logo
Fruit and veg from outside EU to get more expensive under Starmer's deal

Fruit and veg from outside EU to get more expensive under Starmer's deal

Telegraph19-05-2025
Fruit and vegetables imported from outside the European Union are set to become more expensive under Sir Keir Starmer's 'reset' deal.
Avocados, pineapples, mangoes and oranges are among the products industry figures are warning will become more expensive after the Prime Minister bound Britain to the EU's rules on food and drink. Even more common items such as tomatoes, many of which are sourced from Morocco, could also rise in price.
Checks on imports into the EU are currently stricter than in the UK. Under the agreement signed on Monday, the Prime Minister has committed Britain to a 'dynamic alignment ... with all the relevant European Union rules' on food and drink checks. It means more red tape at the border, which is likely to push up prices.
Nigel Jenney, the chief executive of the Fresh Produce Consortium, said: 'Whilst we have resolved the EU border position, we have moved the problem and the cost to non-EU goods. What we have saved on one hand we have lost on the other.
'A lot of that cost or a lot of that burden now appears to have been applied – subject to dynamic alignment – to goods being sourced from the rest of the world.'
In just one example of extra red tape, currently less than 5pc of citrus fruits imported into the UK are subject to checks at British ports. This could rise to as much as 100pc once Britain aligns itself with EU regulations. On average, just 5pc of fresh food products are checked, according to the Fresh Produce Consortium.
Almost 93pc of pineapples in British supermarkets came from Costa Rica last year and almost one-third of avocados eaten in the UK are from Peru, according to figures from the International Trade Centre.
Fruit and vegetables like these cannot be sourced in similar quantities from Europe, leaving importers with no choice but to stomach the extra checks and delays involved.
Mr Jenney said: 'It's not like just saying 'Oh I'll buy it from Europe instead'. It's not available in Europe ... which is why we source it from around the world.'
One in two oranges imported into the UK comes from either Egypt or South Africa. While citrus fruits can be sourced from Europe, prices may rise unless farmers plant more crops to meet extra demand.
Less exotic fruit and vegetables may also be affected.
The UK has become increasingly reliant on Morocco for its supply of tomatoes, particularly over the winter months. More than a quarter of tomatoes imported to the UK originate from the North African country.
Even many strawberries are now grown and harvested outside of Europe, as supermarkets seek to supply the fruit all year round. Egypt grew 17.2 pc of all imported strawberries sold in Britain last year.
Mr Jenney said: 'We're buying products that are grown in season around the world at the highest possible quality and standards to allow UK consumers to enjoy these things throughout the year.'
There are also concerns that more checks could lead to hold ups at ports and delays to products reaching supermarket shelves.
Mr Jenney said: 'Any inspection by an official body means costs and delays to the industry ... We've solved half the problem, but are imposing another one.
'None of these things are a surprise to the UK Government, either this Government or the previous government. We have highlighted these things for months, if not years.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison
Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison

North Wales Chronicle

time34 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison

The 42-year-old, wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, left HMP Peterborough on Thursday morning and it is understood she will be doing limited media interviews a day after walking free. She spent time with her husband, daughter and parents on the day of her release and was pictured walking her dogs in the evening, the Daily Mail reported. Ms Connolly was handed a 31-month sentence after she posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. The former childminder, from Northampton, was ordered to serve 40% of her sentence in prison before being released on licence. It is understood that Ms Connolly was a passenger in a white taxi which left HMP Peterborough via the vehicle airlock, a set of two gates exiting the prison, shortly after 10am on Thursday. Her case has sparked debate, with some criticising her sentence as excessive. Reacting to her release, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Connolly's sentence was 'harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting'. In a post on X, Ms Badenoch compared Ms Connolly's case with that of Ricky Jones, a suspended Labour councillor who was found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. Writing on X, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Juries are a cornerstone of justice, but we shouldn't have to rely on them to protect basic freedoms. 'Protecting people from words should not be given greater weight in law than public safety. If the law does this, then the law itself is broken – and it's time Parliament looked again at the Public Order Act.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described Ms Connolly's case as a 'symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain'. Welcome to freedom, Lucy Connolly. You are now a symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 21, 2025 A bid to challenge her sentence at the Court of Appeal was dismissed in May, which was described by Mr Connolly as 'shocking and unfair'. The Northampton town councillor, and former West Northamptonshire district councillor, said his wife had 'paid a very high price for making a mistake'. But Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. He was asked in May about Ms Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Ms Connolly was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The post was viewed 310,000 times in three and a half hours before she deleted it.

Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison
Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison

Glasgow Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison

The 42-year-old, wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, left HMP Peterborough on Thursday morning and it is understood she will be doing limited media interviews a day after walking free. She spent time with her husband, daughter and parents on the day of her release and was pictured walking her dogs in the evening, the Daily Mail reported. Lucy Connolly was jailed for posting an online rant about migrants (Northamptonshire Police/PA) Ms Connolly was handed a 31-month sentence after she posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. The former childminder, from Northampton, was ordered to serve 40% of her sentence in prison before being released on licence. It is understood that Ms Connolly was a passenger in a white taxi which left HMP Peterborough via the vehicle airlock, a set of two gates exiting the prison, shortly after 10am on Thursday. Her case has sparked debate, with some criticising her sentence as excessive. Reacting to her release, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Connolly's sentence was 'harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting'. In a post on X, Ms Badenoch compared Ms Connolly's case with that of Ricky Jones, a suspended Labour councillor who was found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. Writing on X, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Juries are a cornerstone of justice, but we shouldn't have to rely on them to protect basic freedoms. 'Protecting people from words should not be given greater weight in law than public safety. If the law does this, then the law itself is broken – and it's time Parliament looked again at the Public Order Act.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described Ms Connolly's case as a 'symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain'. Welcome to freedom, Lucy Connolly. You are now a symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 21, 2025 A bid to challenge her sentence at the Court of Appeal was dismissed in May, which was described by Mr Connolly as 'shocking and unfair'. The Northampton town councillor, and former West Northamptonshire district councillor, said his wife had 'paid a very high price for making a mistake'. But Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. He was asked in May about Ms Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Ms Connolly was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The post was viewed 310,000 times in three and a half hours before she deleted it.

It's been a confusing week - and Trump's been made to look weak
It's been a confusing week - and Trump's been made to look weak

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

It's been a confusing week - and Trump's been made to look weak

It's been a confusing week. The Monday gathering of European leaders and Ukraine's president with Donald Trump at the White House was highly significant. The leaders went home buoyed in the knowledge that they'd finally convinced the American president not to abandon Europe, and he had committed to provide American "security guarantees" to Ukraine. 0:49 The details were sketchy, and sketched out only a little more through the week - we got some noise about American air cover - but regardless, the presidential commitment represented a clear shift from months of isolationist rhetoric on Ukraine - "it's Europe's problem" and all the rest of it. Yet it was always the case that, beyond that clear achievement for the Europeans, Russia would have a problem with it. Trump's envoy's language last weekend - claiming that Putin had agreed to Europe providing "Article 5-like" guarantees for Ukraine, essentially providing it with a NATO-like collective security blanket - was baffling. 0:50 Russia gives two fingers to the president And throughout this week, Russia's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov has repeatedly and predictably undermined the whole thing, pointing out that Russia would never accept any peace plan that involved any European or NATO troops in Ukraine. "The presence of foreign troops in Ukraine is completely unacceptable for Russia," he said yesterday, echoing similar statements stretching back years. Remember that NATO's "eastern encroachment" was the justification for Russia's "special military operation" - the invasion of Ukraine - in the first place. All this makes Trump look rather weak. It's two fingers to the president, though interestingly, the Russian language has been carefully calibrated not to poke Trump but to mock European leaders instead. That's telling. 4:02 The bilateral meeting hailed by Trump on Monday as agreed and close - "within two weeks" - looks decidedly doubtful. Maybe that's why he went along with Putin's suggestion that there be a bilateral, not including Trump, first. It's easier for the American president to blame someone else if it's not his meeting, and it doesn't happen. NATO defence chiefs met on Wednesday to discuss the details of how the security guarantees - the ones Russia won't accept - will work. European sources at the meeting have told me it was all a great success. And to the comments by Lavrov, a source said: "It's not up to Lavrov to decide on security guarantees. Not up to the one doing the threatening to decide how to deter that threat!" The argument goes that it's not realistic for Russia to say from which countries Ukraine can and cannot host troops. 5:57 Would Trump threaten force? The problem is that if Europe and the White House want Russia to sign up to some sort of peace deal, then it would require agreement from all sides on the security arrangements. The other way to get Russia to heel would be with an overwhelming threat of force. Something from Trump, like: "Vladimir - look what I did to Iran...". But, of course, Iran isn't a nuclear power. Something else bothers me about all this. The core concept of a "security guarantee" is an ironclad obligation to defend Ukraine into the future. Future guarantees would require treaties, not just a loose promise. I don't see Trump's America truly signing up to anything that obliges them to do anything. A layered security guarantee which builds over time is an option, but from a Kremlin perspective, would probably only end up being a repeat of history and allow them another "justification" to push back. Image and reality don't seem to match Among Trump's stream of social media posts this week was an image of him waving his finger at Putin in Alaska. It was one of the few non-effusive images from the summit. He posted it next to an image of former president Richard Nixon confronting Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev - an image that came to reflect American dominance over the Soviet Union. That may be the image Trump wants to portray. But the events of the past week suggest image and reality just don't match. The past 24 hours in Ukraine have been among the most violent to date.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store