
Everyone's drinking mid-strength – but what actually is it?
There's talk that this presents an 'opportunity' to develop the mid-strength category to meet this demand, but what defines a 'mid-strength' drink? Well, there's no legal definition, and the report doesn't land on an official ABV range, either. It focuses on drinks that are two-thirds the strength of a full-strength beer (let's say 2-3% ABV) and around half the strength of full-strength wine and spirits (6-7% ABV and around 20% ABV, respectively). Not to mention the fact that this report is brought to us by the Mid Strength Collective, a group of 12 businesses that produce and sell mid-strength drinks. I always feel a little cynical towards brand-funded reports whose findings seem to promote – surprise, surprise – a demand for the very brands that funded it.
That said, The Mid Strength Opportunity does feel relevant and timely. As the wine industry bites its nails over decreased alcohol consumption, this report is just the latest that lays bare why. The modern preoccupation with health and wellness, both physical and mental, is detailed as one of the main reasons behind a new interest in mid-strength drinks: the report finds that 38% of us are moderating our alcohol intake for a healthier liver, 25% for weight loss and 15% for better mental health.
This is, of course, great news for anyone who already makes lower-alcohol beverages, or for those with the equipment and means to create them (take a look at my earlier piece on low- and no-alcohol wines to see some ways that this is achieved). And, as temperatures rise due to global heating, alcohol levels in wine are rising, too, and some wines that are under a protected designated origin may by default be subject to a minimum alcohol strength, which may automatically rule them out from the mid-strength category.
The Mid Strength Opportunity coincides with a new proposed Drink Mid-Strength in March campaign (a new Dry January?), which I can see stretching out indefinitely as consumers seek different ways to moderate without compromising on the importance of the post-work drink with friends, that great British cornerstone of public life.
Bersano Monteolivo Moscato d'Asti DOCG £9.99 Waitrose, 5.5%. Moscato d'Asti has been mid-strength since way before it was cool. Sweet, sparkling, floral.
Small Beer 'The Original' Lager £13.20 for six (350ml) Majestic, 2.1%. I'm a big fan of Small Beer. Once only in bottles, but now also in cans. Crisp, classic.
Session Spirit 70cl £25.15 Master of Malt, 25%. Apparently makes 'G&Ts the strength of a beer'. Which kind of depends on how strong you like your beer.
Goldtröpfchen Riesling Kabinett Schloss Lieser 2021 £16 The Wine Society, 7.5%. Another naturally mid-strength drink. Medium-sweet, with notes of peach and orchard fruit.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Gaza is a conveyor belt of carnage, says Kettering paramedic
Warning: this article contains upsetting content A British paramedic working in Gaza said the territory felt like a "conveyor belt of carnage" as he has treated a "steady stream" of patients with blast, shrapnel and gunshot Sears, 44, from Kettering, Northamptonshire, a paramedic with East Midlands Ambulance Service, was stationed for three weeks in Gaza with the charity UK-Med. On arrival, Mr Sears said he began working in response to a mass casualty incident where two children, aged nine and 11, had died from blast injuries."I put the children in body bags and zipped them up," he said. "In the UK I've had to deal with a number of deceased children, but the difference was I'm never involved with putting them in a body bag. It's normally a very calm, slow situation, allowing parents time to grieve."It was particularly heartbreaking putting a child in a body bag, seeing their face for the last time, then moving them out the way so we could treat more people."Part of me felt guilty that there was no dignity for them because the emergency situation meant it was a case of 'they are dead, let's get them out the way to free the beds'."But there was simply no alternative because with such a high volume of casualties, we had to focus on people we might be able to save." The 44-year-old paramedic has carried out humanitarian work in other countries, but said Gaza was like other conflicts "times 1,000". The paramedic said a 16-year-old boy was left paralysed and needing an amputation after suffering blast and shrapnel wounds and the patient's 18-year-old brother wept when told he would now have to care for him Sears also told of seeing more pregnant women and newborn babies suffering severe malnutrition because the mothers lacked the nutrients to breastfeed."That first night, another child came in with shrapnel embedded in their stomach and bleeding internally. "I was personally convinced they would die, but we got him to surgery within 20 minutes," said Mr Sears, who returned to the UK on 31 July."Next day when I saw them they were recovering well and the prognosis was really good. "Gaza's the hardest thing I've ever done but moments like that that keep you going. We have saved that child's life." Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says that in total more than 61,000 people have been killed as a result of Israel's military campaign since launched its offensive in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October that year, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


New Statesman
13 hours ago
- New Statesman
Gaza's children need Britain's support now
RAFAH, GAZA - MARCH 29: A child runs among debris following Israeli air strikes on March 29, 2024 in Rafah, Gaza. Despite warnings from US President Biden, Israeli forces have targeted the city of Rafah which is currently home to an estimated million Palestinian refugees. According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, more than 32,000 Palestinians have been killed, and over 74,000 wounded in Israel's ongoing bombardment of Gaza starting on October 7. (Photo by) After months of moral contortions, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said that his government would recognise a Palestinian state sometime within this parliament. Not today, not tomorrow, but soon, well, soon-ish. The announcement notably came with a heavy dose of 'unless Israel' – grounding the position of the UK firmly in the realm of theory. But the timing of this rhetorical pivot is not coincidental. It follows a second, more immediate shift: the UK's announcement that it will evacuate over 100 critically ill and injured Palestinian children from Gaza to receive NHS treatment. A move campaigners, medics and charities such as ours have long demanded and one that arrives months – indeed, years, too late. Still, after months in which Gaza's children suffered under a siege in which starvation was strategy not side effect – whilst the British government clung to the safety of ambiguity – this feels like movement. Movement graded on a curve set by years of inaction. For Gaza's children, many of whom my colleagues at Children Not Numbers have been treating, it's less a breakthrough and more an indication that Britain may potentially, maybe, consider a late delivery on a stack of broken promises. As the situation begins to spiral out of control, Gaza's children are making a stand. S and S are among three critically ill children at the centre of a potential landmark legal challenge against the UK government. The two siblings are suffering from cystinosis – a rare, progressive disorder that severely damages kidney function. Amidst Israel's all out assault on healthcare facilities, the medication they urgently need is entirely unavailable in Gaza; without it, both face complete renal failure. Their case demonstrates that the government's rationale for denying medical evacuations – a preference for supporting treatment on the ground, is no longer tenable. Last month, with the support of Children Not Numbers, the siblings decided to act. The children initiated legal proceedings, sending a pre-action letter to the Foreign Secretary and Home Secretary. This marks the first formal attempt to hold the British state accountable for failing to establish a medical evacuation pathway for children in Gaza. The letter argues that ministers have breached their Tameside duty of inquiry – a legal requirement to properly inform themselves before making decisions – by failing to seriously assess the overwhelming evidence of medical necessity and humanitarian urgency before choosing inaction. Like so many others facing down a complex life-threatening condition, both brothers are malnourished. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Since the blockade began in mid-March 2025, we've recorded a 30 per cent increase in the death rate amongst children under our care. Alongside this devastating development, starvation is spreading like wildfire through the besieged enclave, leading to 70 per cent of the children we treat now being at risk of malnutrition. The crippling hunger gripping Gaza's children means the UK cannot afford to wait a moment longer. The shame is in the contrast: while the UK moved at lightning pace to welcome Ukrainian medical evacuees in 2022, Gaza's children have been met with bureaucratic fog and political equivocation. This disparity is now under legal scrutiny – the law, unlike politics, has a low tolerance for hypocrisy. If in Starmer's statehood plans, peace, even an unjust peace, can delay recognition, the legal challenge brought by the three children suggests the inverse might also be true: that properly filed paperwork can force principle to the surface. Questions abound as to the precise details of the proposed pathway and the question of recognition is likewise, up in the air. Officials say they'll assess 'progress' in September, which is Westminster-speak for: the red lines are written in pencil. One thing is certain, the ministerial press releases and soundbites that have long been failing Gaza's children are now failing the Prime Minister. Instagram humanitarianism will no longer suffice amidst the mounting legal challenges and hefty political premium on inaction. With Gaza's hospitals in ruins and its children starving on camera, the dam is cracking. The moral ambiguity that once cloaked our policy in the fine mist of 'complexity' is evaporating under the glare of mass civilian suffering. What we're left with is not just a humanitarian crisis, but a mirror: reflecting a British foreign policy that has, for years, outsourced its ethics to perceived strategic interests, PR management and the enduring fiction that some human lives are worth less than others. Dylan Stothard is the Policy and Advocacy Coordinator for Children Not Numbers Related


Daily Record
15 hours ago
- Daily Record
Heatwave death alert as calls for air conditioner law grow
New figures reveal alarming patterns over deaths in hospitals and care homes just as another bout of sweltering weather hits Britain The Government has been urged to "heatproof the NHS" after alarming research showed nearly 1,000 Brits died in hospitals and care homes last year owing to sweltering temperatures. House of Commons Library data revealed 496 fatalities in care facilities and 473 in hospitals, while more than 350 individuals died in their own homes during 2024. The Liberal Democrats another heatwave, with the Met Office forecasting temperatures to hit 34°C in Gloucester – although Scotland is expected to escape the intense heat. The issue extends beyond British borders, as Europe has endured scorching heat throughout the summer with the elderly bearing the brunt. Imperial College London research found that between June 23 and July 2, an overwhelming 88 per cent who died across the continent due to heatwave conditions were aged 65 and over. While more than 470 people died from heat-related conditions in hospitals, this doesn't automatically mean they became unwell due to high temperatures inside NHS premises. Nevertheless, Lib Dem health and social care spokeswoman Helen Morgan branded the statistics "appalling". "It is appalling to think of our most vulnerable dying in what are meant to be safe settings simply because this country is ill-equipped to deal with heatwaves," she said. "In light of soaring temperatures, the Government must ensure that our NHS and social care system are ready to keep people cool and well-cared for. "This starts with a legal requirement for air conditioning or cooling heat pumps in care homes and a taskforce that delivers guaranteed cool wards in our hospitals, to prevent further unnecessary deaths." Morgan also pointed out a significant increase in "overheating incidents" across NHS facilities. During 2023-24, there were 4,451 such cases – representing nearly 50 per cent more than the 2,980 recorded in 2016-17, reports the Mirror. These incidents are recorded whenever temperatures within a hospital or healthcare facility exceed 26°C. As a result, the Lib Dems have called for new laws requiring care homes to install air-conditioning or alternative cooling systems. Sir Ed Davey's party is also advocating for a "crumbling hospitals taskforce" to explore ways of preventing NHS premises from reaching dangerous temperatures. The Lib Dems believe that hospital management should be obliged to establish "cool wards" for patients at risk. This suggestion builds on the party's previous call for community "cool hub" – public venues equipped with air-conditioning to assist vulnerable individuals during extreme heat events. The Liberal Democrats' calls came after former Labour prime minister Gordon Brown condemned the return of "60s-era poverty levels". He warned: "This problem is getting worse. It's going to worsen over the next few years because there's a built-in escalator in the poverty figures because of the two-child rule." A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson hit back at the heat data claims, saying: "This reporting is misleading, alarmist and a wilful misrepresentation of data. The figures quoted refer to patients who have died from complications attributed to excess heat, not deaths caused by excess heat in NHS settings."