logo
California farmers brace for consequences as Trump's tariffs bring economic upheaval

California farmers brace for consequences as Trump's tariffs bring economic upheaval

Yahoo13-04-2025
President Trump's decision to pause punishing tariffs on most U.S. trading partners may have calmed financial markets last week, but it did little to quell anxiety in California's $59 billion agricultural industry.
While Trump kept smaller 10% blanket tariffs on countries around the world, he has imposed much higher levies on products from Canada and China, two of the top markets for California's almonds, pistachios, oranges and other crops.
Trump increased tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%. Beijing retaliated by slapping 125% tariffs on American goods, including California nuts and dairy products.
Canada retaliated against U.S. tariffs with 25% taxes on American goods, which are already cutting into sales of California agricultural products, including fresh produce and wine.
Farmers in the Central Valley say they are nervous about what might come if Trump goes ahead with the larger, so-called reciprocal tariffs after the 90-day pause. If the upheaval persists, they fear it could spiral into long-lasting and damaging conflicts.
'It's scary,' said Christine Gemperle, an almond farmer in Ceres, near Modesto. 'Nobody wants to be in the center of chaos.'
Bianca Kaprielian, a fourth-generation citrus farmer in Reedley and co-chief executive of Creekside Organics, said she is already seeing sales suffer.
'Across the board, everybody's going to feel it,' she said.
Elsewhere in Fresno County, farmer John Diener said he hasn't yet seen effects on the sales or prices of his crops, but he's watching closely.
'People are waiting with bated breath,' he said. 'I think everybody in their business is concerned about what might be the outcome.'
Trump has said he believes tariffs are needed to bring 'fair trade,' protect U.S. workers and reduce the trade deficit.
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said last week that the White House is preparing a relief plan to support farmers 'if necessary.' Details have yet to be made public.
Much is at stake for California's agriculture industry, which ships nuts, rice, tomatoes and other products around the world. The state is the nation's top agricultural exporter, with global sales totaling nearly $24 billion in 2022.
As China, Canada and other countries retaliate against U.S. tariffs by imposing their own taxes on American goods, a substantial burden could fall on California's farming businesses.
Read more: California farmers backed Trump. Now, his tariffs could hurt them
Representatives of California agriculture associations have been raising their concerns with the Trump administration and members of Congress.
'California's farmers and ranchers are at significant risk of bearing the brunt of any potential retaliatory actions resulting from the broad imposition of global tariffs,' said Shannon Douglass, president of the California Farm Bureau Federation.
Douglass said in an email that many growers are already struggling with chronic labor shortages, inflation and other challenges, and that retaliatory measures by other countries could lead to more instability for the industry.
'While we believe targeted trade measures can be helpful in protecting California's production and serve as a useful negotiating tactic,' she said, 'we are still waiting to see what measures other countries take as a result of these tariffs as further trade tensions could jeopardize the viability of California agriculture.'
Karen Ross, secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, said she is deeply concerned about the potential consequences.
'California farmers are already very challenged,' Ross said in an interview. 'Profit margins are being squeezed considerably. Export markets are hugely important.'
In recent years, Canada has been the top foreign buyer of California's agricultural exports, including wine, strawberries, lettuce and oranges. The European Union has ranked second, and China has ranked third, providing thriving markets for nuts, dairy products and other commodities.
Now, these trade relationships have begun to shift and fray. For example, in addition to Canada's 25% tariffs on many U.S. goods, Canadians have also begun to boycott American products.
'How long that will last is hard to say, but it certainly has created a great deal of unease,' Ross said.
In an analysis published last year, economists warned that if Trump imposed major tariffs, the reactions from trading partners could lead to billions of dollars in losses for California's agriculture industry.
UC Davis Professor Emeritus Colin A. Carter, who co-authored the research, said China's retaliatory tariffs are now much higher than what they analyzed, and will choke off Chinese purchases of pistachios, almonds and dairy products.
Ross said farmers are hoping that the economic disruption will be short-lived and quickly resolved. If it goes on, she said, 'there will need to be mitigation measures.'
During Trump's first term, farmers received billions of dollars in subsidies to help cushion the blow of the tariff-related losses for crops such as soybeans. But California's farmers, producing different crops, largely didn't qualify for that government compensation.
California's No. 1 export crop is almonds.
A boom in global prices a decade ago led growers to rapidly plant many new almond orchards. Over the last several years, however, the total acreage of almond orchards has begun to decline because of lower prices.
California now produces an estimated 76% of the world's almonds, with the leading buyers including India, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and China.
Gemperle and her brother grow almonds on 135 acres in Stanislaus and Merced counties, and their nuts are sold in the U.S. and abroad through the Blue Diamond Growers cooperative.
Gemperle said it's too soon to know how the tariffs will affect almond prices, but she is concerned about the current uncertainty.
'Farming is uncertain and a risk and a gamble, as it is. We don't need more of that,' she said. 'It's all just overwhelming.'
The situation was bad enough during Trump's first term, she said, when the adoption of U.S. tariffs in 2018 prompted China to retaliate, bringing losses for growers of almonds, walnuts and other crops.
'We got hammered,' Gemperle said. "We lost the whole Chinese market to Australia."
As China bought less nuts following that first round of tariffs, it contributed to persistent declines in California almond prices. In recent years, the slumping prices have pushed some almond growers out of business, leaving orchards up for sale in places throughout the Central Valley.
'Prices were just starting to come back up,' Gemperle said. 'Now we're getting hit with even more tariffs, and we just can't see the end.'
She said she is concerned about the possibility of losing other vital markets, while at the same time seeing the U.S. tariffs push prices higher for imported farm equipment, fertilizer and other supplies.
'This just makes everything we do so much harder,' she said. 'It does keep me up at night, and it gives me bad dreams.'
Wearing overalls and work boots, Gemperle walked through her orchard with a clipboard under her arm, stopping to check traps hung in the trees to monitor for almond-eating insects. Her four border collies followed behind, scampering through tall grass and wildflowers.
Gemperle said because of high operating costs and low prices, she and her brother Erich have gone about four years without turning a profit, and have been living off their savings.
'At this point, I'm on the verge of losing everything,' she said. 'I just wonder if going through this is just going to seal the deal on killing small family farms.'
California citrus growers also depend on international trade, shipping fruit to South Korea, Canada, Japan and other countries.
Kaprielian's company, Creekside Organics, sells organic citrus and vegetables for a group of growers. It typically ships a substantial amount of mandarins, oranges and lemons to Canada.
But this year, exports to Canada have dropped.
'We have seen those orders go down or dry up,' Kaprielian said. 'We feel the effect.'
At her family's packing house in Reedley, Kaprielian watched as mandarins tumbled from machinery onto beds of metal rollers. Workers wearing rubber gloves scanned the advancing fruit, grabbing any mandarins with blemishes and dropping them into chutes to be trucked to a juice plant.
Other mandarins rolled on for sorting and were boxed to be sold under the Fruit World brand.
'I think as an industry we're not sure about the future,' Kaprielian said. 'If we start losing those export markets, that means we're going to have an influx of supply on the domestic market.'
The concern is that the domestic market couldn't absorb such an influx, potentially leading to lower prices. At the same time, she said, the U.S. tariffs are pushing up costs for growers and eroding their already slim profit margins.
'That's really the big concern in California agriculture in general,' Kaprielian said. 'Is there going to be enough money going back to the farm to make it all work to keep farming again the next year?'
She said the economic turmoil adds to the list of challenges for growers, who are also grappling with regulations, long-running labor shortages, water constraints and the effects of climate change.
As she was growing up, Kaprielian would often help her father on the farm and at the packing house. Her family continues to grow citrus on about 500 acres in Fresno and Tulare counties.
Lately, she said, she feels more uncertain about the future.
'With everything getting so difficult, I don't know if my family is going to be farming in five years. I don't know if we're going to be able to hang on 10 years,' she said.
Kaprielian said she deeply loves farming, but has seen some other operations struggling and going out of business in recent years.
'You can only take so many blows,' she said. 'I really hope that our politicians understand that this is affecting real people.'
A short drive from the packing house, Kaprielian stopped at a grove of mandarins. Picking one, she cut the peel with a knife and lifted a juicy half to her mouth.
With the citrus season now nearing its end, Kaprielian said she would have liked to see this grove harvested already. But the harvest has been slowed as demand is down, she said, partly because of the trade conflict with Canada.
'We're seeing sluggish sales,' Kaprielian said. 'It feels more chaotic than any time that I can remember.'
The dramatic shifts in Trump's announcements have left farmers thinking they will need to wait to see how the situation develops.
'We're moving ahead like normal, and pray that it'll all get sorted out,' said Diener, who farms tomatoes, garlic, almonds, cotton and other crops in Fresno County. 'Everybody's looking to be able to keep their industry healthy.'
Diener has been farming since 1980 and weathered many changes, including previous shifts in federal policies.
'I don't see why this area won't prosper long-term,' Diener said. 'Because where else are you going to get what it is that we grow?'
Ross said many growers are hoping there will be negotiations for better trade agreements to benefit agriculture.
'We're all hopeful that the outcome will be more robust trading opportunities. But the longer the uncertainty and unpredictability lasts, the more likely the harm is, because it starts to create its own self-cascading circumstances,' Ross said. 'The more uncertain things are, the harder it is to just do business.'
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CPI report: Core inflation rises by most in six months, stoking tariff-driven price concerns
CPI report: Core inflation rises by most in six months, stoking tariff-driven price concerns

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CPI report: Core inflation rises by most in six months, stoking tariff-driven price concerns

Inflation remained sticky in July, according to new government data released Tuesday, as investors stay alert to how much President Trump's tariffs are starting to affect consumer costs. The latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that "core" inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy costs, rose 0.3% over the past month, surpassing June's 0.2% uptick and marking the largest gain in six months. Annual core prices rose 3.1% in July, up from June's 2.9% year-over-year increase, signaling that rising goods inflation is no longer being offset by easing services inflation. Core services prices also firmed, with shelter rising 0.2% for the second consecutive month, while transportation services and medical care services each climbed 0.8%, up from respective gains of 0.2% and 0.6% in June. Read more: July CPI breakdown: Consumers feel the crunch of accelerating inflation Heading into the report, economists expected the core Consumer Price Index (CPI) to rise 3% year over year and 0.3% month over month. On a headline basis, CPI increased 2.7% on an annual basis in July, matching June's number and slower than economists' expectations of a 2.8% rise. Month over month, prices rose 0.2% compared to June's 0.3% increase, on par with economists' estimates. The monthly drop was driven by lower gasoline prices and moderately softer food inflation. "Although core annual inflation is back to its highest level since February, today's CPI print is not hot enough to derail the Fed from cutting rates in September," Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, wrote in reaction to the report. Shah noted some evidence of tariff-related pass-through to consumers, though not yet at a level that "rings alarm bells." One example: Footwear prices jumped 1.4% in July from the prior month — the largest monthly increase since April 2021. Other categories seeing increases included furniture and bedding, recreation, household furnishings and operations, and used cars and trucks. Airline fares jumped 4% after a 0.1% decline in June, while lodging away from home and communication were among the few major indexes to fall last month, according to the BLS. Tuesday's report arrives amid ongoing trade developments that could further alter the US effective tariff rate, now hovering near 18.6% — the highest since 1933, according to the latest Yale Budget Lab estimate. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet The back-and-forth raises fresh questions about the Federal Reserve's rate-cutting path. Shortly following the report, investors placed a 90% probability the Fed cuts rates by 0.25% at its September policy meeting, up from 57% last month, according to the CME FedWatch Tool. Traders still expect over two rate cuts by December. "The concern for the Fed is that with inventory run-down, the tariff-induced boost to inflation is likely to grow over the coming months, meaning that inflationary pressures are likely to pick up just as the Fed starts to resume rate cuts," Shah said. "Markets like today's inflation print as it means the Fed can lower rates unheeded next month — rate cut decisions in October, December, and beyond may well be more complicated," the strategist added. Stocks rose immediately after the report, while the 10-year Treasury yield (TNX) hovered below 4.3%. Allie Canal is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X @allie_canal, LinkedIn, and email her at Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump blasts Goldman over tariff forecasts, tells David Solomon to 'focus on being a DJ'
Trump blasts Goldman over tariff forecasts, tells David Solomon to 'focus on being a DJ'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump blasts Goldman over tariff forecasts, tells David Solomon to 'focus on being a DJ'

President Trump called out Goldman Sachs' (GS) research team for a stock market forecast it made earlier in the year, which initially predicted the S&P 500 (^GSPC) would finish the year lower as the US economy entered recession following the initial "Liberation Day" tariff announcements. Specifically, Trump targeted Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon in a Truth Social Post Tuesday while also taking a pass at the executive's hobby as a DJ. "David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due," Trump wrote in a Tuesday post in Truth Social while lauding the revenue tariffs are bring in and a stock market that's hovering near record highs. "They made a bad prediction a long time ago on both the Market repercussion and the Tariffs themselves, and they were wrong, just like they are wrong about so much else. I think that David should go out and get himself a new Economist or, maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ, and not bother running a major Financial Institution." Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the post. On April 9, Goldman's economic research team joined a growing list of Wall Street economists that believed the potential growth hit from Trump's aggressive tariffs stance would push the US economy into recession in 2025. But within that same afternoon, Trump placed a 90-day pause on a wide swath of his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs, and Goldman quickly rolled back its recession call. During that same time period in the spring, Goldman's equity strategy team was among the more 10 Wall Street firms tracked by Yahoo Finance that cut its year-end target for the S&P 500 as the stock market tanked in reaction to tariffs. The equity strategy team led by David Kostin moved its year-end target as low as 5,700 for the S&P 500, which would've reflected a negative year for the benchmark index. But as the market has rallied Kostin, along with many others on Wall Street, has become more positive on equities. Kostin now sees the S&P 500 ending the year at 6,600, or roughly 3% higher than where the index was trading on Tuesday. Calling out Solomon is just the latest example of Trump calling out some of the bosses of the country's largest banks. Last week during an interview with CNBC's "Squawk box", Trump named Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan along with JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, claiming that their banks along with others "discriminated against me" by denying him banking services. Brian Moynihan, 'was kissing my ass when I was president,' but would not accept deposits from him after his first term as president, Trump said in that interview. The social media post also comes as Trump has been inviting some of these same Wall Street CEOs one by one to discuss a potential public offering for mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac later this year, the Wall Street Journal first reported and senior officials confirmed last Friday. As part of those plans, the chiefs of big Wall Street banks including Solomon, Moynihan and Dimon have one by one recently visited the White House to discuss what such a deal could look like. Potentially the largest IPO to date, this offering would be expected to yield a major payday for the banks. Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos

Anthropic offers its Claude AI model to the federal government for $1
Anthropic offers its Claude AI model to the federal government for $1

Engadget

time26 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Anthropic offers its Claude AI model to the federal government for $1

Anthropic has announced it will offer its Claude AI model to all three branches of the US government for $1, following OpenAI offering an almost identical deal last week. These deals both follow the General Services Administration adding OpenAI, Gemini and Anthropic to a list of approved AI vendors for the federal government. Similar to the OpenAI deal, Anthropic will offer access to its commercial-tier service Claude for Enterprise for a period of one year at a cost of just $1. The offer will also encompass Claude for Government, which supports FedRAMP High workloads, allowing federal workers to use Claude for sensitive unclassified work. Government department or agency leadership can reach out today to gain access. Anthropic is no stranger to working within the federal government. Earlier this summer, the Department of Defense awarded Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and XAI with deals worth up to $200 million to develop military applications. The company made no larger mention of the Trump administration's AI Action Plan, or its requirement that large language models used by the federal government be "free from top-down ideological bias." The tacit understanding is that these LLMs not espouse support for anything the current administration opposes. President Trump even issued an executive order decreeing that AI must not favor "ideological dogmas such as DEI," in order to work with the federal government. This latest deal comes as AI-related companies are increasingly looking to build close relationships with policymakers and the current administration. This week, NVIDIA agreed to a revenue-sharing agreement with the US government in order to sell its H20 AI GPUs to China. The current administration has made no secret of its wish for federal agencies to maximize their use of AI.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store