5 years in, the PS5 proves that the PS6 can't just be a more powerful box
As we approach our fifth year with the PS5, and rumors continue to swirl about the PS6, I don't believe Sony can rely on a marginally more powerful box being enough to justify whatever price it demands next time around.
Recommended Videos
Diminishing returns
It's no surprise that the main selling point for new hardware is its technical capabilities. It is easy to show off shinier graphics, bigger worlds, and more realistic physics to a mass audience. We all knew we had to get that PS1 or N64 to experience that level of 3D graphics, or get a PS3 or Xbox 360 to experience full HD games. I'd argue that the last time the general consumer saw a noticeable gap between one generation and the next was going from the PS3 to PS4. I'm not embarrassed to admit that even I could be fooled if someone told me some PS4 games were actually on PS5 or vice versa.
Check out this screenshot of Uncharted 4 — a game released almost 10 years ago — and tell me this couldn't pass for a PS5 game.
If you were to analyze and pick apart this game compared to a PS5 game, yes, I'm certain the PS5 game would come out on top. But more detailed shadows or faster rendering times don't necessarily make a game more fun to play. I'm also confident that every boost in power is a godsend to developers working to squeeze every bit of juice out of the hardware. Even in this regard we are starting to see developers praising the efficiency of new hardware above any graphical leap. Kojima Productions' chief technical officer Akio Sakamoto commented on the transition from PS4 to PS5 for Death Stranding 2 to Edge Magazine saying, 'The most obvious improvement from a technological point of view is the reduction in loading times, but to be honest, the difference between the two hardware systems isn't so great,' he says. 'It's more a case that on PS5 there are more efficient ways of arriving at similar goals.'
I won't deny how important it is to make the creation of games as frictionless as possible for the developers, but the fact is that those are diminishing returns for a large group of players. All we care about is whether or not we feel justified investing in the box we spend our hard-earned cash on.
The trend of introducing Pro models doesn't help the issue as they further blur the lines between proper generations. The PS5 Pro reveal is a prime example, where the differences had to be zoomed in on to be conveyed. We're breaching the level of what the average consumer can even understand as an improvement. Ray-tracing isn't exactly common parlance, and I doubt most people could tell you what a teraflop is. Compounding it all is the fact that many, if not most, people don't own the types of displays that can even show it off to experience that difference.
I'm not saying that we should be content with where graphics are today. Someone at every stage of gaming has proclaimed that 'graphics can never get any better than this,' and has been proven wrong each time. PlayStation absolutely needs to make the PS6 as powerful as it can, but it can't rely on that as its main selling point like past generations. Sony could get away with it with the PS5 Pro, but the general public isn't going to be impressed if they can't see a difference between a PS5 and PS6 game side-by-side without a magnifying glass. To be fair, the PS5's SSD was another touted upgrade over the PS4. Outside of Marvel's Spider-Man 2, however, this hasn't amounted to doing much that couldn't be done previously except for loading games a little faster.
So, where does that leave the PS6 and other future consoles? Convenience has to be where PlayStation pivots next now that any technical advancement will only appeal to developers and the most hardcore fans. It has already started this process with a tempered PC release cadence that doesn't infringe on the core console sales, as well as by adding cloud functionality to the PS Portal without the need for a PS5. The rumors of a dedicated handheld is another necessary gamble to meet players where they are. Like it or not, we're living in a world of instant gratification and PlayStation has to remove as many barriers as possible between its players and its games.
Whatever the PS6 ends up looking like, it's the games that have to be at the heart of it. Introducing new experiences, new ways to play, and the freedom to play however we want will matter far more than throwing around terms like PSSR, terraflops, and CPU clock speeds. Most of all, I want the PS6 to give me what I don't know I want yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I review TVs for a living and these are affordable back-to-school TV deals I'd actually buy for my dorm room
When looking for back-to-school TVs, price means absolutely everything. You don't need to splurge on one of the best OLED TVs if you're not going to use it for more than four years, especially if most of your time will be spent (hopefully) studying, researching, or sitting in classrooms. Still, if you're here, you obviously want to find a TV with good-enough picture quality and not settle for the cheapest TV you can find. While the TV you take to college doesn't have to be a top-of-the-line set, one with a good amount of features and reliable picture performance should be your goal. As someone who tests TVs (and someone who's not too far out of college that I can't remember dorm life) I've tried to narrow the list of TVs down to fit most budgets. So, if you're heading back to school yourself, in search of a new TV for your child, or want a budget display for your off-campus apartment, these are the six TVs I recommend. This Roku display is the perfect back-to-school TV selection, especially if you're on a budget. You will have to make some compromises, like going with a non-4K TV, but that doesn't make the Roku Select any worse of an option. It's limited on specs but high on value, making itself a steal at under $200. Roku just updated its TV lineup, meaning the Select is totally revamped. I got to see the new Roku Select in action earlier this year and was blown away by how slim the design was. The great thing about Roku, too, is the wide selection of free content you have at your fingertips, so you don't even need to subscribe to any streaming services to get quality content. This Roku Select Series TV is one of the newest Roku TVs on the market. Its picture quality won't blow you away, but for a sensationally low price, you're getting access to one of the best streaming platforms on the market. This is a great opportunity to save money on a 65-inch smart TV with simple, easy-to-use features. Sony's commitment to designing some of the best TVs even extends to its budget models. You'd be right in equating Sony TVs with premium, but it also has some cheaper sets that could work well in a dorm room setting. One such model is the Sony Bravia 3 LED TV. Again, given the price range set under $600, you'll have to live with something other than an OLED, which is fine because the Bravia 3 has some pep in its step. It's not pushing out any record-breaking numbers by any means, but it does have some quality color coverage. In our testing, the Bravia 3 hit 95.88% of the UHDA-P3 gamut and sports a Delta-E of 3.5. The Delta-E score deals with color accuracy, with lower numbers being better. In this case, the Bravia 3 has some great color accuracy, as anything under a 4 is quite good. Brightness is another matter entirely. You're not going to see metrics that mirror a Hisense Mini-LED model here, but that's what you get at this price. At least the Bravia 3 does have an input latency of 9.2ms, so on the off chance you end up gaming in your spare time, this TV won't disappoint. The Bravia 3 isn't as impressive as the higher-end Bravia 7, but if you're in the market for a 75-inch TV for under $1,000, you can't go wrong with Sony's budget-friendly LED TV. It doesn't offer a robust set of gaming features, but the Bravia 3 comes with Google TV baked right into the software. We were also impressed with its implementation of Sony's excellent picture processing. So 1080p and bare-minimum LED TVs just aren't really for you? That's okay, because TVs are getting cheaper these days and both TCL and Hisense have some incredible picks for you in the lower-rungs of their lineups. Case in point is the TCL QM6K, a well-rounded, gaming-centric Mini-LED TV that does its best to eke out as much value as is possible on a sub-$500 sticker price. In our review of the TCL QM6K Mini-LED TV, we raved about its sleek design and picture performance. Again, this isn't a premium display, but it still ticks all the right boxes, netting you good color accuracy and tons of gaming features. It wrangles all of the HDR formats, too, making it particularly ideal for anyone with HDR streaming subscriptions. You can also expect to get somewhat middling audio out of this TV, but that's to be expected across the board with most displays. While it might say it's audio system is made by Onkyo, that doesn't quite mean it will have as bombastic an audio output as conventional Onkyo speakers. Need a TV that can also double as a computer monitor? One in particular that I really love on TCL TVs is its 240Hz mode, which lets you drop the TV to 1080p and play games in the higher refresh rate. It's a bit niche and works best when paired with one of the best gaming PCs... just don't let it distract you from your schoolwork. The QM6K represents one of the most affordable ways to land a Mini-LED TV that can double as a computer monitor. Google TV is available right out of the box, and the TV's relatively modest Mini-LED backlight keeps scenes visually appealing. Samsung's The Frame isn't the cheapest TV on the market, but you can find it at lower prices, especially in smaller configurations. It's great for college students who want their room to have some real personality. It comes with access to tons of artwork from galleries across the world, which will certainly make any art history majors out there very happy. It's obviously a good TV, with solid picture performance, but Samsung's The Frame also has incredible audio for a smaller display. You'd expect Samsung to put all of its effort into designing the look and aesthetic of the TV, but the speakers actually offer some kick unlike other options in its weight class. In our Samsung The Frame (2024) hands-on, we said the TV looks great in art mode and we also liked that the Samsung Art Store now offers a monthly curation of artwork users can display for free. The TV also features HDR10 Plus support, 120Hz refresh rate, built-in Amazon Alexa, Samsung's Tizen operating system, and four HDMI 2.1 ports. While it might sit at the bottom of Hisense's 2025 TV lineup, the U6QF still has some quality features and performance that makes it stand out. We don't have an official review of the TV just yet, but we went hands on with the Hisense U6QF Mini-LED TV several months ago and saw some promising results. At 144Hz, the U6QF makes a name for itself with some serious specs at a budget price. On top of its high refresh rate, the U6QF also boasts gaming features, like VRR and ALLM, plus two HDMI 2.1 ports. Hisense also has a special AI Smooth Motion technology, which should enhance motion clarity on the display. Finding a solid 65-inch TV for under $600 is tough, but the U6QF delivers. It's a brilliant TV for this price, but you might have to contend with some blooming and poor off-axis viewing, which is common for Mini-LED TVs at lower prices. This is the lowest price ever offered for the Hisense 55" Class U6 Series Mini-LED 4K UHD Smart Fire TV. It's a newer TV (a 2025 model, in fact), which means you'll have all the most current technology and features. Between the Native 144Hz, HDR10+ support, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and Amazon's stellar Fire TV OS, you have everything you need for a great entertainment experience. We've been singing the praises of the Panasonic W95A ever since the 75-inch variation hit an all-time low price of $797. One of its biggest drawbacks upon debut was the premium price, and now it's one of the cheapest Mini-LED TVs you can buy — even if it's a year old. Don't let its age fool you, though. I tested Panasonic W95A Mini-LED TV last year and was pleasantly surprised by its brightness, HDR performance, and anti-glare mitigation. Again, this TV won't quite match the same high brightness metrics available on Hisense models, but with just over 1,400 nits in both HDR and SDR, it's plenty bright for any dorm room. With its sticker price down to its lowest point, the W95A makes the perfect budget pick for any student looking to get exceptional picture performance without a hefty investment. Panasonic's fantastic Mini-LED TV has never been more affordable, so it's worth pouncing on this deal before it disappears. You're not just getting a great sale price with the W95A, you're also getting a superb, 55-inch Mini-LED TV loaded with extra features. We dug this TV when it was over a thousand bucks, and we really dig it now that it's below $500.
Tom's Guide
4 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Sony WH-1000XM6 3 months later: here's my honest verdict on how Sony's flagship cans hold up
Despite their ever-presence on best lists all over the internet, I wasn't actually all that much of a fan of the Sony WH-1000XM5. Don't get me wrong, I completely understood why so many users and reviewers were enamoured with Sony's flagship over-ears, but there were a number of reasons that they didn't hit right with me. Their extremely narrow headband that dug into my head, and I wasn't a fan of their weird, squishy protective case and their extremely plasticky build. It added up to a pair of headphones that didn't match up to the similarly priced competition. So when Sony announced the XM6, I was ready for a new pair of headphones that could take their place upon my melon. Their release specs were exciting. It looked like Sony had thought about all my issues and fixed the problems. A wider headband, a new sturdy case, a folding frame. And then I got them in my hands. The WH-1000XM6 are a good pair of headphones—they deserve their 4-star review, after all—but they're not the best headphones around. I've now had my hands on the XM6 to really make a solid opinion beyond the review of the cans — here's what I've found. Sony's headphones have always featured excellent ANC — I can't knock them for that. When you turn it on, the world seems to melt away into your music. Recent models have negated some of the pressure and claustrophobia that older versions created, and new features have been introduced to rank them amongst the best noise-canceling headphones you can buy. Perhaps we're now reaching peak noise canceling. The point where the only improvements firms can make are negligible, the top of the curve as it flattens itself out. Maybe the fact that the XM6 aren't all that much more effective at noise canceling than the previous headphones is down to some cosmic ANC limit that we've now reached. They are better than the XM5, and in my testing time, I've found that they are, indeed, very good. But I was hoping for more. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are undefeated. They still block out more noise than Sony's headphones, and they've been out for a full year by the time that Sony launched the XM6. To counteract, Sony created an algorithm that changes the ANC depending on where you are, measuring the noise of your environment to change the ANC on the fly. I understand this decision, but it also sounds a lot like ANC's chief purpose reworded for a specs list. I've stacked the XM6 up against their nearest rivals in a range of different environments and I've seen little difference in 'max ANC' in any of them. The feature, it would appear, doesn't make much sense. The ANC is very good, there's no doubt about that. But considering how good the Bose competition is at blocking noise, I was really hoping for more — and time hasn't done them any favors. One of my main complaints with the XM5 was just how flimsy they felt. Their all-over matte finish and plastic build made them feel cheaper than they actually were, and the squishing case was novel but ultimately too large and annoying. Then there was the headband — a thin, padded affair that pressed down in one spot on my head to make for an unfortunate pressure point. The XM6 have ironed out a whole bunch of these issues. The case, for example, is much sturdier and its magnetic clasp has grown on me in my time with the headphones. I'm still not entirely convinced as to this mechanism's longevity, but it feels secure and tactile as of right now. I miss the magnetic cable store door inside, but I appreciate the folding mechanism that means the case can be more compact. I've found it easy enough to port the headphones around as a result, as they take up less space in a backpack. That folding mechanism does raise a continued issue with the most recent XM designs, however. The XM5's plastic armatures were a key weakness and failure point, so to add a folding mechanism into what appear to be similarly sized points feels... interesting. Nothing has broken in Tom's Guides XM6s as yet, but it's something I know I'll be keeping an eye on as my testing continues. Over my time with the headphones, I've had mixed experiences with the new padded headband. It is much better than that found on the XM6, but it has to sit just right to not cause any comfort issues on your crown. Too far forward or too far back and the same problem persists. Even then, for longer periods of wear, the XM6 aren't as comfortable as the far better-padded Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 or QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. Overall build remains the bugbear. I still don't like the matte finishes that seem to conjure skin grease and fingerprints from thin air, or the overly simplistic style of the XM series. I particularly don't like how light and hollow the headphones feel — while the lightness makes them more comfortable, it also makes them feel much cheaper than their $449 price tag would suggest. That feeling has only been exacerbated over my extended use of the headphones. I want something expensive to feel expensive, and the fairly non-descript looking XM6 neither look or feel the part. They're not badly built, I should re-iterate. They just don't feel expensive. I'm not going to sit here and tell you that the XM6 sound bad. I can't. That wouldn't be true — the XM6 sound good. There's solid balance on display, as well as some top-notch vocal clarity that AV Managing Editor Nick noted in the review. But, when you compare them to some of their similarly priced and even cheaper competition, there are significant chinks in their sonic armor. Sony's typical overemphasis on the low-end is still very much present here. For most listeners, that's not going to be a problem, but it does mean they lose out when compared to the more controlled and tighter sound profile of the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3. There's more detail out of the Brits as well, and an all-around more complete audio experience. I've found the EQ helpful in my testing, but there's still a strange hollowness that I can sense no matter how much work I put into the sliders. It feels like "good sound by numbers" as opposed to a passionate team of audio engineers creating a unique sound profile. Most people aren't going to have a bad time with the XM6. They'll put them on and say, "Wow, those sound great!" and then go about their day. But put them side by side with their closest rivals price-wise, and things get trickier for Sony's flagship. If you put the XM5 next to the XM4, I think that most would be able to fairly quickly work out the differences between the two pairs of headphones. Do the same with the XM5 and the XM6, and things would go differently. Much like the minimal physical differences, the updates inside make the XM6 feel a bit like de ja vu. The battery life remains the same at 35 hours, and the touch controls and app features are pretty much identical. The color-matched cables from the old models are gone, and the ANC key is the same. Dive further in and the XM6 separate themselves out, but this still feels like less of an update than we might have hoped for. As a result, this is not a must-update for XM5 owners. I've found an experience that is almost entirely the same as the XM5 during my extended testing. If your XM5s are still going strong, don't upgrade — wait and see what the XM7 has in store for us in a few years. As for those looking to buy a new pair of flagship headphones, I think you should consider the competition. The XM6 don't sound as good as the PX7 S3 and don't block out as much noise as the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. I don't hate the XM6 by any means. They're a very good pair of headphones. But when the competition are 'excellent', 'very good' doesn't quite seem to match up.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
《Mortal Kombat 1》、《Sword of the Sea》、《Lies of P》！8 月 PS Plus 會員基本、升級、高級檔新遊戲看這裡
Yahoo編輯團隊致力為你精選優質產品及優惠價格，文章中部份商品、平台與Yahoo有合作關係，定價及供應量均會隨市場變動，請以平台最新資料為準。 《 Mortal Kombat 1 》、《Sword of the Sea》、《Lies of P》！8 月 PS Plus 會員基本、升級、高級檔新遊戲看這裡 PS Plus 的 8 月份會員免費、升級及高級檔新遊戲陣容已全數公開。會免這次的主打作品是《Lies of P》，而升級和高級檔則有《Mortal Kombat 1》、《Sword of the Sea》坐鎮。 基本會員 8 月限免： 《Lies of P》（PS5、PS4） 《Day Z》（PS4） 《My Hero One's Justice 2》（PS5） 除基本會員限免遊戲，升級和高級會員可再獲以下作品： 《Mortal Kombat 1》（PS5） 《漫威蜘蛛俠 重製版》（PS5、PS4） 《word of the Sea》（PS5 首發入庫） 《地球防衛軍 6》（PS5、PS4） 《萊莎的鍊金工房３ 終結之鍊金術士與秘密鑰匙》（PS5、PS4） 《聖獸之王》（PS5、PS4） 《Harold Halibut》（PS5） 《珊瑚島》（PS5） 高級會員可再獲以下作品： PS 經典《生化危機 2》（PS5、PS4） PS 經典《生化危機 3》（PS5、PS4） 《死亡擱淺 2》（5 小時試玩） 會免遊戲從 8 月 5 日起有效，升級、高級檔新增遊戲則將從 8 月 19 日起入庫，想體驗的朋友到時記得去下載。 立即前往 PlayStation 官網了解 廣告 廣告 👉 備戰《黑神話：悟空》！PS5 合用大容量 SSD 網購優惠 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠，追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台！ 🎉📱 Tech Facebook： 🎉📱 Tech Instagram： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道：
