
Space Bill debate: I think it's gonna be a long, long time
Rachel Brooking gets plenty of time speaking in the House on her main portfolio responsibilities.
However the Dunedin Labour MP seldom gets the opportunity to put her party Space spokeswoman astronaut helmet on ... at least not until this week, when the government unexpectedly took urgency to push through all stages of the Outer Space and High-altitude Activities Amendment Bill.
It is rare for a government to push through an entire law change in 24 hours — pandemic safety requirements or Budget-critical law changes are recent occasions.
Security is another reason for haste, and Space Minister Judith Collins said that law change was needed to manage "risks to the national interest posed by the misuse of ground-based space infrastructure". All very James Bond.
She later expanded on that, saying that during the past five years "there have been several deceptive efforts by foreign actors to establish and/or use ground-based space infrastructure in New Zealand to harm our national security." Eek!
It turns out that the existing law does a good job of covering things happening at high altitude or in actual orbit, but a rubbish job of ensuring that the terrestrial operators of that high tech were authorised, risks were properly assessed, and that enforcement powers were available when needed.
"By introducing a clear and modern framework for ground-based infrastructure, we are enforcing New Zealand's reputation as a responsible spacefaring nation," Ms Collins concluded ... and who wouldn't want to live in one of those nations?
Certainly not Ms Brooking, who agreed that this country's ventures to infinity and beyond — especially those which emanate from nearby Awarua — needed to be regulated so that they were in the national interest.
But ... and there is always a but ... she was not happy that the law change to protect "ground-based infrastructure" such as satellite tracking stations and telemetry systems was rocketing through Parliament.
"I understand there may have been some prior consultation on aspects of it, but in general nobody has been having any public discussion about this Bill, and so there may be parts of it that have inadvertent, unintended consequences," she said.
"So we do want to go through, in the committee stage, and take it seriously so that we all understand the Bill as best as we can. And I hope the minister is of that view."
Given that "taking it seriously" entailed debate taking up all of Tuesday and a decent chunk of Wednesday, Ms Collins' view may have steadily become less favourable as things progressed.
What Ms Brooking wanted — and given the circumstances it seemed a not unreasonable request— was a post-enactment review of the law.
Her proposed amendment to add one was ruled out of order, but Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk (subbing for Ms Collins) left that "thoughtful suggestion" firmly anchored to the launch pad: "The Minister for Space feels — and I, in her place, am happy to relay but also support the notion — that we don't need to specify a mandated review mechanism, be it in front of the intelligence and security committee or, indeed, the foreign affairs, defence and trade committee as per the original proposal."
Thus stymied, Ms Brooking moved into fresh fields of inquiry, such as the Bill conferring the minister with the authority to stop providing electricity or internet services to any offending space infrastructure: "are there any examples of that sort of thing happening anywhere else in the world?" she wondered.
Mr Penk said the idea, essentially, was to "buy a bit of time" while someone figured out what to do next. Options which the legislation said, "may include, without limitation," — which offers quite the toolbox to utilise.
"It's deliberately not excluding the range of conditions or actions that might be taken — noting, of course, that in this highly technical realm and with developing technology, it might well be the case that there are conditions or actions that might be necessary in the future that we're not able to contemplate now," he added, opening the possibility of all kinds of science fiction ideas being placed in a future Space Minister's hands.
Which sounds preposterous — but so, too, and not too long ago, did the idea of New Zealand having a space industry. Hence, eventually, the Bill became law.
Hard quiz
You know that Tuesday was a big day because Dunedin Green list MP Francisco Hernandez had dug out a tie.
He had to wait a long time to display his sartorial splendour, but eventually he got to ask Q12 — just his second primary question in the House — to the Minister of Universities, on the establishment of the new Waikato medical school.
As it turned out, the minister was not in the building, so Mr Hernandez instead quizzed Health Minister Simeon Brown — which, one suspects, Mr Hernandez was quite pleased by.
It was a good quizzing too, as Mr Hernandez asked pertinent questions such as: will it build a strong, more diverse work force, as claimed; will it generate new doctors faster than the proposal to increase class sizes at Otago and Auckland universities, and — quite frankly — just why does the government think building a new medical school is a good idea when there are two perfectly good ones already, which have the capacity and willingness to expand their rolls?
The answers were not that pertinent sadly, Mr Brown favouring sloganeering — such as "we're getting on with it and we're delivering"; "this is a great day for New Zealand"; and "Just say yes. Get on the side of the positive news this is for our country, rather than keeping on complaining."
However, keeping on complaining is exactly what Mr Hernadez is likely do. Firstly, about the still unreleased business case which underpinned the decision — which the government said on Monday would be proactively released, and which as of late yesterday was still not public.
And secondly, when it finally does see the light of day — and it should have done when the post-Cabinet announcement was made — if the arguments in it do not seem to back up a final decision which has huge ramifications for the University of Otago.
mike.houlahan@odt.co.nz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
9 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: The interminable rage of Chlöe Swarbrick
The exasperated Greens co-leader reached the end of her tether as parliament debated nurses' pay, homelessness, Palestinian statehood and voting rights. Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. No one could ever accuse Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick of not caring about her job. The Auckland Central MP, who was first elected to parliament at the age of 23, has always had a passionate sense of justice. In many ways, that's her superpower. But also… damn, try not to give yourself a heart attack. Caring deeply about things is hard work, and Swarbrick cares about a lot of things. It looks exhausting. No MP puts more energetic fury into question time than Swarbrick – and she reached peak exasperation in Wednesday's session. She shouted constant commentary at government ministers, righteous outrage boiling in her blood and steaming out of her ears. Things kicked off with Marama Davidson asking the prime minister why Te Whatu Ora hired only 45% of nursing graduates, even though 16 health districts were understaffed. 'Well, I'd just say they are all understaffed today,' Christopher Luxon replied. 'Excuse me??' Swarbrick interjected. Luxon continued, emphasising that nurses' pay had increased by 74% since 2011. 'But what have you done?' Swarbrick shouted. Davidson asked when the government would recognise Palestinian statehood, and Luxon replied with some generic words about diplomacy and dialogue and making sure Hamas releases hostages. 'You know the hostages have been offered back,' Swarbrick chirped, leaning back against the keffiyeh on her chair. When it was Swarbrick's turn to take the stand, she grilled Luxon on Auckland Council data that showed a 90% increase in rough sleeping since the government's changes to emergency housing. She asked whether he could come to Auckland Central and 'meet the people that he has made homeless'. Luxon pivoted to blaming the 'previous Labour-Greens government [when] homelessness went up 37%'. When Luxon finds himself stuck or short-circuiting into NatGPT mode, ministers will often try to dig him out with a friendly question. Winston Peters took the first crack: 'Could the prime minister name just one thing the local MP in Auckland Central is doing about homelessness?' Government MPs giggled, and Swarbrick's rage grew. Her head almost looked like it was vibrating. Before Luxon had a chance to respond, she jumped to her feet in indignation and sought leave of the house to answer the question. Multiple National MPs objected, and speaker Gerry Brownlee dropped it. Tama Potaka took a second crack, asking the prime minister to confirm a housing report that found that 'the increase in homelessness cannot be attributed just to changes in the emergency housing gateway and they may actually be reflective of broader economic and social contexts'. 'Yeah, you!' Swarbrick gestured at the government benches, 'they blame you!' Brownlee gave her a wee telling-off – 'you cannot yell out across the House like that. If it continues, it'll be an early afternoon' – but nothing was stopping the Swarbrick rage train. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer asked Luxon about whether he would expel the Israeli ambassador. Luxon gave a bland answer about the importance of maintaining diplomatic relationships. Swarbrick heckled 'just words' and 'you heard of Russia?' (While in opposition, National called for the government to expel the Russian ambassador over the invasion of Ukraine.) Ngarewa-Packer turned her focus to the government's proposed electoral reforms that would end on-the-day voting enrolment. Luxon defended the policy, saying people would merely have to enrol 13 days before the election, which is half of the 26-day deadline in Australia. 'They have compulsory voting!' Swarbrick yelled, 'Who do you work for?' Ngarewa-Packer raised allegations that hundreds of Māori voters appeared to have been removed from the voting roll in the past 24 hours. Luxon again insisted that anyone, Māori or non-Māori, just needs to register 13 days before the election. 'Did you listen to the question?' Swarbrick asked. Once again, Luxon referenced the shorter enrolment period in Australia, and Swarbrick, even louder, yelled, 'They have compulsory voting!' With the final question, Ngarewa-Packed asked if Luxon would commit to delaying the reforms until he could ensure 'that he will not disenfranchise hundreds of thousands more Māori and Pasifika voters who have followed all the correct procedures?' Luxon dismissed her concern. 'I reject outright the characterisation of that question.' Across the room, on the verge of pulling out her hair, Swarbrick harrumphed: 'You don't care.'


Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Protest calls for action over starvation in Gaza
Joining those gathered in the Octagon on Saturday to demand stronger action on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza were (from left) Labour MPs Damien O'Connor, Rachel Brooking, Ingrid Leary and Dunedin city councillor Christine Garey. PHOTO: SUPPLIED About 400 people gathered at the Octagon on Saturday afternoon demanding stronger action regarding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. A report on the event said speakers called for an end to what they described as an engineered mass starvation of Palestinians and demanded the New Zealand Government impose sanctions on Israel and pressure Egypt to open its borders to allow food aid to the war-torn strip. Palestinian community member Rula Talahma made an emotional plea for Palestinians to see the same level of action that New Zealand had taken against Russia when it invaded Ukraine that involved economic sanctions including on individuals associated with the regime. Dr Talahma said New Zealanders were tired of the government's "virtue signalling" after 658 days of "irreversible damage' in Gaza, especially in the context of images from the past week of starving children and hundreds of food trucks blockaded from entry through the borders. "Stop with the lip-syncing filling us with void words and promises," she said. "The time is running out. The suffering in Gaza is real and immense, deeply disturbing." Green party co-leader Chloe Swarbrick addressed the march with a message of solidarity, she said hope lay in the hands of ordinary people who should be making demands of their MPs — otherwise there was no point to their jobs. Five other MPs attended, including Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking and Damien O'Connor from Labour, with local Green MPs Francisco Hernandez and Scott Willis as well as Dunedin city councillors Christine Garey and Marie Laufiso. The UN agency for Palestinians said it had thousands of truckloads of supplies near Gaza waiting to deliver aid. Save the Children UK reported more than 10 children per day have lost one or both of their legs in the past 16 months. March organisers welcomed new faces and said it was never too late to try to end what they described as a genocide. — Allied Media


The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: So, who's to blame for the cost of living?
In question time, sometimes a question is not really a question. Or is it? Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. No one can shut up about the cost of living. And fair enough – butter is, like, a million dollars, and tens of thousands of people who are essential to our health system are walking off the job today because they're still not paid enough for the work we applauded them for doing through the worst years of our lives. With all of this going on, the pro-growth (of the good kind, not the bad kind) government has been very keen to remind the nation of all the great work they've done to improve our lives. But, they're definitely not panicking or anything – they're just setting the record straight, of course. Which is why Monday's post-cabinet press conference began with ten minutes of prime minister Christopher Luxon and finance minister Nicola Willis rattling off a list of their pro-growth achievements this term. And why the minister kicked off Tuesday's question time session with patsies from National backbencher Suze Redmayne, reminding the House of the government's efforts in tax relief and Family Boost. But there was this annoying little voice that kept popping up (amid all the other heckling). Was it Karl Marx himself, risen from the dead to personally punish Willis? No, it was just Greens' co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick, on a mission to set her version of the record straight. 'Road user charges!' Swarbrick reminded the minister. How about putting a price-tag back on prescriptions? Or the price of butter? There was a distinct look of disgust from Swarbrick when Willis wrapped up. Up next was Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who questioned Luxon over – you guessed it – the cost of living crisis and nurses, but when he began a supplementary by using the word 'so', a smart aleck on the front bench thought they'd pull a fast one. 'Point of order, Mr Speaker,' said Act leader David Seymour. 'Speakers have ruled that you cannot begin with a word like 'so' … Usually a question must begin with a question word.' Well, Gerry Brownlee replied, the member used 'so does', and I've overlooked the 'so', so it does go – and haven't there been occasions when the minister himself has done the same thing? 'I got away with it,' Seymour quipped. 'Yeah, well, guess what's happening here,' Brownlee replied. Armed with a pile of notes, Luxon rejected Hipkins' characterisations and claims – but he seemed to lose his cool after so much back and forth. 'If you're really serious about the cost of living, will you support a rate cap on councils? Yes or no?' Luxon challenged his counterpart in red, but that earned him a cuff around the ear from the speaker. The prime minister cannot ask questions, Brownlee reminded him. 'It's a rhetorical one,' Luxon replied. 'Rhetorical or not, it's a question,' Brownlee countered. 'It was just a rhetorical answer,' Luxon grumbled. Not much achieved thus far. There were fisticuffs again when Labour's finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds questioned Willis over whether the country was truly 'back on course' – kinda like 'back on track', but just a bit different. And again the minister rattled off a list of figures of where inflation was at in 2022 and 2023 under the Labour government to prove a point that the current state of inflation is simply all inherited and not really her fault, until Brownlee cut her off with 'that's enough'. 'Ruth Richardson would be proud,' Hipkins cried. Later, famed orator Shane Jones, minister for resources, struggled through his sentences despite NZ First MP Jamie Arbuckle giving him a wide open pass to boast about his portfolio, ahead of the final reading of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill on Thursday. Though he did find his flow while trashing the 'unicorn-kissing, shallow green ideas' that led to 'the perfidy of the cancellation of the oil and gas industry by Jacinda Ardern' that he is trying to repeal (despite being a cabinet minister in the government which enforced the ban). But Labour MP Kieran McAnulty wasn't having a bar of it: point of order – but aren't these remarks a clear example of the very thing you've warned this government about multiple times, using questions to express their thoughts on previous policies? McAnulty kept going, but Brownlee cut him off by saying that while he agreed, it was fine to talk about 'factual matters', just as long as they're not attacking the opposition. 'Point of order,' Jones rose again. 'I'm very happy that you used the word 'factual'. It is a fact that the oil and gas industry was chilled, halted, as a consequence of a decision announced by so said woman' (aka his former colleague, Jacinda Ardern). A groan rippled through the House after that one. Jones is a minister who likes to bark out words like 'fiction!' when his opponents across the aisle are speaking about climate change, and 'mining!' at random intervals to remind the House of his dedication to the kaupapa. So Swarbrick gave Jones a taste of his own medicine when he came to boast about his plans to travel to Taupō – 'the heart of geothermal potential' – today to begin consultations to identify what 'red tape' might be 'blighting' the acceleration of the industry. 'Are you talking about the lobbyists?' she called. 'Tell us about your fossil fuel lobbyist mates.'