Dead mouse found in woman's Monster Energy drink, lawsuit says
McKenzie Cain alleges she found a mouse inside a Monster Energy drink she purchased from a bagel restaurant in Grand Rapids, Michigan, in April 2024. She is seeking $25,000 for "emotional distress, trauma and physical illness," the lawsuit states.
"Upon consuming the drink, Cain picked up the can and realized the can was still oddly heavy," the lawsuit states. "Out of curiosity, Cain opened the can further, and to her horror, found a dead mouse laying in the bottom of the can."
In the lawsuit filed in September 2024, Cain accuses Monster Energy of negligence and strict liability for causing her physical harm, as well as breach of implied warranty of merchantability.
"It's hard to imagine many things more disgusting than finding a dead mouse at the bottom of your energy drink. It is also dangerous. Mice, like all rodents, often carry diseases that can be extremely harmful. It goes without saying that no beverages should ever make it to the shelf with a dead animal inside it," Cain's lawyer, Zach Runyan, said in a statement shared with USA TODAY.
Which has the most caffeine? Energy drinks like Red Bull, Monster and Rockstar are popular.
On Monday, July 14, the lawsuit was transferred from state to federal court, Western District of Michigan records show.
"Plaintiff alleges to have found a dead mouse laying on the bottom of Defendant's can after consuming the beverage," the notice of removal from state court reads.
Monster Energy did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Wednesday, July 16.
This is not the first lawsuit of its kind. In 2011, Monster Energy was sued by a man named Vitaliy Sulzhik, who claimed he found a mouse in his energy drink after opening and consuming part of it. At the time, Monster Energy described the lawsuit as "frivolous, unfounded" and "nothing more than a shakedown."
"Common sense would dictate that if a mouse had been introduced into the can at production (a virtually impossible scenario given modern production technologies) which occurred months prior to Mr. Sulzhik's consumption of the product, the mouse would have deteriorated and the product would not have been drinkable from the very first sip," the company said in a news release.
As of July 16, it is unclear where Sulzhik's lawsuit stands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 hours ago
- USA Today
Texas Democrats evacuate amid bomb threat at Illinois hotel
WASHINGTON — Some of the Texas Democrats who fled their state to try to block Republicans' redistricting efforts were evacuated from an Illinois hotel where they were staying over a bomb threat. Police said they responded to a 'report of a potential bomb threat at the Q-Center hotel and convention complex' at 7:15 a.m. central time in St. Charles, a suburb west of Chicago. They said they conducted a 'thorough search' along with the Kane County Sheriff's Office bomb squad and found 'no device.' 'In response to the threat, 400 people were immediately evacuated and the area was secured as bomb squad units conducted their investigation,' the St. Charles Police Department wrote. 'Following clearance from authorities, all guests and staff have safely returned to the premises.' Illinois Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker wrote on X that, 'Threats of violence will be investigated and those responsible will be held accountable.' Texas House Rep. John Bucy III, one of the Democrats at the hotel, told USA TODAY in an Aug. 6 interview that many legislators were still asleep when the alarm went off in the morning and that the group gathered outside. He said it took about two hours before everything was cleared up and they were allowed to safely reenter. "I want to say thank you to Gov. Pritzker. I want to say thank you to law enforcement and to the hotel staff," Bucy said. "They worked diligently to make sure that the place was safe... They are showing what real leadership looks like. It's sad to me that (Texas Gov.) Greg Abbott doesn't have the same qualities in him as a leader." More than 50 Texas Democrats left their state on Aug. 3 to deny Republicans the quorum they need to move ahead with their redistricting efforts. The effort could give Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives up to five more seats in the 2026 midterms. The Democratic state lawmakers dispersed to blue states, including Illinois, Massachusetts and New York. Abbott, a Republican, filed an emergency petition Aug. 5 seeking to remove the Texas state Democratic House leader from office. Contributing: Phillip Bailey, Savannah Kuchar, and Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will Trump's order encouraging removal of homeless from city streets 'restore public order' — or eat up public money?
Homelessness has long been a significant issue in the U.S. — and things only seem to be getting worse. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it The federal government said the number of people experiencing homelessness on a single night in 2024 was the highest on record at 771,480. This figure has been climbing every year since 2017, when it was at 550,996. In order to address the 'root cause' of homelessness and 'restore public order,' President Trump recently signed an executive order to make it easier for states to remove people from the streets and get them into long-term institutions for treatment of addictions and mental health conditions. This isn't the only major action against homelessness this summer. In late June, the Supreme Court ruled that homeless individuals can be arrested or fined for sleeping in public areas. In a statement to USA Today, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump is "delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America." However, the move is not necessarily being looked at as a positive one. What the new executive order on homelessness entails On July 24, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets." The order says that 'endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations, and violent attacks' have made America's cities unsafe, and the 'overwhelming majority' of people experiencing homelessness are either addicted to drugs, have a mental condition, or both. It directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to reverse judicial precedents and end consent decrees that limit state and local governments' ability to commit individuals on the streets who are a risk to themselves or others. This aims to make forcibly moving people into institutions easier. Federal grants will be prioritized for states that enforce prohibitions on acts related to homelessness, like open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting. Funding will also be redirected away from 'housing first' programs and so-called 'harm reduction' or 'safe consumption' efforts. 'At a time when unaddressed housing costs are driving record numbers of people into homelessness, this order demonstrates a lack of focus and understanding on what our communities — both red and blue — need to address this crisis,' said Ann Oliva, CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. 'Instead, it largely focuses on punishing people for being homeless and denying desperately needed funds to overwhelmed and under-resourced frontline workers.' The nonprofit criticized the attack on the 'housing first' approach, the push for forced institutionalization, and the violation of the right to privacy for the homeless. The National Homelessness Law Center said it "strongly condemns" Trump's order, saying it "deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness." The group also said that the order "does nothing to lower the cost of housing or help people make ends meet." If anything, it expects that more people will be driven into homelessness. 'As a licensed mental health professional, I know that forced treatment is unethical, ineffective, and illegal," Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center told USA Today. Alexandria, Va., Mayor Alyia Gaskins called Trump's executive order "cruel" in an NPR interview. "It requires states and cities like mine to demonstrate aggressive enforcement," she said. "It ends support for housing first policies. It encourages the expanded use of law enforcement all at a time when we know that the criminalization of homelessness doesn't work." The National Low Income Housing Coalition said that Trump's executive order will 'do nothing to address the underlying causes of America's housing crisis and instead make it harder for states and communities to address these challenges.' Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can How homelessness policies impact taxpayers When cities experience high levels of homelessness, it can impact residents in many ways. It can cause them to feel unsafe in their own backyards and result in lower property values. So addressing the homelessness crisis could yield positive results for residents and property owners — provided it's done the right way. Critics of Trump's approach feel that the order does not address the root of the issue and instead focuses on mandating institutionalization and treating homelessness as a crime. It rejects the housing first approach to the problem, which involves quickly moving the homeless into affordable housing and then addressing their other needs. The National Low Income Housing Coalition says the country is short 7.1 million affordable rental homes. If the critics are right, we could see homeless numbers increase. Forcing the homeless into facilities could also burden a health care system that's already overwhelmed and seeing cuts in federal spending with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Experts say there aren't enough facilities to treat the homeless. "The order seeks to make it easier to commit people with mental illness who can't care for themselves, while also promising grants and other assistance to help ramp up commitments, and threatening to divert funding away from places that don't push people into treatment facilities 'to the maximum extent permitted by law,'" noted CalMatters. "But the order doesn't include funding for new mental health or addiction treatment beds. In a state already struggling with a lack of resources, some experts said Trump's order for more forced treatment feels hollow." 'There really is not a lot of bed space. And with budgets being strapped the way that they are these days, particularly with cuts coming from D.C., it's going to — states and communities are going to be hard-pressed to really build those facilities and be able to meet the needs of the people that are looking to be — that people want to put away,' said David Ovalle, national reporter focusing on opioids and addictions for The Washington Post, to PBS. If states decide to foot at least a portion of the bill for housing and treating the homeless long-term, it could divert critical health care resources away from other people in need. It could also force municipalities to increase taxes if they're not given enough federal funding to enforce treatment, burdening taxpayers even more. Addressing the nation's homelessness crisis is crucial. And if done correctly, everyone benefits. Unfortunately, it seems like the current approach may be one in which almost everybody loses out. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
A man inside Chicago's Bean? Viral hoax floods politician with calls.
"I appreciate lighthearted parody as much as the next guy," Chicago Alderman Brendan Riley said in a statement. "However, this online hoax has led to a heavy uptick in calls to my office." Have you heard about the man inside The Bean? A small group of protestors have gone viral over the past week for claiming there is a man living inside of Chicago's Cloud Gate sculpture in Millennium Park, commonly known as "The Bean." Sporting all-black outfits and wielding homemade cardboard signs, the group has been handing out flyers and encouraging the public to contact Chicago Alderman Brendan Riley to "free" the man inside the sculpture. The protests began during Lollapalooza, which ran July 31 through Aug. 3. "There is a man inside The Bean," one of the protesters said in a video that has garnered thousands of views on social media. "We're calling for his immediate release. In 2004, Anish Kapoor, the chief architect of The Bean, stole a baby and put that baby inside The Bean. We are calling for the immediate release of the man trapped inside The Bean, so please, spread the good word." In a statement provided to USA TODAY, Riley said the "online hoax" has led to an influx of calls, proving to be a "distraction for my office from the real work we do for the 42nd Ward and City of Chicago each day." An Instagram account dedicated to the viral protest, Man in Bean, had garnered more than 23,600 followers as of Tuesday, Aug. 5. The Man in Bean team did not immediately respond for comment on the protests when contacted by USA TODAY via Instagram on Aug. 5. Designed by Kapoor, Cloud Gate was constructed between 2004 and 2006. The sculpture was made using computer technology to cut 168 stainless steel plates, which were then pieced together, like a puzzle, on-site, according to the Millennium Park Foundation. The massive sculpture is 33 feet high and weighs about 110 tons. What are Chicago officials saying? While Riley said the lighthearted protest has resulted in a strain on his office, he also provided a tongue-in-cheek response. "I am happy to confirm that a man has not been trapped inside Cloud Gate (a.k.a 'the Bean') for the past 21 years," he said. "In fact, the man was freed years ago. Further, we can neither confirm nor deny that Soldier Field is actually a flying saucer secretly relocated from Area 51 back in 2003." Is there really a man inside The Bean? Despite the ongoing protests, there is no evidence that a man lives inside The Bean. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
