Anthony Albanese defends Labor's action against anti-Semitism after Melbourne synagogue fire
While quizzed by journalists in Hobart on Tuesday, the Prime Minister snapped back at a reporter who said Jewish community leaders had claimed the government's response was 'insufficient'.
The questions were in response to an alleged arson attack on the East Melbourne Synagogue on Friday night,
'Who is saying that?' asked in response, and said he had spoken to community leaders on Saturday.
'Every time there has been a request, it has been met, expeditiously,' he said.
'On Saturday, one of the reasons why this gentleman has been caught so quickly is because the CCTV that was in place there was as a direct result of Commonwealth Government funding.'
Mr Albanese also rejected calls for him to convene national cabinet in response to Friday's alleged arson attack.
'Every time an issue comes up, people say, let's have a national cabinet. Let's be clear. What people want is not a meeting. They want action,' Mr Albanese said.
Mr Albanese's comments comes after Executive Council of the Australian Jewry president Alex Ryvchin urged the government to adopt its 15-point plan to 'defeat anti-Semitism' in Australia.
The plan includes calls for anti-Semitism education in the national curriculum and urges Labor to declare a National Emergency and establish a Joint Counter-Terrorism Taskforce to 'fight against anti-Semitic terror before we have a major terror attack in this country'.
Speaking later on Tuesday following a visit to the East Melbourne Synagogue, Sussan Ley maintained the Albanese government was not doing enough to protect Jewish-Australians.
'What I hear from the community is there have been many task forces, there have been many talkfests, many conversations and many words. What they are really calling for is action,' she said, alongside shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser and finance spokesperson James Paterson.
Ms Ley also called for stronger state hate speech laws, which would prohibit people from chanting phrases like 'death to Israel,' and said calls for a national cabinet meeting to tackle anti-Semitism were a 'good suggestion'.
'There shouldn't be an ability for people to chant the words 'death' and I won't complete the phase, on the streets of Melbourne, and it just be accepted,' she said.
'It is not a protest, it is hate – pure hate and we need to have laws and levers and I would respectfully ask the Premier of Victoria to consider how she might instruct law enforcement in a way that allows a stronger intervention.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
24 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Fast approvals only add to housing construction logjam
Adding new housing projects to Australia's already swollen pipeline has been likened to turning the "tap on a bath that is already full", as analysis shows faster approvals are no silver bullet in fixing the nation's crisis. Data from property research firm Cotality shows approvals could move higher in the coming months due to rezoning reforms and incentives for new builds coinciding with falling interest rates. But rather than fix the shortage of homes, it could cause a problem for the construction industry by adding new projects to an already long list. "It's like turning up the tap on a bath that is already full," said the analysis from head of research Eliza Owen. It found delivery to be the problem, not approvals, with 219,000 homes under construction and completion times ballooning. "The real bottleneck lies in the build phase, not planning reform," the analysis said. The federal government's goal to build 1.2 million new homes in five years, adopted in August 2023, is thought of as unachievable by the industry. "With completion times already above average, and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements to the backlog of work to be done," the report stated. Ahead of the Albanese government's national productivity summit later this month, the report calls for a move away from demand stimulation to sustainable delivery. "Making homes faster and cheaper to build, while still maintaining quality, resilient homes is the key challenge for policymakers to focus on right now," the report reads. Labor's massive election win has prompted union bosses to call for the government to revisit potential changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions. But proposals to scale back the tax deduction is tricky for the government, after Labor took reforms for negative gearing to the 2019 federal election and lost. Negative gearing allows investors to claim deductions on losses and the capital gains tax discount halves the tax paid by Australians who sell assets owned for 12 months or more. The analysis says if governments are serious about delivering on the housing target, they "must focus on building capacity, lifting productivity, and ensuring every approved home actually gets built".
Sky News AU
24 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Labor's international student backflip a 'farce', as economist claims Albanese government 'selling migration and work rights'
MacroBusiness Chief Economist Leith Van Onselen has claimed the Albanese government's backflip on international students will add to the already 'massive' number of migrants seeking permanent residency, favourable labour laws and work rights. The Albanese government announced on Tuesday a 'sustainable' increase of 25,000 additional international student places for 2026, bringing the National Planning Level to 295,000. Mr van Onselen branded the government's announcement 'ridiculous' and argued the 'farce' would contribute to a decline in university standards. 'Australia has the highest concentration of international students in the world… the government needs to get the numbers down,' he told 'We've diluted teaching standards massively, there's cheating scandals and soft marking. 'The integrity's been shot, the government should be focusing on a far smaller number of high skilled, high quality students. We're scraping the bottom of the barrel. (The government) should be going for the best of the best.' The MacroBusiness economist claimed 'enrolments are at a all time high' not because of the standard of Australian degrees, but because of Australia's work rights and potential access to permanent residency. 'We're not selling education, we're selling migration and work rights,' he said. 'If you took away Australia's work rights and permanent residency, none of them would come. Perhaps a small number would come to learn, but most are coming to work and gain permanent residency.' A joint statement put out by Education Minister Jason Clare and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said all international education providers will receive at least their current allocation next year, with the Australian Tertiary Education Commission to oversee future growth in international student numbers from 2027. 'International education is an incredibly important export industry for Australia, but we need to manage its growth so it's sustainable,' Mr Clare said. 'International education doesn't just make us money, it makes us friends.' Mr Clare said the Albanese government was increasing international student intake in a way which supported 'students, universities and the national interest'. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Labor was maintaining the 'integrity of the migration system' while supporting a 'strong international education sector'. 'We are making sure student visa processing supports genuine education outcomes and our strategic priorities - including increasing provision of student accommodation,' he said. In March, Mr van Onselen wrote some domestic students had been 'forced' to help non-English-speaking students complete their courses through group assessments. 'Some tutorials have even been conducted in foreign languages, degrading the experience for local students,' he said, telling some students have claimed to have been subjected to tutorials delivered entirely in Mandarin. The economist also pointed to a 2024 Guardian article which revealed Australian academics were being pressured to pass hundreds of students suspected of plagiarism and other forms of cheating to maintain revenue streams. He claimed the government's media release on Tuesday was loaded with 'political spin' and was 'loose with the truth' about the 2026 planning level increase being eight per cent below the post-COVID peak. The eight per cent figure related to the flow of international students, which Mr van Onselen said was below the 'tidal wave' of commencements after Australia's borders reopened at the end of the pandemic. As a share of population, international students have doubled since 2012 when they made up 1.5 per cent. 'What it means is the numbers are going to keep growing, the total stock of international students is going to rise,'Mr van Onselen said. According to the Department of Education, in the year-to-date to April there were more than 794,000 international student enrolments, which Mr van Onselen said was up 105,000 since the pre-COVID peak. 'It's a disaster and hasn't boosted productivity,' he said. 'We've had 20 years of massive migration, no one can say this has made the economy or standard or living better, it's made it worse. 'They talk tough before the election and now with their stomping mandate they've gone back to their big Australia approach.'
The Age
24 minutes ago
- The Age
Roundtable will fix nothing unless we can all park our self-interest
I'm not sure if it's happening by accident or design, but we may be about to convince ourselves that, though our democracy isn't nearly as stuffed up as America's, we're fast making ourselves ungovernable, unable to agree on how to fix our problems. I fear that Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic roundtable in a fortnight's time won't reach agreement on any measures of substance. The players – business on one side, the unions on the other, plus assorted experts – confidently assume that the Albanese government will use this indecision to come up with its own set of solutions. But what if it doesn't? Everyone complains that this government's too timid, unwilling to risk losing votes by making the controversial changes we need. Surely, it could use the roundtable's failure to agree on anything as its justification for doing nothing. 'When you guys can agree on what we should do, we'll do it.' Initially, the roundtable was to discuss the great worry of our times – productivity. Almost every year since forever, our economic production machine has got a fraction more efficient at turning economic resources into goods and services, thus raising our material standard of living. But for the past decade or so, it seems to have stalled. Why? And what can we do to get it going again? Loading But Treasury would have been quick to remind Chalmers that the budget is expected to be in deficit for as far as the eye can see. Something needs to be done about this, and the government is certainly in no position to try to fix productivity by cutting taxes. And, led by former Treasury secretary Dr Ken Henry, the nation's economists will tell you our biggest economic problem is that our tax system, which is little changed since the introduction of the goods and services tax 25 years ago, is no longer working properly. It needs a major overhaul. In economics, you can't get away from tax. Our productivity is determined largely by what happens inside the nation's factories, mines and offices. Ask any economist what can be done to make our businesses more productive, and they'll want to do it by changing the 'incentives' businesses face. Translation: pull some kind of tax lever. So it's no surprise that, when the Productivity Commission was asked to offer some suggestions, its first was to rejig company tax in a way that encouraged greater business spending on more and better machines for the workers.
