New Zealand to consider recognising Palestinian state
New Zealand said the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is rightly at the forefront of the global agenda.
WELLINGTON - The New Zealand government said it is considering recognition of a state of Palestine, with a formal decision to be taken in September.
'New Zealand has been clear for some time that our recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if,' Foreign Minister Winston Peters said in a statement on Aug 11 in Wellington.
'The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is rightly at the forefront of the global agenda.'
If it proceeds, New Zealand would be following several of its western peers, including the UK, France and Canada, who plan to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations summit in September.
Australia on Aug 11 also said
it would do so .
'Some of New Zealand's close partners have opted to recognise a Palestinian state, and some have not,' Mr Peters said.
'Ultimately, New Zealand has an independent foreign policy, and on this issue, we intend to weigh up the issue carefully and then act according to New Zealand's principles, values and national interest.'
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Keppel to sell M1's telco business to Simba for $1.43b, says deal expected to benefit consumers
Business Singtel, StarHub shares fall after announcement of Keppel's M1 sale
Singapore Healthy lifestyle changes could save Singapore $650 million in healthcare costs by 2050: Study
Opinion Anwar's government: Full house but plenty of empty offices
Singapore 79 arrested, over 3kg of heroin seized in 5-day drug blitz
Singapore Man's claim amid divorce that his mother is true owner of 3 properties cuts no ice with judge
Asia Tourist spots in South Korea face complaints over rude service, price gouging during peak season
Business Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenues to US, official says
It was not a straightforward, clear-cut issue, Mr Peters said, with 'a broad range of strongly held views' within government.
Cabinet would take a formal decision in September and Mr Peters will 'present the government's approach to this issue' at the UN in late September, he said. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Taiwan is continuing tariff negotiations with US, cabinet official says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox TAIPEI - Taiwan's cabinet is still negotiating for more favourable tariff rates after a 20% levy was imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun said on Monday. "Taiwan's goal is to seek a better and more reasonable tariff rate from the U.S.", Cheng told a news briefing, adding that negotiations with the U.S. are continuing, and that they are prepared to report to Taiwan's parliament on their progress. Cheng said Taiwan was hoping to continue its tariff negotiations concurrent with a U.S. national security probe, which is being conducted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Taiwan has the sixth-largest trade deficit with the U.S., with 90% of that from semiconductors. Taiwan's TSMC is the world's biggest contract chip maker and makes chips for tech giants such as Nvidia. Rates for semiconductors, electronics as well as information and communication technology - which make up the bulk of Taiwan's exports to the U.S. - will be subject to separate U.S. sectoral tariffs and are still to be worked out. REUTERS
Business Times
28 minutes ago
- Business Times
Keppel DC Reit proposes sale of M1-issued NetCo bonds, preference shares
[SINGAPORE] The manager of Keppel DC Real Estate Investment Trust (Reit) on Monday (Aug 11) proposed the disposal of all its NetCo bonds and preference shares issued by network operator M1. This comes after parent company Keppel announced that it will sell M1's telco business to Simba Telecom , a mobile network operator, for S$1.43 billion. Keppel will receive nearly S$1 billion for its 83.9 per cent effective stake in M1. Simba – whose parent company is Tuas Ltd, which is owned by Australian businessman David Teoh's TPG Telecom – is expected to create more revenue pools and career opportunities from its combination with M1. NetCo is a subsidiary of M1 and holds some of the telco's mobile, fixed and fibre assets. It also has a network services agreement with M1. On Dec 22, 2021, Keppel DC Reit subscribed to S$88.7 million in bonds issued by NetCo through its trustee, Perpetual (Asia). Under the terms, the Reit will receive S$11 million a year, comprising both the principal amount and interest, for a period of 15 years from the date of issuance. Under the same transaction, Keppel DC Reit also subscribed to 100 per cent of the preference shares issued by NetCo, for S$1 million. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up These shares entitle the Reit to have 50 per cent representation on NetCo's board of directors – a move intended to give it additional protection for its investment in the bonds. The NetCo bonds and preference shares will be sold to an unrelated third party, which is a Singapore-incorporated holding company, Keppel DC Reit's manager said. Assuming the sale was completed on Monday, the buyer will have to pay around S$79.2 million, the manager said. This amount comprises S$77.2 million as a principal amount for the NetCo bonds, S$1 million in accrued interest, and a principal amount of S$1 million for the preference shares. The deal is subject to clearance from the Infocomm Media Development Authority. Units of Keppel DC Reit were trading flat at S$2.31 as at 3.30 pm on Monday.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Hyflux issued preference shares to fund Tuaspring as it had problems getting bank loans: Prosecution
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox SINGAPORE - Hyflux issued preference shares to fund its Tuaspring project because it had trouble getting bank loans, the prosecution said on the first day of the trial involving former senior executives of the failed water treatment plant. Deputy Chief Prosecutor Christopher Ong noted that a consortium of banks had raised concerns in 2011 over Hyflux's strategy of selling electricity to subsidise the sale of water to PUB. This led Hyflux to consider other avenues of raising funds. Its eventual collapse left about 34,000 investors of perpetual securities and preference shares, who had sunk in a combined $900 million, with nothing. Former Hyflux employees and bank representatives who were involved in negotiations on financing the Tuaspring integrated water and power project are expected to testify for the prosection. In total, seven people have been charged over Hyflux's intentional failure to disclose information relating to Tuaspring, among other things. Six of them – Hyflux founder and former chief executive Olivia Lum Ooi Lin, former chief financial officer Cho Wee Peng, and former independent directors Teo Kiang Kok, Christopher Murugasu, Gay Chee Cheong, and Lee Joo Hai – are contesting their charges in a 56-day trial scheduled to run from Aug 11 to Feb 5, 2026. The prosecution will proceed on 11 charges, including two of the six charges Lum faces. The remaining four charges against Lum are stood down. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Keppel to sell M1's telco business to Simba for $1.43b, says deal expected to benefit consumers Business Singtel, StarHub shares fall after announcement of Keppel's M1 sale Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1? Singapore Simba-M1 deal is S'pore's first telco merger, after years of liberalisation Singapore S'pore Govt asks inactive political parties including Barisan Sosialis for proof of existence Singapore Man's claim amid divorce that his mother is true owner of 3 properties cuts no ice with judge Opinion Anwar's government: Full house but plenty of empty offices The prosecution, in an opening statement to the State Court on Aug 11, said Hyflux won the tender for Singapore's second and largest desalination plant with the lowest submitted bid. It had proposed to sell water to PUB at a first-year tariff price of $0.45/m3, undercutting its competitors by at least 27 per cent. 'At this price, the desalination plant would operate at a loss,' Mr Ong said. 'To make the project financially viable, and also fulfil PUB's requirement to procure or produce electricity for the desalination plant at Hyflux's cost, Hyflux intended for the power plant to supply electricity to the desalination plant, while actually selling the vast majority of the power that it generated to the national grid.' It was only from this sale that Hyflux would be able to make up for the desalination plant's losses and make the project profitable. But Hyflux had no prior experience in power generation, much less selling electricity. The Tuaspring Project would be the first time Hyflux entered the electricity market, the prosecution said. How it all unfolded To finance the Tuaspring project, which was initially projected to cost $890 million, Hyflux sought a term loan of about $527 million from a consortium of banks. Six banks signed in-principle commitment letters in October 2010 indicating their willingness to finance the project. But they had not been told of Hyflux's plan to build a power plant and sell excess electricity to the grid at the time, Mr Ong noted. In November 2010, when they found out about Hyflux's power strategy, they 'raised serious concerns'. In January 2011, they told Hyflux that they could not lend it money on the terms previously indicated, as the power plant introduced new 'merchant sale risk and operational risk'. On 4 July 2011, only three of the original six banks - DBS, Mizuho Corporate Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation - extended Hyflux financing of $150 million for the construction of the desalination plant. This financing was eventually terminated by Hyflux. Tuaspring was ultimately financed by a shareholder's loan of $840.4 million by Hyflux in October 2011, which was in turn refinanced with Maybank Singapore and Maybank Kim Eng Securities in September 2013. The case against Lum In January 2011, in the midst of their negotiations with the banks, Hyflux's management began to contemplate issuing of preference shares to raise funds. On 19 January 2011, Hyflux senior vice president, legal (business) Ms Yang Ai Chian informed the Board of the need to issue preference shares to 'increase our funding options' for 'several new major projects' that Hyflux was expected to win that year. In reality, this money was meant to fund Tuaspring because of the challenges Hyflux faced in getting bank financing. On 13 April 2011, Hyflux lodged an offer information statement with the Monetary Authority of Singapore to issue up to $200 million in 6% preference shares. These were oversubscribed and the offer amount was increased. Hyflux ultimately raised $400 million. But the statement did not mention risks arising from Hyflux's entry into the electricity business, or those associated with Hyflux's strategy for Tuaspring, which could affect the company's financial position or results, the prosecution said. The information was omitted because Lum wanted to downplay Tuaspring's significant exposure to the electricity market, both in Hyflux's announcement that it had been named the 'preferred bidder' for the desalination project, as well as in the offer information statement, the prosecution said. 'Lum was determined that Hyflux had to win the bid and cement its status as a global leader in the water treatment and desalination industry. Hyflux was facing setbacks in its Middle Eastern ventures and winning the Tuaspring bid was critical for strengthening the company's order book,' Mr Ong said. 'She did not want to detract from the positive news of winning a landmark water project, by revealing the Tuaspring Project's reliance on electricity sales, and the fact that the low tariff price – the key to winning the tender – was only viable because of such electricity sales.' The prosecution also said Lum was well aware of the banks' negative reactions regarding the power plant component of the project, and feared that full disclosure might deter investors and compromise Hyflux's ability to raise funds through the planned preference shares. This, in turn, could jeopardise financial close for the project and potentially result in losing the bid, the prosecution said. The desalination plant of the Tuaspring Project became operational on September 18, 2013. But its power plant only became operational nearly two years later, on or around August 2015. It began selling electricity commercially on 18 February 2016. In March 2011, the average Uniform Singapore Energy Price had been around $187 per megawatt hour (MWh). By February 2016, this had fallen to around $49.10 per MWh. As the profitability of Tuaspring depended on electricity sales, this fall in electricity prices hit Hyflux hard. In its 2017 annual report, it reported a $115.6 million after tax loss. The report stated that the weak power market in Singapore drove losses for the first time in Hyflux's history, with the Tuaspring Project accounting for the majority of the losses. On 21 May 2018, Hyflux suspended trading of its shares. The next day, Hyflux announced that it had applied to seek court protection for debt reorganisation. On 18 May 2019, PUB took over the Tuaspring desalination plant. On 1 June 2022, a wholly owned subsidiary of Malaysia-based YTL Power International, YTL Powerseraya, completed its acquisition of the Tuaspring power plant. By 16 November 2020, Hyflux entered judicial management and into liquidation on 21 July 2021. Other witnesses include a lawyer from Stamford Law Corporation, who was Hyflux's external legal counsel on the April 2011 offer information statement; an SGX representative who will provide evidence on the sequence of events that led to this case being investigated; and a PUB representative, who will testify to PUB's dealings with Hyflux and its employees and management during the tender and award process for Tuaspring. The Prosecution will also adduce evidence from a securities expert, Mr Kevin Gin who will address why the omitted information ought to have been disclosed by Hyflux. The hearing continues.
