Joanna Cherry: 'Shocking' Free Speech threat at Edinburgh Fringe
She placed part of the blame on former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, adding that the current First Minister 'does not have the courage to speak against it.'
READ MORE:
WATCH: The Herald's Unspun Live takes over the Fringe
How Kate Forbes managed to avoid 'good riddance' comments
Kate Forbes: I am not a quitter - this is why I'm leaving Holyrood
Ms Cherry criticised Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar as 'missing in action' on issues of free speech, while praising Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay as 'pretty good' on the topic. She described Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton as 'absolutely appalling' and said the Greens were 'unspeakable.'
'There is a real problem in our politics in Scotland that has seeped into our public life,' she said.
Ms Cherry condemned the National Library of Scotland for censoring a book written by feminists, lesbians, and sex abuse survivors who opposed what she called Sturgeon's 'identity politics.' She accused the librarian and board chairman of bowing to pressure from a small staff group representing an LGBT network, saying: 'I think that's shocking.'
She also criticised Summerhall, the venue that hosted The Herald's Unspun Live Fringe show featuring Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes.
Last week, the venue apologised for 'the understandable upset' caused by Forbes' appearance and offered a 'designated relaxed space' for artists, promising to implement new inclusion and wellbeing policies.
Ms Cherry, who attended the event, described the situation as 'shocking' and said it was symptomatic of a wider problem at the festival: 'It is also shocking that a venue in this city has effectively said that the deputy first minister of the country is not welcome there…and that staff are so coddled that they need to have a safe room provided for them when Kate did come to speak.'
Discussing the broader threat to free speech, Ms Cherry concluded: 'There is a real problem here that we are seeing at the festival.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Angus Robertson makes freedom of speech pledge at Festival
Speaking exclusively to The Herald, he highlighted the importance of arts organisations allowing people to express 'unpopular' views and giving audiences the choice of whether to hear them. Read more: Mr Robertson was speaking less than a fortnight after First Minister John Swinney opened Edinburgh's summer festivals season with a speech that pledged that he would 'always protect freedom of speech in our country.' The Edinburgh International Book Festival, the National Library of Scotland and Fringe venue Summerhall, which are all government-funded, have all become embroiled in free speech rows. Scottish culture secretary Angus Robertson has spoken out in the wake of a number of freedom of speech controversies. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Politicians and writers have raised concerns over 'censorship' and behind-the-scenes lobbying by activists to try to cancel events and influence programming decisions. Mr Robertson insisted the government had no involvement in programming decisions made by arts organisations and the importance of 'arms-length' decision-making on funding for arts and culture. The National Library of Scotland has been accused of censorship. (Image: Gordon Terris/ The Herald) However the culture secretary said that did that 'diminish' the importance of freedom of expression. Edinburgh's summer festivals season has played out against a background of freedom of speech and cancel culture controversies. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes was interviewed by The Herald's political editor Andrew Learmonth at Summerhall. (Image: Gordon Terris) The book festival has been accused of avoiding 'difficult' topics, and excluding certain books and writers, including gender critical authors, from its line-up. The National Library has been accused of 'cowardice' after it emerged it had removed a best-selling gender critical book from a special exhibition to mark its centenary after some of its staff raised complaints that it promote 'hate speech.' The Edinburgh International Book Festival has been accused of deliberately excluding gender critical authors from its line-up. Although the exhibition features books selected by well-known authors Damian Barr, Alan Cumming, Gemma Cairney, Sir Ian Rankin and Val McDermid, the National Library decided to withdraw The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, after it was initially selected based on public nominations. It features essays by women including Harry Potter creator JK Rowling, MP Joanna Cherry, MSP Ash Regan and former prison governor. Summerhall, which was threatened with closure over an HMRC investigation last year, has come under fire after it issued an apology to artists and performers for hosting an event with Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, which it described as an "oversight." Management had been urged to pull the plug on her appearance, which was part of a series of Fringe events organised by The Herald. Summerhall said it would be 'developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies' as a result of Ms Forbes appearance. In response to reports of Summerhall's apology, Ms Forbes, who has responsibility for the funding of Edinburgh's festivals, said she fervently believed in freedom of speech, adding: 'Any effort to 'cancel' people, especially politicians, undermines democracy.' Mr Robertson was speaking after an event to celebrate the Made in Scotland showcase at the Fringe. Four shows have secured a shared of £540,000 in government funding, while Summerhall secured more than £600,000 in funding for the next years in January. He told The Herald: 'As Scotland's culture secretary I am a strong supporter of the freedom of speech and of expression at our festivals and as part of our cultural life in general. 'There is a distance between government and our cultural organisations, which is important, but does not diminish our strong support for the broadest cultural offerings. 'There a number of issues of public concern and public debate. 'For as long as I can remember, there have been tensions between the right to freedom of speech and developments or views that some people find unpopular or unjustifiable. 'That tension will always exist. It's something that the organizers of festivals or cultural events are presented with at all times. It will not be easy all of the time to please everybody. 'But I think keeping an eye on the principle of freedom of expression and the expression of different views is an established and important part of our national life. 'For very good reasons, funding to our major cultural and festival events takes place at arm's length. 'That, though, does not diminish the important position of the Scottish Government, including myself and the First Minister, to support the right of freedom of expression and freedom of speech. 'I want to make sure that our arts festivals and our arts organisations are properly supported and properly funded, as they are being now, with the biggest increase in spending for culture since the beginning of devolution. 'And I am keen to make sure that we have an understanding about freedom of expression and the ability of people to express views that may be popular or less popular as part of our cultural life, and people can choose if they want to go and hear those or not.' A spokesperson for the Scottish Government said: "While ministers have no role in booking or curation decisions taken by individual venues or institutions, the Scottish Government supports individuals' rights to freedom of expression and we are clear that there is no place for any form of discrimination in Scotland.' The Herald has teamed up with to make the purchase of tickets for the Edinburgh Festival Fringe so much easier. To buy tickets please click here.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ready, steady, green for go... Sheeran's proud of roots
I think I may have an Irish great-great grandparent somewhere in the family tree, but unfortunately I have no artistic or creative talent, or I would have been on the first ferry going in that direction years ago. Eric Gardner, Glasgow. More letters... Play for today While I don't always agree with him, there is no denying that Neil Mackay rarely misses and hits the wall. I completely concur with his recent contention about the wealthy ('Us vs them: why the rich like Musk and Bezos are destroying our world', The Herald, August 7). My support for this point of view was fortified having seen 'Make it Happen' the previous evening. This superb play describes the rise and fall of the Royal Bank of Scotland, and the fate of its CEO, Fred Goodwin. Having been economically active for the period covered by the play, I felt slightly disconcerted seeing those events, with the benefit of hindsight. It is hard to explain the slightly deranged atmosphere of the time. But it was like watching the proverbial frog boil until the water becomes scalding and its time to leap clear. The hubris of that time was encouraged by Gordon Brown, who declared the end of the boom-and-bust era. We could apparently look forward to ever increasing prosperity. It was going to be sunshine and lollipops all the way… until it wasn't. Inevitably, the Greeks have a word for what happened next: aporia. This is the state of intense puzzlement when our certainties fall to pieces and we suddenly are caught in an impasse, at a loss to explain what our senses are telling us. At these rare moments, aporia humbles us and prepares our mind for previously unbearable truths. September 2008 was such a moment. We have never fully recovered from the mayhem and carnage that ensued, but inevitably the rich do not suffer as much as the rest of the populace. They don't do austerity. Keith Swinley, Ayr. Mind your language I'VE read with increasing dread and dismay the comments of your columnists, notably Kevin McKenna and Carlos Alba, as well as the extensive coverage of the Sandy Peggie tribunal (''Peggie case has escalated a shameful anti-trans campaign'', The Herald, August 11). I assume the majority of your journalists to be cis, heterosexual men. (I note Carlos Alba only applies 'the public has a right to know rule' to former politicians, and not to journalists with a powerful platform to shape public discourse…) Can I suggest some training in basic concepts and contemporary language around sexuality and gender identity. The resources produced by the Time for Inclusive Education (TIE) campaign, whose tenth anniversary you recently celebrated, would be an excellent starting point. Simply reading the articles you published in your own paper explaining the history of section 2A/28 (a period we are rapidly returning to on trans issues), and the impact that media and public discourses had on those of us growing up queer in the 1980s, might give pause on recent commentary. To explain (again): non-binary gender and rejecting the idea of a straight / gay sexuality binary are entirely separate concepts, and in any case, politicians' identities, declared or otherwise, have no bearing on their ability to shape policy. Indeed it is the straight, cis allies in parliament, in the press and elsewhere, who we need now more than ever to resist the legislative and media backsliding on decades of progress on LGBT+ inclusion. Pam Currie, Millport. Road rules The Labour Party's current stance on eyesight testing focuses on ensuring drivers, particularly those who are over 70-years-old, can safely operate vehicles by meeting minimum vision standards for all drivers, namely, being able to read a car number plate at 20 metres. I agree with the thinking on this issue, as eyesight deteriorates as one gets older. What I don't agree with is the misconception that those under 70 should have no eyesight test, other than on the day of their driving test. Once you reach 70 you apply for a three year licence to drive your car, and you complete the application form with no input from your GP or Optician. Meanwhile, foreign visitors and workers can drive with their licence for a year. After that, they are required to sit a test. My point is that there are considerable issues involving both drivers and driving licences, which need to be improved long before we focus on eyesight tests for over 70s. Especially self-assessment without any intervention from a doctor or optician; allowing visitors to drive in this country for a year with their current licence; and holiday makers from around the world driving on their national licence. It's time that the government addressed these issues instead of prioritising testing the eyesight of the over 70s. Neil Stewart, Balfron. Dubious dialectic If a shopkeeper hangs a sign describing shoplifters as 'scum', the police will advise him to take it down. If he puts up pictures of suspected shoplifters, the Information Commissioner will threaten him. But if your phone is stolen with all your personal data on it, the authorities will most likely do absolutely nothing. Behind this absurd behaviour is Marxist thinking, which divides us into categories of oppressors and the oppressed. The 'scum', usually drug addicts who shoplift, are viewed as the oppressed. They are not to be held morally accountable, as it is their disadvantaged circumstances which have led to their misconduct. On the other hand, the law-abiding person is not disadvantaged, and as such their misfortune is of no concern to the authorities. This is all the more so when they belong to an oppressor category such as small-business people. There is only one word that fits this ruinously destructive thinking, and that is evil. Life will only start getting better in Britain when the authorities revert to traditional moral thinking, which rewards hard work, thrift, honesty and public spiritedness, and punishes anti-social and destructive behaviour. Otto Inglis, Fife. Moggies go wild; birds have banging time (Image: Cats Protection Scotland) Blast off It is ironic that Clark Cross should write of cats "decimating our wildlife" (Letters, August 13), when the same edition's front-page photo is of the 'Glorious' Twelfth! George Morton, Rosyth.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Kate Forbes's treatment at the Edinburgh Fringe was a farce
Summerhall is one of Edinburgh's largest Fringe venues, also running year-round exhibitions and artistic performances. This past week, it has also played host to the city's latest site-specific beclowning show, with artists so reportedly 'terrified' by Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes being in the building, they had to set up a 'safe room' on the day she was booked to be there. Forbes is apparently so dangerous to your average avant-garde theatre-maker or performance poet, using Summerhall's many spaces for their Fringe run, that management at the venue issued a grovelling apology to these notional adults: A fragility and intolerance of others, an anti-arts politics even, has been permitted to spread Summerhall Arts' primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again. With such overblown rhetoric and handwringing, your average person still living in reality may suspect something appalling happened. Did Forbes goosestep across the atrium? Call for an immediate ban on stage make-up? Did she bring some kind of weapon to the venue, which was awarded £608,302 of public cash from Creative Scotland in January? It's worse. She came to the building, was asked questions by the Herald's Andrew Learmonth, in front of a paying audience who wanted to hear her, then left again. Frightening. Forbes was booked to take part in the Herald's Unspun Live talk-show series on 6 August. Leaving aside the irksome rise in political interview shows at what is supposed to be an arts festival, it's entirely ordinary she would do so. A diminutive 5ft 2, Scotland's not-remotely-dangerous deputy First Minister has an earned reputation of being a capable, diligent and principled legislator who, until the recent announcement she'll be leaving parliament at the 2026 elections, was tipped to be a future First Minister. She also holds gender-critical views. Despite these being entirely lawful, they bring instant pariah status in the arts world. In addition to the heresy of believing in the law of the literal land, which states that women and men are not each other, and that the former require single-sex spaces sometimes, Forbes is also a devout Christian. Her religious views wouldn't have permitted her to vote for same-sex marriage had she been in parliament at the time that Act was passed. She has also said she'd personally never have an abortion. Both viewpoints arguably scuppered her leadership bid against former First Minister Humza Yousaf in 2023, despite his devout Muslim beliefs likely being similar. If you want to impose a double standard on a woman, of course, it suddenly becomes very easy to know what one is. It says something ugly about both the state of the arts and freedom of expression that a venue in a city once celebrated as the 'home of the Enlightenment' wishes to apologise for a mild-mannered political leader saying things some people disagree with. In my recent experience, however, as someone formerly embedded in Scotland's artistic community, I know that using one's art form to explore difficult, controversial issues is in itself a downward trend. The performing arts have been inculcating such a navel-gazing, relentless focus on the self – whether one's sexuality or the ever-nebulous 'gender identity' – that it has made a great deal of its practitioners about as edgy as a floral-patterned fabric circle. A fragility and intolerance of others, an anti-arts politics even, has been permitted to spread. It's not normal for artists to act this way – something younger performers perhaps may not be aware of. It's also not remotely acceptable – or lawful – for a venue in receipt of taxpayers' funds to say they may in future ban people with Forbes's views from their programming. The dramas created by these types are often worthy of a Fringe First award. A stunning display of both comedy and farce, good fodder for column inches and baffled conversations with like-minded peers. But, for those of us who value the arts, freedom of speech, and democracy, this is yet another example of a growing tragedy.
