logo
Former OpenAI Board Member Questions Zuckerberg AI Hiring Spree

Former OpenAI Board Member Questions Zuckerberg AI Hiring Spree

Mint10 hours ago
(Bloomberg) -- Meta Platforms Inc.'s lavish multimillion-dollar budget for recruiting top AI talent may not guarantee success, said Helen Toner, former OpenAI board member and director of strategy at Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
The poaching of artificial intelligence researchers from the likes of OpenAI — with salaries in the tens of millions of dollars — and the debut of Meta's new Superintelligence group comes after the Facebook operator developed a reputation for 'having a dysfunctional team,' Toner said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. The practice of luring away high performers from each other's AI labs has intensified among Silicon Valley companies since the launch of ChatGPT, she said.
'The question is, can it turn around Meta's fortunes and turn it into a real juggernaut?' Toner said. 'It'll be difficult, there's a lot of organizational politics at play.'
Meta's troubles began compounding when China's AI upstart DeepSeek came out of nowhere this year and put forward credible competition to Meta's open source models. 'The fact that DeepSeek was outshining them was really not a good look for the company,' according to Toner.
Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg is now plowing financial resources in, but whether he'll be able to change organizational dynamics and make progress fast enough to retain top engineers is an open question. 'Can Meta convince them that they are moving fast enough?' Toner said.
Toner, an influential voice in artificial intelligence, came into the limelight first as a board member of OpenAI and then for her vote to oust Sam Altman from the CEO post in late 2023. The Melbourne-educated academic departed from the board following Altman's brief stepping down and restoration to the top job, and has since advanced her career in studying the AI race between the US and China.
That race is now spilling across borders as the two superpowers vie for the business and collaboration of other countries, Toner said. US companies like OpenAI and Chinese players like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., DeepSeek and Zhipu AI are making plays for international partnerships with governments and businesses. South Korea's Kakao Corp. is integrating ChatGPT and other AI services into the country's most used social media platform, while Alibaba is adding new data centers in Southeast Asia.
China has a long history of working with other governments and is chipping away at the US tech monopoly globally, Toner said. 'It's certainly a strong showing they're making,' she said. China's models are widely available even if they are less technically sophisticated. They compete on the basis that they're 'cheaper, easier to use, and they help you adopt and customize.'
Toner hasn't interacted with Altman since their clash in the November 2023 OpenAI boardroom battle. 'At some point, we'll wind up at the same event, the AI world is pretty small,' she said. 'I'm sure we'll both be happy to shake each other's hand.'
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China mineral curbs a wake-up call for India, urgent steps needed: GTRI
China mineral curbs a wake-up call for India, urgent steps needed: GTRI

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

China mineral curbs a wake-up call for India, urgent steps needed: GTRI

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel China's export curbs on critical minerals crucial for India's electronics sectors are no longer mere warnings but a wake-up call for New Delhi, underscoring the need for urgent measures like reverse-engineering of low- to mid-tech imports to cut overreliance on Beijing, think tank GTRI said on a series of calculated moves, China has stepped up its use of economic leverage to constrain India's industrial ambitions, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) the past year, Beijing has systematically restricted exports of critical raw materials and engineering support, sending a clear warning to New Delhi as geopolitical tensions and trade realignments mid-2023, China has imposed curbs on exports of critical minerals such as gallium and germanium -- essential for India's electronics, EV, and defence in late 2024, the restrictions were extended to graphite, dealing a direct blow to India's clean energy and battery manufacturing sectors, it said, adding that citing national security reasons, Beijing has cloaked these actions in strategic ambiguity, while tightening its grip on supply chains that India is still dependent on."The pressure mounted further in June 2025, when Chinese battery giant CATL reportedly directed Foxconn to withdraw all Chinese engineers from its manufacturing unit near Chennai. The move disrupted timelines and coordination at a crucial time for India's electronics and EV supply chain buildout," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava imports from China surged in FY25, while exports declined sharply. It has led to a widening trade deceit of USD 100 firms now supply over 80 per cent of India's needs in laptops, solar panels, antibiotics, viscose yarn, and lithium-ion batteries, deepening strategic vulnerabilities."India must act to slash Chinese import dependence. There is an urgent need to do reverse-engineering of low- to mid-tech imports, domestic production incentives, and long-term investment in deep-tech manufacturing to reduce overreliance on a geopolitical rival and build economic resilience," Srivastava added that a strategic and phased approach can help reduce this dependence significantly."The first step is to launch a nationwide reverse-engineering initiative. Sector-specific industrial labs should be set up to deconstruct commonly imported goods and develop standardised, open-access blueprints," he designs can then be shared with Indian MSMEs for niche production and with larger firms for mass manufacturing, he model, Srivastava said, combining public R&D and private production, would enable rapid substitution of many high-volume imports."India should also create a 'Localize-100' tracker to monitor progress on localising the top 100 low- and mid-tech imports from China," he said.

Can ChatGPT ‘rot' your brain as MIT study claims?
Can ChatGPT ‘rot' your brain as MIT study claims?

Scroll.in

time27 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Can ChatGPT ‘rot' your brain as MIT study claims?

Since ChatGPT appeared almost three years ago, the impact of artificial intelligence technologies on learning has been widely debated. Are they handy tools for personalised education, or gateways to academic dishonesty? Most importantly, there has been concern that using AI will lead to a widespread 'dumbing down', or decline in the ability to think critically. If students use AI tools too early, the argument goes, they may not develop basic skills for critical thinking and problem-solving. Is that really the case? According to a recent study by scientists from MIT, it appears so. Using ChatGPT to help write essays, the researchers say, can lead to 'cognitive debt' and a 'likely decrease in learning skills'. So what did the study find? Brain vs AI Over the course of four months, the MIT team asked 54 adults to write a series of three essays using either AI (ChatGPT), a search engine, or their own brains ('brain-only' group). The team measured cognitive engagement by examining electrical activity in the brain and through linguistic analysis of the essays. The cognitive engagement of those who used AI was significantly lower than the other two groups. This group also had a harder time recalling quotes from their essays and felt a lower sense of ownership over them. Interestingly, participants switched roles for a final, fourth essay (the brain-only group used AI and vice versa). The AI-to-brain group performed worse and had engagement that was only slightly better than the other group's during their first session, far below the engagement of the brain-only group in their third session. The authors claim this demonstrates how prolonged use of AI led to participants accumulating 'cognitive debt'. When they finally had the opportunity to use their brains, they were unable to replicate the engagement or perform as well as the other two groups. Cautiously, the authors note that only 18 participants (six per condition) completed the fourth, final session. Therefore, the findings are preliminary and require further testing. Does AI really make us stupider? These results do not necessarily mean that students who used AI accumulated 'cognitive debt'. In our view, the findings are due to the particular design of the study. The change in neural connectivity of the brain-only group over the first three sessions was likely the result of becoming more familiar with the study task, a phenomenon known as the familiarisation effect. As study participants repeat the task, they become more familiar and efficient, and their cognitive strategy adapts accordingly. When the AI group finally got to 'use their brains', they were only doing the task once. As a result, they were unable to match the other group's experience. They achieved only slightly better engagement than the brain-only group during the first session. To fully justify the researchers' claims, the AI-to-brain participants would also need to complete three writing sessions without AI. Similarly, the fact the brain-to-AI group used ChatGPT more productively and strategically is likely due to the nature of the fourth writing task, which required writing an essay on one of the previous three topics. As writing without AI required more substantial engagement, they had a far better recall of what they had written in the past. Hence, they primarily used AI to search for new information and refine what they had previously written. What are the implications? To understand the current situation with AI, we can look back to what happened when calculators first became available. Back in the 1970s, their impact was regulated by making exams much harder. Instead of doing calculations by hand, students were expected to use calculators and spend their cognitive efforts on more complex tasks. Effectively, the bar was significantly raised, which made students work equally hard (if not harder) than before calculators were available. The challenge with AI is that, for the most part, educators have not raised the bar in a way that makes AI a necessary part of the process. Educators still require students to complete the same tasks and expect the same standard of work as they did five years ago. In such situations, AI can indeed be detrimental. Students can for the most part offload critical engagement with learning to AI, which results in ' metacognitive laziness '. However, just like calculators, AI can and should help us accomplish tasks that were previously impossible – and still require significant engagement. For example, we might ask teaching students to use AI to produce a detailed lesson plan, which will then be evaluated for quality and pedagogical soundness in an oral examination. In the MIT study, participants who used AI were producing the 'same old' essays. They adjusted their engagement to deliver the standard of work expected of them. The same would happen if students were asked to perform complex calculations with or without a calculator. The group doing calculations by hand would sweat, while those with calculators would barely blink an eye. Learning how to use AI Current and future generations need to be able to think critically and creatively and solve problems. However, AI is changing what these things mean. Producing essays with pen and paper is no longer a demonstration of critical thinking ability, just as doing long division is no longer a demonstration of numeracy. Knowing when, where and how to use AI is the key to long-term success and skill development. Prioritising which tasks can be offloaded to an AI to reduce cognitive debt is just as important as understanding which tasks require genuine creativity and critical thinking. Vitomir Kovanovic is Associate Professor and Associate Director of the Centre for Change and Complexity in Learning (C3L), Education Futures, University of South Australia. Rebecca Marrone.

China's critical mineral squeeze: GTRI urges urgent localisation drive; reverse-engineering push seen key to cutting $100 bn trade gap
China's critical mineral squeeze: GTRI urges urgent localisation drive; reverse-engineering push seen key to cutting $100 bn trade gap

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

China's critical mineral squeeze: GTRI urges urgent localisation drive; reverse-engineering push seen key to cutting $100 bn trade gap

China's escalating export curbs on critical minerals are no longer just strategic warnings but a direct challenge to India's industrial ambitions, think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said on Thursday, urging immediate action through reverse-engineering and localisation of key imports to reduce dependency on Beijing. 'India must act to slash Chinese import dependence. There is an urgent need to do reverse-engineering of low- to mid-tech imports, domestic production incentives, and long-term investment in deep-tech manufacturing to reduce overreliance on a geopolitical rival and build economic resilience,' GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava said, PTI reported. GTRI noted that since mid-2023, China has restricted exports of gallium, germanium, and graphite — minerals essential for India's electronics, defence and clean energy sectors. The curbs have disrupted Indian industry's supply chains, with strategic ambiguity used to justify the restrictions under the guise of national security. Srivastava also flagged a recent incident where Chinese battery giant CATL allegedly instructed Foxconn to pull Chinese engineers from a plant near Chennai. 'The move disrupted timelines and coordination at a crucial time for India's electronics and EV supply chain buildout,' he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Todos os idosos deveriam ter um desse no banheiro! Veja só! Evite quedas e escorregões Saiba Mais Undo As per GTRI, India's trade deficit with China surged to $100 billion in FY25, with imports rising even as exports fell. Chinese companies now dominate over 80% of India's supply in key areas such as laptops, solar panels, antibiotics, viscose yarn and lithium-ion batteries. To address this growing imbalance, GTRI recommended setting up sector-specific industrial labs to deconstruct high-volume imports and develop standardised open-access blueprints. These could be shared with MSMEs and large manufacturers to build domestic capacity. 'The first step is to launch a nationwide reverse-engineering initiative,' Srivastava said, adding that a 'Localize-100' tracker should be launched to monitor localisation of the top 100 imported items from China. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store