logo
Wall Street is on the cusp of ending the dumbest recruiting cycle known to man, and we all could stand to benefit from it

Wall Street is on the cusp of ending the dumbest recruiting cycle known to man, and we all could stand to benefit from it

JPMorgan and Apollo took steps to delay the early recruitment of junior bankers.
The move challenges the traditional recruiting cycle for entry-level PE jobs.
If successful, the switch would shake up the entire industry and benefit people outside PE.
They were the shots heard round Murray Hill.
Recent announcements by JPMorgan and Apollo aimed at slowing down the early recruitment of junior bankers have sent young Wall Streeters into a frenzy.
First, JPMorgan threatened termination for first-year analysts accepting future-dated private-equity jobs. Then, private-equity firm Apollo delayed recruiting young bankers. Not long after, Business Insider was first to report that PE giant General Atlantic told young bankers it's also pumping the brakes.
The entire episode is still unfolding, but it risks upending years of planning by people pursuing one of the most sought-after careers in finance. And the end result could be PE firms pulling from a much bigger pool of talent as opposed to the select few who zeroed in on nabbing a job in the industry years ago.
The news isn't just important for your Wall Street buddy who played lacrosse in college, though. Upending the well-worn practice of PE recruiting could ultimately impact all of us.
And it's not a bad thing.
The power of PE
Understanding the magnitude of JPMorgan's and Apollo's announcements is realizing the effort it takes to get a job in PE.
Imagine you have a big test on Monday. While most of your classmates spent the weekend partying, you buckle down and hit the books so you're fully prepared. But when Monday comes your teacher postpones the test so everyone else can study more. That doesn't negate the work you did, but it definitely stings a bit.
Now imagine it's not a test but the chance at a job with a base salary upwards of $150,000 that you spent years, not just a weekend, getting ready for. Starting to get the idea?
Still, you might be asking yourself: Why do I care about changes to PE recruitment?
(To be fair, you clicked the link, but I'll allow it.)
The truth is, this impacts more people than just those who consider a Friday night at Hair of the Dog a good time.
Private-equity's reach is immense, and it's only set to get bigger. At the end of last year, PE firms had $1.2 trillion in global buyout dry powder, according to Bain & Company. That's a lot of cash ready to be put to work at a time when dealmaking takes off.
The industry is also evolving beyond the typical PE strategies we're used to, like bundling up smaller companies. Firms are becoming big lenders, often beating regulator-constrained banks at their own game.
(Whether that's a good or bad thing remains to be seen. But that's a conversation for another day.)
In short, it's a PE-backed world, and we're all just living in it.
A recruiting cycle 'that serves no one'
Working off the premise that private equity remains an unavoidable part of our future, the industry's hiring tactics, even at the junior level, suddenly seem a lot more important.
Apollo's move could be viewed as a way to avoid picking a fight with the biggest US bank. Apollo CEO Marc Rowan's statement to BI offers some more insight.
First, he alludes to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's criticism of the early recruitment of junior bankers.
"When someone says something that is just plainly true, I feel compelled to agree with it," Rowan wrote via email.
He then touched on why a reset was called for.
"Asking students to make career decisions before they truly understand their options doesn't serve them or our industry," he wrote.
"When great candidates make rushed decisions it creates avoidable turnover—and that serves no one," Rowan added.
I'm not trying to carry PE's water here, but that makes sense to me! Not only is it incredibly dumb to ask young people to commit to their next job before they start their first one, but it also limits PE firms from a recruiting perspective.
Under the current framework, people vying for these PE positions tend to fit a certain profile. From prestigious universities to finance clubs to summer internships to analyst jobs, the path to PE glory doesn't leave much room for detours.
That's not to say these people make bad PE employees. God knows we've got plenty of examples of those who followed that exact route to success.
But who says there isn't a great potential PE dealmaker out there taking the long road, so to speak? Maybe they didn't learn about PE or realize they wanted to get into the industry until the treadmill was moving too fast for them to jump on.
Wanting to be in PE for a long time doesn't make you the most qualified person to work in PE.
Meanwhile, pulling from such a small, selective talent pool could put firms at risk of groupthink. If you need to tick a certain number of boxes before getting a sniff at PE, you'll likely find a lot of people who were taught to think the same way. And when it comes to investing, that rarely turns out well.
Moving away from that model is also good for the rest of us. As our interactions with PE firms grow, having people on the inside who understand life outside the PE rat race can benefit us all.
There are no gurantees it'll hold
Full disclosure: I'm still not convinced this will ultimately change anything.
We've been down this path before. A few years ago a group of PE recruiters made a pact to hold off approaching junior bankers too early … only for one of them to break the truce and try front running the others. (This is Wall Street after all.)
There's also nothing stopping another PE firm, let's call them Whitepebble or LLS, from using Apollo's pause as a way to scoop up even more talent. Or for another bank, let's call them Nevermore or Wizard, from telling aspiring bankers they'll be happy to help with their PE aspirations when they're recruiting on college campuses this fall.
I'm also not naive enough to think that Apollo will open up the floodgates to anyone when it eventually starts recruiting associates. Even getting a sniff at such a prestigious firm will still be an honor for only a select few.
But a slight deviation from the regimented system we have in place, where committing to a long-term career before you're even considered a legal adult is almost a prerequisite, is a step in the right direction.
What do you think of the change? Is it a good thing that firms are taking a pause? Or will the PE industry lose something by slowing down early recruitment? Email me at .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breaking down all the recruiting drama rocking the PE industry
Breaking down all the recruiting drama rocking the PE industry

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Breaking down all the recruiting drama rocking the PE industry

A prestigious corner of Wall Street is having a bit of an identity crisis. The private-equity industry is on the cusp of some massive changes to how it recruits young talent. Big-name firms are putting their foot down about the early recruitment of junior bankers, leaving young Wall Streeters scrambling. There's a lot to unpack here, so let's dive in: On-cycle recruiting? Offers for jobs that are two years away? What is going on in private-equity land? Some big-name firms are trying to stop incoming investment-banking analysts from interviewing and accepting future-dated private-equity jobs. JPMorgan formally warned incoming analysts last week that they would be fired if they accept​​ed a PE job offer. PE giant Apollo followed up by informing junior bankers it would hold off on recruiting associates for its 2027 class this year. Then, as BI's Reed Alexander and Emmalyse Brownstein were the first to report, General Atlantic told young bankers that those job offers they had been prepping for won't materialize this year. Wait, these are for jobs two years from now? How does that even work? OK, this is very dumb, but try to stick with me. Private-equity firms hire entry-level talent almost exclusively from investment banks, which train them in dealmaking skills through analyst programs that last two to three years. The trick is that they don't want to wait too long to recruit for fear of missing out on the best talent. That's led to the process, known as on-cycle recruiting, creeping earlier and earlier. Some junior bankers started lining up these PE gigs before even starting their jobs at the banks. And the banks are OK with that? Not really. It's just one of those things you learn to live with, like the dent in your bumper. In theory, the setup should be mutually beneficial. Banks get first crack at undergrad talent and send their alums to firms they hope will turn around and give them business. PE firms get to outsource dealmaking training to banks. So, how did it all go wrong? PE recruiters flew a bit too close to the sun and annoyed the banks enough to get them to react. Over the past three years, the process has crept up from late August in 2022, to late July in 2023, to late June in 2024. This year, there was talk of informal coffee chats starting before some students had even graduated. It's also disruptive, as some juniors were skipping training sessions at work to prep for the PE interviews. But ultimately, the tipping point came down to one man. Who? JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon hasn't hidden his annoyance with the practice. The bank's decision to formally threaten termination, as opposed to just discouraging junior bankers from doing it, was definitely a turning point. So what does this all mean? We still have to see how things play out. Pledges from a few firms, as big as they are, don't guarantee anything. But if they do hold, I think it could benefit PE firms by allowing them to draw from a much wider pool of talent. And since it's basically PE's world and we're all just living in it, that should benefit the rest of us. You don't sound entirely convinced … I've seen this play before. Back in 2020, a bunch of PE headhunters made a pact to hold off on recruiting. (Back then, things didn't kick off until the fall.) It wasn't long before one of them broke the truce. Lovely. Anything else? As always, I want to know your thoughts on this stuff. You can email me here. You can also ping Reed, Emmalyse, and Alex Nicoll, who are all following this closely for BI. The Insider Today team: Dan DeFrancesco, deputy editor and anchor, in New York. Lisa Ryan, executive editor, in New York. Hallam Bullock, senior editor, in London. Grace Lett, editor, in Chicago. Akin Oyedele, deputy editor, in New York. Amanda Yen, associate editor, in New York. Ella Hopkins, associate editor, in London. Elizabeth Casolo, fellow, in Chicago.

Israel's Strikes on Iran Raises Risk of Wider War
Israel's Strikes on Iran Raises Risk of Wider War

Bloomberg

time3 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Israel's Strikes on Iran Raises Risk of Wider War

Brent surged almost 10% after Israel carried out military strikes against Iran. Israel targeted nuclear facilities and killed senior military commanders in a major escalation that could spark a broad war in the Middle East. Explosions were heard across Tehran, Natanz — home to a key atomic site — and other cities, according to local and social media. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel — which used 200 air force planes and said it hit around 100 targets — had 'struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment program.' Today's guests: Hugh Gimber, JPMorgan Asset Management Global Market Strategist, Julien Barnes-Dacey, European Council on Foreign Relations Middle East and North Africa Programme Director, Phoenix Kalen, SGCIB, Emerging Markets Research Head, Lynette Nusbacher, Nusbacher & Associates Chair. (Source: Bloomberg)

Almost 2 million 23andMe users have asked the company to delete their data in the last 2 months
Almost 2 million 23andMe users have asked the company to delete their data in the last 2 months

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Almost 2 million 23andMe users have asked the company to delete their data in the last 2 months

23andMe's database is shrinking as customers request to delete their data. Interim CEO Joseph Selsavage said 1.9 million customers have asked for data deletions. 23andMe said its business could be "adversely affected" if the trend continues. The hits just keep on coming for 23andMe. Although the embattled genetic testing giant has found a new owner, pending court and regulatory approval, nearly 2 million customers have asked to delete their data from its database since it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and put the company up for sale in March. Interim CEO Joe Selsavage revealed the number of deletion requests on Tuesday during a House Oversight Committee hearing. He attended the hearing with Anne Wojcicki, 23andMe's cofounder and former CEO. "Since we announced bankruptcy, we've had 1.9 million customers call and request that we delete their data, and we have done so within a reasonable timeframe," Selsavage said, adding that's about 15% of its user base. 23andMe's bankruptcy announcement came after a tumultuous 2024 that was marred by a $30 million class action settlement, layoffs, and the resignation of its entire board of independent directors, among other issues. In May, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals said it intended to acquire 23andMe for $256 million, but the sale has received pushback from lawmakers. Attorneys general from over half of the states in the US and the District of Columbia sued 23andMe on Monday to block it from selling genetic data without customer consent. 23andMe's annual report, published Wednesday, also addressed customers' requests to delete data. As of May 31, the company said its user base had dwindled to about 14 million personal genome service customers. "We have experienced and expect to continue to experience significant declines in PGS revenues in the near-term as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Cyber Incident, negative media coverage, the pending Transaction, and other general market and economic trends," the company said in its annual report. The company added that customer fluctuation could impact the size of its database. "If the number of our customers consenting to participate in our research programs declines or fails to grow, our research services revenue may be adversely affected, and our database may become less effective in facilitating our ability to create new features, products, and services to offer to our customers," the company said. Representatives for 23andMe did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store