Powys council misses information request deadlines
The number of requests for information met on time by Powys County Council plummeted during 2023/4, a meeting has heard.
At a meeting of Powys County Council's Liberal Democrat/Labour Cabinet senior councillors received a historic annual report on Information Governance covering 2023/2024.
The report showed that during that year the council received a total of 1,271 information requests under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) and Subject Access Requests (SAR), 16 per cent up on the 1,093 received in 2022/2023.
FOI and EIR requests are supposed to receive an answer within 20 working days while for SAR the deadline is 30 days.
The performance during 2023/2024 saw was 73 per cent for FOI, 77 per cent for EIR and for SARs only 32 per cent were completed on time.
This is down on the 84 per cent for both FOI and EIRs and 57 per cent for SARs that the council achieved in 2022/2023.
The Information Commissioner expects the compliance rate to be at 90 per cent.
The report explains that the team have had staffing issues during the reporting period.
Cllr Raiff Devlin (Liberal Democrat) who was installed as the cabinet member customers, digital and customer services only last month said that an 'Information Management, Assurance, and Governance plan' was in place to try and improve things.
As of the end of March last year only 35 per cent of this plan had been completed.
Cllr Devlin said: 'Further work is required to meet the targets.
'Compliance rates have seen a decline, and this is as a result of resource challenges within the department.
'66 per cent of non-compliant responses were due to delays in the provision of information by the service enabling a response to be drafted or released.
'Complaints to the commissioner are mainly linked to late requests.'
'The commissioner made decisions on two complaints, over an exemption applied and information held.
'The commissioner found in favour of the council on both occasions.'
He said that the report provided 'reasonable assurance' that the council's arrangements and plan 'adequately' reflect the principles of good information governance.
Cllr Devlin added: 'It is important to note that this report is from 2023/2024 and many of the forward plan priorities have already been actioned by the department and that the 2024/2025 report is in development.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Scottish Government changes guidance that led to Supreme Court ruling
The Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act sparked the legal challenge from For Women Scotland (FWS) on the definition of a woman which led to the issue being heard in the UK's highest court. Initially, the guidance stated that transgender women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) or those living as women would count towards gender balance on public boards. The 2004 Gender Recognition Act, which introduced GRCs, used the terms sex and gender interchangeably. It said a GRC meant someone "becomes for all purposes the acquired gender". READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off over Israel divestment The anti-trans campaign group disagreed with this definition, and in 2022 took the Scottish Government to court. They initially lost a judicial review, but were then successful on appeal. The Scottish Government then changed guidance to only include trans women with a GRC. This led to FWS calling for a second judicial review, which they lost in December 2022. The case then went to the Supreme Court, with judges ruling in April that women were defined by biological sex under the Equality Act 2010. (Image: NQ staff) FWS raised thousands of pounds via a crowdfunder to take the case to the UK's highest court. They have recently said they would consider further legal action. And now, the Scottish Government has updated the statutory guidance relating to public boards on its official website. An update to the document reads: 'The meaning of 'woman' for the purposes of the Act. 'There is no definition of 'woman' set out in the Act with effect from 19 April 2022 and 22 March 2022. 'By virtue of section 11 and section 212(1) of the Equality Act 2010 references in the Act to a 'woman' or to 'women' are references to a biological woman or women.' READ MORE: Labour U-turn on benefits cuts in bid to win over rebel MPs In April, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville announced the Scottish Government would make the change to the guidance. She added that the ruling had sparked 'real anxiety' from trans and non-binary people. 'It is significant that the Supreme Court stated that their judgment that the rights of the trans community are enshrined in law and I want to reassure our trans community that you are valued and the Scottish Government is fully committed to protecting everyone's rights and that includes your community,' she said. Following the judgment, the Equality and Human Rights Commissions (EHRC) issued guidance that banned transgender people from using the toilets of their acquired gender. The EHRC has since been forced to change part of the guidance amid a legal challenge of its interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling. It rescinded guidance that stated it was 'compulsory' for workplaces to provide single-sex toilets. The Scottish Parliament, and more recently the House of Commons, have banned transgender people from using the toilets of their acquired gender following the Supreme Court's ruling. Trans women were also banned from playing in women's football and cricket teams.
Edinburgh Reporter
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Election data shows incredibly tight race in Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election
Labour and the Liberal Democrats were neck and neck at the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election, according to data released by the council. Under the Single Transferrable Vote system used by the election, candidates are eliminated in stages, with the lowest scoring candidate in each stage eliminated. Voters rank candidates in order of preference, and can rank as many or as few candidates as they wish. For each candidate knocked out, their votes are analysed. If a voter had a lower-ranked candidate still in the running, their vote was redistributed to them. Reform UK's Gary Neill was the first major party candidate to be eliminated, ranking last in the ninth stage, with 196 votes transferring to Mark Hooley, and a handful going to other parties. Next to fall was the SNP's Murray Visentin, who went at the 10th stage. The majority of his votes – 408 – went to the Scottish Greens' Q Manivannan, with 134 going to Labour, 116 to the Liberal Democrats and 29 to the Conservatives. This pushed Manivannan into the lead briefly, with their 1,595 votes standing 97 ahead of Labour's 1,498, and 115 ahead of the Liberal Democrats' 1,480. Both Labour and the Liberal Democrats were within 30 votes of each other for most of the transfer stages. But, the tight-necked race collapsed when Conservative candidate Mark Hooley was knocked out in the 11th stage. Some 387 of his votes went to the Liberal Democrat candidate, Kevin Joseph McKay, while only 166 went to Scottish Labour's Catriona Munro, giving Mr McKay a 199 vote lead. A rebound for Scottish Labour came when Manivannan fell out in the 12th stage, with 449 of their votes going to Mr McKay and 551 going to Ms Munro. But, it was not enough to secure Labour the seat. Mr McKay was still ahead by 97 votes – enough to bring him the victory, and increase the Liberal Democrat group in the council to 14 members. Ms Munro's votes were still redistributed in a 13th stage, with 1,093 of them transferring to McKay – leaving him with a total of 3,409 votes. It marks a stark reversal for the Liberal Democrats, who in the 2022 council elections took home just 7.1% of the first preference votes and were knocked out in the fifth stage. By comparison, this time, they took home 20.4% of the first preference votes. The victory is the third by-election win for the party this term, snagging one seat in March 2023 and another in November 2024. However, their win last year was incredibly short lived, with councillor Louise Spence resigning after six days due to her having apparently made plans to move to Dubai within days of the by-election. The party now holds 14 seats, below the SNP's 17 but ahead of Labour's 11 and the 10 each for the Tories and the Greens, as well as the council's one independent member, Ross McKenzie. To hold a majority of votes in the City Chambers, a coalition needs 32 councillors behind it. When asked on Thursday night if his group might make a bid to run the council, Liberal Democrat group leader councillor Ed Thornley said that his group 'will have a conversation'. By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Mid and East Antrim Council: Two prosecutions over deleted emails
Two people are to be prosecuted following a police investigation into Mid and East Antrim Public Prosecution Service (PPS) says it's linked to the alleged deletion of e-mails related to a Freedom of Information person is being prosecuted for three offences under section 77 of the Freedom of Information other is facing one charge under the same act. A total of four people were reported on a police file submitted to the PPS for a statement the PPS said that the available evidence in relation to the other two people being investigated is insufficient to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction and therefore the test for prosecution is not twice searched the council offices in October 2021 and then the following BBC Spotlight programme previously reported it was connected to alleged attempts to delete correspondence relating to the decision to withdraw council staff operating under the post-Brexit trade conditions known as the Northern Ireland Protocol. The staff, who were carrying out checks on goods arriving from Great Britain, were removed because of apparent threats from loyalist later emerged the then council chief executive Anne Donaghy had written to the UK Cabinet Office before the decision to remove staff was told the UK government that graffiti had been directly targeting council staff working on then Agriculture Minister Edwin Poots subsequently withdrew inspectors performing the checks at ports in Northern shortly after, all staff had returned to duties with the PSNI issuing a written threat assessment stating it had no information to support claims of loyalist paramilitaries threatening staff safety.
