Lucid Gravity review: Seven-seat Tesla rival heaving with tech
There's a fair bit of Britishness around Lucid, not least because the company was set up and run until recently by British former Tesla engineer Peter Rawlinson. Rawlinson's obsession was with the efficiency of Lucid's drivetrain, and he even struck a deal with Aston Martin to use Lucid tech in the British brand's upcoming EVs.
The Lucid Air was the brand's first car to launch. A big saloon rival to the Tesla Model S, it scooped the World Luxury Car Award in 2023.
Despite reported financial troubles, Lucid continues to grow its sales and this latest model, the seven-seat Gravity, is a stunning car. It sits lower and looks sleeker than other seven-seat SUVs, let alone electric ones.
It combines strong build quality with a decent drive, a comfortable ride and plenty of room for seven people in all three rows. Everyone – including those in the front – get a great view out and up thanks to the panoramic roof, which blends into a windscreen that flows over the top of the driver's head. It gave a great view of the New York skyline on our test drive.
The Lucid Gravity features strong tech on board too. There's a curved 34in display with 6K OLED tech that seems to float just above the dashboard, with an augmented reality head-up display. Underneath is a big 120kWh battery on a 926V platform, meaning the Gravity can charge at up to 400kW if you can find a fast enough charger. That equates to adding 200 miles of range in under 11 minutes.
How we tested
Lucid let us take the Gravity for a quick test drive at the New York Auto Show. We did the usual checks on usability, tech and the passenger experience in the back seats, and had a drive around Manhattan's quick and not-so-quick roads.
Independent rating: 9/10
Pros: Loads of space, blends tech with usability, efficiency, great roof
Cons: No plans for the UK… yet
Lucid Gravity specs
Price range: $94,900 (£70,800)
Battery size: 120kWh
Maximum claimed range: 450 miles
Miles per kWh: TBC
Maximum charging rate: 400kW
Battery, range, charging, performance and drive
Lucid doesn't officially quote battery size – something it obviously learnt from Tesla – but we understand the Gravity Grand Touring model that's currently available packs a whopping 120kWh battery pack, with a claimed maximum range on US tests of 450 miles. A cheaper Touring model comes later this year with a smaller battery.
What we do know is that Lucid's advanced tech includes a 925V platform that helps with super-fast charging. Assuming you can find a suitably fast charger, the Gravity will take power at 400kW. Combined with Lucid's claim that the car can sustain fast charging for longer, that means 200 miles could be added in under 11 minutes. The company also says it can charge at a sustained speed of up to 225kW on Tesla's fastest V3 Superchargers.
In our short test drive, we got a chance to test Lucid's acceleration claims. The Gravity certainly feels as quick as its 0-60mph time of 3.4 seconds suggests – a bizarre sensation in a seven-seat SUV. Throttle response is suitably sharp, but throttle modulation is good and you can drive the Gravity in a relaxed manner, which pleases passengers. One-pedal driving is intuitive, too.
We were also impressed by the ride quality over New York's notoriously bumpy streets. The Gravity, with its air suspension, rode the bumps well and is unlikely to fluster passengers too much. Although this SUV is no sports car, it does a reasonable impression of one with beefy-feeling steering that balances reaction times and feedback without feeling overly responsive. Rear-wheel steering helps manoeuvring this large 5,029mm SUV.
Interior, practicality and boot space
Not only is the build quality of the Lucid Gravity impressive, the space on offer is too. Whether you're in the first, second or third rows there's plenty of space, helped by the wonderful panoramic roof that seems to merge seamlessly with the extended windscreen flowing back over the driver's head.
The flat floor helps to boost the space on offer, especially in row two where the seats slide back and forth (powered, obviously) to provide limo-like space. Clever fold-out tables on the back of the front seats mean you can actually work without having to perch your laptop on your lap.
Moving the middle seats forward at the touch of a lever makes getting access to the third row about as easy as possible, helped by long, wide-opening rear doors. In the third row there's good head and leg space.
Boot space is pretty impressive, too. All five rear seats fold flat to give a maximum 3,143 litres of total space. Even with all seven seats in use, there's still 594 litres of room. You can even sit in the frunk with a padded seat that folds out from the floor.
There's plenty of sustainable materials available including sustainable woods and vegan leather – which looks and feels pretty much the like the real thing. It's a tasteful, well-judged interior that looks and feels premium, and is comfortable, too. Even the squared-off steering wheel, set low for a better view of the screen, feels great to use. Unlike on the latest Tesla models, there are stalks behind the wheel for indicators, wipers and gear selection.
Technology, stereo and infotainment
The star of the show is the 34in, 6K OLED curved screen, which combines the driver display with touchscreen controls. But there's also a second touchscreen lower down and just above the centre console with fast keys for the ventilation.
Just in case the big screen isn't enough for you, there's also a high-definition head-up display with augmented reality to help you with navigation. There's wireless Apple CarPlay, but Android Auto users will have to wait a little longer.
Sticking to the sleepy naming convention, Lucid calls its autonomous driving tech DreamDrive. It uses radar, lidar and cameras to manage situation awareness, with a display showing you all of the road (and path) users around you. Of course, the car will drive itself in lane and change lanes, with over the air updates keeping the software up to date. Numerous sensors keep watch when you're not in the car, too.
The in-house audio system sounded good when we turned it on briefly. There are 22 speakers and Dolby Atmos for a full surround sound experience.
Prices and running costs
Last time we pushed Lucid on right-hand drive production we were told the company was keen to do it but had other priorities. We sincerely hope those priorities ease soon as the Gravity (and the Lucid Air for that matter) are both brilliant cars that would find favour with UK luxury EV buyers.
In the US the Grand Touring model we drove costs $94,900. We'd expect that to translate to around £90,000 rather than the current conversion of £70,800, which would have made the Gravity an absolute steal, although tariffs might come into play, too.
A Touring model is expected to land in the US later in the year. Order books are now open for that model with a price of $79,900 (£59,800).
What's just as impressive as those prices is the efficiency on offer, with a claimed 450 mile range for the Grand Touring Gravity.
FAQs
How long does it take to charge?
If you can find a fast enough charger, the Lucid Gravity will charge at up to 400kW, being able to add 200 miles in just 11 minutes.
How much does it cost - is it worth it?
The Lucid Gravity is excellent value in the US with the Touring version coming later in 2025 for $79,900 (£59,800). Even the bigger battery Grand Touring is good value at $94,900 (£70,800)
Does Lucid replace batteries for free?
Lucid offers an eight-year warranty that covers the battery for up to 100,000 miles when it should retain at least 70 per cent of its capacity.
The verdict: Lucid Gravity
Lucid says it has other priorities before making right-hand drive cars, but I reckon they're missing a trick. Both the Air and now the Gravity are stunning cars – great to drive and easy to live with – that blend luxury with usability. They'd go down a storm here in the UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
6 minutes ago
- Daily Record
UK to build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines in major defence shake-up
The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme. The UK is poised to construct up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and will pour £15 billion into its warhead programme, with the Prime Minister set to disclose these plans on Monday during the Government's strategic defence review. Major investments are queued for the UK's nuclear warhead programme this parliamentary session, along with commitments to maintain the current arsenal, as supported by 62 recommendations the Government aims to fully implement. However, there's been a debate over defence spending promises, after the Defence Secretary was unable to verify if the Treasury had secured budgeting to increase it to 3% of GDP by 2034. Part of the Aukus deal with the US and Australia, the creation of these submarines is projected to sustain 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s, along with generating 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate positions over the forthcoming decade, according to the Ministry of Defence. Defence Secretary John Healey remarked: "Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression. "With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly skilled jobs across the country." The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will bolster the Government's pledges to sustain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, construct a new line of Dreadnought submarines, and facilitate all forthcoming enhancements. From the late 2030s, the array of up to 12 SSN-Aukus class attack submarines – conventionally armed yet nuclear-powered – are set to succeed the seven astute class submarines that the UK anticipates commissioning. The Government, in echoing the findings of the strategic defence review, has pledged to:. - Prepare the armed forces for readiness to engage in conflict should the need arise. - Enhance armament reserves and maintain scalability in production capacities to respond promptly in times of crisis or warfare. - Procure up to 7,000 domestically produced long-range missiles, a decision projected to preserve 800 jobs within the defence sector. - Establish a pioneering cyber command while committing £1 billion towards digital advancements. - Allocate an excess of £1.5 billion for refurbishing and updating service personnel accommodation. Sir Keir Starmer is expected to declare: "From the supply lines to the front lines, this Government is foursquare behind the men and women upholding our nation's freedom and security. "National security is the foundation of my Plan for Change, and this plan will ensure Britain is secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering a defence dividend of well-paid jobs up and down the country." The Shadow Defence Secretary, James Cartlidge, expressed scepticism regarding Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises, stating that they would be viewed with caution unless Labour could demonstrate that sufficient funding would be allocated. Labour's Shadow Defence Secretary, John Healey, had previously mentioned in an interview with The Times that there was "no doubt" the UK would achieve its goal of 3% defence spending. However, when questioned on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, he sidestepped queries about whether the Treasury had provided any guarantees for the necessary funding. Healey also acknowledged that he did not anticipate an increase in the number of armed forces personnel until the next Parliament, citing ongoing recruitment and retention challenges. When asked about the Army's target of 73,000 personnel, he replied, "We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining. "The first job is to reverse that trend and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number." In response, James Cartlidge argued, "All of Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises will be taken with a pinch of salt unless they can show there will actually be enough money to pay for them. "Whereas, far from guaranteeing the funding, John Healey has been hung out to dry by Rachel Reeves. "As recently as Thursday, Healey promised that defence spending would definitely hit 3%, but today he's completely backtracked. "These submarines are not due to enter service till the late 2030s, so how can we have any confidence Labour will actually deliver them when they can't even sustain a policy on defence spending for more than 48 hours?" Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire commented: "This signals absolutely the right intent about the need to bolster the UK's defences in the face of Putin's imperialism and Trump's unreliability. "But this must come with a concrete commitment and detail on full funding. "Labour's mere 'ambition' rather than commitment to reach 3% of GDP on defence leaves serious questions about whether the money for these projects will actually be forthcoming. "The 2034 timeline suggests a worrying lack of urgency from the Government. "Unless Labour commits to holding cross-party talks on how to reach 3% much more rapidly than the mid-2030s, this announcement risks becoming a damp squib."
Auto Car
6 minutes ago
- Auto Car
Real range anxiety: Driving London to Land's End in 1921
Indeed, many competitors floundered, but there were several impressive performances too, like that by VG Lloyd, who 'astounded everyone with his speed' in his two-cylinder Carden. Notably, Lionel Martin 'romped up the hill' in his new production Aston Martin (he had co-founded the company in 1913 to build hillclimb specials; Aston was a course in Buckinghamshire). Several had to shed passengers to reach the top, while others fouled the hill by hitting the wall at the hairpin. Some even managed to clear it while avoiding a comrade's stricken car. One did it on a flat tyre. From there on to Land's End, there was little to really concern the drivers. Forty-two made it to the finish – and we were surprised to see among them HJG Smith's 10hp Eric-Campbell (a small firm that briefly made cars at the Handley Page aircraft factory in London), as he had broken a tie rod on Porlock so effectively was steering with one wheel. He won a gold medal along with 22 other worthy competitors. We concluded: 'The general consensus of opinion was that a better trial had never been, or one to which more merit was attached to a reward, while, as to sport, no man could wish for better.' Since then, more notoriously difficult sections have been added, most famously Beggars Roost (in 1922) and Blue Hills (in 1936), and the Land's End Trial continues to challenge the best trials drivers and cars. Long may it continue.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Motorists who perform 'friendly gesture' could end up landing £1k fine
A survey has revealed that more than half of motorists in the UK are breaking the highway code due to common driving myths - and this could be leading to fines of up to £1,000 Over half of UK motorists are unwittingly contravening the Highway Code, believing in widespread driving myths, according to new research. A study by LKQ Euro Car Parts quizzed British drivers on their understanding of road regulations to uncover the most prevalent misconceptions and the potential repercussions of such beliefs. With a staggering 58% of drivers flouting the Highway Code due to these fallacies, potentially facing fines up to £1,000, specialists at LKQ Euro Car Parts have pinpointed the top five blunders and debunked each one. Take a look below at the myths to make sure you don't end up landing any driving fines. Myth 1: You should flash your lights as a friendly gesture (60%) A significant number of motorists, 45%, confess to occasionally using their full-beam headlights as a cordial signal, with some even sharing their actions on social platforms. Often it's used to permit another driver to merge from a junction or as an expression of gratitude. Yet, this seemingly benign act contravenes the Highway Code and could lead to a fine of as much as £1,000. Alarmingly, 60% of drivers are oblivious to the fact that this practice is prohibited. The Highway Code's Rule 110 clearly instructs: "Only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there. Do not flash your headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users. Never assume that flashing headlights is a signal inviting you to proceed." Myth 2: Driving with the interior light on is illegal (38%) A common belief instilled from a young age is that it's illegal to drive with the interior light on, with 38% of drivers thinking this. Despite this widespread belief, there are no rules against driving with your vehicle's interior lights on. However, it can be distracting, so it should only be used when absolutely necessary and for brief periods. Myth 3: You can beep your horn to express frustration (52%) More than half of UK drivers (52%) believe it's harmless to honk their car horn at other road users out of frustration, with over a third (36%) admitting they have done so in the past. However, while you can use your horn to signal danger to yourself or other road users, you're breaking the highway code if you honk simply out of annoyance and could receive a Fixed Penalty Notice of £30. According to rule 112 of the highway code: "Use your horn only while your vehicle is moving, and you need to warn other road users of your presence. Never sound your horn aggressively. You must not use your horn while stationary on a road - "except" when another road user poses a danger." Myth 4: It is illegal to drive in certain footwear or barefoot (43%) The type of footwear you wear while driving can impact your ability to drive safely, but there are no strict rules or laws about what you can wear on your feet, including flip flops, high heels and even going barefoot. Many motorists mistakenly believe it's illegal to drive in flipflops (41%), barefoot (43%) or in high heels (29%). However, you can be stopped for unsafe driving, so always ensure you can competently operate your vehicle in whatever footwear you choose. Myth 5: Air-con is more fuel efficient than rolling down the windows (68%) Over two thirds of drivers (68%) believe that air-con uses less petrol than driving with the windows down, thus making it the most economical choice. However, this isn't accurate. When driving at slower speeds, having the windows open is the more fuel-efficient option as it creates minimal drag compared to the constant energy consumption caused by AC.
