Govt seeks compliance from edu institutes on ICC
The higher education department, in an urgent letter, asked the colleges and universities to include appropriate representation of women members and external representatives in the committees. They were also instructed to follow UGC (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and Students in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2015.
The department asked the institutes to display the name and contact number of all ICC members in a proper place for general awareness and upload their details in the higher education information management system (HIMS) portal.
The govt also directed the institutes to immediately organise workshops on the Act for the sensitisation of students and faculty members. "You are further requested to ensure that a geo-tagged photograph of the location where the details of the ICC are displayed is uploaded to the link positively," wrote Rajata Kumar Mansingh, deputy director of higher education.
The department earlier communicated to all colleges and universities about the constitution of ICC.
Some colleges do not have ICCs, and some have not formed them as per UGC rules.
University Grants Commission (UGC) has been issuing guidelines to all universities and colleges to set up ICCs and take necessary steps to prevent and redress sexual harassment on their campuses. UGC also asked all universities to set up special cells to deal with issues of gender-based violence and conduct gender sensitisation programmes. It suggested the institutes ensure a safe and healthy environment for women students and employees on their campuses as a necessary precondition to quality education and research.
Last year, a student of a city-based university lodged a complaint against a faculty member for sexual harassment. The university investigated the matter and suspended the faculty member.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Mumbai man arrested after being filmed performing indecent act with pet hen
Police have arrested a 45-year-old man in the Borivali area of Mumbai for allegedly indulging in indecent acts with one of his pet hens, and also found that he had sexually harassed a neighbour's minor son by showing pornographic content to him in the past, officials incident occurred on Tuesday night and a complaint was lodged by a man who lives in front of the residence of the per the complaint, the accused, Rajendra Rahate, who is unmarried, has dozens of pet hens at his home. Around 10.30 pm on July 22, the complainant saw him indulging in indecent acts with a hen in his room. The complainant started recording it on his mobile phone, an official said. The complainant's 10-year-old son later told him that the accused had shown him pornographic content on his mobile phone on multiple occasions from 2021 and warned him against telling his parents about it, he on the complaint, the police called Rahate for questioning and later placed him under arrest, the official action against him was taken under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act on the charge of sexually harassing the boy."The angle of animal cruelty is also being investigated to add more charges against the accused. Committing an unnatural act with any animal leads to cruelty, which is also a violation of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act," the official added.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Mumbai
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ex-BJP MP Gopal Shetty among 2 acquitted by Mumbai court in 20-year-old police assault case as witness turns hostile
Mumbai: With the purported victim claiming that the push might have been unintentional due to the accused being in a hurry, a sessions court recently acquitted former BJP MP Gopal Shetty (71) and party functionary Ganesh Khankar (52) over two decades after they were accused of storming into a police station and attacking a constable. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It was alleged that their reaction came after Kasturba Marg police booked Netaji Shinde, a BJP worker from Borivli (E), under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act. The constable turned hostile in court and did not support the prosecution's case. "From overall evidence on record, it appears that both accused visited Kasturba Marg police station at midnight, possibly with the intention of assisting or supporting their party activist, Netaji Shinde, who was detained under the MPDA Act," additional sessions judge Satyanarayan R Navander said. He added that the only witness who partly supported the prosecution case was the constable, and even his testimony was contradictory, vague, and substantially weakened during cross-examination. "No independent or neutral witnesses were examined, and no other officer supported the allegations despite being named in the FIR. The investigating officer himself did not corroborate the allegations. In light of this, a serious doubt arises regarding the prosecution's case," the judge said. The prosecution had alleged that on Sept 10, 2004, at 12.45am, Shetty and Khankar allegedly pushed aside constable Udesh Mohite, forcibly entered Kasturba Marg police station, hurled abuses, and threatened him. They reportedly entered the detection room and abused the cops and threatened police sub-inspector Radheshyam Sharma before leaving. A crucial point in the trial was the deposition of Mohite. While he admitted that one of the accused used insulting words after entering the police station, he denied lodging any complaint against them and claimed to be unaware of what transpired after they entered. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now During examination by the prosecution, he admitted that the accused pushed him and hurled abuses, and that he lodged a complaint. However, during cross-examination by the defence, he stated he could not confirm if it was intentional or accidental. He also did not specify the exact abusive words used. The judge found his testimony to be "extremely weak and unreliable". "Only after being confronted with leading questions did he admit to being pushed and abused, but those allegations are vague and unsupported. The further admissions given by him during the defence cross-examination weaken the prosecution's case even more," the judge said. Sharma deposed that he carried out the investigations and filed the chargesheet. However, he did not state that he personally witnessed the incident or corroborate the allegations in the FIR about him being insulted or intimidated. The case initially proceeded before the Mazgaon magistrate's court, which framed charges against the accused on Jan 30, 2025, and recorded prosecution witness evidence. However, the JMFC lacked jurisdiction to try the offence under Section 353 of the IPC, which was made exclusively triable by the sessions court via a state amendment. Consequently, the matter was committed to the sessions court on June 21. Fresh charges were framed against the accused by the sessions court on July 19, to which both pleaded not guilty. The prosecution opted to rely on the evidence already recorded before the JMFC, and the defence raised no objection.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Registrar can't alter birth certificates relating to disputed paternity, rules Kerala high court
Kochi: High court has held that the registrar of births and deaths in local bodies cannot make corrections in birth certificates relating to disputed paternity, as such matters require a full-fledged trial, adjudication and judicial imprimatur. The bench of Justice C S Dias further clarified that the circular issued by local self-govt department on Dec 16, 2015, mandates that if the father's name is to be changed in the birth records, a DNA test report, an agreement attested before a notary public and an order from a competent court must be produced. HC was considering a petition by a divorced man challenging the correction made in his son's birth certificate, by which his name had been replaced with that of his ex-wife's present partner. The petitioner alleged that the registrar of Payyannur municipality had made the change without issuing notice to him or affording him an opportunity of being heard. According to the petition, the petitioner had married the woman in May 2010, and she gave birth to a child in March 2011. Post-delivery, she went to her paternal home with the child for recuperation. Later, in April 2011, she went missing along with the child. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo On a habeas corpus petition filed by the petitioner, the woman appeared and stated that she desired to live with her lover. In Dec 2011, their marriage was dissolved by mutual consent. Thereafter, the woman and her partner filed a joint application before the municipality registrar to change the father's name in her son's birth certificate, producing certain documentary evidence. Based on this, the registrar altered the entry, prompting the petitioner to move HC. Upon examining the matter, HC noted that, as per Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a child born during the subsistence of a valid marriage, or within 280 days after its dissolution, is presumed to be the legitimate offspring of the husband, unless it is proved that the spouses had no access to each other during the relevant period. In the present case, it was an admitted fact that the child was born during the subsistence of the marriage, and there was no admission by the parties or declaration by a competent court that the petitioner was not, conclusively, the legitimate father of the child. HC further held that under the Act and the Rules governing corrections to the register of births and deaths, the registrar is empowered to correct or cancel an entry only in cases of clerical or formal errors, or where the entry has been fraudulently or improperly made. Such corrections are to be made by a marginal note, without altering the original entry. Disputed questions of paternity fall outside the scope of the registrar's powers. Quashing the altered birth certificate, HC directed the registrar to reconsider the matter after hearing all parties.
