Green Oceans Report Reveals Systematic Non-Compliance in Offshore Wind Development
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) decisions to promulgate these contracts violate procedural law to justify projects that are causing irreversible environmental, cultural, and economic consequences.
Share
'This Report demonstrates that BOEM's review of these projects was fraught with omitted, misrepresented, and arguably false information regarding its ability to provide reliable electricity,' said Green Oceans President Lisa Quattrocki Knight. 'The projects also have significant adverse environmental, economic, and national security consequences. The Trump Administration has sufficient executive authority and reason to cancel the Rhode Island and Massachusetts Wind Energy Areas leases.'
Critical data and legal criteria in the report reveal possible omissions or misrepresentations by OSW project developers and government decision-makers. This is shown by citing OCSLA provisions, environmental protection statutes, state obligations to serve, Federal Power Act electricity system reliability rules, and federal requirements from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). These include misrepresentations about:
Bulk transmission system reliability
Actual installed capacity requirements for fully decarbonized electricity generation
Actual amount of electricity generated by OSW operations versus ratepayer demand
Illegal segment-by-segment lease issuance
Encroachment on national security operations and training
Dire economic impacts on maritime activities like fishing and navigation
The North Atlantic right whale population resides in the RI/MA WEA. The region also encompasses one of the last remaining spawning grounds for Southern New England cod. Offshore wind development permitted by these leases could lead to the extinction of both species. Federal documents also confirm that offshore developments will compromise the East Coast's only Early Warning Radar system operated by Cape Cod Space Force Stations, underwater threat detection capabilities, military readiness, and Coast Guard search and rescue operations. BOEM's studies acknowledge long-term, major adverse and irreversible impacts on fishing and regional fisheries, and the historical and cultural resources of the Wampanoag Nation of Gay Head/Aquinnah. The Wampanoag Nation has inhabited Massachusetts and Eastern Rhode Island for more than 12,000 years. BOEM did not adequately consider the cumulative impact of all proposed development on the entire lease area, a legal requirement of their authority.
The Green Oceans report aligns with the ongoing comprehensive federal review of wind leasing and permitting practices, as directed by the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2025, and makes the case for immediate intervention overwhelming, both on legal and policy grounds. The six offshore wind projects referenced throughout this announcement are: Revolution Wind, Vineyard Wind, South Fork Wind, Sunrise Wind, SouthCoast Wind, and New England Wind.
You may access the full report here:
About Green Oceans
Green Oceans is a nonprofit, non-partisan group of community members dedicated to the preservation and protection of our nation's marine ecosystems and coastal communities. For more information or to get involved, visit: https://green-oceans.org/.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
07-08-2025
- Forbes
The US Wind Controversy In Maryland: Project Survival At Stake
Across the East Coast, opposition to offshore wind energy is turning into a cultural identity. From Ocean City, Maryland to coastal Delaware and New Jersey, once slated for a major offshore wind development, resistance is gaining traction. The opposition continues to perpetuate false narratives about purported harms to whales and dolphins, undeterred by the lack of scientific evidence. All the while, supporters are less visible and mostly quiet about their preferences. With 'Stop Windmills' bumper stickers, storefront signs, and even beachside lemonade stands, the message is clear. This is not just a protest against turbines; it is a cultural stand, a way of building walls against change. US Wind Project Delayed Through Litigation The latest skirmish comes from Ocean City and Worcester County. In early July, Ocean City and Worcester County jointly filed two legal appeals against US Wind's air permit, claiming that the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), a state agency, issued the permit without following proper procedures. One appeal was filed with the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board on July 8, and the other in the Worcester County Circuit Court on July 11. Jurisdiction over the permit is unclear, so both a federal and a state agency were petitioned. Prior to that, another federal regulator, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, had already approved the project's Environmental Impact Statement, complete with mitigation measures. Many objections to US Wind's air permit are procedural, such as failure to provide public notice on permit provisions or failure to issue a permit within a year after the application was deemed complete. However, two complaints were more substantive. One referred to the failure to conduct a required alternatives analysis. The other was the failure to calculate boat emissions from the vessels shuttling workers out to turbines located 11 miles offshore, a distance so far that the turbines are barely visible from land. Given the number of commercial and recreational boats currently active in the region, it is interesting that the service boats for a wind project were singled out as a topic for complaint. As for the required alternatives analysis, the city and county do not seem to see the bigger picture. The question is not whether there will be a wind project in coastal waters or not. The question is how the region is going to secure its electricity supply if projects like US Wind keep being delayed. Local Electricity Production Helps Electric Grid Electricity markets across the country are facing growing challenges in reliably meeting demand. The Delmarva region is part of PJM, a regional transmission organization that manages the high-voltage power grid and wholesale electricity markets across 13 states and Washington, D.C. In PJM's most recent capacity auction, the clearing price hit a record high of $329 per megawatt-day. This signals a long-term need for more available power sources to keep the grid stable. While capacity markets were originally designed with on-demand, dispatchable power plants in mind, like natural gas or coal, renewables and batteries can and do participate. Capacity markets provide payments to energy producers in exchange for committing to be available during times of peak electricity demand. Wind energy offers another key benefit: it can help strengthen the local power supply. With electricity demand rising across the PJM region, especially from data centers, every new power project built within a county helps reduce pressure on the grid and stabilize prices. This electricity is not being transmitted from hundreds of miles away. It is generated locally. US Wind would bring 114 turbines to the grid. Offshore wind, in particular, has an advantage. Thanks to stronger and more consistent winds over the ocean, offshore turbines can generate electricity more reliably throughout the year than turbines on land. That makes them a promising part of the solution for meeting growing energy needs. If they are built, of course. CVOW Success in Virginia The history of offshore wind development seems to have many such examples when projects were never built. The earliest example is from 2001, when Jim Gordon began the development of Cape Wind with 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound off the coast of Cape Cod. After spending over $100 million and obtaining necessary permits, the project was cancelled in December 2017 due to issues with power purchase agreements, construction financing, and a mounting local opposition funded by Senator Ted Kennedy and William Koch, who liked vacationing on Cape Cod. Successful offshore wind developments are much rarer. Virginia's Dominion Energy seems to have pulled it off with their 2.6 GW planned project 24 nautical miles off the coast of Virginia Beach. Once completed, the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project will be one of the largest offshore wind farms in the world, consisting of 176 Siemens turbines. While the construction is still ongoing, the company announced that 78 monopile foundations, which hold wind turbines, have been installed. In addition to wind turbines, Dominion Energy needs to install substations that handle the flow of electrons from the new source to the existing grid. In January 2025, the first of three offshore substations arrived, weighing 4,000 tonnes, becoming the heaviest piece of equipment ever handled by the Port of Virginia. Dominion Energy built its offshore project due to hard work of their teams, as well as existing institutional backing and thousands of stakeholder meetings to address opposition over the years. As a state-regulated monopoly with a state Renewable Portfolio Standard to meet, Dominion Energy had the political alignment to get the project done. It seems like US Wind is not so lucky. US Wind, as a private developer, is being whipsawed between state courts and federal agencies. The result is procedural chaos and mounting delays, which are jeopardizing a private upfront investment. A Nation That Forgot How to Build The tragedy here is not the lawsuit. It is the lost learning of building large offshore wind projects. Given that installing each turbine is a modular task: once one turbine is installed, you kind of know how to install the next one. The book How Big Things Get Done explains that this is how big infrastructure scales. This is a reason why modular projects like solar and wind farms are less likely to experience cost and time overruns, once legal hurdles are cleared. We can learn and get better at it over time. Instead, in the U.S., projects are litigated and delayed, often to make the project economics untenable and the investment unrecoverable. China, meanwhile, has installed the world's largest turbine off the coast of Taiwan and is building the largest hydropower plant in Tibet, which will make the famous Three Gorges Dam pale in comparison. If energy dominance is still the goal, then we should seek to dominate in something beyond long development timelines. Contrary to the opposition's narrative, most people support offshore wind. Peer-reviewed studies of offshore residents, as well as opinion polls among Americans, show that support for wind energy remains strong. But the silent majority often gets drowned out by highly organized opponents who dominate the narrative. There is no evidence that wind turbines kill whales or cause dolphin strandings. However, there is certainty that due to ocean acidification and overfishing, apex species are in danger of starving. This happened because we disturbed the marine food chains, not because wind developers are using sonar. If marine life was the concern, wind projects would be seen as something to fight for, not against.
E&E News
04-08-2025
- E&E News
Trump admin eliminates offshore wind project areas
The Trump administration took another swing at offshore wind Wednesday, rescinding areas of federal waters deemed most suitable for wind development. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), which oversees leasing in federal waters, said it rescinded all designated 'Wind Energy Areas' on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf. The move follows an order from Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Tuesday directing his department to go after any 'preferential treatment' for wind and solar projects on federal territory. BOEM is part of Interior. Advertisement Wind energy areas are defined by BOEM as sections of federal waters 'that appear most suitable for commercial wind energy activities, while presenting the fewest apparent environmental and user conflicts,' according to the bureau's website. BOEM has previously used designated wind areas to guide lease sales for offshore wind.
Yahoo
01-08-2025
- Yahoo
Green Oceans Applauds the Department of Interior's Order Rescinding Designated Wind Energy Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf
New Order Opens 45-Day Window to Reconsider Offshore Wind Projects Under Fire for Environmental, Fishing, Tribal, and National Security Violations LITTLE COMPTON, R.I., July 31, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Green Oceans, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to protecting ocean health, applauds the Trump Administration's decision to rescind designated Wind Energy Areas on the outer continental shelf (OCS) of the U.S. Secretary Doug Burgum and the DOI Bureau of Ocean Management (BOEM) announced bold and definitive action to correct misguided leasing policy practices for offshore wind development. Green Oceans thanks the Department and President Trump for putting fact-based, scientific data before speculative foreign entity interests. "Secretary Burgum's Order will restore the integrity of the process," said Dr. Lisa Quattrocki Knight, President of Green Oceans. "We urge the Solicitor to recommend a remand of these unjustified approvals to restore proper oversight to our ocean." Green Oceans has raised concerns about granting leases and permits despite serious risks to the environment, economy, and national security—and without clear, proven benefits or a full understanding of the long-term harm. Our commissioned report, Cancelling Offshore Wind Leases, inspired by the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2025, compiles wind leasing and permitting practices, and provides justification for immediate intervention, both on legal and policy grounds. Green Oceans also commends Secretary of the Interior Douglas Burgum for issuing Order No. 3437, "Ending Preferential Treatment for Unreliable, Foreign-Controlled Energy Sources in Department Decision Making." The Order directs the Department's Solicitor to review all pending litigation and recommend, within 45 days, whether Records of Decision for wind projects should be remanded—an action that could impact the Revolution Wind and South Fork Wind projects, both currently under federal challenge. Green Oceans has led a coalition of 35 co-plaintiffs in lawsuits against both projects and has actively petitioned multiple agencies to halt construction and reconsider federal approvals based on environmental, national security, and legal grounds. Green Oceans stands ready to assist in the review process and calls on the Department to act swiftly in the public interest. About Green Oceans Green Oceans is a nonprofit, non-partisan group of community members dedicated to the preservation and protection of our nation's marine ecosystems and coastal communities. For more information or to get involved, visit: View source version on Contacts For Media Inquiries, Contact: Mia HeckCellular (210)284-0388Mia@
