logo
Dear Abby: Every man I meet online wants to marry me

Dear Abby: Every man I meet online wants to marry me

Yahoo20-06-2025
DEAR ABBY: I am twice divorced and recently celebrated my 61st birthday. I look pretty fantastic, and I'm in great health.
My husbands were really great guys, and I have maintained positive relationships with both. My first marriage lasted 20 years; the second lasted 10. I have been flying solo for the last five years.
I love my life and lifestyle and have no desire to marry again. I like having my own space and the freedom to do as I please.
My dilemma is, while I'm open to dating and having companionship, the men I connect with online all want to be married! As soon as I tell them I'm not looking for marriage, they disappear.
Recently, I was literally hung up on in mid-conversation because of my response to the marriage question.
How can I get to the 'let's meet in person' part if the first or second phone conversation ends things because I'm being honest? I don't want to lie.
It's challenging trying to explain that I no longer believe I must be married in order to feel fulfilled. I have family and wonderful friends in my life, plus I'm very outgoing.
I admit that I do miss some aspects of being in an exclusive relationship. It's just that I'm not trying to be a Mrs. anymore. Third time's the charm … NOT! Please advise. — STOPPING AT TWICE IN TEXAS
DEAR STOPPING: I hear from so many women who have the opposite problem that you are having. As soon as they indicate that they ARE interested in marriage, the men head for the hills.
You either haven't met the right men yet, or you may be delivering your disinterest in marriage message too strongly.
You might have better luck if you specify what you DO want — which appears to be companionship and a monogamous relationship.
DEAR ABBY: I need advice about my daughter. She is in an abusive marriage. Her four boys, aged 3 to 12, have been affected by what is going on.
They are not properly disciplined and are being abused as well. Her husband is on drugs and abuses my daughter mentally and physically in front of the children.
Should I keep letting her take my grandsons back to a bad situation, or should I call child protective services? This is tearing me up inside.
We are not young enough to handle caring for the kids full time because they're so messed up. They'd end up in foster care.
What should I do? My daughter would probably lose her mind if she lost them, but I can't stand to see them suffer. — ALARMED IN MISSOURI
DEAR ALARMED: There may be a less drastic solution than calling child protective services. The next time the husband acts out, call the police.
Once he's out of the house, help your daughter find a battered women's shelter that will accept her and her children until she can become independent.
The National Domestic Violence Hotline (800-799-7233; thehotline.org) may be able to help you locate one. This would be better than turning your grandchildren over to strangers.
Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. Contact Dear Abby at DearAbby.com or P.O. Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flexibility Is King: Why Rigid Education Models Shut Out Talent
Flexibility Is King: Why Rigid Education Models Shut Out Talent

Forbes

time14 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Flexibility Is King: Why Rigid Education Models Shut Out Talent

Pablo Listingart is the founder of ComIT, a nonprofit providing free, tailored tech training to help people overcome employment barriers. In more than two decades of teaching (first in high school classrooms, then university lecture halls and now through the nonprofit tech‑training programs I run), I've met a lot of educators. Wonderful, passionate people. And yet, sprinkle in any discussion about how learning should happen, and the mood shifts. Suddenly, everyone's clutching their pedagogical pearls: 'Courses must be in‑person due to the social aspect of it!' 'Online is the only way to scale!' 'Eight a.m. classes build character!' Rigid certainty is oddly fashionable in education circles. It's comforting to declare one universal 'right way,' but it's also the way to keep smart, motivated people stuck on the outside looking in. The Privilege Of A Roof And The Myth Of 'Free' School I was lucky. My parents offered me a roof and food until I finished my studies at university. The deal was that everything else (weekend outings, vacation money, even some textbooks) was on me. And so that's why I started working when I was 17 years old, doing many different things. Plenty of people probably share my experience. Many others do not. Even in countries with 'free' tuition, the hidden price tag is real: transportation, food, childcare, lost wages, the cost of juggling night shifts with morning exams. Tell a single mom working one or more survival jobs that scholarships exist and see if that helps. Scholarships rarely cover diapers or bus fare, and they certainly don't solve a rigid lecture schedule. It's simple: When the choice is attending biology lab at 9 a.m. or paying the electric bill, the lab loses. Not because students lack discipline, but because Maslow organized that hierarchy for a reason. Are We Really Opening The Door? Many institutions tout diversity initiatives. Worthy efforts, but often focused on entry rather than completion. Once a student steps through the door, we stick to a fixed timetable, mandatory attendance, single‑attempt exams and 15‑week semesters. Take the single mom again. She obtains a scholarship, then misses class because her toddler spikes a fever. A zero for participation follows, and her grade slides. The scholarship renews only with a B average, and soon she's gone. We pat ourselves on the back for 'access,' never noticing the revolving door spinning behind us. What Students Actually Want Earlier this year, my nonprofit surveyed 500 learners. The results were unsurprising if you've been paying attention: • 45% prefer a hybrid format: part self‑paced, part live instruction. • 46% crave a balance of independent and collaborative work. • Only 40% believe formal degrees are the best path, though many say prestige still matters on a résumé. Translation: Students welcome structure, but not at the expense of sanity. They appreciate community, but not if it means forfeiting their paycheck. They respect credentials, but only when those credentials signal real-life skills. The Case For Flexibility (And How To Do It Without Lowering The Bar) Break courses into bite‑sized units that can be started at different moments in the year. Give evening, weekend and recorded options. Mastery, not seat time, should drive progression. Swap high‑stakes midterms for projects that mirror real work. If a student can demonstrate competency at midnight on a Tuesday, why force them into an exam hall at dawn? Pandemic Zoom fatigue taught us that slapping a webcam on a three‑hour lecture is torture. True hybrid learning mixes asynchronous micro‑lessons with short, purpose‑built live sessions for discussion, feedback or group work. Allow a limited number of 'life happens' passes per term—no doctor's note required. Missed a class because your bus broke down or your shift ran late? Use a pass, catch the recording, complete an assignment and move on. Offer micro‑certificates that build toward a larger credential. A student who finishes two modules earns something tangible even if life interrupts the third. Momentum can be a powerful antidote to dropout rates. Will The Ivory Tower Survive The Remodel? Critics worry that flexibility dilutes academic rigor. In my experience, it does the opposite. When you remove arbitrary barriers, you're left with the actual barrier: learning the material. Students no longer fail because the daycare closed; they succeed or fail on understanding algorithms, supply chain theory or Renaissance art. Exactly as it should be. And employers? They love it. Ask any CTO if she'd rather hire a graduate who perfected Java at 2 a.m. while caring for aging parents or someone who breezed through a lecture‑only course. Resilience, time management, grit. That's the hidden curriculum flexible programs teach. Flexibility: An Equity Issue (And A Talent Issue And A GDP Issue ... ) When education only fits the schedule of a 19‑year‑old with no dependents and plentiful cash, we waste oceans of talent. Single parents, newcomers, rural learners and neurodivergent students are not edge cases. They are the workforce we claim to need. By 2030, global shortages in tech alone could leave millions of roles unfilled. Meanwhile, capable adults shelve their potential because classes clash with paychecks. The math doesn't add up. Crowns, Thrones And The Future Which brings us back to the headline: Flexibility is king. In medieval times, the king's word was law; in modern education, flexibility should rule with similar authority. Not as a feel‑good add‑on, but as the organizing principle around which curricula, funding and policy revolve. If we fail, we'll keep graduating a narrow slice of the population and wondering why innovation stalls. If we succeed, we'll unleash minds previously sidelined by timetables and tuition receipts. Twenty years in, I've learned that teaching isn't about delivering content; it's about removing every nonessential barrier between a learner and the aha moment. Roof and food not included? Let's figure that out. Child with a fever at 10 p.m.? Record the session. Need to work the breakfast shift? Offer the lab in the afternoon or the evening. Because when our systems bend, talent doesn't break. And that, whether you're a university dean, a boot‑camp founder or a hiring manager, is the smartest investment you can make. Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?

The top 20 private high schools in Tennessee, according to Niche
The top 20 private high schools in Tennessee, according to Niche

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The top 20 private high schools in Tennessee, according to Niche

The 2025 Niche list for Tennessee's best private high schools includes campuses from all corners of the Volunteer State. Niche, a ranking and review organization, based its list on an analysis of statistics, U.S. Department of Education Data and reviews from students and parents. The organization considers factors like the quality of colleges students consider, student-teacher ratio, private school ratings and more. The full list of Tennessee's best private high schools can be found at Here's a look at Niche's top 20 private high schools in Tennessee. Top 20 private high schools in Tennessee for 2025 Lausanne Collegiate School (Memphis) University School of Nashville (Nashville) St. Mary's Episcopal School (Memphis) McCallie School (Chattanooga) Montgomery Bell Academy (Nashville) Hutchison School (Memphis) The Ensworth School (Nashville) Memphis University School (Memphis) Baylor School (Chattanooga) Harpeth Hall School (Nashville) The Webb School (Bell Buckle) Webb School of Knoxville (Knoxville) Christian Brothers High School (Memphis) University School of Jackson (Jackson) St. George's Independent School (Collierville) Girls Preparatory School (Chattanooga) Battle Ground Academy (Franklin) Harding Academy of Memphis (Memphis) St. Agnes Academy (Memphis) St. Andrew's-Sewanee School (Sewanee) This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Tennessee private high schools: Niche releases top 20 ranks Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store