-dream. It might have been SNP policy too, but for an opportunistic change in stance just ahead of the general election aimed at saving seats in Aberdeen and beyond. The Scottish Government's current position is now a more nuanced one in which new licences for development would be assessed on a case-by-case basis, rather than the current outright ban imposed by Westminster. It's one of the few things that Holyrood seems to have done right, even if, with the overarching decision made down south, it makes no difference to the outcome. In any case, the ban steepens Scotland's fiscal challenge. Offshore oil and gas provide some of Scotland's highest-paying jobs; Ed Miliband's assault on the sector threatens lasting damage to income tax receipts, with the growth in renewables unlikely to provide a complete substitute. The smart thing to have done in maximising jobs and revenues would be to allow the two industries to run side by side, but when did either Westminster or Holyrood last practice common-sense politics? As it is, Scotland is in the same rut of rising taxation, excessive spending and declining public services as the rest of the UK, but magnified several times over. The SNP offers no answers on how it would correct the shortfall in the public finances should it ever succeed in freeing Scotland from the English teet. You might imagine that the cause of Scottish independence would have been finished for a generation or more by the SNP's inept record in government, topped off as it was by the tragicomedy of Humza Yousaf's short-lived reign as first minister. But then along came Reform UK, which threatens to split the unionist vote and thereby gives the SNP another leg up in next year's Holyrood elections.
