logo
Doctoral student faces life term for Idaho killings, motive may remain unknown

Doctoral student faces life term for Idaho killings, motive may remain unknown

Bryan Kohberger was pursuing a doctorate degree in criminal justice at the time of the murders. (AP pic)
BOISE : When relatives of four University of Idaho students stabbed to death in 2022 attend a court session today to see a judge sentence the convicted killer, the outcome promises to be, in all likelihood, a foregone conclusion.
Bryan Kohberger, 30, a former criminal-justice doctoral student, faces life in prison without the possibility of parole or appeal under a deal with prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in return for his guilty plea to four counts of first-degree murder.
The proceedings in a county courtroom in Boise, the state capital, also will afford family members the chance to directly address Kohberger through the presentation of victim impact statements.
But relatives of the victims – Ethan Chapin, 20, his girlfriend Xana Kernodle, 20, and her roommates Madison Mogen, 21, and Kaylee Goncalves, 21 – may very well remain baffled about why their four loved ones were slain on Nov 13, 2022.
In pleading guilty on July 2, Kohberger admitted to the underlying allegations that he had crept into an off-campus house under cover of pre-dawn darkness and stabbed the four victims to death with a hunting knife, then slipped away.
Two other women living at the house survived unharmed.
But the killer made no mention of motive.
Authorities likewise have yet to offer an explanation for what might have driven Kohberger to commit the crime, and how or why he singled out his victims.
Neither does the plea agreement require Kohberger to provide any such insights.
Under Idaho's judicial rules, he will have one last chance to address the court just before the judge passes sentence.
Such statements, or allocutions, typically are used by defendants to express remorse or mitigating circumstances.
A spokesman for the state judicial system said yesterday the court has not been notified as to whether Kohberger or his attorney planned to speak at the hearing.
President Donald Trump weighed in on the case on his Truth Social platform earlier this week, saying he hoped the judge in the case, Steven Hippler, 'makes Kohberger, at a minimum, explain why he did these horrible murders'.
Some legal experts have voiced doubt that Kohberger will shed any light on the lingering mysteries surrounding his actions, even if he chooses to address the court at all.
With the four consecutive life terms he faces virtually pre-ordained under the plea deal, there would seem nothing to be gained by Kohberger breaking his silence.
He would be free to speak out about the case in future media interviews.
And some documents that remain sealed in the case may eventually be opened to public scrutiny.
During the plea hearing earlier this month, Latah County prosecuting attorney Bill Thompson sought to rule out one possible avenue of speculation, declaring that there was no evidence of sexual assault among the victims or a 'sexual component' to the killings.
At the time of the murders, Kohberger was pursuing a doctorate degree in criminal justice at Washington State University in Pullman, Washington, a short distance from the University of Idaho campus in the neighbouring northwestern Idaho town of Moscow.
Thompson has said Kohberger planned the violence in advance, purchasing the knife online about eight months before the killings.
The knife's sheath was recovered, but the murder weapon was never found.
As evidence Kohberger sought to cover up his crimes, Thompson said investigators found he had meticulously cleaned the inside of his car, which he used as the getaway vehicle.
Authorities have said they linked Kohberger to the murders using DNA evidence, cell phone data and video footage.
He was arrested weeks after the killings in Pennsylvania, where he was visiting family during the Christmas holidays, and was returned to Idaho to face charges.
The families of the victims were divided about the plea deal, with some relatives expressing anger that they were not consulted before the agreement was reached.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I am an American': US court slams ICE for detaining LA man without cause
‘I am an American': US court slams ICE for detaining LA man without cause

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

‘I am an American': US court slams ICE for detaining LA man without cause

LOS ANGELES, Aug 3 — A US appeals court has upheld an order blocking immigration agents from carrying out patrols in California that led to indiscriminate detentions without reasonable grounds to suspect people of being undocumented. The ruling late Friday by a three-judge panel denies the federal government's appeal to overturn a temporary July order to halt the 'roving patrols' in Los Angeles that immigration rights groups have described as illegally using racial profiling. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong had ordered an end to the arrests, arguing such actions by agents violate a person's constitutional rights that safeguard against unreasonable seizures by the government. She said the detentions were being made 'based upon race alone,' on whether a person was speaking Spanish or English with an accent or because of their place of work, and ordered them stopped. Friday's ruling by the US court of appeals for the Ninth Circuit described the case of plaintiff Jason Gavidia, a US citizen born and raised in East Los Angeles who was arrested outside a tow yard in Montebello on June 12 by agents carrying military-style rifles. 'The agents repeatedly asked Gavidia whether he is American – and they repeatedly ignored his answer: 'I am an American,'' the ruling said. Agents asked what hospital he was born in, and Gavidia responded he did not know, but said he was born in 'East LA.' It said Gavidia told the agents he could show them his government-issued ID. 'The agents took Gavidia's ID and his phone and kept his phone for 20 minutes. They never returned his ID.' California residents and advocacy groups sued the Department of Homeland Security over the detentions. Los Angeles and surrounding suburbs have been ground zero for President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown. He ordered the US military deployed there for weeks, and agents have rounded up migrants at car washes, bus stops, stores and farms. The ruling said the government's defense team argued that 'certain types of businesses, including car washes, were selected for encounters because... they are likely to employ persons without legal documentation.' Rights groups hailed the order as a victory for those seeking to bar the Department of Homeland Security and agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement from conducting such raids. 'This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region,' said attorney Mohammad Tajsar of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California. 'We look forward to holding the federal government accountable for these authoritarian horrors it unleashed in Southern California.' — AFP

Trump says no one asked him to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, won't pardon Diddy
Trump says no one asked him to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, won't pardon Diddy

Malay Mail

timea day ago

  • Malay Mail

Trump says no one asked him to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, won't pardon Diddy

WASHINGTON, Aug 2 — US President Donald Trump said yesterday that nobody had asked him to grant clemency to Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Jeffrey Epstein abuse underage girls. 'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it. I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it,' Trump told Newsmax. Trump also said he would not pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs, who was convicted in July on two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution. — Reuters

Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell moved from Florida prison to lower-security facility
Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell moved from Florida prison to lower-security facility

Malay Mail

timea day ago

  • Malay Mail

Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell moved from Florida prison to lower-security facility

NEW YORK, Aug 2 — Ghislaine Maxwell has been transferred from a Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas to continue serving her 20-year sentence for helping the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, the US Bureau of Prisons said yesterday. Maxwell's move from FCI Tallahassee, a low-security prison, to the Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas, comes a week after she met with Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche, who said he wanted to speak with her about anyone else who may have been involved in Epstein's crimes. Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, confirmed she was moved but said he had no other comment. Spokespeople for the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The BOP classifies prison camps such as Bryan as minimum security institutions, the lowest of five security levels in the federal system. Such facilities have limited or no perimeter fencing. Low-security facilities such as FCI Tallahassee have double-fenced perimeters and higher staff-to-inmate ratios than camps, according to the bureau. Asked why Maxwell was transferred, BOP spokesperson Donald Murphy said he could not comment on the specifics of any incarcerated individual's prison assignment, but that the BOP determines where inmates are sent based on factors including 'the level of security and supervision the inmate requires.' Blanche's meeting with Maxwell came as President Donald Trump faces pressure from both his base of conservative supporters and congressional Democrats to release more information from the Department of Justice's investigations of Maxwell and Epstein. The Department is seeking court approval to of law enforcement officers' testimony before the grand juries that indicted Maxwell and Epstein. Such transcripts are usually kept secret. Two federal judges in Manhattan are weighing the government's requests. Lawyers for Maxwell, Epstein, and their alleged victims are due to share their positions on the potential unsealing with the judges in filings on Tuesday. Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. Neither Markus nor Blanche has provided detailed accounts of what they discussed. Markus has said Maxwell would welcome relief from Trump, who has said he had not thought about whether to pardon her. Maxwell was found guilty at a 2021 trial of recruiting and grooming girls for Epstein to abuse. She had pleaded not guilty and is asking the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store