Italy concert of pro-Putin conductor Gergiev cancelled
Gergiev has not condemned Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, a stance for which he was fired from the Munich Philharmonic in March 2022. He has not played a concert in Europe since.
The scheduled concert in the 18th century palace near Naples -- now a museum -- had caused a heated debate in Italy, with Ukraine condemning the move and Russia's exiled opposition calling for protests.
Days of uncertainty over whether the concert would take place ended with an abrupt cancellation.
"The Directorate of the Royal Palace of Caserta has ordered the cancellation of the symphony concert conducted by Valery Gergiev, scheduled as part of the Un'Estate da Re festival for July 27," the palace said in a brief statement.
It gave no official reason for the cancellation.
The team of late Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny welcomed the cancellation on social media with a "Hurrah!".
"Putin's pals should not be touring around Europe like nothing happened," they said in a statement.
Moscow's ambassador to Italy, Alexei Paramonov, however, slammed the move as a "scandalous situation".
In a statement on the Russian embassy's Facebook account, Paramonov railed against Western politicians' "policy of 'cancelling' Russian culture".
He also said it was "sad" to watch Italy "subordinate its cultural policy to the demands of Ukrainians and other immigrants".
Russia's state TASS news agency said Gergiev was not informed about the decision, quoting the conductor as saying: "I do not have this information."
- 'Common sense' -
Italian Culture Minister Alessandro Giuli -- who had earlier warned that the concert risked turning into a propaganda event -- said the cancellation was "common sense" and aimed at "protecting the values of the free world".
The 72-year-old Gergiev -- recognised as one of the world's leading conductors -- is known for conducting epic symphonies of Russian classical music by Piotr Tchaikovsky, amongst other successes in Western opera houses.
For decades, he has been one of the most vocal supporters of Putin's long rule.
He famously played a 2016 concert in the ruins of Syria's Palmyra after its capture by Russian-backed Syrian forces.
He also conducted a triumphant concert in Georgia's Tskhinvali region after the Russian invasion in 2008, just a few metres from a detention centre where Georgian civilians were being held.
Gergiev also supported the Kremlin's 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimea peninsula.
The conductor has stayed silent on the Ukraine invasion and mostly out of the public eye since 2022, but has played concerts in Asia.
He is believed to have personal ties with Putin.
In 2023, Putin named him as the director of Moscow's historic Bolshoi Theatre, while he was already heading Saint Petersburg's Mariinsky theatre.
Russia's cultural figures have been divided since the Ukraine invasion -- with many supporting the Kremlin while others have gone into exile to denounce the military offensive.
By Ola Cichowlas
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Russia-Ukrainian Conflict: 'Give me liberty or give me death'
Rescuers work at Ohmatdyt Children's Hospital, which was damaged during a Russian missile strike, in Kyiv, Ukraine in July, 2024. What we are witnessing in Ukraine is not only one of Russia's 'final pushes', but the realisation of Vladimir Lenin's prophecy. Image: Gleb Garanich/Reuters HISTORY, as CV Wedgwood observed, is written backwards but lived forwards. In the fog of war, the path ahead is obscured by ambiguity and risk. Kierkegaard put it well: 'We can only understand life backwards, but life must be lived forwards.' This lens helps make sense of the Russia-Ukraine war — not as a sudden crisis, but as the unfolding of long-standing ideological and geopolitical currents. In 1921, Lenin presciently wrote that Western capitalists would willingly supply the Soviet Union with the technology and credit it needed to eventually overthrow them. 'They will work hard,' he said, 'in order to prepare their own suicide.' This vision was not mere rhetoric. OC Boileau argued in 1976 that Soviet leaders saw themselves not just as national rulers, but as stewards of a revolutionary mission — the inevitable triumph of communism over the West. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, after fleeing to America, echoed this warning in his 1978 Harvard speech: 'The West is on the verge of a collapse created by its own hands.' He observed a weakening of Western resolve and warned that the Soviet economy was so entrenched in militarisation that even if its leaders wanted peace, they could no longer stop the machine. 'The degeneration of America is underway,' he said, 'and off there in the wings, the military power is being prepared to apply the final push.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ What we are witnessing in Ukraine is not only one of Russia's 'final pushes', but the realisation of Vladimir Lenin's prophecy. Jim Courter, in *Step by Step: The Soviet Bloc's Global Challenge to Democracy*, reminds us that a larger story underpins the current crisis — one of territorial expansion and the consolidation of political, economic, and military power. Guided by proletarian internationalism, the Soviet bloc has long aimed at the destruction of the 'Free World' — the great democracies. Courter does not claim the Soviets want war, but insists it would be naive to assume they desire peace. The evidence is clear: the Soviet Union ceaselessly prepared for war, and those designs continue wherever opportunity allows. When Americans spent 40% of their defence budget on personnel, the Soviets invested in weapons. As Robert McFarlane noted, the USSR produced twice as many fighter aircraft as the US and NATO combined, four times as many helicopters, and 50 times as many bombers. The armoured battalions now rolling into Ukraine are not new, they are the legacy of a system that never stopped building. In his Crimean annexation speech, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that Crimea is saturated with shared history and pride, that St Vladimir's baptism in Chersonese laid the spiritual foundation for a common civilisation linking Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. 'We are not just close neighbours,' he said, 'we are actually the same nation. Kyiv is the mother of Russian cities. Ancient Rus is our common origin; we cannot live without each other.' This deep historical bond explains Russia's sensitivity to Ukraine and its inevitable involvement. Samuel Charap and Keith Darden cite Samuel Huntington's *Clash of Civilisations*, which argues that nations need enemies for self-definition. While discredited, Huntington's thesis gains credibility in Ukraine. After more than 30 years of the West treating Russia as an adversary, Moscow may have truly become one. Putin's private remark to George W Bush — questioning whether Ukraine was a real country — reveals a dismissive attitude. Yet, as Charap and Darden note, until the collapse of the EU-brokered settlement on February 21, 2014, Russia's role did not warrant labels like 'aggressive' or 'expansionist'. Until then, blaming Russia for Ukraine's crisis was unjust. The Russia-Ukraine war marks the second major confrontation with NATO. In 2008, Russia occupied Georgia, a NATO aspirant, and recognised breakaway regions. In 2013, it repeated the pattern with Ukraine, annexing Crimea and backing separatists. The West rightly condemned these actions. Yet, as Safak Oguz argues, NATO's weak response to the 2008 Georgia war failed to deter future aggression. Its posture lacked the strength to prevent Russia from challenging the West again. The UN's inability to mediate was summed up by Boutros Boutros-Ghali: 'The whole philosophy is to avoid military force. If we have used force, we have failed.' When asked how to respond to a voracious fighting force, he replied: 'Our philosophy is based on talk — negotiate — and then talk again.' To move to force, he said, is 'like someone doing therapy who suddenly decides to do brain surgery'. This aversion renders the UN — and similar bodies — 'toothless dogs', a flaw mirrored in the OAU's non-interference clause that enabled coups across Africa. Lee H Hamilton noted six shifts after the Cold War: the end of the communist challenge, Soviet instability, fragile new democracies, the rise of Western Europe and Japan, Middle East instability, and emerging transnational threats. The Warsaw Pact dissolved in 1991, ending the threat of Soviet invasion. Yet thousands of nuclear weapons still pointed west. The danger faded — but did not vanish. Many believe negotiations will end the war. But history cautions against blind trust. Fred Ikle once said, 'Negotiating with the Russians is tough. They tend to press for higher numbers.' Boutros-Ghali's mantra — 'talk, negotiate, talk again' — offers little hope. The prospect of peace through such diplomacy is bleak. Rather than suffer under authoritarianism, Ukrainians echo Patrick Henry: 'Give me liberty or give me death.' The wealth of the modern world is created in free nations. The Soviets come to the West for food, not because they lack resources, but because their leaders choose arms over agriculture. One gets the impression that Soviet, and now Russian, leaders would rather their people starve than risk the 'contamination' of freedom. Plato said: 'Only the dead have seen the end of war.' Rosenberg, a poet who died at 28 on the Western Front, mourned a world where: 'Red fangs have torn His face. God's blood is shed.' He longed for the world to regain its 'pristine bloom'. For those in Ukraine, Palestine, and Syria, every day is a battle. Only death brings peace. If Ukrainian freedom is to survive, negotiations must not compromise liberty. As Jesse Helms argued, only the free world has the creativity to adapt. Each free citizen holds a power no oppressive state can match — the power to shape their own life. True security lies not in control, but in freedom. As JFK said: 'We must never negotiate out of fear, but we must never fear to negotiate.' Weinberger warned that concession after concession leads to empty agreements. Reinhold Niebuhr cautioned that democratic failure often comes from idealists facing ruthless realities with too many illusions. The real conflict is not between Russia and Ukraine, but between Russia and the United States. What we see is either the resurgence or continuation of the Cold War. There was no official end — only an assumption, fueled by Reagan's 1987 meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev. When asked how long the conflict would last, Reagan said: 'Oh, that's a thing of the past. They no longer believe in one-world Marxian domination.' But do they? Could nations like Ukraine, Georgia, and Hungary have turned to NATO not just for security, but for survival? Russia feeds its military, not its people. Dmitry Medvedev once told Crimeans: 'There is no money, but you be strong.' Hunger-fueled revolutions in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland. Today, Russians queue for bread while trains haul armoured battalions to Ukraine. As a song says: 'There are more questions than answers.' But this is clear: NATO's Supreme Allied Commander stated, 'What is happening in eastern Ukraine is a military operation… carried out at the direction of Russia.' And so we return to Lenin's warning: 'They will supply us with the materials and technology which we need for our future victorious attacks upon our suppliers. In other words, they will work hard in order to prepare their own suicide.' Let Ukraine decide: bow to pressure, or rise with Henry's cry? 'Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!' * Dr Vusi Shongwe works in the Department of Sport, Arts, and Culture in KwaZulu-Natal and writes in his personal capacity. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, IOL, or Independent Media. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Rakesh Chaurasia premieres 'Symphony of Bansuri' in Cape Town: a fusion of Eastern and Western music
Two-time Grammy Award-winning flautist Rakesh Chaurasia Image: Ian Landsberg Rakesh Chaurasia, the two-time Grammy Award-winning maestro of the Indian bamboo flute known as the bansuri is in Cape Town for the world premiere of Symphony of Bansuri, a groundbreaking fusion of Eastern music and Western classical traditions at the Artscape on Saturday 2 August. 'Where we are showcasing and showing the world that one harmony can be reached through different disciplines of music,' he explained. The journey to Cape Town was sparked by a long-standing encouragement from Zakir Hussain. 'There's a small story about me and Ustad Zakir Hussain when I used to compose some pieces and used to make him listen. And he used to tell me that, you should write a symphony on flute. And nobody has done it before. 'So basically composing a thing. So I said, no, this is not my cup of tea. It's very difficult for us who have, like, all my life we have done the improvisation music to be in a box and do everything. But he said, no, you should do it, because no wonder you are doing a classical, but you should do this.' Eventually, Chaurasia embraced the challenge. 'I wrote some music, and the music, which was morally appreciated and approved by Ustaz Zakir Hussain. And then Nisar, I told Nisar Bhai that I am ready to do it. He said, OK, definitely we'll do it. And then I went on the internet and I was listening to the Cape Town Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra. They were amazing. And so I wanted to do it with them first.' The choice of Cape Town wasn't only musical. 'South Africa is one of my favourite countries. I came first when I started my career in 89' somewhere, you know, and especially Cape Town. It's so sweet. People are so beautiful here and always a warmth welcome. I get it.' Chaurasia's creative vision is rooted in unity through contrast. 'As I always say that we are the two sides of a country which present the classic form. So the Indian culture, heritage music, the classical form is very strong and the Eastern classical form is very strong. So why not bring them together?' 'Somewhere we find common ground and try to figure it out because it sounds great because and the best part — it's totally organic. It's totally acoustic unplugged. Unplugged symphony. Rakesh Chaurasia, widely regarded as one of India's greatest living musicians, practicing with the CT Philharmonic Orchestra for the upcoming world premiere of Symphony of Bansuri Image: Ian Landsberg 'There's so much happening in the world. I think the two sides of the country and I think the music in common can give peace of mind to anyone. Because I've seen a lot of people saying that music is not my cup of tea. But what I believe, God has given birth to everyone with tone, which is what we speak, and a beat, which is heartbeat. 'Everybody has music running inside and stays with the music. I think that's the best way of being calm and doesn't have any language, doesn't have any religion. Anybody can accept it. Anybody can listen to it. You don't have to be knowledgeable to understand the music. Just sit and enjoy, while we show the world that we can be from different places, different religions, cultures, outlooks, but we are capable of becoming one.' Chaurasia described the collaboration with the Cape Town Philharmonic Orchestra (CPO) as both intricate and rewarding. 'Well, the pieces, we were sharing it in a group to our conductor and it has been taking quite a bit of time for me to compose, to write a song and then to send it here. I have some songs which have been arranged by an Italian guy and some pieces from our Indian pianist, Sangeet Haldipur. So my job was to write a song and their job was to make it decorated and sound more beautiful. 'They were so compatible and so easygoing. And I was listening to them and we're going to rehearse for two days and really listening to them and I've been already — I have my flute in my hand and I was enjoying. I wanted to play with them. So I'm really looking forward to them.' Chaurasia's intentions for the audience go far beyond entertainment. 'The bansuri itself stands for spirituality and meditative because this instrument has been played by Lord Krishna, which you can imagine. How old is this instrument? According to history, it's like 5,000 years old. And it's one of the most organic instruments because nothing has been applied on this instrument which comes from the factory. It's a small piece of bamboo with a few holes and one side is always shut down with the natural knot of the bamboo.' The performance will reflect this heritage and innovation. 'We are presenting ... trying to present all kinds of genres. Because as everybody knows, we have a mixed audience. So in the beginning, I'm going to start with classical. The Indian traditional way, classical, where the people can really meditate and take the joy of the classical genre. Then we'll have a break. Then we'll start with a symphony, a special piece composed for Cape Town people. Rakesh Chaurasia Image: Ian Landsberg
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Don't twist the meaning of words: It is either a genocide or it's not
Letters to the Editor. Image: Supplied There are no half meanings in words Just as there is no such thing as half a homicide, there can be no such thing as a partial genocide. The genocide in Gaza is therefore complete. Finished. Governments around the globe – most of whom stood by silently, witnessing the total extermination of Gaza and the forced submission of the West Bank – are now, with great hypocritical enthusiasm, asking the same age-old question: 'A two-state solution, or what?' And of course, most people on all sides are now clamouring for that same answer: 'A two-state solution!' Forgetting, it seems, that this has effectively been the case for over seven decades: a Have-State and a Have-Not State. To continue along this same path would simply be a return to the current, deeply unequal status quo. Imagine an Israel continuing with its pompous, haughty military and technological dominance – fully backed by the United States and other Western powers – just as it has for the last 70 years. Meanwhile, a 'new' Palestinian state would remain a dependent, impoverished welfare state, propped up by third-tier handouts from so-called 'charitable' nations, Arab or otherwise, and the United Nations. Both would exist side by side? Really? So what, exactly, would be new? Except, perhaps, an even deeper hatred between the two 'new' states – hatred born of the horrors of the past two years. That hatred – fuelled by decades of oppression, bombardment, starvation, displacement, and massacre – will not disappear overnight. The South African example is instructive. Had there been a two-state solution – one for apartheid South Africa and one for a 'free' South Africa – the result would have been endless instability, tension, and likely war. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ As difficult as it may be to visualise or accept, the only feasible solution is a single, inclusive, democratic country. One that dares to forgive and forget not just the last 20 months, but the last 70 years. A single country founded on full human rights and genuine democracy – not one based on racial, ethnic, or religious supremacy. A place where Christians, Muslims, Jews, and people of all other faiths live with equal words like 'Zionist' and all other supremacist ideologies are buried forever in the desert sand. In truth, this may be the only choice left.| Ebrahim Essa Durban Trump's whims not worthy of our focus The time has come for South Africa and indeed the world to accept an uncomfortable truth: Donald J Trump, despite his stature and influence, behaves less like a statesman and more like a child trapped in a grown man's body. His conduct, rhetoric, and disregard for democratic norms render him fundamentally unfit to lead any nation, least of all a global superpower such as the US. It is profoundly troubling that some world leaders still clamour for meetings with Mr Trump, as though proximity to his power validates their own. This sycophantic behaviour does not merely diminish their own credibility; it places them on equal footing with a man whose values are inconsistent with the principles of justice, diplomacy, and human dignity. They forget one important fact, Donald Trump is a convicted rapist, grossly dishonest businessman and good friend of Jeffrey Epstein and yet, they beg to meet with this evil man. The upcoming G20 Summit to be hosted on South African soil, presents an opportunity to re-centre global leadership around reason, compassion, and moral responsibility. The greatest gift to the G20 nations may well be a summit devoid of Trump's presence. His habitual deflections and inflammatory remarks undermine the seriousness of this platform, where leaders gather to deliberate on issues of critical consequence to billions across the globe. We cannot allow his presence to overshadow or derail urgent global discussions, including the ongoing humanitarian crisis and alleged genocide being committed against the Palestinian people – an atrocity Trump has vocally supported. The world's focus must remain on human rights, peace, and accountability, not on the whims of one man. Though we may be forced to tolerate Mr Trump's presence on the global stage for the next 40 months, we are under no obligation to indulge his bullying, immaturity, or the contempt for the office he currently occupies. President Cyril Ramaphosa must recognise that Donald Trump holds no genuine respect for him or for any black South Africans. It is imperative that our president place the dignity and interests of the Republic above any personal diplomatic or business Africa, and the G20, deserve better. The world deserves better. | Rozario Brown Moille Point DAILY NEWS
