
Nauru Says Deep Sea Mining And Ocean Conservation Can Coexist
Ocean conservation and deep sea mining are not in conflict, Nauru's climate change minister has told leaders at the United Nations Ocean Conference.
Asterio Appi said Nauru sees the extraction of metals from deep sea nodules as essential for the increased production of electricity as the world moves away from fossil fuels.
"Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development," Appi said.
Deep sea mining involves extracting potato size rocks called nodules - which are packed full of valuable metals - from the seafloor many kilometres deep.
Earlier this month, Nauru updated its commercial agreement with Canadian mining group The Metals Company for deep sea mining in international waters.
It comes at a time of increasing uncertainty in the deep sea mining industry with both the United States and International Seabed Authority (ISA) stating each offers a licencing pathway to mine the seabed in international waters.
According to the UN's Multidimensional Vulnerability Index, Nauru is the fifth most vulnerable nation in the world.
Appi said Nauru had financial needs to address issues related to climate change and economic instability.
"Nauru considers that the sustainable use of our oceans must include the responsible recovery and extraction of these critical energy transition metals to ensure supply chain security," he said.
Also read:
The five-day Ocean Conference in Nice - co-hosted by France and Costa Rica - concluded on on Friday.
One of the key aims was to get the High Seas Treaty ratified by 60 countries to bring it into force.
Fifty countries had ratified it by Friday, with a dozen more promising to do so by the end of the year.
Vanuatu's Climate Change Adaptation Minister Ralph Regenvanu told journalists that fossil fuel reduction did not feature enough at the conference.
"It's the single greatest cause of the damage to the oceans that we're seeing now and we're not talking about it enough."
He said the Pacific is living through a climate emergency every day.
"You're recovering, you're coming to the next one, you're facing another one. You're preparing for something, for example a lot of people living on the cost can no longer access fresh water like they used to, so just basic things being affected.
"Those of us who are the most climate vulnerable now are simply living the future that we're all going to get one day."
Tuvalu's Prime Minister Feleti Teo said he was an "optimist by nature" and believed the conference had contributed to the climate change conversation.
However, Teo said he wanted to see more action from the big emitters.
"As a small island developing country, we don't have that influence to pressure them to change their policies, but we need to sustain the pressure and meeting of this sort give us that opportunity to continue to tell that story."
He said the ocean means everything to the people of Tuvalu.
New Zealand committed NZ$52 million dollars to strengthen ocean governance in the Pacific.
But the country's environment and climate change ministry chief executive said Australia and New Zealand's fossil fuel expansion raises questions about their respect, or lack of it towards the ocean.
"If Australia and New Zealand are going to expand oil and gas that sends a very strong signal that the agreements or decisions that they have made internationally are not upheld," Sivendra Michael said.
"So who do we hold to account? Are there any government mechanisms that we can legislatively or through the judicial system, take them to court?"
Michael said legislation is also needed to hold countries to account for trans-boundary waste, like if the Great Pacific Garbage Patch enters into a countries exclusive economic zone.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
15 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Recognition of Palestine - NZ weighs decision amid global pressure
Neither argument is strictly relevant to New Zealand's decision, which will be made by UN leaders' week in six weeks. The purpose of recognising Palestinian statehood is not to please Hamas or the Palestinian Authority or to infuriate Israel, although it will do all of those things. It is not to instantly magic up a happy ending to the misery in Gaza. It is to preserve the viability of a two-state solution, a state of Israel co-existing with a state of Palestine in the occupied West Bank and Gaza. Every country that has joined the latest international effort to recognise Palestinian statehood has cited that as the rationale. And the reason for that is that Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu is redoubling efforts to undermine and reject a two-state solution, including plans to take control of Gaza City, and a symbolic vote in the Knesset (Israeli parliament) last month calling for Israel to annex the West Bank. 'The Netanyahu government's rejection of a two-state solution is wrong – it's wrong morally and it's wrong strategically,' said British Foreign Secretary David Lammy. 'The two-state solution is in mortal danger. It is about to give way to perpetual confrontation. That is something France simply cannot resign itself to,' said France's Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, Jean-Noel Barrot. 'Prospects for a two-state solution have been steadily and gravely eroded,' said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. 'The Netanyahu Government is extinguishing the prospect of a two-state solution by rapidly expanding illegal settlements, threatening annexation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and explicitly opposing any Palestinian state,' said Albanese. As in New Zealand, the two-state solution has long been endorsed by most countries, and the United Nations, as the only fair long-term answer to two peoples with claims to the same land. Palestinians wait to receive hot meals with their pots and pans in Deir Al Balah, Gaza. Photo / Anadolu via Getty Images The alternative, one state of Israel, is one in which the Palestinian quest for a homeland would never be satisfied, one in which Palestinian rights would be subjugated and one in which conflict would be permanent. At times, Israel has supported a two-state solution. But Netanyahu, now in this third stint as Prime Minister, has actively undermined it by supporting Israeli settlements in the West Bank, in breach of international law. When New Zealand was preparing to co-sponsor UN Security Council resolution 2334 in 2016 – again in order to preserve a two-state solution - he described it as 'a declaration of war'. Netanyahu had already bullied Egypt out of co-sponsoring the resolution, but it passed, and Israel withdrew its ambassador from Wellington for five months. The United States, whose Secretary of State John Kerry had done a huge amount of work in the Middle East, abstained, allowing it to pass without dissent. The present has some echoes to back then. Today's rallying of the international community, once again to preserve the two-state solution, also serves to reinforce the position that this protracted conflict needs a political solution, not a military one. Since the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023 and the ensuing crisis, New Zealand's position has remained non-committal about when it will recognise Palestine and to 'focus on the needs of the moment'. It is the classic bob-each-way position of a small state, trying to keep onside with Israel by not recognising Palestine, and keeping Palestinians onside by saying it's just a matter of when, not if. But given that Israel has thumbed its nose at the international community and its disproportionate, horrific actions in Gaza, the question New Zealand must ask is whether it is still valid to try to please everyone. With movement on the issue from a large number of like-minded friends, Australia, Britain, France, and Canada give a small country the cover it might not normally have over such a major shift. No shift is likely without conditions. They could be similar to those accepted by France and Canada, such as commitments by the Palestinian Authority to reform its governance, commit to elections in 2026, exclude any role for Hamas, and demilitarise any Palestinian state. If a condition by New Zealand were to wait for recognition until an actual state was in place, that would be tantamount to the status quo. Foreign Minister Winston Peters took an oral item to cabinet on Monday about recognition of a Palestinian state, as opposed to a cabinet paper. That is not to say that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade won't have plenty of advice on recognition, and that is being prepared. But it is also a reminder that no matter what the official advice is, it will be a political decision. Peters himself, a former student of Hebrew, has been a hawk on Israel. He was critical of New Zealand sponsoring resolution 2334 in 2016. That meant his strong criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza last year and this year has carried more weight. Planes drop aid packages by parachute over western Gaza City, Gaza. Photo / Anadolu via Getty Images It is acknowledged by most countries that the United States and President Trump, Israel's strongest ally, hold the key to ending the conflict and what happens afterwards. And because Peters is sympathetic to the Trump Administration and its America First ethos, he is open to accusations of delaying recognition in order to please the United States. That is why Peters, despite professing to loathe the common refrain that New Zealand has an independent foreign policy on the basis that it implies that others don't, on Monday insisted that 'New Zealand has an independent foreign policy'. An important factor in how New Zealand is approaching the issue of recognition is the unique makeup of the Government. It is the prerogative of the cabinet to make such a decision. However, given that the cabinet avoids votes (National with 14 out of 20 would win every time) and operates on party consensus, it effectively gives a veto to each of the three parties in Government, National, Act and NZ First. That could lead to an outrageous outcome if, for example, every party in Parliament except Act favoured recognition of Palestinian statehood or if every party except Act and NZ First supported recognition. The parties other than Act, led by Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, and NZ First, led by Peters, represent 85% of the Parliament. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says the recognition of Palestine is a complex issue and will take time to work through. Actually, it is not that hard. What will be hard is presenting the views of a disparate Government to a country that has largely lost sympathy with Israel because of its appalling treatment of Palestinians. One of the reasons Peters might find it difficult to support recognition of Palestinian statehood is that he has spent the past year saying why New Zealand shouldn't. But when the circumstances change, as they have done, it is not unreasonable for the response to change.

RNZ News
20 hours ago
- RNZ News
Samoa backs Solomon Islands' move to defer partner talks at Pacific Islands Forum
Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mata'afa at the 99th USP Council Meeting in Auckland. 21 May 2025 Photo: RNZ Pacific / Lydia Lewis Samoa's caretaker Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mata'afa backs the Solomon Islands' plan to essentially block at least twenty countries from participating at a key Pacific meeting in just over three weeks' time. "Samoa supports [the] proposal to defer dialogue meetings to next year," Fiame Naomi Mata'afa told RNZ Pacific. This comes just one week after ABC reported Fiamē threatened to boycott the meeting if Solomon Islands blocks Taiwan from attending the 54th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting in Honiara. She has since told RNZ Pacific that a deferral would allow Forum leaders to focus on organisational issues, including receiving reports from a review of external partners and the regional architecture review. The changes are the leaders' response to increasing interest from nations that want a seat - and a say - at the regional decision-making table. If the Solomon Islands Prime Minister's plan is endorsed at this week's Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Fiji, China, the US, and 19 other partners would not be invited to the Honiara summit scheduled from 8-12 September. "What we are saying here is, let's give some more time for the region to put the process a new process in place so that we can effectively engage with our partners going forward, not now, but the later stage, once we are ready," Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele told local reporters in a news conference on Friday. In May, Fiamē told RNZ Pacific that with "every man and his dog coming into the Pacific", it is difficult for small Pacific Island administrations to navigate evolving geopolitical interests. "The geopolitical situation [in the] Pacific is becoming very contested. It is becoming very congested." "But their basic question is: Is Pacific unity still there? Do we still want it? If we do, what do we want it to look like?" Asked if Pacific unity was still there, she said: "We say it is. But in practice, I personally think that there is fragmentation. "There is always that conflict between the collective and national interests and so forth. We really do have to be thinking about what is it, in regionalism, that we want to make sure stays?" Pacific Island's Forum Leader's retreat 2024 Vava'u. Photo: RNZ Pacific/ Lydia Lewis Pacific foreign ministers are meeting in Suva on Thursday for the final high-level meeting in a suite of gatherings ahead of the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders' Meeting. They will consider the region's ongoing efforts to strengthen and deepen Pacific regionalism in the face of intensifying geopolitical competition in the region, the PIF Secretariat said. The Crown Prince of Tonga Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala - who is also the Kingdom's Foreign Affairs Minister - will chair this year's Foreign Ministers Meeting. Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni, right, and Crown Prince of Tonga Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala in Nuku'alofa. August 2024 Photo: RNZ Pacific / Lydia Lewis


Otago Daily Times
21 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZ mum 'locked in a cell' hopes 6-year-old son will be released by ICE soon
By Kate Green of RNZ A friend of Sarah Shaw, a New Zealander detained at the US-Canada border, says they're expecting to hear today whether her six-year-old son will be released. Shaw and her son Isaac, who live in Washington state, were detained three weeks ago after dropping her other children off in Vancouver to catch a flight. Victoria Besancon said Shaw was "absolutely terrified" when she and her son were bundled into a giant white van with no markings on it at the Canadian border. "I remember her on the phone being absolutely panicked. She originally thought she was being kidnapped, she didn't even realise she was being detained originally." The conditions she was being held in were "very similar to a prison," Besancon said. "She is in a locked room with five bunk beds, she's allowed to walk around the facility from 8am to 8pm, but outside of that she is locked in a cell with other families." They were among the only English-speakers at the facility. A graduate student working towards her masters degree and working for the state in corrections, Shaw had lived in America for the past three years. Besancon explained that there were two parts to Shaw's visa, known as a "combo card" - first, an I-360 visa (the kind granting immigration status to a widow or, in Shaw's case, a victim of domestic violence), and second, an employment visa, which Shaw was granted when she was employed by the state. Shaw was waiting on both parts of her visa to be renewed, but long wait times on I-360s meant this part was not renewed at the same time as her employment visa - but Shaw did not know that, Besancon said, assuming the visa card she received in the post meant she was fully approved. Besancon said ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officials at the border could have allowed Shaw to return anyway by filing for humanitarian parole, but due to increased detainment quotas and "the atmosphere in America right now", many people were being detained who normally would not have been. Isaac, however, was being held illegally, she said, as he possessed all the right paperwork to re-enter the country. They were expecting a decision today on whether ICE would release him into her care. The Foreign Minister's office has confirmed to RNZ that New Zealand's embassy is working on the case, after only just finding out about it. Winston Peters' office said it was through the media that staff heard about the case and nobody made contact beforehand. Peters' office said the minister was aware of the detention and would let consular officials do their work. Detainment in another state making legal battle difficult Despite Isaac's paperwork, he was still detained along with his mother, which meant they needed to be kept in a family detainment centre - of which there are only three, with the nearest option to Washington state in Texas. "Instead of being detained in her state of record, which is Washington, where her legal attorney would have had a much easier time defending her and requesting information, they took her multiple states away," Besancon said. If Isaac was released, it would hopefully mean Shaw could be transported to a facility in her own state. Retaining legal counsel in both states was expensive, on top of Shaw not being able to work. The GoFundMe page Besanon set up for her friend had topped US$37,000 - that is, nearly NZ$64,000 - by Tuesday evening, leaving her "speechless". "I was hoping to just get her rent covered for a month, I had no idea that this was going to get so much support." As well as donations, they had also been receiving stories from other families who had experienced similar situations. "I know it's really high on Sarah's priority list that when she does get out, to try and find a way to advocate for this."