
Another Indian Origin Left Democrat Saikat Chakrabarti Is Creating Waves In U.S.
The Left wing section in the Democratic Party in the United States of America led by Senator Bernie Sanders is on upswing even though the party establishment seems clueless to deal effectively with the challenge thrown by the second term President Donald Trump to the very existence of its rival party. After the stunning victory of the 33 year old Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary for the New York mayoral election in November this year, another Indian origin Democrat Saikat Chakrabarti is creating waves in the American politics by announcing his intention to stand against the former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the veteran of the Democratic Party establishment in the November 2026 midterm elections.
This has created furore in both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party leadership as Saikat carries a background of a successful activist who has been playing an important role in transforming the Democratic Party since the 2016 presidential elections in which he was associated with Bernie Sanders's campaign .Sanders could not win the nomination butSaikat was noted for his expertise in leading the election campaign.
Starting with Bernie Sanders's 2016 presidential run, Saikat Chakrabarti has played an important role in the left-wing insurgency that has recently attempted to remake the Democratic Party. After working on Sanders's 2016 campaign, Saikat managed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (AOC) successful 2018 challenge against Joe Crowley. He went on to serve as her chief of staff, launching her Green New Deal proposal.
Now Saikat is running for Congress himself, challenging former House speaker Nancy Pelosi, in California's 11th Congressional District. Saikat says that the Democrats' embarrassing loss to Trump last year inspired him to run. He hopes to build a national movement around an ambitious program called the 'Mission for America' that aims to transform the US economy through aggressive government planning and investment — a kind of spiritual successor to the Green New Deal.
In a recent interview to the American left magazine Jacobin, Saikat said, back in the 1970s, America felt unstoppable. We had just put a man on the moon, built the interstate highway system, had decades of rising living standards and wages, and were including more and more people in society through the civil rights, gay rights, women's rights, and other movements.
We were doing so much that we actually had immigration offices all over the world that were recruiting millions of people to come help build this country. That's how my parents got here. One of my dad's friends took him to one of these offices in Calcutta where a nice staffer pitched him on the American Dream and got him to apply for a visa right there on the spot.
Elaborating on his immigrant background , Saikat says 'My parents came here with less than $20. They grew up poor in India, especially my father. After being displaced during Partition, his family of ten squatted in an abandoned house before 'upgrading' to a one-bedroom apartment. He often went days without food. But he was lucky to have a solid education because my grandfather was a teacher who ended up starting the local public school for all the neighbourhood kids.
Saikat said ,In the United States, my dad was able to get a job within a week of arriving despite having no connections, and, on a single income, was able to afford a solid, middle-class life for me and my family. Growing up, I had everything I needed: a roof over my head, food on the table, and a great public school education in Fort Worth, Texas.
He said 'My parents' story has always stuck with me precisely because of how common it actually was. Millions of immigrants who came here during that time had a similar story. So did hundreds of millions of Americans who, starting with the New Deal and all the way to the 1970s, accomplished one of the biggest leaps in incomes and living standards that humanity has ever seen. I've always been awed by that accomplishment, and the core driver of my politics and work over the last decade has been the belief that we can do it again.
About his bringing up in USA, Saikat said 'I was pretty apolitical, though, growing up and through college. After college, I came out to San Francisco the first chance I got to work in tech because I naively believed tech would be a way to fix the biggest problems in the world. After working in tech for a few years though, I knew the answers didn't lie there. So I quit.
It feels cheesy to say this today, but I actually made a list of the problems I wanted to help do something about. It said: inequality, poverty, and climate change. Then Bernie Sanders announced his run for president in 2016 talking about exactly those things, and he started filling stadiums with people excited for something new. So I joined!'
Saikat got name as he was the prime mover of the Green New Deal was proposed by the leftwing congress members According to Saikat, the Green New Deal was our vision of what Democrats should stand for: a plan to invest in upgrading and developing our economy by tackling climate change, creating millions of high-wage jobs in the process. 'While Alexandra, Corbin, I, and others were working at Justice Democrats and then on AOC's race, Zack Exley was busy running New Consensus, the think tank he and I had started a few months after Justice Democrats. We had looked around for a think tank that was working on the details of how to radically reverse the decline of the working class while building a clean economy. We didn't find any (though many economists were talking about the need to do this), so we started one. The Green New Deal came out of the work Zack and others did at New Consensus.'
Once AOC won, Saikat and his team had a three-pronged approach to launching the Green New Deal. He worked on the inside to build political support, while the Sunrise Movement, whose political team he had met through campaign work, worked on the outside to mount a pressure campaign on representatives and presidential candidates. At the same time, New Consensus worked to flesh out the ideas in the Green New Deal and socialize them with academics and journalists (which was a big reason people like Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman came out in favour of it when it launched).
Saikat said that experience made him realize how powerful it can be to have people on the inside working with a movement on the outside who are all aligned on a vision for the country. And he learned that it is easier than we think to get new ideas to go somewhere in DC, especially right now when people are hungry for some vision of a future. If we could do the Green New Deal with just one member of Congress, what could be possible with dozens or hundreds of Congress members acting with real purpose and urgency?, he said.
Saikat left AOC's office at the end of 2019 after ruffling a few too many feathers in DC and moved back to San Francisco. Since then, he has been working on the Mission for America at New Consensus, which is a successor to the Green New Deal .
Saikat said that his plan when he left Washington DC and moved back to San Francisco was to continue working at New Consensus and continue supporting political candidates who rejected the corporate status quo in favour of championing working-class people. I wasn't looking to be a congressional candidate myself. But this last election changed his mind.
He thought the fact that Trump made more inroads into the traditional working-class, multiracial Democratic base than any GOP presidential candidate would be a wake-up call for Democrats — especially since they couldn't dismiss his victory as a fluke like they did the first time around. He thought Democrats might take the threat of Trump and the authoritarian right seriously, since they repeatedly told us during the election that a Trump win would slide the US into authoritarianism and fascism. But then he saw how Democratic leaders actually acted in the face of a Trump win and Trump's brazen attempts to consolidate power. He heard Nancy Pelosi interviewed after this election saying Democrats did nothing wrong and didn't need to change.
According to this young Democrat, Democrats need a new economic vision, and they need new leadership. Here in San Francisco, even those who have supported Pelosi for decades and deeply respect her past work believe it's time for change. But because of the deeply hierarchical nature and deference to seniority in the Democratic Party, no one else is willing to risk their political career by running against her. 'So it was one of those, 'If not me, then who?' moments, and I felt a duty to run.'
Saikat said 'I'm running because I want to help spark a national movement of candidates who are willing to fight for a new economy and society that will dramatically improve working people's lives. No single candidate can do this alone, and I am recruiting others around the country to join me — a handful for 2026 and a wave for 2028. That huge leap in incomes and living standards that started with the New Deal and went into the 1970s — we can do that again and do it while building a clean and fair economy. And if we don't — if we can't prove that democracy can deliver what people need — then people will vote for the authoritarian who promises to do it himself.''
More than 15 months are left for the midterm elections in America scheduled in November 2026. But already preparations and campaigns have started. Nancy Pelosi, now 85, has the longest term as a US congress member. She is known belonging to the centrist group of Democrats including Joe Biden and Barack Obama. The centrists are feeling uneasy, but openly they are not taking any position against Saikat Chakrabarti.
Saikat has the advantage that he represents the aspirations of the white American youth also , apart from the dream of immigrant youth. He went to Harvard, did big jobs in IT sector, set up his own company and then joined politics to make a difference. The younger population in the West Coast are rallying around Saikat. His group of campaigners are marketing their New Deal for the youth. There is an air of optimism in San Francisco 's political environment. Many veteran Democrats want Pelosi to retire. Saikat is involved full time in propagating his Mission for America to the Democratic Party support base irrespective of the outcome of the midterm polls in November 2026. (IPA Service)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ARN News Center
an hour ago
- ARN News Center
India PM Modi faces opposition fury after Trump's 25% tariff threat
Indian opposition parties criticised the government on Thursday, describing US President Donald Trump's threat of a 25 per cent tariff as a diplomatic failure for New Delhi, while the rupee currency tumbled and equity indexes slid in response to the news. The 25 per cent rate would single out India more harshly than other major trading partners, and threatens to unravel months of talks, undermining one of Washington's strategic partners in the region, viewed as a counterbalance to China. Trump said the tariff on goods imports from India would start from Friday, in addition to an unspecified penalty for Russian dealings and involvement in the BRICS grouping of nations, but added later that trade talks continued. In response, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi said it was studying the implications of Trump's remarks and was dedicated to securing a fair trade deal. "This development reflects a broader collapse of foreign policy under the Modi government," a lawmaker of the main opposition Congress said in a notice asking for a discussion of the matter in the lower house. The debate would focus on the "government's economic and diplomatic failure in preventing the imposition of 25 per cent US tariffs plus penalties on Indian exports," it added. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal is expected to brief the lower house later on Thursday, television news channels said. Economists warned the steep tariff could hurt India's manufacturing ambitions and trim up to 40 basis points from economic growth in the financial year to March 2026. India's benchmark equity indices, the Nifty 50 and BSE Sensex, fell about 0.6 per cent each, while the rupee declined to 87.74, its lowest in more than five months, before paring losses. India has received a "raw deal", said Priyanka Kishore, an economist at Asia Decoded. "While further trade talks may bring the tariff rate down, it appears unlikely that India will secure a significantly better outcome than its eastern neighbours," she added. That would raise questions about India's relative appeal as a China plus one destination, she said, referring to a strategy of diversifying supply chains through manufacturing outside China to reduce geopolitical and operational risks. Trade talks continued, Trump said on social media, however, as nations face a Friday deadline to strike deals on reciprocal tariffs or have a US tariff slapped on their exports. The US levy on India exceeds those achieved by some other nations in deals with the Trump administration. For example, the tariff on Vietnam is set at 20 per cent and on Indonesia at 19 per cent, with levies of 15 per cent on Japanese and European Union exports. On Wednesday, Trump said Washington had reached a trade deal with India's arch-rival Pakistan that Islamabad said would lead to lower tariffs on its exports, but neither side have yet revealed the agreed rate. Since India's short but deadly conflict with Pakistan in May, New Delhi has been unhappy about Trump's closeness with Islamabad and has protested, casting a shadow over trade talks. Despite former public displays of bonhomie between Trump and Modi, India has taken a slightly harder stance against the United States in recent weeks. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10, but India disputes his claim that it resulted from his intervention and trade threats. "The country is now bearing the cost of Narendra Modi's friendship," Congress said. The United States, the world's largest economy, now has a trade deficit of $45.7 billion with India, the fifth largest. Russia remained India's top oil supplier during the first six months of 2025, accounting for 35 per cent of overall supplies. "I don't care what India does with Russia," Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday.


Dubai Eye
5 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Israel over Gaza
Two resolutions that would have blocked arms sales to Israel in response to civilian casualties in Gaza were blocked in the US Senate on Wednesday, although they garnered more support than similar measures earlier this year. The two resolutions were introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent aligned with Democrats. They failed by 73 to 24 and 70 to 27 in the 100-member chamber in voting late on Wednesday night. Similar measures, also introduced by Sanders, failed by 82-15 and 83-15 in April. A decades-long tradition of strong bipartisan support for Israel in the US Congress means resolutions to stop weapons sales are unlikely to pass, but backers hope raising the issue will encourage Israel's government and the US administration to do more to protect civilians. All of the votes for the resolutions came from Democrats, with all of President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans opposed. Sanders said in a statement he was pleased that a majority of the Democratic caucus had backed the effort. "The tide is turning. The American people do not want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza," Sanders said. "The Democrats are moving forward on this issue, and I look forward to Republican support in the near future." Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of the Democrats who opposed the Sanders-backed resolutions in April but voted for them this time. Shaheen said in a statement that Israel has a right to defend its citizens, but added: "It is clear that the Government of Israel has not conducted its military operations in Gaza with the necessary care required by international humanitarian law. It is also clear that the Government of Israel has failed to allow adequate humanitarian assistance into Gaza, resulting in unbelievable suffering." The resolutions would have blocked the sale of $675 million in bombs and shipments of 20,000 assault rifles. Senator Jim Risch of Idaho, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a speech opposing the resolutions that the militant group Hamas was to blame for the situation in Gaza. "It is in the interest of America and the world to see this terrorist group destroyed," he said. Israel has consistently said its actions in Gaza are justified as self-defence and accuses Hamas of using civilians as human shields, a charge Hamas denies. The US Senate vote came as France and Canada have indicated they plan to recognize a Palestinian state amid growing international outrage over the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Britain has also said it would recognise the state at September's UN General Assembly meeting if the fighting in Gaza had not stopped by then. Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, destroyed much of the enclave and led to widespread hunger. A global hunger monitor has warned that a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding in the enclave. The war began after Gaza's dominant Palestinian armed group Hamas carried out a cross-border attack on southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages, according to Israeli authorities. Israel's subsequent air and ground campaign has leveled entire neighbourhoods in Gaza and displaced most of the population of 2.3 million. Israel says its operations are aimed at dismantling Hamas' military capabilities and securing the release of hostages.


Campaign ME
5 hours ago
- Campaign ME
The Spin: When mistakes make it to the front page
Those with a keen eye on news and advertisements – or, should we say, errors and mistakes within media and marketing – sent in a couple of interesting submissions to The Spin this month. Several of these submissions, unfortunately, appear on the front page of local news titles, so we've reserved the top spot for them on the last page of this edition. Kicking things off in big, bold font is an inescapable typo on the front page of the Norwich Evening News. Looks like the headline either made the front page in a hurry or the sub-editor might have called in sick on 10 June. Funnier still, we have a typo on the front page of the Irish Examiner that might have escaped notice if it were anything but the name of a certain UK Member of Parliament – who remains quite unpopular in Ireland. Let us know if it tickles you when you read it aloud. Meanwhile, in what seems to be quite the coincidence, Indian newspaper Mid-Day ran a Daddy's Day Out ad by KidZania on its front page, which was prepared well in advance, to advertise an aviation experience for kids. The coincidence: The ad, which shows a portion of an Air India plane popping out of a building, was featured on 12 June – the same day an Air India plane crashed into a building in India. Note to creatives: Maybe, next time avoid any associations between planes and buildings? Speaking of aeroplane-related mishaps in the media, Sky News and The Guardian went live with a howler during their coverage of the Heathrow airport closure. They reported that the British Army's Special Air Service (SAS) cancelled 12 flights to and from Heathrow. However, it was Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS) that actually cancelled its flights. On a a Facebook post, the latter SAS had a field day, saying: 'We get it, Sky News and The Guardian – [we both have the] same initials, both wear uniforms, operate internationally and move fast.' What better way to advertise ways to 'Make You Fluent' than to destroy the language with an ad that reads: 'Say Goodbye to Fear of Speaking New Language.' Looks like this one was custom made for The Spin. We are looking for 10 volunteers who need to start speaking new language this month. No matter what.' If you think about it, what's the point of great copy, if the target audience doesn't understand it anyway? We wind up this edition of the The Spin with an AI-generated Sciatica ad that seems more like a wind up. Is there a better way to get rid of the pain than chopping off the parts of the body responsible for it?