Why are 24% of Americans still 'Functionally Unemployed' in a growing economy?
Amid headlines touting low unemployment and strong hiring numbers, a deeper, more troubling narrative is taking root across the American workforce. According to a report by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), 24.3% of working-age Americans are "functionally unemployed"—a term that recasts the traditional definition of joblessness to reflect a far grimmer reality (LISEP, 2024).
Unlike the official unemployment rate reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)—which stood at 4.2% as of May 2025—LISEP's metric includes individuals who are technically employed but still unable to secure full-time, living-wage work. That's more than 66 million Americans trapped in jobs that do not cover even the most basic cost of living.
Redefining unemployment: What the numbers miss
The federal government considers anyone who worked at least one hour in the past two weeks to be employed (BLS, May 2025 Report).
But this narrow framework fails to capture underemployment and wage insufficiency.
LISEP's True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) seeks to fill that blind spot by counting individuals as fully employed only if they work full-time (at least 35 hours per week) and earn at least $20,000 annually, adjusted for inflation, or are voluntarily in part-time roles and content with their hours.
More than just a statistical tweak, this reframing exposes the widening chasm between having a job and making a living.
A crisis in plain sight: The toll of functional unemployment
The 24.3% 'functionally unemployed' rate represents workers in three key categories:
The unemployed and actively seeking work
Part-time workers who want full-time employment
Full-time workers earning below $25,000 per year before taxes, below the federal poverty threshold for many households according to LISEP, 2024.
Not just a number: Disparities across race and gender
The crisis does not strike equally. Women experience a functional unemployment rate of 29.9%, compared to 19.3% for men, according to LISEP's latest analysis. The racial breakdown is equally stark: Black and Hispanic Americans consistently face higher rates of functional unemployment than their white counterparts.
These disparities point to deep-seated structural inequalities, from occupational segregation and pay gaps to reduced access to education, transportation, and caregiving support. The traditional employment metrics gloss over this hidden labor divide. TRU, in contrast, brings these injustices to the surface.
A shrinking job market or skills mismatch?
Much of the national discourse has fixated on the so-called skills gap—the idea that workers lack the training needed to compete in a modern economy.
But that explanation oversimplifies the problem. Many Americans are skilled but remain locked out of sectors where automation, outsourcing, and wage compression have reduced the availability of viable work.
The bigger question: What counts as work in America today?
At its core, the issue of functional unemployment is about more than data; it's about how we value labour and human dignity in a 21st-century economy. LISEP's findings force policymakers to confront the uncomfortable truth: Tens of millions of Americans are technically employed, yet economically invisible.
It's not just a matter of training workers better. It's about rebuilding pathways to meaningful, sustainable employment, jobs that pay living wages, provide benefits, and allow for upward mobility.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
38 minutes ago
- United News of India
US wholesale prices just jumped most in 3 years
New York, Aug 15 (UNI) US inflation on the wholesale level picked up steam last month, with prices rising by the fastest monthly pace since June 2022, a new data showed. The latest Producer Price Index, which measures the average change in prices paid to producers, jumped 0.9 percent from June, lifting the annual rate to 3.3 percent, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data released on Thursday. It means costs were sharply on the rise for producers and manufacturers in July, a sign that higher prices could soon filter down to American consumers, reports CNN. The PPI serves as a potential bellwether for the prices consumers may see in the months ahead. Thursday's readings far exceeded economists' expectations for prices would rise by just 0.2 percent in July and 2.4 percent annually. And considering the PPI covers the domestic output of goods and services and excludes imports, the potential consumer price inflationary impact could be underestimated, noted Brian Bethune, an economist at Boston College. The Dow fell 175 points, or 0.4 percent, at the opening bell on Thursday. The broader S&P 500 fell 0.35 percent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.3 percent. All three indexes mostly pared those losses later in the morning. Earlier this week, the Consumer Price Index for July showed that falling gas prices kept a lid on overall consumer price hikes but that tariff-sensitive goods continued to get more costly. Traders pared their bets that the Federal Reserve would cut its benchmark lending rate at its September meeting. Excluding food and energy, core PPI also shot higher by 0.9 percent, sending the annual rate to 3.7 percent, the highest level since March. On the goods side, higher food prices were the biggest culprit behind a 0.7 percent monthly increase. Raw agricultural products leapt 12.8 percent highest from June; and within that, fresh and dry vegetables saw a 38.9 percent monthly price surge, which is the largest since March 2022. UNI XC SS
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Passenger, goods transport revenue up in Trichy division
Trichy: The 79th Independence Day was celebrated by Trichy division of Southern Railway at the railway stadium in Kallukuzhi. Divisional railway manager (DRM) Balak Ram Negi hoisted the national flag and took the salute at the ceremonial parade performed by Railway Protection Force (RPF). The DRM said in his speech that the division handled 1.39 crore passengers between April and July 2025, generating a revenue of Rs187.4 crore. The revenue from passenger movement is about 5.8% higher than the earnings in the corresponding period last year (April to July 2024). In the transportation of goods, the division loaded 5 million tonnes (MT) from April to July 2025, earning Rs318.9 crore. This was an increase of 31.6% in earnings compared to the same period last year, the DRM said. He said Trichy division crossed 5 million tonnes in a record 122 days, the fastest in its history. Between April and July 2025, a penalty of Rs4 crore was collected from passengers travelling without a ticket, with improper tickets, or with excess luggage. In this financial year, the division achieved 94.2% punctuality for Express/Passenger/TOD (Train on Demand), a 6% increase when compared to the corresponding period last year. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo On future plans, division sources said that 14 lifts and 12 escalators are planned to be commissioned in coming months at various stations. As part of promoting energy efficiency, a total of 216 conventional fans were replaced with BLDC fans, resulting in an annual saving of Rs5.2 lakh. A dog show by Rocky and Lucky of the RPF dog squad was also performed. The trained canines showcased agility and discipline. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Resisting the coercive new global trade order
How should India respond to the challenges posed by the US tariffs of 50%? Some believe that this crisis presents an opportunity for India to implement deeper economic reforms aimed at enhancing the overall competitiveness of its economy. Others argue that India should intensify its efforts to integrate with non-American economies, such as the EU. Trump has inaugurated a new chapter in the global imperial project, which his successor may continue. Efforts are underway to establish new rules for international trade. (Bloomberg) While these measures are undoubtedly necessary, many Indian analysts overlook a larger issue — the new ideological contestation on the global stage aimed at reshaping international law norms governing world trade. Many believe that US President Donald Trump has upended the rule-based international trading order established by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, there is a prevailing belief that this disruption is temporary. Once Trump leaves office, the status quo would be restored. This view, however, is overly sanguine. There appears to be a bipartisan consensus among both Republicans and Democrats in the US regarding the substance of Trump's actions, even though they may differ in their approach. The Biden administration did little to revive the moribund WTO during its term from 2020 to 2024. Trump has inaugurated a new chapter in the global imperial project, which his successor may continue. Efforts are underway to establish new rules for international trade. This was made clear by ambassador Jamieson Greer, the US Trade Representative. Greer posits that the US has initiated a new 'Trump round' of trade negotiations that, unlike previous rounds at the GATT and WTO, will not rely on consensus-based decision-making. The key elements of this new global trade order include legitimising American coercion for deeper market access, establishing stronger links between trade and non-trade issues like labour, and, most importantly, implementing unilateral enforcement by the US, as opposed to the apolitical dispute settlement system employed by the WTO. If these rules of coercive capitalism become codified as a new international trade order, it could be disastrous for countries in the Global South, including India. Therefore, it is essential to engage in an ideological battle on the global stage against the radical American populist right. It is crucial to understand the intriguing relationship between imperialism and international law. The mainstream belief has been that there is a clear distinction between the imperial past and modern international law. The former is often viewed as a historical anomaly, while the latter is promoted as universal and liberal, representing a narrative of decolonisation and development. However, critical international lawyers argue that international law never severed its ties with its imperial and colonial history. Genealogy, they argue, plays a crucial role in shaping international law norms. Therefore, the expansion of capitalism has played a pivotal role in the growth of international law. As India's foremost international lawyer, B S Chimni, argues, akin to the 'spirit of capitalism' — capitalism's ability to reinvent itself in different phases — there is also a 'spirit of international law'. This spirit allows international law to evolve continually, ably disguising imperial ambitions within the narrative of progress. On one hand, international law presents itself as a universal tool that promotes the global common good and aims to establish a just world order. On the other hand, it also reinforces the imperial agendas of the Global North. The evolution of the multilateral trade order from the establishment of GATT in 1948 to the formation of the WTO in 1995 and beyond reflects the 'spirit of international law.' This rule-based international trade system, influenced by the assertiveness of the decolonised world, made several concessions to developing countries by recognising principles such as non-discrimination, special and differential treatment, preferential market access, and a depoliticized dispute settlement system that aims to resolve trade disputes without resorting to coercive trade diplomacy. Simultaneously, international trade law has promoted and exported American and European norms, leading to their universal adoption. A notable example is the treatment of intellectual property rights (IPR). Economist Robert Reich argues that private property is a fundamental element of the Western capitalist model based on free markets. Over time, the rules governing the protection of private property have expanded to include new types of property, such as IPR. International trade law has played a vital role in establishing binding rules for the global enforcement of IPR through the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement within the WTO. This framework primarily benefits the corporate interests of countries in the Global North, often at the expense of those in the Global South. Another significant example is agricultural trade. The US and the EU provide substantial subsidies to their agricultural sectors. They managed to include an Agreement on Agriculture in the WTO rulebook, allowing them to continue offering significant subsidies to their farmers. Despite its weaknesses, the WTO systemoffers a platform for deeper engagement and the possibility of reform. It provides an opportunity to mainstream the development argument and hold the Global North accountable in a depoliticised international court. The consensus-based decision-making process has mostly prevented the adoption of rules inimical to the developing world. However, the emerging global trade order appears to be unabashedly imperial, abandoning any pretensions of development and equity and sacrificing the spirit of international law. It unapologetically aims to legitimise unilateralism and coercion, validating the connection between imperialism and international law that critical international lawyers draw. Consequently, the Global South, particularly India, must engage in an ideological battle to defend the existing order. For India, the stakes extend beyond mere market access or a trade deal with the US. India must be at the vanguard in defending the WTO-based international trade system, which, while not perfect, is certainly preferable to the impending new imperial trade order. Prabhash Ranjan is professor and vice-dean (research), Jindal Global Law School, OP Jindal Global University. The views expressed are personal.
