Govt seeks compliance from edu institutes on ICC
The higher education department, in an urgent letter, asked the colleges and universities to include appropriate representation of women members and external representatives in the committees. They were also instructed to follow UGC (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and Students in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2015.
The department asked the institutes to display the name and contact number of all ICC members in a proper place for general awareness and upload their details in the higher education information management system (HIMS) portal.
The govt also directed the institutes to immediately organise workshops on the Act for the sensitisation of students and faculty members. "You are further requested to ensure that a geo-tagged photograph of the location where the details of the ICC are displayed is uploaded to the link positively," wrote Rajata Kumar Mansingh, deputy director of higher education.
The department earlier communicated to all colleges and universities about the constitution of ICC.
Some colleges do not have ICCs, and some have not formed them as per UGC rules.
University Grants Commission (UGC) has been issuing guidelines to all universities and colleges to set up ICCs and take necessary steps to prevent and redress sexual harassment on their campuses. UGC also asked all universities to set up special cells to deal with issues of gender-based violence and conduct gender sensitisation programmes. It suggested the institutes ensure a safe and healthy environment for women students and employees on their campuses as a necessary precondition to quality education and research.
Last year, a student of a city-based university lodged a complaint against a faculty member for sexual harassment. The university investigated the matter and suspended the faculty member.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
Explained: Why a 53-year-old rape convict will be sentenced as a juvenile
A 53-year-old man will appear before a juvenile justice board in Ajmer for appropriate punishment in a rape case, the Supreme Court of India ruled on July The case involves a 53-year-old Rajasthan man convicted for raping a minor in 1988 and sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment by a trial court, a decision upheld by the Rajasthan High Court in in 2025, the accused appealed to the Supreme Court, raising a plea of juvenility, claiming he was only 16 years old at the time of the offense. This claim was based on his school records, which indicated his date of birth as July 1, 1972, making him a minor (under 18 years) when the crime was committed. The Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, noted that the prosecution's case was robust, supported by the survivor's testimony, witness statements, and medical Court accepted his claim of being a juvenile based on his school records, which were deemed reliable evidence under the Juvenile Justice objections from the Rajasthan government counsel, who argued against granting juvenile status after decades, the court cited prior rulings that the plea of juvenility can be raised at any stage, even after a case's the court set aside the earlier sentence, as it could not be sustained under juvenile justice provisions, and directed the JJB to issue appropriate JJB may send the man to a special home for a maximum of three years, as per the Juvenile Justice are the key provisions of India's Juvenile Justice laws relevant to this case?The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, defines a juvenile as a person under 18 at the time of the are tried by the Juvenile Justice Board, not adult courts. They cannot face adult penalties like life imprisonment or measures, such as counselling or placement in a juvenile home for up to three years, are prioritised (Section 18).At the time of the offense, the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, was in effect, defining boys under 16 and girls under 18 as juveniles. However, the Supreme Court applied the beneficial provisions of the 2015 Act, which raised the age to 18 for all is this case significant?The case underscores that juvenility claims remain valid regardless of the time elapsed or the accused's current age. It reinforces the principle that juveniles must be treated differently, even for serious crimes, and highlights the retrospective application of beneficial juvenile justice provisions.- Ends
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India Inc's rare earth magnet dependence
Not just automotive, which is using rare earth magnets for EVs aggressively, renewable energy, consumer electronics, and defense sectors are also in need of these products. India expects the government to clarify the uncertainties regarding the shortage of rare earth magnets, as the industry is struggling to manage alternative solutions. Here is my view on India vs. China debate and India's growing dependence on rare earth magnets, its risks and solutions. The world is once again learning that the materials of the future come with geopolitical strings attached. India, aspiring to be a global manufacturing hub and a clean-tech leader, finds itself hobbled by a shortage of rare earth permanent magnets, a problem that threatens to derail its electric vehicle (EV) push, defence readiness, and green energy plans. At the root lies a familiar issue: overdependence on China. China's decision in April 2025 to tighten export controls on rare earth magnets has sent tremors through Indian industry. These magnets, indispensable in EVs, wind turbines, consumer electronics and missile guidance systems, are now in short supply. Inventories are projected to run out in a matter of weeks. Automakers are already sounding alarm bells, while electronics manufacturers brace for cascading delays. This crisis has long been in the making. China supplies around 90 per cent of India's rare earth magnets and controls a similarly dominant share of global capacity. Its grip extends not just to raw materials but to refining and high-end processing—domains in which India is dangerously underdeveloped. Since the export curbs came into force, Indian companies have been required to seek end-use licences from Chinese authorities, a process marked by opacity and inertia. Russia, once viewed as a rising alternative, remains a fringe player. Other potential suppliers—Australia, Vietnam, and the United States—lack the capacity or speed to plug the gap. Meanwhile, India's own magnet demand has soared. From 12,400 tonnes in FY2021, usage has quadrupled to nearly 54,000 tonnes in FY2025, according to government estimates. The spike is a direct consequence of policy initiatives that promote green mobility, solar and wind capacity, and Make-in-India electronics . But infrastructure without inputs is futile. Mining time lost There are signs of action. The government has begun diplomatic engagement with Beijing in an effort to expedite clearances. More importantly, it is considering amendments to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act to ease exploration of rare earths. Public-sector enterprise Indian Rare Earths Ltd has commenced work on a small-scale magnet plant, and broader production initiatives are under review. But this is reactive policymaking, not foresight. The processing and manufacturing of magnets requires not just raw materials but deep technical capabilities, years of investment, and robust supply chains. India is at least a decade behind where it needs to be. States like Andhra Pradesh and Odisha hold monazite-rich beach sands that could be tapped for rare earths, but red tape and regulatory inertia have kept them underexploited. Refining capacity—capital-intensive and environmentally sensitive—remains virtually non-existent. Without it, India will remain a shipper of ores and an importer of value-added goods. A rare opportunity in rare earths The current crunch ought to be treated not merely as a supply hiccup, but as a strategic wake-up call. India's vision of self-reliance must extend beyond finished goods to the materials that make those goods possible. This calls for nothing short of a rare earth industrial policy. The stakeholders seem to have understood the magnitude of the issue and are moving swiftly. The government is working on a production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme specifically for rare earth magnet manufacturing, offering tax incentives, bonuses based on output, and a simplified regulatory framework to support domestic mining and processing of rare earths like neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium. Public sector enterprises such as Indian Rare Earths Ltd have been asked to expand capacity, while private players—Sona Comstar, Uno Minda, and Mahindra & Mahindra among them—are exploring pilot projects to build magnet manufacturing facilities. India is also diversifying import sources, accelerating trade and mining partnerships with countries like Australia, Vietnam, and the United States to reduce dependence on China. Meanwhile, several public–private partnerships are in motion to create rare earth magnet recycling hubs to reclaim materials from used motors, while startups and research institutions are working on magnet-free electric motor technologies and ferrite-based alternatives. With these initiatives gaining traction, the Indian government expects to begin commercial production of rare earth magnets by late 2025, with an eye on scaling to global relevance by 2030. The transition marks not just a supply-side correction, but a long-term industrial strategy to secure India's position in critical green and strategic technologies. Ultimately, what India faces is not a commodity shortage, but a strategic constraint. As it builds its industrial future, it must ensure that core materials are not hostage to geopolitical volatility. The rare earth crisis of 2025 is both a cautionary tale and a call to action. India would do well to heed it—and place magnets, literally and figuratively, at the centre of its economic strategy.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Mumbai police arrest brother-in-law, book father for sexually assaulting 16-year-old girl
The Mumbai police Thursday arrested the brother-in-law and booked the father of a 16-year-old girl on charges of sexually assaulting her, and threatening her with dire consequences last year. The police said they registered a child sexual abuse case, and arrested her sister's husband from the area after the girl lodged a complaint Thursday. They said her father has been absconding, and they are trying to trace him. According to the First Information Report (FIR), filed on the basis of the girl's police complaint, her father allegedly raped her in April last year, and that her elder sister's husband groped her a month before that. She told the police that her father also threatened her, saying he would kill her and her mother if she told anyone about the crime against her. Her brother-in-law also threatened the girl not to tell her sister about the incident, or else she would face dire consequences. The girl said she did not tell anyone about the sexual assault as she was scared. The police charged both men under sections 64(2)(f) (rape by relative or guardian), 75(1) (sexual harassment), 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 351(2) (criminal intimidation), and sections 4, 8, and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act.
