Why are 24% of Americans still 'Functionally Unemployed' in a growing economy?
Caption: (Gemini)
Amid headlines touting low unemployment and strong hiring numbers, a deeper, more troubling narrative is taking root across the American workforce. According to a report by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), 24.3% of working-age Americans are "functionally unemployed"—a term that recasts the traditional definition of joblessness to reflect a far grimmer reality (LISEP, 2024).
Unlike the official unemployment rate reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)—which stood at 4.2% as of May 2025—LISEP's metric includes individuals who are technically employed but still unable to secure full-time, living-wage work. That's more than 66 million Americans trapped in jobs that do not cover even the most basic cost of living.
Redefining unemployment: What the numbers miss
The federal government considers anyone who worked at least one hour in the past two weeks to be employed (BLS, May 2025 Report).
But this narrow framework fails to capture underemployment and wage insufficiency.
LISEP's True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) seeks to fill that blind spot by counting individuals as fully employed only if they work full-time (at least 35 hours per week) and earn at least $20,000 annually, adjusted for inflation, or are voluntarily in part-time roles and content with their hours.
More than just a statistical tweak, this reframing exposes the widening chasm between having a job and making a living.
A crisis in plain sight: The toll of functional unemployment
The 24.3% 'functionally unemployed' rate represents workers in three key categories:
The unemployed and actively seeking work
Part-time workers who want full-time employment
Full-time workers earning below $25,000 per year before taxes, below the federal poverty threshold for many households according to LISEP, 2024.
Not just a number: Disparities across race and gender
The crisis does not strike equally. Women experience a functional unemployment rate of 29.9%, compared to 19.3% for men, according to LISEP's latest analysis. The racial breakdown is equally stark: Black and Hispanic Americans consistently face higher rates of functional unemployment than their white counterparts.
These disparities point to deep-seated structural inequalities, from occupational segregation and pay gaps to reduced access to education, transportation, and caregiving support. The traditional employment metrics gloss over this hidden labor divide. TRU, in contrast, brings these injustices to the surface.
A shrinking job market or skills mismatch?
Much of the national discourse has fixated on the so-called skills gap—the idea that workers lack the training needed to compete in a modern economy.
But that explanation oversimplifies the problem. Many Americans are skilled but remain locked out of sectors where automation, outsourcing, and wage compression have reduced the availability of viable work.
The bigger question: What counts as work in America today?
At its core, the issue of functional unemployment is about more than data; it's about how we value labour and human dignity in a 21st-century economy. LISEP's findings force policymakers to confront the uncomfortable truth: Tens of millions of Americans are technically employed, yet economically invisible.
It's not just a matter of training workers better. It's about rebuilding pathways to meaningful, sustainable employment, jobs that pay living wages, provide benefits, and allow for upward mobility.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Senate Parliamentarian blocks key Medicaid cuts in Trump's tax bill, jeopardizing July 4 deadline
The Senate parliamentarian delivered a crucial setback to Republicans on Thursday, ruling that a core Medicaid provider tax overhaul in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending bill violates Senate procedural rules. The provision, intended to save $250 billion by slashing state taxes on hospitals and health providers, was a linchpin in offsetting the bill's trillions in tax breaks, primarily benefiting corporations and wealthy Americans. With Democrats uniformly opposed, Republican leaders must now scramble to revise or remove the provision entirely, as defying the nonpartisan parliamentarian's guidance is virtually unprecedented. The ruling intensifies pressure on GOP senators racing against Trump's July 4 deadline for passage, with the bill's fate now hanging in the balance. The fallout extends beyond Medicaid: The parliamentarian also rejected GOP measures blocking immigrants from healthcare programs and restricting gender-affirming care under Medicaid, further eroding the bill's planned savings. Republican leaders had leaned heavily on these health cuts to fund permanent extensions of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which expire this year. Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) hailed the rulings as a victory, stating they excised 'morally bankrupt' cuts threatening vulnerable Americans. Yet for Republicans, the decisions risk ballooning the bill's deficit impact, which the Congressional Budget Office already estimated at $2.8–$3.4 trillion over a decade. Even before the parliamentarian's ruling, the Medicaid cuts faced fierce resistance within the GOP. Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) warned the provider tax reductions would cripple rural hospitals reliant on those funds—potentially triggering closures in their states. Hawley revealed Trump personally directed him late Wednesday to revert to the House's milder approach (freezing provider taxes instead of cutting them), signaling disarray in Republican strategy. Hospital associations nationwide echoed alarms, predicting the Senate's deeper cuts would 'wipe out balance sheets' and devastate healthcare access. To placate critics, Senate GOP leaders floated a $15 billion rural hospital fund as a safety net. But Collins demanded at least $100 billion, calling the initial figure woefully inadequate, while fiscal hawks like Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) deemed even $15 billion excessive. Tillis, facing reelection in battleground North Carolina, bluntly warned colleagues the cuts could cost Republicans the 2026 midterms, comparing the political fallout to Democrats' Obamacare implosion in 2014. Meanwhile, House Republicans from New York and California threatened to sink the bill over unrelated state tax (SALT) disputes, highlighting the fragile coalition. With the parliamentarian's decision constraining GOP options, Republican leaders now face three untenable choices: strip the Medicaid provisions, revise them to comply with rules (a complex task under time pressure), or force a floor vote requiring 60 senators to override objections, a near-impossible threshold given Democratic unity. The ruling also undermines Trump's ultimatum for passage by July 4, though Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) insisted Republicans have 'contingency plans' and are 'plowing forward.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added urgency by noting the U.S. is nearing its debt limit deadline in August, complicating the timeline further. As the Senate grinds toward potential weekend votes, human stakes underscore the policy clash. In Missouri, mother Courtney Leader told CNN her 9-year-old daughter with cerebral palsy relies on Medicaid for life-sustaining care: 'Without Medicaid, we would lose everything, our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Nato's new higher spending pledge hinges on outcome of Ukraine-Russia war
Though Wednesday's agreement marks a substantial increase over the current goal of 2 per cent the method of measuring this expenditure offers a slightly altered reality Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article American President Donald Trump's claims of securing a 'monumental win' at the annual North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) summit, which concluded at The Hague on June 25, marks a significant shift from his combative stance during his first term. The broad agreement by members to spend 5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) annually on defence by 2035 addresses the American President's contention — insistently raised in his first term (2017-21) — that the United States (US) was doing the heavy lifting in the alliance. This pledge and the overt flattery adroitly heaped on Mr Trump by Nato General
Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US weekly jobless claims fall but unemployment rolls swelling
AP FILE - A help wanted sign is posted in Lansdale, Pa., Friday, April 28, 2023. The number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits fell last week, but the unemployment rate could rise in June as more laid off people struggle to find work. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 10,000 to a seasonally adjusted 236,000 for the week ended June 21, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 245,000 claims for the latest week. The data included last week's Juneteenth National Independence Day holiday. Claims tend to be volatile around public holidays. Technical factors as well as the start of the summer school breaks have accounted for some of the recent rise in claims, which have pushed them to the upper end of their 205,000-250,000 range for this year. Also Read: U.S. economy shrank 0.5% between January and March, worse than earlier estimates revealed Non-teaching staff in some states are eligible to file for unemployment benefits during the summer holidays. Nonetheless, layoffs have picked up and economists say President Donald Trump's broad import tariffs are making it difficult for businesses to plan ahead. The Federal Reserve has responded to the economic uncertainty by pausing its interest rate cutting cycle. Fed Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers this week the U.S. central bank needed more time to gauge if tariffs pushed up inflation before considering lowering rates. The Fed last week left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range where it has been since December. Still, layoffs remain historically low, accounting for much of the labor market stability. Hiring has, however, been lackluster, making it harder for many unemployed to find new opportunities. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 37,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.974 million during the week ending June 14, the highest level since November 2021, the claims report showed. The so-called continuing claims covered the week during which the government surveyed households for June's unemployment rate. The elevated continuing claims have left several economists to expect that the unemployment rate rose to 4.3% in June from 4.2% in May. A survey from the Conference Board this week showed the share of consumers who viewed jobs as being "plentiful" dropped to the lowest level in more than four years in June. "The rising volume of layoffs is likely to translate into an increase of at least one tenth of a percent in the national jobless rate in the June employment report," said Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP.
