Armenian police detain seven opposition figures on suspicion of terrorism
The people are affiliated with the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF), also known as Dashnaktsutyun, a group part of the pro-Russian parliamentary coalition headed by Robert Kocharyan, a former president of the South Caucasus country.
Armenia's Investigative Committee said police had arrested seven individuals and charged one of them with preparing a terrorist act. Reuters was not able to determine the identities of all seven of the people.
ARF said in a statement that raids were ongoing at several MPs' homes as of early Thursday morning and that at least one politician and the son of another had been arrested.
Thursday's arrests follow criminal indictments levied earlier this week against three politicians of the Armenia Alliance, the larger umbrella coalition of which the Armenian Revolutionary Federation is a part.
Opposition groups have decried the investigations as politically motivated.
The arrests come on the same day as a meeting between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Abu Dhabi, where the two are working to finalise a peace agreement to end nearly four decades of conflict.
Pashinyan, who swept to power during street protests in 2018, has brought Armenia closer to the West and distanced the country from traditional ally Russia.
But recent weeks have seen a widespread clampdown on Pashinyan's political rivals and critics, including opposition figures, a leading Christian cleric and a former president.
Several prominent figures in Armenia, including the cleric, Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, are accused of orchestrating a coup to usurp power, something they deny.
(Reporting by Lucy Papachristou; editing by Guy Faulconbridge)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 minutes ago
- The Star
US judge weighs putting new block on Trump's birthright citizenship order
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media, after the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the power of federal judges by restricting their ability to grant broad legal relief in cases as the justices acted in a legal fight over President Donald Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship, in the Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo BOSTON (Reuters) -A federal judge on Friday could deal another blow to President Donald Trump's attempts to limit birthright citizenship, even though a U.S. Supreme Court decision last month made it more difficult for lower courts to block White House directives. A group of Democratic attorneys general from 18 states and the District of Columbia will urge U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin at a hearing in Boston at 10 a.m. ET Friday to maintain an injunction he imposed in February that blocked Trump's executive order nationwide. The order directs U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States after February 19 if neither their mother nor father is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. The states' case is back in Sorokin's courtroom so he can assess the impact of the Supreme Court's landmark June 27th decision. In that 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court directed lower court judges like Sorokin that had blocked Trump's policy to reconsider the scope of their orders. Rather than address the legality of Trump's executive order, the justices used the case to discourage nationwide, or 'universal,' injunctions — in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country. COMPLETE RELIEF But the court raised the possibility that universal injunctions are still permissible in certain circumstances, including class actions, in which similarly situated people sue as a group, or if they are the only way to provide "complete relief" to litigants in a particular lawsuit. Friday's hearing will shed light on how lower courts plan to address what providing complete relief entails, said George Washington University law professor Paul Schiff Berman. "One of the questions theSupreme Court left open in its nationwide injunction decision is whether states can assert claims on behalf of their citizens and, if so, whether a large-scale injunction would then be necessary to vindicatethe rights of large numbers of citizens from large numbers of states," Berman said. Spokespersons for the White House and the attorneys general did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A ruling from Sorokin, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, in favor of the states would be the second blow to Trump's executive order this month. On July 10 at a hearing in New Hampshire, U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante, an appointee of Republican president George W. Bush, issued a nationwide injunction blocking Trump's order after he found that children whose citizenship status would be threatened by it could pursue their lawsuit as a class action. The Democratic-led states, backed by immigrant rights groups, argue the White House directive violated a right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment that guarantees that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. They have argued that, if the executive order is allowed to take effect, it would wreak havoc on the administration of federal benefits programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by making it difficult to verify eligibility. They also argue that, because children often move across state lines or are born outside their parents' state of residence, a "patchwork" of injunctions would be unworkable. "Families are likely to be confused if federal benefits eligibility — let alone U.S. citizenship — differs by State," the states wrote in a July 15 court filing. They have urged Sorokin to double down on his February injunction, saying in the court filing that the Supreme Court decision has no bearing on the case before him. "This Court correctly remedied the States' injuries via a nationwide injunction, based on the same complete-relief principle that the Supreme Court recently recognized and endorsed," the brief argued. The Justice Department has countered that Sorokin's injunction from February was "clearly overbroad and inappropriate." In a July 8 court filing, the department argued that individuals are best situated to litigate their own citizenship status. (Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Cynthia Osterman)
The Star
3 minutes ago
- The Star
Russian-controlled Crimea brings in information blackout designed to counter Ukrainian drone attacks
MOSCOW (Reuters) -Authorities in Russian-controlled Crimea said on Friday they were introducing an information blackout designed to counter Ukrainian drone, missile and sabotage attacks. Sergei Aksyonov, the head of Crimea - which Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014 - said he had signed a decree banning media outlets and social media users from publishing any photos, video or other content that revealed the location of Russian forces or details of Ukrainian attacks on the Black Sea peninsula. "The relevant decree was adopted to safeguard public security and military and other important facilities in the republic," Aksyonov said in a statement on Telegram. Ukraine, which has said it wants Crimea back - something Moscow says it will not allow to happen - has repeatedly launched major attacks on Russian military assets in Crimea and targeted Russia's Black Sea Fleet, which is formally based on the peninsula. Aksyonov specifically mentioned the need to classify the location of Russian air defence systems, weapons, military equipment, and military personnel and not to share any GPS coordinates. He also said that the ban covered the sharing of any information detailing the location, nature or aftermath of any Ukrainian attacks on Crimea, including missile and drone or sea drone strikes and sabotage. Russian bloggers, media, and social media users frequently post images and details of Ukrainian strikes on Russian-held territory, often triggering criticism from both local and federal authorities. (Reporting by ReutersWriting by Maxim RodionovEditing by Andrew Osborn)
The Sun
3 minutes ago
- The Sun
China says successful US trade talks avoid tariff war return
BEIJING: China's commerce minister Wang Wentao said successful trade talks with the US in Europe demonstrate that a return to a tariff war is unnecessary. He urged the US to act responsibly as a superpower while emphasizing China's readiness to protect its interests. Wang highlighted the economic interdependence between the two nations, stating, 'Major countries should act like major countries. They must shoulder their responsibilities.' He added that dialogue and high-level communication have proven effective in resolving disputes. China faces an August 12 deadline to finalize a lasting tariff agreement with the US. Failure to reach a deal risks renewed supply chain disruptions, with potential tariffs exceeding 100%. Wang noted that negotiations in Geneva and London earlier this year showed progress, making further trade conflicts avoidable. 'Practice has proven that through dialogue and consultation, with leadership and communication at the highest levels, we can properly manage contradictions and resolve our differences,' he said. Recent data showed China's rare earth exports rose 32% month-on-month in June, suggesting easing trade restrictions. Additionally, Nvidia's decision to resume H20 AI chip sales to China reflects ongoing cooperation, as noted by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Wang described his meeting with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang as evidence that forced economic decoupling is unrealistic. 'As the dust settles, everyone has come to the conclusion - especially the US side - that forced decoupling is impossible,' he said. Despite progress, US tariffs on Chinese goods remain high at 53.6%, with analysts warning that additional duties above 35% could severely impact Chinese manufacturers. Wang stressed mutual reliance, stating, 'Both sides have come to understand that they need each other.' 'China does not want a trade war, but it is not afraid of one,' he reiterated. - Reuters
