Battling tariffs is no trivial pursuit for U.S. games retailer
By Beiyi SEOW
At a strip mall in Maryland, a miniature landscape extends across a table between Dash Krempel and his friend as a war game unfolds. But their hobby is becoming more expensive as U.S. tariffs take a toll.
Krempel, 29, told AFP the cost of models for tabletop games have surged from inflation, and continued rising since U.S. President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on trading partners this year.
UK-made figurines that cost $60 around three years ago now go for $94.50, he said.
"Prices have gotten bigger," he added. "It's a very expensive hobby to begin with, so it's maybe pricing a lot of people out."
Instead of buying more products, he now tries to support retailer Game Kastle College Park by renting tables to play in-store.
For the shop's owner, Boyd Stephenson, stocking new board games, paints and hobby supplies has only become more challenging.
To avoid the harshest of Trump's tariffs, some suppliers had to delay shipments or postpone new releases.
As they raised their suggested retail prices, so has Stephenson at Game Kastle.
About a fifth of his store's products have seen cost hikes, with increases ranging from 5 percent to 20 percent.
"If we see higher prices or higher tariffs, I'm going to see higher wholesale prices, and then I have to raise my prices accordingly," he said.
Asked what percentage of his store relies on imports, Stephenson replied: "Almost all of it."
Stephenson estimates some 7,000 board games were released last year from 5,000 different companies.
"You're really looking at 5,000 different approaches (to tariffs)," he said.
"Some producers are saying, 'We're going to eat the cost.' Some producers are saying, 'We're passing the cost through all the way.' And other producers are doing some sort of mix of that."
Like other U.S. retailers, Stephenson could face more cost pressures come August 1, when steeper tariffs are set to hit dozens of economies like the European Union and India.
The elevated rates mark an increase from the 10 percent levy Trump imposed on goods from most economies in April.
While China -- a crucial manufacturing hub for games -- is temporarily spared, Trump has separately imposed fresh 30 percent tariffs on products from the world's second biggest economy this year.
US tariffs on Chinese products could return to higher levels from August 12 if officials fail to extend their truce.
Yet, there is no quick fix to return manufacturing to the United States.
"U.S. manufacturers just don't have the capacity to do that anymore," said Stephenson, showing an intricate board game figurine.
"Really, the people that are good at that, that's China," he said. "The best modeling paints come from Spain."
"So if you see tariffs get put up on the EU, then all of a sudden I'm going to have to pay higher prices on modeling paint when I bring it into the country," he added.
Trump has threatened the bloc with a 30 percent tariff.
Stephenson tries to absorb some cost hikes, but said: "I have to be able to pay the staff, pay the electric company, pay the landlord."
Trump's on-again, off-again approach to duties has also made suppliers' price changes more unpredictable.
"What is always universally bad for business is uncertainty," Stephenson said.
He usually stocks up on inventory ahead of the year-end holiday season, but expects to be more strategic with purchases this year to avoid unwelcome surprises.
Many companies are delaying merchandise imports as they lack certainty, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy at the National Retail Federation.
"When the product is brought into the country and entered into commerce, you have 15 days to pay your tariff bill," he said.
This causes problems when tariff rates change and businesses lack funds to pay for orders.
Some businesses, and industry group the Game Manufacturers Association, have mounted legal challenges against Trump's blanket tariffs hitting various countries, noting nearly 80 percent of tabletop games sold in the U.S. are made abroad.
But such complaints are an uphill battle.
"The damage, especially for small retailers, has been significant," Gold said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
7 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
EV slump isn't stopping CATL's battery production buildup
CATL leads the world in automotive battery market share. (Photo by Shizuka Tanaka) SHIZUKA TANABE GUANGZHOU -- CATL, the world's largest supplier of electric-vehicle batteries, is maintaining a high pace of production investments in an effort to stay ahead of its biggest rivals. The Chinese company, formally Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., posted a record-high 30.4 billion yuan ($4.22 billion) net profit in January-June earnings out Wednesday. Revenue grew 17% in CATL's core EV battery segment.
The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why the US Is Letting China Win on Energy Innovation
To China's delight, the U.S. has simply stopped competing to be the world's clean energy powerhouse. During the cold war, the United States and Soviet Union were locked in a desperate race to develop cutting‑edge technologies like long-range missiles and satellites. Fast forward to today and the frontiers of global technology have pivoted to artificial intelligence (AI) and next‑generation energy. In one domain, AI, the U.S. has far outpaced any other nation – though China looks to be closing the gap. In the other, energy, the U.S. has just tied its shoelaces together. The reason isn't technology, economics or, despite the government's official line, even national security. Rather, it is politics. Since returning to the White House in January, Donald Trump has handed out huge wins to the coal and oil and gas industries. This is no great surprise. Trump has long been supportive of the U.S. fossil fuel industry and, since his reelection, has appointed several former industry lobbyists to top political positions. According to the Trump administration, national security requires gutting support for renewable energy while performing political CPR on the dying coal industry. The reality is that, since 2019, the United States has produced more oil, gas, and coal annually than Americans want to use, with the rest exported and sold overseas. The U.S. is currently one of the most prolific exporters of fossil fuels in the world. In short, the U.S. does not have an energy security problem. It does, however, have an energy cost problem combined with a growing climate change crisis. These issues will only be made worse by Trump's enthusiasm for fossil fuels. Over the past six months, the Trump administration has upended half a decade of green industrial policy. It has clawed back billions of U.S. dollars in tax credits and grants that were supercharging American energy innovation. Meanwhile, China has roared forward. Beijing has doubled down on wind, solar and next‑generation batteries, installing more wind and solar power in 2024 than the rest of the world combined. To China's delight, the U.S. has simply stopped competing to be the world's clean energy powerhouse. While Trump repeats the tired mantra of 'drill, baby, drill,' China is building factories, cornering the market for critical minerals such as lithium and nickel, and locking in export partners. Roughly one-in-five lithium‑ion batteries, a key component in clean energy products, are made in China. Many of the newest high‑tech batteries are also being developed and patented there. At the same time, household energy spending in the U.S. is expected to increase by $170 each year between now and 2035 as a result of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The bill, which includes sweeping changes to taxes, social security, and more, will raise energy costs mainly because it strips away support for cheap and abundant renewables like wind and solar. Household energy costs could go up even more as Trump threatens to make large‑scale clean energy development much more onerous by putting up bureaucratic hurdles. The administration recently issued a directive requiring the secretary of the interior to approve even routine activities for wind and solar projects connected to federal lands. Meanwhile, climate change is hitting American communities harder with each passing year. As recent flooding in Texas and urban fires in California and Hawai'i have shown, fewer Americans still have the luxury of ignoring climate change. As the cost of these disasters mount – $183 billion in 2024 – the grifting of the oil and gas industry will become an increasingly bitter pill for the nation to swallow. China, with its authoritarian government, is less susceptible to the petroleum-obsessed dogma fueling the Republican party. It does not have prominent leaders like U.S. politician Marjorie Taylor Greene, who previously warned that Democrats are trying to 'emasculate the way we drive' by advocating for electric vehicles. Rather, China's leaders are seeing green – not in the environmental sense, but in a monetary one. It is generally cheaper nowadays to build and operate renewable energy facilities than gas or coal power stations. According to a June 2025 report by Lazard, an asset management company, electricity from new large-scale solar farms costs up to $78 per megawatt hour – and often much less. The same electricity from a newly built natural gas plants, by comparison, can cost as much as $107 per megawatt hour. Across the world, utilities are embracing clean energy, choosing lower costs for their customers while reducing pollution. China saw the writing on the wall decades ago, and its early investments are bearing a rich harvest. It now produces more than half of the world's electric vehicles and the vast majority of its solar panels. The United States can still compete at the leading edge of the energy sector. American companies are developing innovative new approaches to geothermal, battery recycling, and many other energy technologies. But in the battle to become the world's 21st-century energy manufacturing powerhouse, the U.S. seems to have walked off the playing field. In Trump's telling, the U.S. may have simply exited one race and reentered another. But the fossil fuel industry – financially, environmentally and ethically – is obviously a dead end. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
Nikkei Asia
4 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Corporate Japan outlines Trump tariff impact on bottom line
Komatsu estimates that U.S. tariffs will increase costs by 75 billion yen for the year ending March 2026. (Komatsu) RYOSUKE HANADA and TAKESHI SHIRAISHI TOKYO -- Japanese companies are feeling the impact of higher U.S. tariffs under the Trump administration, with Nissan Motor, Komatsu and others outlining the financial hit to their earnings. In April, the Trump administration had increased tariffs on automobiles exported from Japan to 27.5% from 2.5%. This rate is brought down to 15% in a deal recently announced after more than three months of negotiations, with revised "reciprocal" duties taking effect next Thursday. But the burden on Japanese automakers remains heavy.
