Iran's Supreme Leader makes first public statement after end of Israel-Iran war
Mr Khamenei spoke in a video broadcast on Iranian state television, his first appearance since June 19, looking and sounding more tired than he did only a week ago.
He told viewers that the US had only intervened in the war because 'it felt that if it did not intervene, the Zionist regime would be utterly destroyed'.
The Islamic Republic delivered a heavy slap to the US's face. It attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region.
— Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) June 26, 2025
But he said, however, that the US 'achieved no gains from this war'.
'The Islamic Republic was victorious and, in retaliation, delivered a hand slap to America's face,' he said, in apparent reference to an Iranian missile attack on an American base in Qatar on Monday, which caused no casualties.
The 86-year-old Mr Khamenei hasn't been seen in public since taking shelter in a secret location after the outbreak of the war June 13 when Israel attacked Iranian nuclear facilities and targeted top military commanders and scientists.
Following an American attack on June 22, which hit the nuclear sites with bunker-buster bombs, US President Donald Trump was able to help negotiate a ceasefire that came into effect on Tuesday.
In his appearance on Thursday, he sat in front of plain brown curtains to give his address, similar to his June 19 message.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Former Iran diplomat makes disturbing claim to Aussie journalist following US bombings
Iran could rebuild its nuclear sites within months, a former Iranian diplomat has warned. Seyed Hossein Mousavian, who previously served as a senior member of Iran's nuclear diplomacy team, said recent US strikes only 'partly' destroyed Iran's nuclear facilities and that the country still retains its nuclear 'know-how'. 'There is no doubt... Iranian nuclear facilities have been attacked, have been bombed, have been damaged,' he told the ABC's 7.30 program on Thursday. 'You can imagine buildings, utilities, even perhaps centrifuges have been destroyed, partly, not all. 'Nevertheless, if the objective of the US-Israeli air strikes aim and objective was to destroy (the) Iranian nuclear program, I'm confident they have failed. 'Even if they have another attack, even if they have 100 attacks, they will fail because you can not kill technology and know-how, Iranians, they have know-how.' Mr Mousavian, who claims to no longer be affiliated with the Iranian regime, suggested it might take only months to reconstruct the country's nuclear facilities. 'Iranians have the know-how technology and they can reconstruct everything, whether that would take one month or five months or six months, it doesn't matter.' The US launched an array of strikes on Saturday after Israel and Iran's long-standing feud developed into a direct conflict earlier this month. The strikes involved 125 US military aircraft and targeted three nuclear facilities: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Mr Mousavian's comments stand in stark contrast to those of US President Donald Trump who has claimed the bombings devastated the country's nuclear facilities. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. The former Iranian diplomat is not the first to suggest the damage could have been less extensive than Trump had suggested, including by his own intelligence agencies. An initial assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency also suggested Iran's path to building a nuclear weapon might have been set back only by months. Trump shrugged off the findings in an appearance at a NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, claiming they were 'inconclusive'. 'It was very severe. It was obliteration,' he said. CIA director John Ratcliffe has since said the strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear facilities but stopped short of stating the nuclear program had been wiped out. Asked by Mr Speers whether he believed Iran would remain in the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Mr Mousavian was non-committal. 'It depends to the US. If the US would be committed to international rules and regulations,' he said. 'If the US would respect Non-Proliferation Treaty, if the US would respect the rights of Iran like other members of Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran would stay. 'Iran, like before, would never go for nuclear bombs, like before, Iran would cooperate at the highest level of transparency and inspections, to ensure its nuclear program is peaceful.' Mr Speers then asked whether, in Mr Mousavian's view, there would be an 'incentive' for Iran to speed up its efforts towards building a nuclear weapon. 'It depends on the US. If the US is going to accelerate hostilities, wars, assassinations, terror, cyberattacks, why they should not? 'That sounds like a threat. 'It is (the) American threat. It is (the) Israeli threat. Why you are saying vice-versa? 'Iran has been attacked. Iran did not attack. Israel attacked Iran. The US attacked Iran. But now we are discussing about Iranian threat?'
NBC News
6 minutes ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court set to issue rulings on birthright citizenship and 5 other cases on its final day
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is set to conclude its nine-month term on Friday with a flurry of rulings including a closely watched case concerning President Donald Trump's attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has six cases left to decide of those in which it heard oral arguments in the current term, which began in October. Other cases are on such issues as voting rights, religious rights and health care. The one that has attracted most attention is the birthright citizenship dispute, which focuses not on the lawfulness of the proposal but whether federal judges had the power to block it nationwide while litigation continues. What the court says about so-called nationwide injunctions could have wide-ranging impacts, with judges frequently ruling against Trump on his broad use of executive power. The court also has the option of side-stepping a decision on that issue and instead taking up the merits of the plan. Birthright citizenship is conferred under the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which states: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.' The longstanding interpretation of the provision as understood by generations of Americans, including legal scholars on the left and right, is that anyone born on U.S. soil is an American citizen with a few minor exceptions, including people who are the children of diplomats. Along with birthright citizenship, the other five cases the court has to decide concern: Whether conservative religious parents can opt their elementary school-age children out of LGBTQ-themed books in class. Long-running litigation over whether congressional districts in Louisiana are lawful. A law enacted in Texas that imposes . A challenge to the Affordable Care Act's preventive care task force. A Federal Communications Commission program that subsidizes phone and internet services in underserved areas. The justices typically break for the summer and return for a new term in October, although they will still likely have to continue acting on cases that reach them on an emergency basis. Such cases have been reaching the court with increasing frequency since Trump took office.
Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Spectator
Iran's supreme leader looks more deluded than defiant
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, has made his first public comments since the ceasefire with Israel took hold. Khamenei, who has ultimate authority over all major decisions in the country, has not been seen or heard from in more than a week. His pre-recorded speech, aired on state television, is meant to put an end to rising speculation about his fate after he went into hiding at the start of the conflict. In the televised address, the Iranian leader hailed his country's 'victory' over Israel and vowed never to surrender to the United States. The Iranian leader was eager to tell anyone who would listen that the US bombing of his country's nuclear sites 'did not achieve anything' Defiant as ever – and with his trademark habit of being entirely divorced from reality – the Iranian leader was eager to tell anyone who would listen that the US bombing of his country's nuclear sites 'did not achieve anything'. That, to say the least, is something of an understatement. US forces struck three nuclear sites with huge bunker-busting bombs, with US president Donald Trump claiming the attacks had 'obliterated' the facilities. Khamenei was dismissive of Trump's claims. 'Anyone who heard his remarks could tell there was a different reality behind his words – they could do nothing,' the 86-year-old Iranian leader said. Khamenei had an alternative reading of events, in which Iran apparently 'delivered a heavy slap to the US's face' – a reference to an Iranian missile attack on a US military base in Qatar on Monday, which led to no casualties. The Americans were give advance notice of the Iranian plans. Trump himself mockingly described the Iranian action as 'very weak', claiming that 13 of the 14 missiles fired had been intercepted. Even so, according to the Ayatollah's rewriting of recent history, the Americans are now on notice that Iran is ready to respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East. What's Khamenei's game? Few will be convinced by his bid to minimise the national humiliation that his regime suffered during the 12-day war with Iran. Just as implausible is the idea that Iran has emerged 'victorious' from this conflict, and in a position of strength to reek revenge if attacked by its enemies at some future point. Khamenei's televised remarks were delivered from an undisclosed location in front of a brown curtain. He was seated between an Iranian flag and a portrait of his predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Despite the show of bravado, he remains at a secret location reportedly somewhere in the capital Tehran. Communications are kept to a minimum for security reasons. It is the first time since Khamenei assumed absolute power in 1989 that he has been forced into hiding during a war – reflecting the real fear and worry in his inner circle. The supreme leader cuts something of a diminished figure. It is hard to project power and authority from a secret bunker, and no one can be sure anymore how much real control Khamenei wields. His main priority remains to stay alive. High-ranking military officials and nuclear scientists were targeted by Israel in the opening stages of the conflict. Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, did not rule out targeting Khamenei directly. President Trump hinted that the Americans knew exactly where Khamenei was hiding, but said that a decision to kill the Iranian leader had not been made. This latest television address by the Iranian leader is meant to project a sense of business as usual. He must know – his fellow countrymen and women certainly do – that everything has changed. It is anything but business as usual. That is why the country's supreme leader is reduced to delivering the occasional recorded video message on television from a secret location. Khamenei can spit fire and vengeance all he likes, but even he cannot be sure what the future holds for him or his nation.
