
Heathrow's £49 billion third runway battle is back on
If passed, it will allow flights to 30 new destinations, add 0.43 per cent to the UK's GDP and carry 66 million more passengers per year, Heathrow says. But it is set to face a battle, with Mayor of London Sadiq Khan (pictured), who is strongly opposed to a third runway on noise and environmental grounds, suggesting he could launch a legal challenge.
The extension would involve diverting a section of the M25 through a tunnel running underneath the new runway and will mean a major redesign of the airport. The submission of the plans comes ahead of the Government formally approving proposals for a second runway at Gatwick in the next few weeks.
It marks the largest expansion of Britain's airports for half a century, as Labour attempts to revive Britain's sluggish economy with infrastructure projects . But it will also reignite a major row within the party and highlight sharp divides between those who want growth and those concerned about the environment. While a majority of MPs are likely to back the project if it goes to a vote, Sir Keir Starmer and many of his Cabinet ministers have previously voted against Heathrow expansion.
Earlier this year, Ed Miliband (pictured), the Secretary for Energy Security and Net Zero, had to issue a statement saying he wouldn't quit over the third runway given his previous opposition to the plans. Political rows and legal challenges over pollution have repeatedly held up plans for a Heathrow expansion, which were first raised more than two decades ago. The plans will be reviewed by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander before a consultation on the airport's national policy statement. Should permission be granted for a new runway, a full planning application can then be submitted in 2028.
The new runway would mean 276,000 new flights annually and 68million more passengers. It would cost £21billion, with the rest of the planned budget paying for a redesign of the airport. The total number of flights would increase to 756,000 a year, carrying 150million passengers. Heathrow CEO Thomas Woldbye said: 'It has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow. We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity.'
The expansion will be financed by private investment, but airlines have expressed concern that the airport will hike its passenger charges to pay for the project. Business groups welcomed the plans, saying they were 'an investment in the nation's future'. A joint statement from the Confederation of British Industry, British Chambers of Commerce, MakeUK, Federation of Small Businesses and Institute of Directors said: 'The benefits are clear: for exporters, it opens up vital access to major and emerging markets; for visitors, it enhances global and domestic connectivity; and for businesses, it unlocks billions in private investment, strengthening supply chains, creating jobs, and driving skills across the country.'
But green campaigners continue to oppose the expansion, arguing that it is bad for the environment due to noise and air pollution. Dr Douglas Parr, policy director for Greenpeace UK, said: 'The Government has decided yet again to prioritise more leisure opportunities for a comparatively small group of frequent fliers, while the rest of us have to live with the consequences of their disproportionate polluting.'
Richard Holden, Shadow Transport Secretary, welcomed the announcement but said it was vital it got the expansion right. 'The Government's role is now to ensure the process delivers real benefits for Britain, for passengers, protects taxpayers, and guarantees proper local consultation,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer paves way for tax hikes this autumn putting damper on interest rate cut
SIR Keir Starmer has paved the way for tax hikes this autumn — putting a damper on today's expected interest rate cut. The Prime Minister failed to explicitly rule out increases to income tax or National Insurance in the Budget to plug a multi-billion-pound black hole. His refusal to reaffirm manifesto commitments comes as experts warn an eye-watering £50billion is needed just to maintain Chancellor Rachel Reeves ' £9.9billion financial buffer. Speaking on a visit to Milton Keynes, Sir Keir said: 'In the autumn, we'll get the full forecast and obviously set out our Budget. 'The focus will be on living standards, so that we will build on what we've done in the first year of this government. 'We've stabilised the economy. "That means interest rates have been cut now four times. "For anybody on a mortgage, that makes a huge difference on a monthly basis to how much they pay.' No10 tried to play down the comments, saying the Government remains committed to its manifesto by not raising taxes on working people. But the National Institute of Economic and Social Research has said the Chancellor is likely to be forced into raising taxes and cutting spending just to meet the massive shortfall. Despite the economic gloom, homeowners are set to receive a boost from the Bank of England today. Experts predict bank chiefs will cut i nterest rates by 0.25 per cent, even though inflation is stubbornly high and growth weak. Raising taxes will kill off growth, Reeves warned as she pledges to rip up business red tape 1 TOWN HALL CASH ALERT ONE in four English town halls will lose money under Labour's shake-up to council funding, experts warn. Areas like inner London face risking cash to go to services, while the East Midlands and Yorkshire are set for the biggest cash windfalls. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, said changes will 'sting' for councils set to lose out. Labour's changes, still being consulted on, are due to come into effect next year.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Interest rate hopes send Footsie to a record high as traders shrug off concerns about Trump's India tariffs
The FTSE 100 hit a fresh record yesterday as traders placed bets on another interest rate cut from the Bank of England. The index closed up 0.2 per cent, or 21.58 points, at 9164.31 after a similar record-breaking session on Tuesday when it passed 9142. Traders shrugged off concerns about a trade war between the US and India after Donald Trump announced he would slap a 50 per cent tariff on goods from the South Asian nation in response to its importing of oil from Russia. The FTSE 100 was led higher by insurer Hiscox, which jumped 9.4 per cent, or 119p, to 1379p after it announced it would be increasing its stock buyback plans by £75million. Precious metals miner Fresnillo jumped 8.9 per cent, or 135p, to 1655p following strong results this week. Traders were also pricing in an expected interest rate cut from the Bank of England later today. Market forecasts are predicting the central bank will lower rates by 0.25 per cent to 4 per cent. Rate cuts tend to boost stock markets as they make it easier for firms to borrow and invest, stimulating growth. Lower rates also make it easier for mortgage holders and other borrowers to repay their debts, leaving them with extra cash to spend elsewhere. A rate of 4 per cent would be the lowest in over two years and signal that the decision-makers on the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee believe inflation pressures are starting to ease. But Tom Matterson, investment manager at Saltus, warned 'significant instability remains', highlighting the autumn Budget and turmoil in the global economy.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rate fillip for dismal housing: Reeves must ring the changes to get Britain building, says ALEX BRUMMER
During the run-up to the July 2024 election, economic journalists were invited along for an informal chat with the future Chancellor Rachel Reeves. She argued that growth would be a priority for a Labour government and a key part of the programme would be to get Britain building again. The UK has been poor at delivering infrastructure and in the past housing targets have been hard to meet. Tearing up planning rules was always going to be difficult because of Britain's long history of Nimbyism. More than a year into power, and with reforms to planning rules falling into place, brisk progress was to be expected. But the S&P report from UK construction managers for July doesn't offer optimism. It shows the steepest fall in activity since May 2020. The biggest drop came from residential, putting the Government's target of building 1.5m homes in this Parliament in jeopardy. Construction firms cited site delays, fewer new orders and weak consumer confidence as factors. We shouldn't be surprised. Interest rates have proved sticky despite four decreases since Labour took office. The Bank of England is expected to offer a quarter of a percentage point reduction to 4 per cent today. Bad tax policy has played a part. Employment costs are up because of the employers' National Insurance Contributions rise. And the abolition of tax relief on stamp duty at the bottom rung of the ladder makes the aspiration to be part of a property-owning democracy harder. To add to the woes of those seeking a construction revolution, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has joined the Nimbys – he objects to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner giving permission to four councils to build over allotments. That's bad for working people, for homegrown produce and the nation's health. Another unforced error. America first The fascinating aspect of commodity trader and miner Glencore's decision to stick with a London listing is its reasoning. Moving to New York, the favoured option, involved 'significant costs'. Its chief executive Gary Nagle might also have pointed out that, with some rare exceptions such as smart chip maker Arm and building group CRH, American investors have not greeted the British arrivals with hosannas. Nagle also rued the fact that there was no certainty that £36billion Glencore would be granted entry to the S&P 500 because of coolness to foreigners. The loss of Glencore would have been serious for London, with its strong history of hosting natural resources companies. BHP retreated to Sydney and if activists had their way Rio Tinto might have done the same. Glencore would have been a less significant departure than AstraZeneca or Shell, both of which have flirted with the idea. Not all is green on the other side of the Atlantic, where AstraZeneca is vowing to invest £37billion. Overnight, the US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr halted production of mRNA vaccines on a whim. Indeed, Astra's first-to-market Covid jab was slow to be approved in the US, where 'America first' vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were preferred. It is not just US President Donald Trump and the Republicans who willingly bash overseas investors. President Barack Obama humiliated oil giant BP over the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 – leading to tens of billions of pounds of losses for UK investors. Glencore's vote of confidence in Britain might be seen by cynics as a distraction from a disappointing performance in the first half. The miner is responding with a pledge to cut $1billion in costs. Never underestimate the odds of it roaring back on robust trading operations. Oven ready It was predictable that supermarket Morrisons would have to jettison assets to pay down the debt it acquired when it fell under the private ownership of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice in 2023. That is unlikely to be enough in a highly competitive grocery market. Prices are generally higher than at rivals and it may require a fresh look at costly specialist counters and whether the vertical model, from farm to customer, is sustainable. That would be a pity.