Drake's OVO Fest Is Returning This 2025
Drake'sOVO Festis due to make its big return this 2025.
The announcement was made by The Boy himself during his appearance atCentral Cee's Toronto show over the weekend. In a viral clip, Drake is first heard giving Cee his flowers before thanking the audience.
'I'll see you this summer,' he tells the crowd as he gets ready to continue the show. 'I will say this though, because I haven't had the chance to say this yet. OVO Fest is back this year.'
No additional details were announced, leaving fans to wait for more info.
The last OVO Fest dates back to2022, which happened to also mark the festival's return since the pandemic.
Stay tuned for more details.
DRAKE
OVO FEST
🚨COMING 2025🚨
Drake was at Central Cee's Toronto show and announced it's return 🦉pic.twitter.com/Mn3k6bzySL
— NFR Podcast (@nfr_podcast)May 25, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
a day ago
Drake's legal battle against record label intensifies
The rapper Drake looks for ammunition in the defamation lawsuit against his own record label over the Kendrick Lamar diss track, "They Not Like Us."
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Drake Blocked From A New No. 1 By One Of Rap's Most Successful Women
As is often the case, Drake has a number of singles present on multiple Billboard charts this week. The Canadian superstar recently delivered a pair of new tunes — 'What Did I Miss?' and 'Which One' with Central Cee — only a few months after sharing a full-length, Some Sexy Songs 4 U, with PartyNextDoor. A number of tunes from that project are also performing well, even as Drake seems ready to move on. Drake almost sends one of his most recent releases to No. 1, but one of the most successful women in hip-hop history blocks him from ruling, at least for the moment. 'What Did I Miss?' Climbs to No. 2 Drake's 'What Did I Miss?' rises to No. 2 on the Rhythmic Airplay chart, one of Billboard's radio rosters centered around hip-hop. Five weeks into its life on the tally, 'What Did I Miss?' almost conquers the ranking, but another current smash blocks it from becoming the rapper's record-extending forty-third champion. Cardi B Sends 'Outside' to No. 1 This week's Rhythmic Airplay is led by Cardi B, who brings 'Outside' to No. 1 for the first time. Last week, the tune sat at No. 3, and now it's another chart ruler for her. Cardi lands her ninth career No. 1 on the Rhythmic Airplay chart as 'Outside,' a single from her forthcoming sophomore album Am I the Drama?, ascends. She has now led the charge with all of the following successes: 'I Like It' with Bad Bunny and J Balvin, 'Bodak Yellow (Money Moves),' 'Finesse' with Bruno Mars, 'No Limit' with G-Eazy and ASAP Rocky, 'WAP' with Megan Thee Stallion, 'Please Me' (another collaboration with Mars), and 'Be Careful.' Drake's 'Which One' With Central Cee Debuts While he might not score another No. 1 just yet, Drake does collect a new hit on the Rhythmic Airplay chart, as 'Which One,' which features U.K. artist Central Cee, opens at No. 29. Drake has now racked up 135 wins on the radio roster. He fills a trio of spaces on the tally this time around, as 'Nokia' drops outside of the top 10, falling from No. 8 to No. 11. 'What Did I Miss?' Lifts on All Radio Rankings 'What Did I Miss?' is gaining ground on every radio chart on which it appears. The track lives inside the top 10 on the Rhythmic Airplay, Rap Airplay, R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay, and Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay lists, lifting to Nos. 2, 3, 7, and 8, respectively. Drake's cut also grows on the all-genre Radio Songs roster, pushing from No. 39 to No. 31 in its third turn on the tally.
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
UMG chief Lucian Grainge calls Drake's ‘Not Like Us' lawsuit ‘ridiculous'
Universal Music Group Chief Executive Lucian Grainge called Drake's lawsuit over Kendrick Lamar's hit diss track 'Not Like Us' a 'farcical' effort that's 'groundless and indeed ridiculous.' In a declaration letter filed Thursday night in the Southern District of New York, Grainge said that Drake's accusation that UMG (the parent label firm to both Drake and Lamar) defamed him and damaged his career 'makes no sense due to the fact that the company that I run, Universal Music Group N.V., has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Drake, including longstanding and critical financial support for his recording career, the purchase and ownership of the bulk of his recording catalog, and the purchase of his music publishing rights.' Drake signed a new deal with UMG label Republic in 2022 for a reported $400 million, and he's one of the bestselling artists of the last 20 years. Yet Interscope artist Lamar's scathing 'Not Like Us' famously capped a venomous battle between the two artists, which resulted in a pair of Grammy wins for Lamar, who performed the song at the Super Bowl halftime show. Drake's attorneys, in discovery, have recently tried to obtain UMG's contract with Lamar and information about his personal life (Drake accused Lamar of beating his partner in the song 'Family Matters'). Drake has accused UMG of both defamation and running a clandestine campaign to boost 'Not Like Us' at the expense of his own reputation and career. A notably exasperated Grainge wrote to the court that 'Given my role, I am accustomed (and unfortunately largely resigned) to personal attacks, and I further recognize that a frequent strategy of UMG's litigation opponents is to attempt to waste my and UMG's time and resources with discovery of the sort that Drake is seeking here — either in an attempt to gain media attention or in an effort to force some kind of commercial renegotiation or financial concessions.' Grainge also denied having any personal involvement in the rollout or marketing for 'Not Like Us.' 'Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG's global businesses,' he said, 'the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of 'Not Like Us,' its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.' In a separate letter to the court, UMG said that 'The premise of Drake's motion — that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG's corporate structure — is absurd.'
