Pakistan confirms its expulsion of more than 80,000 Afghans since April 1
Pakistan has confirmed to have repatriated more than 80,000 Afghan nationals since April 1, before an extended April 30 deadline for the country's largest migrant group in an initiative labelled as 'forced deportation' by Afghanistan.
Talal Chaudhry, Pakistan's Interior Ministry adviser, told reporters in Islamabad on Friday that there would be no more extensions to the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan launched in late 2023 for more than three million Afghans.
'We have communicated clear instructions to all provinces, if anyone gives a shop, house, or any kind of space to an illegal foreigner, they will be held accountable under the law,' he said.
Those lacking valid documents or holding Afghan Citizen Cards had initially been ordered to leave by March 31. That deadline was later extended by a month.
On Tuesday, the International Organization for Migration, a UN entity, said Pakistan has expelled nearly 60,000 Afghans since the start of April.
'With a new wave of large-scale returns now under way from Pakistan, needs on the ground are rising rapidly – both at the border and in areas of return that are struggling to absorb large numbers of returnees,' Mihyung Park, head of the IOM's Afghanistan mission, said at the time.
More than 1.3 million Afghans who hold Proof of Registration cards from the UN refugee agency, UNHCR, have also been told to move outside the capital Islamabad and the neighbouring city of Rawalpindi.
On Saturday, Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar is due to visit Kabul, where he will head a delegation for high-level talks with the Taliban-led government.
'The talks will cover the entire gamut of the Pakistan-Afghan relationship, focusing on ways and means to deepen cooperation in all areas of mutual interests, including security, trade, connectivity, and people-to-people ties,' said a statement from Pakistan's foreign office.
The crackdown threatens to uproot Afghan families that have been in the country for decades.
Earlier this month, Akber Khan, who owns a restaurant in the northwest Pakistani city of Peshawar, told The Associated Press news agency: 'I have been here for almost 50 years. I got married here, so did my children, and 10 of my family members are buried here. That's why we have no desire to leave.'
At least a third of the Afghans Pakistan wants to expel this year live in the northwest province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
'Afghans can never be completely repatriated, especially from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, as they return using illegal channels or exploiting loopholes in the system despite fencing at the border,' said Abdullah Khan, managing director of the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies, to Al Jazeera.
Islamabad has frequently linked Afghan refugees to rising security threats and criminal activity within its borders – allegations rejected by Kabul, which has described the campaign as forced deportation and politically motivated.
Authorities in Pakistan say they have established temporary holding centres across multiple cities to process and accommodate Afghan nationals before their return.
Most are being transported to the Torkham border crossing in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, the key route into eastern Afghanistan.
Human rights groups have criticised the repatriation drive, warning that mass expulsions risk endangering vulnerable people, particularly women and children, who may face insecurity or persecution upon return.
Despite these concerns, Pakistani officials maintain that the crackdown targets only those who remain in the country without legal authorisation, insisting the policy is a matter of national security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation says 5 aid workers killed by Hamas
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the United States and Israel-backed organisation established to supplant the aid work of the United Nations, has accused Hamas of killing five staff and wounding multiple others in an attack on a bus en route to a food distribution centre. A bus carrying more than two dozen Palestinians working with the organisation was 'brutally attacked' while travelling to a distribution centre west of Khan Younis in southern Gaza, the foundation said in a statement on Wednesday night. While the organisation was still gathering facts, 'at least' five people were killed and there were 'multiple injuries', the foundation said, adding there were fears that some of its staff had been taken captive. 'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms. These were aid workers. Humanitarians, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others,' the foundation said. 'Our hearts are broken and our thoughts and prayers are with every victim, every family, and every person still unaccounted for.' Hamas, which governs Gaza, did not immediately comment on the claims. Hamas earlier this week denied that it had threatened the foundation after the organisation accused the Palestinian group of making 'direct threats' against its operations. The aid organisation has been strongly criticised by the UN and rights groups, which have accused it of failing to meet basic humanitarian standards. Numerous Israeli attacks on Palestinians have taken place near the foundation's distribution sites in Rafah and the Netzarim Corridor, with more than 220 people killed since the group began operations on May 27, according to Gaza health authorities. In its statement, the foundation, which on Saturday reported that it had been unable to distribute aid due to Hamas threats, said the attack 'did not happen in a vacuum'. 'For days, Hamas has openly threatened our team, our aid workers, and the civilians who receive aid from us. These threats were met with silence,' the foundation said. 'Tonight the world must see this for what it is: an attack on humanity,' the foundation added. 'We call on the international community to immediately condemn Hamas for this unprovoked attack and continued threat against our people simply trying to feed the Palestinian people.'
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Money not infertility, UN report says: Why birth rates are plummeting
Millions of people around the world are unable to have the number of children they desire, and financial constraints, lack of quality healthcare and gender inequality are some of the barriers to reproductive choices, according to a UN report. The UN Population Fund (UNFPA) unveiled its State of the World Population report on Tuesday, warning that a rising number of people are being denied the freedom to start families due to elevated living costs, wars and lack of suitable partners and not because they reject parenthood. Roughly 40 percent of respondents cited economic barriers – such as the costs of raising children, job insecurity and expensive housing – as the main reason for having fewer children than they would like, according to the report based on an online survey conducted by the UN agency and YouGov. Fertility rates have fallen to below 2.1 births per woman – the threshold needed for population stability without immigration – in more than half of all countries that took part in the survey. On the flip side, life expectancy continues to grow across almost all regions of the world, according to the survey conducted in 14 countries that are home to one-third of the world's population. Right-wing nationalist governments, including in the United States and Hungary, are increasingly blaming falling fertility rates on a rejection of parenthood. But the 2025 State of the World Population report found most people did indeed want children. The survey findings indicated that the world is not facing a crisis of falling birth rates but a crisis of reproductive agency. UNFPA surveyed 14,000 people from four countries in Europe, four in Asia, three in Africa and three in the Americas. The study examined a mix of low-, middle- and high-income countries and those with low and high fertility rates. They were picked to try to represent 'a wide variety of countries with different cultural contexts, fertility rates and policy approaches', according to the report's editor, Rebecca Zerzan. South Korea, which is included in the study, has the lowest fertility rate in the world. The report also looked at Nigeria, which has one of the highest birth rates in the world. The other countries included, in order of population size, are India, the US, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Thailand, South Africa, Italy, Morocco, Sweden and Hungary. The survey is a pilot for research in 50 countries later this year. When it comes to age groups within countries, the sample sizes in the initial survey are too small to make conclusions. But some findings are clear. According to UNFPA, 39 percent of people said financial limitations prevented them from having a child. Job insecurity and fear of the future – from climate change to war – were cited by 21 percent and 19 percent of respondents, respectively, for reasons to avoid reproducing. Elsewhere, 13 percent of women and 8 percent of men pointed to the unequal division of domestic labour as a factor in having fewer children than desired. Only 12 percent of people cited infertility or difficulty conceiving for not having the number of children they wanted. That figure was higher in countries like Thailand (19 percent), the US (16 percent) and South Africa (15 percent). In many cases, there were significant differences in responses depending on which country people were reporting from. But for Natalia Kanem, executive director at UNFPA, a universal finding from the report is that 'fertility rates are falling in large part because many feel unable to create the families they want.' In South Korea, three in five respondents reported financial limitations as an obstacle to having children. It was just 19 percent in Sweden, where both men and women are entitled to 480 days of paid parental leave per child, which may also be transferred to grandparents. Still, birth rates in Sweden are among the lowest in the world. Zerzan pointed out that one factor alone does not account for falling fertility rates. 'I fully agree with that,' said Arkadiusz Wisniowski, professor of social statistics and demography at the University of Manchester. 'The decision to have a child is complex. Yes, it's about money. But it's also about time and access to the right kind of childcare,' he told Al Jazeera. When deaths outpace births, that is an indication that fertility rates are falling. 'That's not currently true at the global level,' Wisniowski said. 'But it is true for numerous countries around the world, especially wealthier nations.' 'And some governments are having to navigate the reality of falling birth rates against the backlash against immigration. Clearly, immigrants can fill labour market gaps, and there is evidence they contribute to economic growth,' he said. 'But it's no panacea.' 'We can see both the problem and solution clearly,' the UNFPA report noted. 'The answer lies in reproductive agency, a person's ability to make free and informed choices about sex, contraception and starting a family – if, when and with whom they want.' UNFPA warns against simplistic and coercive responses to falling birth rates, such as baby bonuses or fertility targets, which are often ineffective and risk violating human rights. 'We also see that when people feel their reproductive choices are being steered, when policies are even just perceived as being too coercive, people react and they are less likely to have children,' Kanem said. Instead, the UN body urged governments to expand choices by removing barriers to parenthood identified by their populations. Its recommended actions included making parenthood more affordable through investments in housing, decent work, paid parental leave and access to comprehensive reproductive health services. 'The recommendations [in the report] are all good,' Wisniowski said. 'They would all empower people to try and achieve their family-linked aspirations. But these comprehensive policies will come with a cost.' For years, labour economists have warned that falling fertility poses a threat to future prosperity because it increases fiscal pressures due to ageing populations – when the number of pensioners in relation to workers rises. 'Governments may need to tax working people more or take on more debt to address the reality of fewer young people,' Wisniowski noted. 'But fertility isn't something that you can easily tinker with. We are facing considerable uncertainty.'
Qatar Tribune
2 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
Sheikha Alya meets president-elect of 80th UN General Assembly
NEW YORK: Permanent Representativeof the State of Qatarto the United Nations HE Sheikha Alya Ahmed bin Saif Al Thani has met with HE Annalena Baerbock, President-elect of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, at the headquarters of the Permanent Mission of Qatar in New York. During the meeting, the two sides reviewed joint priorities for the State of Qatar and the United Nations within the framework of the upcoming General Assembly session. They also discussed ways to enhance cooperation in addressing pressing global challenges. Sheikha Alya reaffirmed Qatar's continued commitment to actively supporting UN initiatives, with the aim of contributing to the success of the 80th session of the General Assembly. For her part, Baerbock expressed appreciation for Qatar's prominent role in supporting United Nations efforts, particularly in promoting international peace and security and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals.
