Fast approvals only add to housing construction logjam
Data from property research firm Cotality shows approvals could move higher in the coming months due to rezoning reforms and incentives for new builds coinciding with falling interest rates.
But rather than fix the shortage of homes, it could cause a problem for the construction industry by adding new projects to an already long list.
"It's like turning up the tap on a bath that is already full," said the analysis from head of research Eliza Owen.
It found delivery to be the problem, not approvals, with 219,000 homes under construction and completion times ballooning.
"The real bottleneck lies in the build phase, not planning reform," the analysis said.
The federal government's goal to build 1.2 million new homes in five years, adopted in August 2023, is thought of as unachievable by the industry.
"With completion times already above average, and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements to the backlog of work to be done," the report stated.
Ahead of the Albanese government's national productivity summit later this month, the report calls for a move away from demand stimulation to sustainable delivery.
"Making homes faster and cheaper to build, while still maintaining quality, resilient homes is the key challenge for policymakers to focus on right now," the report reads.
Labor's massive election win has prompted union bosses to call for the government to revisit potential changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions.
But proposals to scale back the tax deduction is tricky for the government, after Labor took reforms for negative gearing to the 2019 federal election and lost.
Negative gearing allows investors to claim deductions on losses and the capital gains tax discount halves the tax paid by Australians who sell assets owned for 12 months or more.
The analysis says if governments are serious about delivering on the housing target, they "must focus on building capacity, lifting productivity, and ensuring every approved home actually gets built".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
27 minutes ago
- The Age
A super-sized GST – with a $3300 cheque in the mail for all
All Australians would receive $3300 a year in exchange for accepting a higher and broader GST under a plan which proponents claim would boost the budget by $28 billion a year while driving up the nation's living standards. Before this month's economic roundtable, independent MP Kate Chaney has backed an idea first floated by leading Australian economist Richard Holden to lift the GST to 15 per cent and extend the tax on food, education, health and childcare services and water and sewerage. This would raise an additional $92.5 billion in its first full year of operation, but would be offset by a $3300 rebate to every person over the age of 18 that would effectively erase the impact of the higher GST on the first $22,000 of an individual's annual purchases. The rebates would leave low- and middle-income earners up to $371 a year better off but slug the nation's top 20 per cent more than $2200 annually, costing the government $68.8 billion. That would leave the Commonwealth with almost $24 billion a year to put towards other services, paying down debt or reducing personal income tax levels. Chaney, who has been working with Holden on the concept for the past two years, said the roundtable had to be open to all tax reform options. Loading 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower- and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive. Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity,' she said. Holden, who on Thursday will release a paper with fellow economist Rosalind Dixon on the so-called 'progressive GST', said the change would benefit younger Australians who under current tax arrangements paid a disproportionate amount of personal income tax. 'Our proposal would make our taxation system more efficient, make our economy more dynamic and provide the impetus for productivity growth,' he said.
The Age
27 minutes ago
- The Age
Bridge protest misread creates new caucus problem for premier
Chris Minns read his MPs the riot act early last year. If his Labor colleagues had a passion for international relations, the premier warned them via an ABC interview, they should head down the Hume Highway and become an MP in Canberra. Minns was referencing MPs speaking out about the bitterly divisive issue of Palestine and Israel, the catalyst for some of the most fiery debates on the floor of NSW Labor Party conferences over decades. In this instance, two of Minns' MPs had signed a letter to Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong, criticising the decision to suspend payments to the main UN agency in Gaza after Israel provided intelligence that it said linked some employees to the October 7, 2023 attacks. 'I can understand people feel passionately about international affairs,' Minns told ABC's Stateline, 'but honestly, if that's your passion, and that's where your desires are, your policy interests are, well, run for federal parliament.' Some 18 months on, Minns had better hope they do not follow his directions because 10 of them – or just shy of 20 per cent of his Labor caucus – revealed their passion/desires/interests when they took part in the pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday. The most senior of those MPs, among at least 90,000 protesters, was the government's leader of the upper house and Environment Minister Penny Sharpe. Her attendance sent a clear message that the Left of the party can, despite Minns' instructions, walk and chew gum at the same time. Loading Also on the bridge were former Labor general secretary turned upper house MP Bob Nanva, Emergency Services Minister Jihad Dib and backbenchers Stephen Lawrence, Sarah Kaine, Anthony D'Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy, Kylie Wilkinson and Peter Primrose. Former Labor premier and long-term Palestine supporter Bob Carr joined them. Dib, a Muslim with family ties to Palestine, was understandably motivated to be on the bridge. The others had their own motivation – and they sent a clear message to Minns that being an elected official in NSW does not preclude you from having a position on a humanitarian crisis. It also shows that the caucus Minns has ruled with an iron fist since his election as leader is willing to think for itself. The first caucus meeting after the march, on Tuesday, was heated. MPs were angry. Before he was overruled by the Supreme Court and the protest given the greenlight, Minns said he would not tolerate shutting down the 'central artery' of Sydney, despite there being a history of that happening. (In 2007, the Harbour Bridge was closed for a full day to give US Vice-President Dick Cheney a clear ride through the city.) As is his skill, Minns played to both sides, stressing he had empathy for the plight of civilians in Gaza.
The Age
27 minutes ago
- The Age
Australians are set to inherit huge amounts of money. Here's what to do with it
Wealth is set to rain down on Australians in the next decades as the pool of inherited cash accumulated by older generations is passed down. The Productivity Commission notes $1.5 trillion was inherited between 2002 and 2021, and UBS estimates more than $US150 billion in wealth will be transferred over the next 20 years. And so for generations of Australians, managing inheritance will be a significant aspect of overall wealth management, and it won't be as simple as buying a bunch of stocks in a couple of tech start-ups and waiting for the money to multiply. Put the money in a high-interest account and wait The worst thing you could possibly do after inheriting any amount of cash is to spend it quickly. Dawn Thomas, a Perth-based financial adviser, says that often people feel an urgency to decide about what to do with money they inherit, and are often under the impression that not doing something is wasting it. 'Sometimes people feel that they have to make a decision really quickly when they receive an inheritance, but it's OK for funds to stay in a bank account, in a high-interest bank account for 12 months to two years while you make up your mind,' she says. 'You would expect there's some sort of emotion there as well because someone's lost someone that they've loved, and that [might] not be the best scenario for you to actually be making financial decisions. Sometimes, time is your best friend in being able to actually understand what you want.' Identify what you want and what you can live without Though it seems obvious, Thomas says writing down your goals is an important first step when inheriting a large sum of money. The exercise carves out time to consider how satisfied you are in various parts of your life and size up how important each is to you.
