Macron invites all New Caledonia stakeholders for Paris talks
Photo:
supplied
French President Emmanuel Macron has sent a formal invitation to "all New Caledonia stakeholders" for talks in Paris on the French Pacific territory's political and economic future to be held on 2 July.
The confirmation came on Thursday in the form of a letter sent individually to an undisclosed list of recipients and dated 24 June.
The talks follow a series of roundtables fostered earlier this year by French Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls.
But the
latest talks
, held in New Caledonia under a so-called "conclave" format, stalled on 8 May.
This was mainly because several main components of the pro-France (anti-independence) parties said the draft agreement proposed by Valls was tantamount to a form of independence, which they reject.
The project implied that New Caledonia's future political status vis-à-vis France could be an associated independence "within France" with a transfer of key powers (justice, defence, law and order, foreign affairs, currency ), a dual New Caledonia-France citizenship and an international standing.
Instead, the pro-France Rassemblement-LR and Loyalistes suggested another project of "internal federalism" which would give more powers (including on tax matters) to each of the three provinces, a notion often criticised as a de facto partition of New Caledonia.
In May 2024, on the sensitive issue of eligibility at local elections, deadly riots broke out in New Caledonia, resulting in 14 deaths and over €2 billion in material damage.
In his letter, Macron writes that although Valls "managed to restore dialogue...this did not allow reaching an agreement on (New Caledonia's) institutional future".
"This is why I decided to host, under my presidency, a summit dedicated to New Caledonia and associating the whole of the territory's stakeholders".
Macron also wrote that "beyond institutional topics, I wish that our exchanges can also touch on (New Caledonia's) economic and societal issues".
Macron made earlier announcements, including on 10 June 2025, on the margins of the recent UNOC Oceans Summit in Nice (France), when he dedicated a significant part of his speech to Pacific leaders attending a "Pacific-France" summit to the situation in New Caledonia.
"Our exchanges will last as long as it takes so that the heavy topics...can be dealt with with all the seriousness they deserve".
Macron also points out that after New Caledonia's "crisis" broke out on 13 May 2024, "the tension was too high to allow for an appeased dialogue between all the components of New Caledonia's society".
Letter sent by French President Emmanuel Macron to New Caledonia's stakeholders for Paris talks on 2 July 2025.
Photo:
Supplied
The main political objective of the talks remains to find a comprehensive agreement between all local political stakeholders, in order to arrive at a new agreement that would define the French Pacific territory's political future and status.
This would then allow to replace the 27-year-old "Nouméa Accord", signed in 1998.
The 1998 pact puts a heavy focus on the notions of "living together" and "common destiny" for New Caledonia's indigenous Kanaks and all of the other components of its ethnically and culturally diverse society.
It was also mentioning a necessary economic "re-balancing" between the Northern, Islands provinces and the more affluent Southern province, where the capital Nouméa is located.
The Nouméa Accord also contained provisions to hold three referendums on self-determination.
The three polls took place in 2018, 202 and 2021, all of those resulting in a majority of people rejecting independence.
But the last referendum, in December 2021, was largely boycotted by the pro-independence movement.
According to the Nouméa Accord, after those three referendums were held, political stakeholders were to "examine the situation thus created", Macron recalls.
But despite several attempts, including under previous governments, to promote political talks, the situation has remained deadlocked and increasingly polarised between the pro-independence and the pro-France camps.
A few days after the May 2024 riots, Macron made a trip to New Caledonia, calling for the situation to be appeased so that talks could resume.
In his 10 June speech to Pacific leaders, Macron also mentioned a "new project" and in relation to the past referendums process, pledged "not to make the same mistakes again".
He said he believed the referendum, as an instrument, was not necessarily adapted to Melanesian and Kanak cultures.
In practice, the Paris "summit" would also involve French minister for Overseas Manuel Valls.
The list of invited participants would include all parties, pro-independence and pro-France, represented at New Caledonia's Congress (the local parliament).
But it would also include a number of economic stakeholders, as well as a delegation of Mayors of New Caledonia, as well as representatives of the civil society and NGOs.
Talks could also come in several formats, with the political side being treated separately.
The pro-independence platform FLNKS (Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front) has to decide at the weekend whether it will take part in the Paris talks.
During a whirlwind visit to New Caledonia in June 2024, Macron met Christian Téin, the leader of a pro-independence CCAT (Field Action Coordination Cell), created by Union Calédonienne (UC).
Téin was arrested and jailed in mainland France.
In August 2024, while in custody in the prison of Mulhouse -North-east of France), he was elected, in absentia, President of a UC-dominated FLNKS.
Even though he remains prosecuted for allegedly being one of the masterminds of the May 2024 riots, Téin was released from jail on 12 June 2025, under the condition that he does not travel to New Caledonia and reports regularly to French judges.
On the pro-France side, Téin's release triggered mixed angry reactions.
"To liberate Christian Téin just a few days away from the final negotiation on New Caledonia's future is a very bad signal sent by the French justice", he told pro-France Radio Rythme Bleu on 13 June 2025.
"I, personally, will not go to the negotiating table with Christian Téin. This is one condition we are posing to the French State", he stressed.
Other pro-France hard-line components said the Kanak leader's participation to the Paris talks was simply "unthinkable".
Pro-independence Tjibaou said Téin's release was "a sign of appeasement", but that his participation was probably subject to "conditions".
"But I'm not the one who makes the invitations", he told public broadcaster NC la 1ère on 15 June 2025.
FLNKS spokesman Dominique Fochi said in a release Téin's participation in the talks was earlier declared a prerequisite.
"Now our FLNKS President has been released. He's the FLNKS boss and we are awaiting his instructions", Fochi said.
At former roundtables earlier this year, the FLNKS delegation was headed by Union Calédonienne (UC, the main and dominating component of the FLNKS) President Emmanuel Tjibaou.
Manuel Valls takes part in the welcoming ceremony.
Photo:
Delphine Mayeur / Hans Lucas / AFP
In a press conference on Tuesday in Paris, Valls elaborated some more on the upcoming Paris talks.
"Obviously there will be a sequence of political negotiations which I will lead with all of New Caledonia's players, that is all groups represented at the Congress. But there will also be an economic and social sequence with economic, social and societal players who will be invited", Valls said.
During question time at the French National Assembly in Paris on 3 June 2025, Valls said he remained confident that it was "still possible" to reach an agreement and to "reconcile" the "contradictory aspirations" of the pro-independence and pro-France camps.
During the same sitting, pro-France New Caledonia MP Nicolas Metzdorf decried what he termed "France's lack of ambition" and his camp's feeling of being "let down".
The other MP for New Caledonia's, pro-independence Emmanuel Tjibaou, also took the floor to call on France to "close the colonial chapter" and that France has to "take its part in the conclusion of the emancipation process" of New Caledonia.
"With the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister, and the political forces, we will make offers, while concluding the decolonisation process, the self-determination process, while respecting New Caledonians' words and at the same time not forgetting history, and the past that have led to the disaster of the 1980s and the catastrophe of May 2024", he replied.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Electricity Authority not a 'chocolate teapot', Shane Jones says
Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Electricity Authority has proven itself not to be a "chocolate teapot", the associate energy minister says. In a bid to make energy more affordable, the authority will require generators to offer the same price to all retailers - and ban the bigger power companies from giving themselves discounts . The government said the change would increase competition, giving consumers more choices . Associate energy minister Shane Jones - who has previously been heavily critical of the authority and has threatened to end it unless it flexed its authority - was pleased. "The EA (Electricity Authority) have proved that they're not totally a chocolate teapot. Anything that shrinks the cost of energy and secures greater security, I think Kiwis should be happy." Jones accused big electricity companies of currently operating as if they had more power than Cabinet. He said the change was a surgical instrument - and in future he would like to see a sharper instrument taken to the gentailers' (companies that are both generators and retailers) corporate makeup. Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Meanwhile, Labour was also backing the move to level the playing field between big power companies and smaller outlets. Leader Chris Hipkins said he wanted to see what kind of enforcement there would be behind the new rule. "I think there probably needs to be more teeth behind it, and I think that they actually need to go further than that - but it is a good start." The change came out of the Energy Competition task force, which was set up last August in response to the winter power crisis . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
From taonga to target: the assault on te reo Māori
Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa' last month in Parliament. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Across Aotearoa - or New Zealand - depending on the speaker, resistance to te reo Māori and calls to roll it back from public life are growing louder. In Parliament, lawmakers are pushing a growing number of policies that critics say erode Māori culture and put New Zealand at risk of losing its cultural identity. Among the policies, cuts to te reo Māori teacher training , mandating English-first in public service naming and communication, the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), reversal of co-governance reforms, and undermining local Māori representation. The coalition also supported the Treaty Principles Bill , pushed by ACT, which aimed to enshrine fixed principles of the Treaty and extend these to all New Zealanders, effectively diluting Māori-specific rights. The bill was ultimately rejected by Parliament. Just last week, it was revealed that Education Minister Erica Stanford stopped the printing of new editions of a series of books designed to teach Year 1s how to read, which included te reo words, while last month in Parliament, Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa'. Together, these measures signal a retreat from decades of progress toward biculturalism, says associate professor Awanui Te Huia, who teaches Māori studies at Victoria University. "The issue that these policies have created is it emboldens those [racist] positions and it treats the irrational as rational," she tells The Detail . "When we're hearing these anti-Tiriti or Waitangi statements, when we hear these anti-Māori, anti-te reo Māori statements, and they are being put forward as rational and considered arguments, this is when we have some of the trouble ... it platforms particular perspectives that are harmful for our community, harmful for cohesion." She says the revival of te reo is one of our greatest national achievements - proof of a country willing to confront its past and weave its two founding cultures together. But she worries the government's policies will stall momentum. "It's not a zero-sum game. If te reo Māori is doing well, that does not take anything away from another person; it's additive." And she says the cost of the roll-back of Māori rights and culture is damaging. "There is considerable racism that happens in our communities, and that has multiple implications across the spectrum - on economics ... on our socio-political spectrums." Māori journalist Ella Stewart has been covering the policy changes for RNZ's in-depth department. She tells The Detail that the Māori community is hurting, but also pushing back. "I have spoken to a raft of people, in my personal life but also just in reporting ... I remember speaking to Tureiti Moxon a couple of weeks ago, and she said that this partnership that's been forged many years ago, over decades and decades, to get to a point where Māori are actually at the decision-making table - she said that's all been taken away. "You have also got Māori legal scholars, Te Tiriti/treaty experts, like Carwyn Jones, who said to me, 'we are seeing that this government has a clear strategy of removing Māori rights and removing the ability of Te Tiriti to have any impact in our law'." She says, from her conversations, people would prefer if the government focused on big picture issues, rather than stripping te reo Māori from agency names and books. "I think they are mainly upset because there are some issues that are being focused on that arguably the government could be spending time doing something more important ... on more pressing issues for our people rather than 'should the name of New Zealand be New Zealand or Aotearoa', maybe focus on how you can further our people." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Palau President Calls Exclusion Of PIF Partners A 'Missed Opportunity'
Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific Journalist Palau's President Surangel Whipps Jr says it is "a missed opportunity" not to include partners at next mont's Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders' summit. However, Whipps said he respects the position of the Solomon Islands, as hosts, to exclude more than 20 countries that are not members the regional organisation. The Solomon Islands is blocking all external partners from attending the PIF leaders' week in Honiara from 8-12 September. The decision means that nations such as the United States and China (dialogue partners), and Taiwan (a development partner), will be shut out of the regional gathering. Whipps Jr told RNZ Pacific that although he has accepted the decision, he was not happy about it. "These are Forum events; they need to be treated as Forum events. They are not Solomon Islands events, [nor] are Palau events," Whipps said. "It is so important for any Pacific [Islands] Forum meeting that we have all our partners there. It is a missed opportunity not to have our partners attending the meeting in the Solomon Islands, but they are the host." Last week, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele said the decision gives leaders space to focus on a review of how the PIF engages with diplomatic partners, through reforms under PIF's Partnership and Engagement Mechanism. Solomon Islands opposition MP Peter Kenilorea Jr said that the move is about disguising the fact the Manele administration was planning on blocking Taiwan from entering the country. "The way I see it is definitely, 100 percent, to do with China and Taiwan," he said. Kenilorea said he was concerned there would still be bilateral meetings on the margins, which would be easy for countries with diplomatic missions in Solomon Islands, like China and the US, but not for Taiwan. "There might be delegations coming through that might have bilaterials that make a big deal out of it, the optics and the narratives that will be coming out of those, if they do happen are out of the control of the Pacific Islands Forum architecture, which is another hit to regionalism." Palau, Tuvalu and Marshall Islands are the remaining Pacific countries that have ties with Taiwan. The Guardian reported that Tuvalu is now considering not attending the leaders' summit. Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo said he would wait to see how other Pacific leaders respond before deciding whether or not to attend and he was disappointed at the exclusion. New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said he was concerned. "We have advocated very strongly for the status quo. That actually the Pacific Islands Forum family countries come together, and then the dialogue partners, who are from all over the world can be present as well." Whipps said all would be welcome, including China, at the Pacific Islands Forum next year hosted in Palau. He said it is important for Pacific nations to work together despite differences. "Everybody has their own sovereignty, they have their own partners and they have their reasons for what they do. We respect that. "What's most important is we find ways to come together," he added. Kenilorea said other Solomon Islands MPs know the deferral is about China and Taiwan but he is the only one willing to mention it. Solomon Islands switched diplomatic ties from Taiwan to China in 2019. In 2022 the island nation signed a security pact with China. "If [the deferral] had happened earlier down in our [China and Solomon Islands] relationship, I would have thought you would have heard more leaders saying it how it is. "But we are now six years down the track of our switch and leaders are not as vocal as they used to be anymore."
