logo
Widely criticized student loan servicer MOHELA faces investigation by multiple state attorneys general

Widely criticized student loan servicer MOHELA faces investigation by multiple state attorneys general

Yahoo28-04-2025

Student loan servicer MOHELA is under investigation by multiple state attorneys general and regulators over alleged mismanagement of borrowers' accounts, according to three sources directly familiar with the matter.
The investigations, which began in late 2023, focus in part on MOHELA's frequent errors handling basic administrative tasks like calculating monthly payments, billing customers, and processing paperwork when the Biden administration resumed loan repayments that year — mistakes that often turned costly for borrowers and the servicer was slow to fix, according to the sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record about the investigations.
The states are scrutinizing issues similar to ones covered in a lawsuit filed last summer against MOHELA by the American Federation of Teachers, two of the sources said. That complaint accused the nonprofit of committing a 'shocking series of abuses' against its customers and claimed it actively 'misleads and misinforms borrowers' about their repayment options.
MOHELA — otherwise known as the Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missouri — currently racks up the worst customer satisfaction and performance scores among the government's servicers. At the end of January, it was responsible for handling accounts for 6.8 million federal direct loan borrowers.
State attorneys general in Washington, New York, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia have all filed so-called civil investigative demands seeking information from MOHELA, according to two of the sources. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the Oregon Division of Financial Regulation have also begun investigations.
The states have created a working group to collaborate on their investigative efforts, one of the sources who spoke with Yahoo Finance said. Their investigations are adding to a sprawling, years-long pressure campaign by borrower advocates and elected Democrats against the servicer, which played a high-profile role in the court cases that blocked President Biden's student loan forgiveness efforts.
'Multi-state investigations don't happen every day,' said a former US Department of Education Official who described the inquiries to Yahoo Finance. 'The last time we saw an investigation of this scale, the company was ultimately forced out of the market entirely, and we're still cleaning up the mess they left. That should make clear the gravity of the misconduct happening at MOHELA.'
A MOHELA spokesman told Yahoo Finance that the servicer 'does not comment on the existence or nonexistence of confidential investigations.'
Sources who spoke with Yahoo Finance suggested that the investigations could potentially be hampered by the recent mass layoffs at the Department of Education, which eliminated its oversight divisions that supervised the servicers. Those teams were also responsible for fulfilling information requests from state attorneys general; without them, inquiries may get bogged down, the sources said.
The states have also lost a potentially important federal ally in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has partnered with them in past lawsuits against servicers. Under the Trump administration, the bureau's staff has been told to 'deprioritize' student loan cases.
The Massachusetts attorney general's office declined to confirm or deny whether they were scrutinizing MOHELA. But an official said the office was generally in touch with the Department of Education about investigative efforts and waiting to see what level of cooperation the Trump administration would offer. They said that without assistance from the federal government, they could be forced to bring cases to court earlier in order to obtain information through civil discovery.
The other state attorneys general offices and regulators also declined to confirm or deny the investigations, or did not respond to a request for comment.
Student loan servicers are nonprofit organizations and private companies hired by the federal government to collect monthly payments from borrowers and help them manage their debt. But they've frequently been accused of gross incompetence and of trying to save costs by cutting corners on customer service, sometimes leading to legal actions.
In 2022, for instance, 39 states reached a $1.85 billion settlement with Navient, then the country's largest servicer, over its treatment of borrowers. Among other failures, states accused it of pushing Americans who had trouble paying their loans to enter more expensive long-term forbearances instead of income-driven repayment plans, essentially because it saved the company time and money.
The CFPB later reached a deal with Navient that banned it from the student loan collections business.
MOHELA has found itself under the gun more recently. In 2023, the Department of Education said it would dock $7.2 million from the nonprofit's pay because it had sent bills late to millions of borrowers. In October of 2024, the department told MOHELA it would stop awarding it new accounts, partly because it had failed to inform the agency that it had built up a large backlog of applications for income-driven plans. Officials also threatened to terminate MOHELA's contract unless its performance improved.
Much of the scrutiny on the organization has come from progressive advocacy groups and Democrats on Capitol Hill. Last year, the American Federation of Teachers and the Student Borrower Protection Center released a report called 'The MOHELA Papers,' claiming that 4 in 10 of its customers had experienced a servicing failure since loan repayments resumed from their pandemic pause.
The report singled out MOHELA's handling of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, claiming its botched management had led to a backlog of 800,000 forms (MOHELA temporarily began overseeing PSLF in 2022 and has since handed it off). It also suggested understaffing at its call centers had left many borrowers facing hours-long wait times for help on the phone, and that it had engaged in a 'call deflection scheme' meant to loop borrowers away from live customer service representatives.
MOHELA responded with a lengthy cease-and-desist letter demanding that the organizations remove their report, which it said had made 'false, misleading, and sensationalized claims.' The letter said MOHELA had fewer than 15,000 PSLF forms left to process, and that it had increased its staff by more than 500% to deal with PSLF and the resumption of payments. It also said it had been instructed to use 'call deflection' by the Department of Education.
The issues have already spilled into court. MOHELA is currently fighting a class-action lawsuit in Missouri over its management of the public service program and another in California that argues it failed to properly implement student loan discharges. The American Federation of Teachers filed its lawsuit last summer in Washington, D.C., alleging MOHELA was guilty of wide-ranging failures that created a 'kafkaesque experience' for its customers.
MOHELA has argued that it is immune from the lawsuit because it is technically an arm of the government of Missouri, and that the teachers' union lacks legal standing to bring its case.
In Congress, meanwhile, Senate Democrats, including Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, have savaged MOHELA in hearings and launched investigations into its work. In September, following the teacher's union lawsuit, more than 50 House and Senate Democrats wrote to the Department of Education urging it to potentially drop its contract with the nonprofit. Warren, Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Sen. Bernie Sanders also called on the CFPB and state attorneys general to investigate MOHELA over its handling of PSLF.
Republicans have argued that the actions by the Department of Education and congressional Democrats, as well as lawsuits by advocacy groups, are merely an attempt at revenge against the servicer for the role it played in lawsuits that foiled the Biden administration's attempts to offer broad-based student debt forgiveness.
The Supreme Court ruled that the state of Missouri had the legal right to challenge Biden's plan because it had created and technically governed MOHELA, which stood to lose $44 million a year in fees if the loans were canceled. MOHELA itself did not have any say in its involvement in the case, which was spearheaded by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey.
Bailey later brought suits that froze Biden's SAVE plan, a more generous student loan repayment option, as well as a second attempt at large-scale loan cancellation.
Those cases 'drew the ire of litigants who have sought to retaliate against MOHELA for its role in upholding the rule of law,' Bailey wrote in a recent Supreme Court filing arguing the nonprofit should be immune from suits. Bailey also sent a letter to Trump's Department of Education in February asking it to review the previous administration's actions and 'acknowledge that they were efforts to retaliate' against MOHELA.
If MOHELA were to ever exit the servicing business, it could potentially deprive Missouri of the legal standing to challenge future student loan actions by the federal government.
Jordan Weissmann is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance.
Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China Revoked My Visa, and Came to Regret It
China Revoked My Visa, and Came to Regret It

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

China Revoked My Visa, and Came to Regret It

President Trump's first term gave us the 'China Initiative,' a government program intended to root out Chinese espionage. The result was ethnic profiling of Chinese and Asian American researchers, flimsy cases that were eventually dropped and no prosecutions of scholars for spying or theft of secrets. President Joe Biden wisely eliminated it. Mr. Trump's current administration is back at it, however, demonizing Chinese citizens once again with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announcement on May 28 that the United States would 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students. While it appears that Mr. Trump's team may have backed off on that measure for now after trade negotiations last week, the threat lingers and damage may have been done already. Targeting Chinese students, researchers and academics was a horrible idea the first time around and still is. It would harm America academically, economically and strategically. It will leave us more ignorant about our biggest rival and fuel paranoia while doing little to safeguard sensitive information. We should of course be concerned about China's wide-ranging espionage efforts. Much of this is focused on the U.S. government or corporations. But universities are targets too. Chinese government tactics are known to include pressuring students from China to gather information on American know-how and innovation from their U.S. colleges, coupled with threats against their families in China if they don't comply. Innocent students like these are China's victims, too. We should be devising ways to protect their academic freedom and safety while on U.S. soil. Excluding them en masse blames the victim and throws the baby out with the bath water. Very little of the research that happens on American campuses is classified, anyway. Many universities forbid it under the principle that academic research should be openly available. Some areas of study are more sensitive than others, but U.S. restrictions and screening procedures already block or restrict visas for Chinese researchers in certain fields. A 2020 Trump executive order, for example, limits entry by graduate students with past or present links to Chinese entities that the United States determines are involved with technologies that have potential military use. Mr. Rubio's announcement added worryingly vague new criteria to these already robust standards. He singled out students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party,' which is almost meaningless for a country where the party runs everything. Just as every American is connected to the U.S. government in some way — getting a driver's license, paying taxes, going to public schools — dealing with the Communist Party is a fact of life for Chinese citizens, not an ideological commitment. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll
What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll

Hamilton Spectator

time3 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just over a month after Pope Leo XIV became the first U.S.-born pontiff in the history of the Catholic Church, a new poll shows that American Catholics are feeling excited about their new religious leader. About two-thirds of American Catholics have a 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable view of Pope Leo, according to the new survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research , while about 3 in 10 don't know enough to have an opinion. Very few Catholics — less than 1 in 10 — view him unfavorably. Among Americans overall, plenty of people are still making up their minds about Pope Leo. But among those who do have an opinion, feelings about the first U.S.-born pope are overwhelmingly positive. The survey found that 44% of U.S. adults have a 'somewhat' or 'very' favorable view of Pope Leo XIV. A similar percentage say they don't know enough to have an opinion, and only about 1 in 10 see him unfavorably. As he promises to work for unity in a polarized church, Americans with very different views about the future of the church are feeling optimistic about his pontificate. Terry Barber, a 50-year-old Catholic from Sacramento, California, hopes Leo will seek a 'more progressive and modern church' that is more accepting of all. 'I'm optimistic. Certainly, the first pope from the United States is significant,' said Barber, who identifies as a Democrat. 'Since he worked under the previous pope, I'm sure he has similar ideas, but certainly some that are original, of his own. I'm looking forward to seeing what, if any changes, come about under his leadership.' Bipartisan appeal About half of Democrats have a favorable view of the new pope, as do about 4 in 10 Republicans and independents. Republicans are a little more likely than Democrats to be reserving judgment. About half of Republicans say they don't know enough to have an opinion about the pope, compared to about 4 in 10 Democrats. Republicans, notably, are no more likely than Democrats to have an unfavorable opinion of the pope. About 1 in 10 in each group view Pope Leo unfavorably. Victoria Becude, 38, a Catholic and Republican from Florida, said she's excited about the first U.S.-born pope and hopes he can steer the country back to Catholic doctrine and make Americans proud. 'I'm rooting for him,' she said. 'I hope that America can get back to faith, and I hope he can do that.' Being a political liberal or conservative, of course, isn't the same thing as identifying as a liberal or conservative Catholic. But the poll found no discernible partisan gap among Catholics on Pope Leo, and Catholics across the ideological spectrum have expressed hope that Leo will be able to heal some of the divisions that emerged during the pontificate of his predecessor, Pope Francis. Pope Leo recently criticized the surge of nationalist political movements in the world as he prayed for reconciliation and dialogue — a message in line with his pledges to make the Catholic Church a symbol of peace. Before becoming pope, Cardinal Robert Prevost presided over one of the most revolutionary reforms of Pope Francis' pontificate by having women serve on the Vatican board that vets nominations for bishops. He also has said decisively that women cannot be ordained as priests. Donald Hallstone, 72, a Catholic who lives in Oregon, said he expects that Leo will continue to promote women in governance positions 'at a time when there's a shortage of priests' and other leaders in the church. 'It'd be great to see women in those roles,' he said. 'Women were not excluded in the first centuries.' On the other hand, some right-wing U.S. Catholics hope Leo will focus on Catholic doctrinal opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion. Becude, the Republican, said she's against same-sex relationships because she believes that unions should be between a man and a woman, something that Pope Leo has reiterated . Even though she describes herself as 'very conservative,' though, she's in favor of reproductive rights even when church teaching opposes abortion . 'I don't believe that they should stop women from having abortions,' she said. 'We should have our own rights because you don't know the circumstances behind the reason why a woman would want the abortion in the first place.' Few have negative views — yet There's plenty of room for views to shift as Leo's agenda as pope becomes clear. Not all Americans have formed an opinion of the new pope yet; particularly, members of other religious groups are more likely to be still making up their minds. About half of born-again Protestants, mainline Protestants, and adults with no religious affiliation don't know enough to have an opinion about the pope, although relatively few — about 1 in 10 — in each group have an unfavorable view of him. Older Americans — who are more likely to identify as Catholics — are also more likely than younger Americans to be fans of Leo's. About half of Americans ages 60 and older have a favorable view of Pope Leo, compared to about 4 in 10 Americans under 30. But even so, only about 1 in 10 U.S. adults under 30 have an unfavorable view of the pope right now. Mercedes Drink, 31, is from the pope's hometown of Chicago. She still hopes that women will become ordained under his pontificate. 'It's cool; I like him because he brings something different,' said Drink, who lives in Minnesota and identifies as being part of the 'religious nones' — atheists, agnostics, or nothing in particular. 'As a young woman, I hope that he can bring change … considering who he is, he brings something new to the table. I hope he opens the world's eyes to modernizing the church, bringing more people in, having more diversity.' ___ Henao reported from Princeton, N.J. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll
What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

What US adults think about Pope Leo XIV, according to a new AP-NORC poll

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just over a month after Pope Leo XIV became the first U.S.-born pontiff in the history of the Catholic Church, a new poll shows that American Catholics are feeling excited about their new religious leader. About two-thirds of American Catholics have a 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable view of Pope Leo, according to the new survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, while about 3 in 10 don't know enough to have an opinion. Very few Catholics — less than 1 in 10 — view him unfavorably. Among Americans overall, plenty of people are still making up their minds about Pope Leo. But among those who do have an opinion, feelings about the first U.S.-born pope are overwhelmingly positive. The survey found that 44% of U.S. adults have a 'somewhat' or 'very' favorable view of Pope Leo XIV. A similar percentage say they don't know enough to have an opinion, and only about 1 in 10 see him unfavorably. As he promises to work for unity in a polarized church, Americans with very different views about the future of the church are feeling optimistic about his pontificate. Terry Barber, a 50-year-old Catholic from Sacramento, California, hopes Leo will seek a 'more progressive and modern church' that is more accepting of all. 'I'm optimistic. Certainly, the first pope from the United States is significant,' said Barber, who identifies as a Democrat. 'Since he worked under the previous pope, I'm sure he has similar ideas, but certainly some that are original, of his own. I'm looking forward to seeing what, if any changes, come about under his leadership.' Bipartisan appeal About half of Democrats have a favorable view of the new pope, as do about 4 in 10 Republicans and independents. Republicans are a little more likely than Democrats to be reserving judgment. About half of Republicans say they don't know enough to have an opinion about the pope, compared to about 4 in 10 Democrats. Republicans, notably, are no more likely than Democrats to have an unfavorable opinion of the pope. About 1 in 10 in each group view Pope Leo unfavorably. Victoria Becude, 38, a Catholic and Republican from Florida, said she's excited about the first U.S.-born pope and hopes he can steer the country back to Catholic doctrine and make Americans proud. 'I'm rooting for him,' she said. 'I hope that America can get back to faith, and I hope he can do that.' Being a political liberal or conservative, of course, isn't the same thing as identifying as a liberal or conservative Catholic. But the poll found no discernible partisan gap among Catholics on Pope Leo, and Catholics across the ideological spectrum have expressed hope that Leo will be able to heal some of the divisions that emerged during the pontificate of his predecessor, Pope Francis. Pope Leo recently criticized the surge of nationalist political movements in the world as he prayed for reconciliation and dialogue — a message in line with his pledges to make the Catholic Church a symbol of peace. Before becoming pope, Cardinal Robert Prevost presided over one of the most revolutionary reforms of Pope Francis' pontificate by having women serve on the Vatican board that vets nominations for bishops. He also has said decisively that women cannot be ordained as priests. Donald Hallstone, 72, a Catholic who lives in Oregon, said he expects that Leo will continue to promote women in governance positions 'at a time when there's a shortage of priests' and other leaders in the church. 'It'd be great to see women in those roles,' he said. 'Women were not excluded in the first centuries.' On the other hand, some right-wing U.S. Catholics hope Leo will focus on Catholic doctrinal opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion. Becude, the Republican, said she's against same-sex relationships because she believes that unions should be between a man and a woman, something that Pope Leo has reiterated. Even though she describes herself as 'very conservative,' though, she's in favor of reproductive rights even when church teaching opposes abortion. 'I don't believe that they should stop women from having abortions,' she said. 'We should have our own rights because you don't know the circumstances behind the reason why a woman would want the abortion in the first place.' Few have negative views — yet There's plenty of room for views to shift as Leo's agenda as pope becomes clear. Not all Americans have formed an opinion of the new pope yet; particularly, members of other religious groups are more likely to be still making up their minds. About half of born-again Protestants, mainline Protestants, and adults with no religious affiliation don't know enough to have an opinion about the pope, although relatively few — about 1 in 10 — in each group have an unfavorable view of him. Older Americans — who are more likely to identify as Catholics — are also more likely than younger Americans to be fans of Leo's. About half of Americans ages 60 and older have a favorable view of Pope Leo, compared to about 4 in 10 Americans under 30. But even so, only about 1 in 10 U.S. adults under 30 have an unfavorable view of the pope right now. Mercedes Drink, 31, is from the pope's hometown of Chicago. She still hopes that women will become ordained under his pontificate. 'It's cool; I like him because he brings something different,' said Drink, who lives in Minnesota and identifies as being part of the 'religious nones' — atheists, agnostics, or nothing in particular. 'As a young woman, I hope that he can bring change … considering who he is, he brings something new to the table. I hope he opens the world's eyes to modernizing the church, bringing more people in, having more diversity.' ___ Henao reported from Princeton, N.J. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store