In ‘landmark' find for forensics, ZSI IDs 17 distinct blow fly species
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Led by ZSI director Dhriti Banerjee and scientist Atanu Naskar, researchers collected 2,977 specimens from four regions of Bengal and identified 17 distinct blow fly species, each with its own genetic signature. Their analysis found significant genetic differences between species (up to 12.3%), ensuring definitive identification.
Blow flies are among the first insects to colonise a corpse and are crucial in estimating the postmortem interval or the time elapsed since death.
Traditionally, forensic scientists relied on the size and growth stages of the insects — an approach prone to errors, as different species vary in size, characteristics and infestation periods.
"This is a game-changer for PMI estimation," said Banerjee. "With DNA barcoding, species identification can happen within hours — even from a single egg — without waiting for the maggots to mature, significantly boosting accuracy and speed," she added.
"Different species of blow flies have different larvae size and growth rate. But since many blow fly species look alike in their early forms, misidentifications led to inaccuracies in determining their age, and hence, how old the corpse was. The ZSI team overcame this by focusing on a tiny mitochondrial gene segment — Cytochrome Oxidase I — known as the 'DNA barcode'," explained Banerjee.
The findings were validated using four globally recognised scientific methods, all confirming that each species forms a distinct genetic cluster. This makes the blow fly's DNA an indisputable forensic marker. The study has been published in the international journal PLOS ONE.
"Forensic science has long focused on human evidence," Naskar explained. "But nature itself provides vital testimony. The fly's DNA speaks volumes," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
Why experts are opposing India's gene-edited rice varieties
The Union government recently announced it is ready to release two genome-edited rice varieties—DRR Rice 100 (Kamla) and Pusa DST Rice 1. In these varieties, a drought and salt tolerance gene has been mutated using gene-editing technology. As a result, water efficiency has increased, the plants can withstand salt better and yields are reported at 2.4 to 3.7 metric tonnes per hectare in saline and alkaline to officials, some 40 more crops are in the pipeline, using this technology. Experts, however, caution that gene editing is no different from genetic modification. Dr Krithika Yegna, a biotechnology scientist, calls it mere word editing cannot be achieved without modification of the genome. Any modification in the genome is still a modification,' says Dr Yegna. She adds that some scientists' claim that this method is foolproof has been disputed. There is scientific literature to show any modification done on crops may pose the risk of getting incorporated into the human genome—something researchers are slowly beginning to understand. 'The need of the hour is regulation and creating awareness,' says Dr researcher and agro-ecology practitioner Soumik Banerjee explains the genetic meddling. 'We are interfering with the DNA. We are removing elements of the DNA without knowing their function. We only talk about the positive results, but we don't know the negative ones. Nature put those genes there, and we are removing them, saying there are only positive effects. That is not possible,' says Banerjee. He argues that technology is not foolproof and research papers confirm several off-target effects. During the process, genome sequences other than the targeted ones may get mutated, and this is irreversible. 'It changes the plant's phenotype substantially—the gene-edited plant becomes a new plant,' says Banerjee. He adds that India has many stress-tolerant and high-productivity rice varieties, which should be grown rather than adopting such risky concern is shared by farmer activists. Kavitha Kuruganti, farmers' rights activist and convenor of the Coalition for a GM-Free India, says: 'Any gene technology in our food systems is a living technology. Once you release it into the environment, the seed germinates, flowers, and the pollen spreads. That pollen can spread uncontrollably and irreversibly.'Dr Yegna emphasises on proper government oversight. 'The first thing is to have regulatory systems in place—to check what kind of modification is being done, why it is being done and whether there is a natural alternative to achieve the same outcome without genetic modification.' She points out that even by traditional breeding methods, traits like size of corn cobs can be improved, though not as adds that gene editing and all its applications must be regulated. She criticises the government's move to deregulate SDN1 and SDN2 (categories within Site-Directed Nuclease genome editing). 'Genome editing is genetic engineering. It should have been regulated by the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), India's apex biotechnology regulator. Instead, they deregulated SDN1 and SDN2 and then announced these two rice varieties. We haven't seen any comprehensive, independent or long-term testing. Even in GM mustard, there were allegations of rigged tests by big corporations. The same story could be repeating here,' she concern is patents. The technology is patented and licenced exclusively to multinationals like Corteva and Monsanto. Why should the Indian government promote patented seed material, asks Kuruganti. At global platforms, India says it is against patents on seeds and planting material. Promoting these patented rice varieties contradicts that stand. 'Farmers in India have always treated seed as open-source, shared across generations. Patented technologies undermine both livelihood security and food security,' says viewpoints emerged in the webinar 'Understanding Gene-Edited Rice and Its Implications', organized by the Coalition for a GM-Free India. With experts agreeing that gene editing must be brought under biosafety regulation, some key questions arise. What is the need for such a technology, after all? Are there alternatives? And can governments push untested technologies on citizens without debate or scientific scrutiny?advertisementSubscribe to India Today Magazine- Ends
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
ZSI cracks blow fly DNA, which could help solve crimes faster in India
A recent breakthrough by researchers at the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) could revolutionize forensic science. By cracking the genetic code of blow flies, they have created a powerful new tool for solving murder mysteries. This method, called DNA barcoding, allows investigators to quickly identify the species of blow flies at a crime scene, a key step in accurately determining the Post-Mortem Interval (PMI), or time since death. The study, published in the international journal PLOS ONE, introduces DNA barcoding as a reliable method to identify blow fly species. Until now, investigators had to wait for maggots to mature into adult flies before confirming their species, often delaying timelines and raising doubts in court. The ZSI team, led by Dr Banerjee and Dr Atanu Naskar, analysed 2,977 blow fly samples collected across West Bengal. By decoding a specific mitochondrial gene region called COI (Cytochrome Oxidase I), known as the 'DNA barcode,' they identified 17 distinct blow fly species, each carrying a unique genetic fingerprint. 'Forensic science has traditionally focused on the human body,' explained Dr Naskar. 'Our research demonstrates that nature itself offers vital evidence. The fly's DNA is a language we've now learned to interpret.' The results were validated through four international methods, confirming that each species formed distinct genetic clusters. The study produced the first complete DNA barcode reference library for blow flies in West Bengal. Researcher Oishik Kar compared the DNA barcode system to an 'Aadhaar card for flies,' underscoring its potential for global law enforcement. Once uploaded to international databases, the system could help investigators worldwide track time of death with unprecedented precision. Beyond forensic application, the study also highlights the biodiversity of the region. 'The fly, often overlooked, is now a key that can unlock the truth,' Dr Banerjee emphasised.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
In ‘landmark' find for forensics, ZSI IDs 17 distinct blow fly species
Kolkata: A breakthrough study by Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) on blow flies promises to transform forensic investigation by helping scientists accurately determine the time of death, especially in the case of decomposing bodies. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Led by ZSI director Dhriti Banerjee and scientist Atanu Naskar, researchers collected 2,977 specimens from four regions of Bengal and identified 17 distinct blow fly species, each with its own genetic signature. Their analysis found significant genetic differences between species (up to 12.3%), ensuring definitive identification. Blow flies are among the first insects to colonise a corpse and are crucial in estimating the postmortem interval or the time elapsed since death. Traditionally, forensic scientists relied on the size and growth stages of the insects — an approach prone to errors, as different species vary in size, characteristics and infestation periods. "This is a game-changer for PMI estimation," said Banerjee. "With DNA barcoding, species identification can happen within hours — even from a single egg — without waiting for the maggots to mature, significantly boosting accuracy and speed," she added. "Different species of blow flies have different larvae size and growth rate. But since many blow fly species look alike in their early forms, misidentifications led to inaccuracies in determining their age, and hence, how old the corpse was. The ZSI team overcame this by focusing on a tiny mitochondrial gene segment — Cytochrome Oxidase I — known as the 'DNA barcode'," explained Banerjee. The findings were validated using four globally recognised scientific methods, all confirming that each species forms a distinct genetic cluster. This makes the blow fly's DNA an indisputable forensic marker. The study has been published in the international journal PLOS ONE. "Forensic science has long focused on human evidence," Naskar explained. "But nature itself provides vital testimony. The fly's DNA speaks volumes," he added.
