logo
'We're still at war': Jo Hamilton ‘vindicated' by OBE but vows to continue Horizon scandal fight

'We're still at war': Jo Hamilton ‘vindicated' by OBE but vows to continue Horizon scandal fight

ITV News26-06-2025
A former subpostmistress who was a victim of the Horizon IT scandal said she feels 'vindicated' after being made an Officer of the British Empire (OBE), but "can't rest" until everyone affected has been paid compensation.
Jo Hamilton, a lead campaigner for Post Office victims, received her OBE for services to justice.
More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted between 1999 and 2015, after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts.
A former sub-postmistress, Jo Hamilton was falsely prosecuted when a £36,000 shortfall was calculated by Horizon software at her Post Office branch in Hampshire, in 2006.
Her story was featured in the ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office, where she was played by Monica Dolan.
On Thursday, Hamilton said being honoured for services to justice by the Princess Royal at Buckingham Palace was 'beautiful'.
'I feel honoured to be honoured, but the fight continues," said the former sub-postmistress.
'We're still at war until the rest of the postmasters are paid, which is just awful.'
She added: 'I do feel vindicated but I can't rest.
'You'd think that after everything that this is the cherry on the cake but I can't stop because I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for my colleagues.'
Hamilton continued: 'Everyone needs to be paid what's right and let everyone get on with their lives because we're all running out of road.
'I'm 22 years older than when it started, I shouldn't have to still be fighting.'
On receiving the letter about her honour, she said: 'You can't mistake the envelope, I knew it was something important.
'It was lovely to receive and it's just another step on my journey to get proper redress for everybody.'
The Government announced earlier this month that more than £1 billion has been paid out to sub-postmasters across the Horizon-related schemes.
But the compensation scheme has been criticised for moving too slowly, or offering far less than sub-postmasters believe they are entitled to.
Many are still awaiting compensation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DAN HODGES: Palestine Action IS a terror group. But its liberal, middle-class backers think it's their right to defy the law
DAN HODGES: Palestine Action IS a terror group. But its liberal, middle-class backers think it's their right to defy the law

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

DAN HODGES: Palestine Action IS a terror group. But its liberal, middle-class backers think it's their right to defy the law

Deborah Hinton had been left in 'a state of trauma'. 'I was shaking uncontrollably,' the 81-year-old former magistrate explained as she reclined in her stylish armchair in her home in Gorran Haven, Cornwall. The police who had arrested her had the temerity to confiscate 'my handbag, my watch, and I was also wearing my miniature OBE, and they took that too', she recalled. Ms Hinton's only crime? Well, it was actually quite a serious one. She was arrested for supporting a proscribed terrorist organisation, an offence which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. As she would have been aware, given she's also a former member of the National Parole Board.

Tenby Male Choir raised £2,000 for Wales Air Ambulance
Tenby Male Choir raised £2,000 for Wales Air Ambulance

Western Telegraph

time11 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Tenby Male Choir raised £2,000 for Wales Air Ambulance

Tenby Male Choir's recent concert at St Mary's Church in Tenby raised £2,000 for the Wales Air Ambulance, with around 250 people in attendance. Anthony 'Tony' Key, OBE, aged 79, is the choir's MC and a former regional fundraising manager for the air ambulance. Mr Key said: "We have performed 13 concerts so far, seven of which have been fundraisers for charities and good causes. "We have raised £7,000 and have a few more events ahead." On the latest concert, he said: "We packed out St Mary's, around 250 people supported our event in aid of Wales Air Ambulance. "The atmosphere was electric. "We raised £2,000, that's the most we have ever raised at just one concert. "We only charge £10 per person and children under 16 go free, so we are delighted to be able to donate so much." Mr Key said it means a great deal to support the Wales Air Ambulance once again. He said: "I am hugely proud to be connected with the charity. "I worked for the air ambulance for five years before stepping down in 2016 to have more family time. "We live in such a rural part of Wales, so if something serious happens to you, your best hope is the onboard clinicians. "The service brings all the expertise that you would find in an emergency department to your doorstep or roadside. "I am so pleased that we have been able to support this incredible cause." The Wales Air Ambulance relies on public donations to raise the £11.2 million needed each year to keep its helicopters flying and rapid response vehicles on the road. Mike May, regional fundraising manager for South West Wales, said: "Congratulations to all the Tenby Male Choir members on your amazing milestone. "We are delighted that as you celebrate your 50th anniversary, you have chosen us as one of the beneficiaries of your fundraising. "We'd like to extend a big thank you to all those who took part in the concert in aid of us and the generous supporters who attended on the night. "£2,000 is an incredible amount and every pound raised will help save lives." The choir opened the concert with the Welsh hymn Rachie, originally sung during the First World War, which Mr Key dedicated to the 'loyal and brave' pilots and clinicians of the air ambulance service. He said: "It's been so wonderful to bring together two things I am hugely passionate about, my singing and the amazing work of the Wales Air Ambulance." The choir's 50th anniversary concert will take place on September 4 at the De Valence Pavilion, with special guests including president Wynne Evans and feature choir Bella Voce.

Widower continues tribunal claim against FOI Commissioner
Widower continues tribunal claim against FOI Commissioner

The Herald Scotland

time13 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Widower continues tribunal claim against FOI Commissioner

Just weeks later, she was diagnosed with terminal cancer. She died in February 2025. One of her dying wishes was that her husband, Ian, push on with the case. The Commissioner's office is defending the claim. READ MORE The tribunal claim also raises wider concerns about who watches the watchdogs. The Commissioner is responsible for the "enforcement and promotion of Scotland's freedom of information laws", including "handling appeals about the way in which Scottish public authorities respond to information requests". Given the need to avoid political interference, the job comes with a certain degree of independence. But that means the postholder can only be removed by a supermajority in the Scottish Parliament. According to the claim, Helen enjoyed a good working relationship with the previous Commissioner, Daren Fitzhenry, but that changed after the appointment of David Hamilton, a former chair of the Scottish Police Federation, in October 2023. The tribunal papers submitted by Helen state that the relationship deteriorated rapidly. They go on to allege that at a January 2024 meeting, Mr Hamilton proposed an internal award called 'Margaret the Fox', named after a recently retired colleague, which Helen and two female colleagues found offensive due to 'the use of the word fox [having] negative connotations when referring to women". The Commissioner, in his legal defence, says the award was a tribute to a colleague's fondness for foxes and had been welcomed by the person in question. The claim also says she raised broader concerns about the 'introduction of a police culture', including staff feeling pressured to laugh at the Commissioner's jokes. The defence disputes that such concerns were raised in the way described. During a return-to-work call after a period of absence, the claim alleges Helen was told she was "being precious", "obsessing", and that "people do not like her". The Commissioner denies saying that people disliked her. In meetings, she was reportedly told she was "not agile", lacked a "can-do attitude", and had "failed in her job". One meeting allegedly ended with her being told to "be quiet" after raising financial concerns – an incident contested in the Commissioner's defence. On March 14, she emailed Mr Hamilton, stating: "All members of staff, including myself, should be treated with consideration, dignity and respect while at work. Your comments about me are incorrect and are having a detrimental effect on me. "You are not treating me fairly, with dignity or respect. I feel intimidated by you and discriminated against. The way you treat me, in person, in meetings and in writing, is unacceptable and also makes me feel belittled, anxious and not valued." She lodged a formal grievance five days later, citing "unreasonable treatment" and alleging discrimination, harassment and intimidation. She was then absent due to ill health. Helen submitted the claim in December. She died in February. (Image: agency) According to her claim, Mr Hamilton initially responded by saying a "bespoke arrangement" would be created to ensure an independent process was in place, but only upon her return to work. In March, he assigned another senior official, line-managed by him, to act as her main contact – despite Helen requesting someone else. The Commissioner disputes that the arrangements were inappropriate and later agreed to appoint an external independent investigator, contingent on confirmation of Helen's fitness to engage. In June, he reiterated that he would proceed with the grievance only once she confirmed she was medically fit. He added he had sought legal advice. Helen responded that her ill health had been caused by his conduct and she was willing and able to participate in the process. The claim alleges that on July 19, Mr Hamilton phoned Helen's trade union representative to suggest she was ignoring emails – something her tribunal documents say was untrue. The Commissioner says he simply asked for emails to be acknowledged. That same day, she was told her laptop and phone would be collected due to cyber-security protocols applying to staff absent for more than four months. Her legal team say she was also blocked from using pre-approved annual leave to extend her period of full pay, with leave cancelled three times in April, May and August. The Commissioner says she was paid in lieu and suffered no loss. In a letter dated August 13, Mr Hamilton wrote that "on conclusion of the internal grievance process, it is likely I will be investigating performance and disciplinary procedures". The letter provided no details of the alleged issues. Tribunal documents say Helen found this particularly upsetting and reiterated her request for the grievance to be investigated without delay. By October 21, Helen had still not been contacted by the promised investigator. She emailed Mr Hamilton again to say the delay was harming her health and that she felt she was being punished for lodging a grievance. He replied that same day, saying he had just returned to work and would respond after catching up. Helen resigned three days later. READ MORE In her resignation letter, she wrote: "It is now more than seven months since I submitted a formal grievance against you and you have refused to allow any of my grievances to be dealt with." She said his behaviour during her absence and while working had caused "enormous damage" to her health and left her with "no alternative but to resign". There is no suggestion of a link between the treatment Helen received and her cancer diagnosis. Before her resignation, she is understood to have been offered a financial settlement by the Commissioner, but it was rejected. Helen's lawyer, Tony McGrade, argues that the Commissioner's handling of the grievance process was "significantly below accepted standards". He told The Herald: "This case highlights the real dangers in there being no procedure in place to allow grievances against officials such as the Scottish Information Commissioner to be independently investigated. "This means that the person against whom an allegation of discrimination or unfair treatment is made decides whether that is investigated. This is simply wrong." Under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, the Scottish Information Commissioner is a statutory officeholder appointed by the Scottish Parliament and operates independently of government. Unlike most public sector roles, the Commissioner is not accountable to ministers or civil service structures, and complaints about their conduct are not subject to routine oversight. Removal from office requires a formal resolution passed by two-thirds of MSPs – a deliberately high threshold designed to protect the role from political interference. That resolution can be triggered if the Parliament is satisfied the Commissioner has breached the terms and conditions of office, or if it determines that it has lost confidence in the Commissioner's willingness, suitability or ability to do the job. Helen's husband believes this has created an accountability gap, making it extremely difficult for staff to challenge the Commissioner's actions through normal employment procedures or for Parliament to intervene when serious concerns arise. It is understood the matter has been raised informally with Alison Johnstone, the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament, who confirmed the limited powers available to intervene in what is treated as an internal employment matter. Those close to the case say the aim of the legal action is not financial compensation, but accountability – though Mr Hamilton strongly contests the allegations. The Commissioner said it "fully intends to defend its position in the Employment Tribunal" but that it "would be entirely wrong to make any comment on the substance of the claim until the Tribunal has considered the full evidence and issued a judgment." "The Commissioner will accordingly respect that process, being of the view that this is covered by the law relating to contempt of court, and will be making no comment until the appropriate time."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store