logo
High-Yield ETFs: Big Payouts, Bigger Trade-Offs?

High-Yield ETFs: Big Payouts, Bigger Trade-Offs?

Yahoo19-05-2025

While a significant amount of money continues to flow into low-cost, plain-vanilla ETFs, the ETF universe is becoming increasingly complex. Most new ETFs being launched are actively managed, and many make use of derivatives.
Two recent regulatory changes—the 'ETF Rule' and the 'Derivatives Rule'—have made it easier for providers to launch ETFs and incorporate derivatives into their strategies. The explosion in derivative-backed ETFs has been particularly striking.
Most of these new derivative-based ETFs fall into one of three categories:
Buffer or defined outcome ETFs
Leveraged or inverse single-stock ETFs
Option-based income ETFs
Some of the newest products even combine options-selling strategies with leveraged single-stock ETFs. (See: Buffer ETFs Attract Billions as Investors Seek Shelter from Market Turmoil)
This article takes a closer look at ETFs that trade options on single stocks to generate exceptionally high yields—among the hottest-selling funds in the market today. Thanks to their eye-catching distribution rates, these funds are generating significant buzz on social media. However, they generally underperform the underlying stocks, even as they continue to attract assets from investors drawn to their lucrative monthly payouts.
We analyzed the performance of 24 single-stock covered call ETFs in the YieldMax suite from their respective inception dates. We focused on YieldMax because it is the clear leader in this niche, significantly ahead of competitors despite a recent surge in similar offerings.
Many of YieldMax's ETFs launched in 2023—providing a limited, yet more substantial, performance history compared to most rivals, which are even newer.
Despite their eye-popping distribution rates, these products tend to underperform on a total return basis due to steep declines in share price. Of the 24 YieldMax ETFs we examined, only two managed to slightly outperform their respective underlying stocks.
Option Income ETFs: How the Strategy Works
YieldMax currently offers 48 ETFs in U.S. markets, with total assets under management of over $10 billion. Though relatively new—the oldest, TSLY, debuted in November 2022—the suite has grown rapidly, largely driven by its headline-grabbing distribution yields of 100% or more. Inspired by this success, many copycat ETFs have entered the market.
According to the provider, the primary investment objective of these funds is to seek current income; the secondary objective is to seek exposure to the price movement of the underlying stock, subject to a cap.
These funds do not actually hold the underlying stocks. Instead, they gain synthetic exposure by taking long positions in call options and short positions in put options. They also hold Treasury securities for collateral and additional income.
To generate monthly income, the fund manager sells call options against the synthetic long position. These calls typically have expirations of one month or less and strike prices about 0%–15% above the current share price. In some cases, managers use covered call spread strategies to further enhance yields.
The YieldMax Reddit community has around 44,000 members, many of whom discuss using these ETFs to replace their 9-to-5 jobs or to generate retirement income.
The four most popular products in the suite are linked to some of the hottest and most volatile stocks. The inherent volatility of these stocks leads to higher option premiums—and higher potential income. Each of these ETFs has gathered over $1 billion in AUM.
Yields are calculated by annualizing the most recent monthly payout and dividing it by the fund's latest NAV. However, yields can vary significantly from month to month as income from selling options depends on fluctuations in the underlying stock, implied volatility, and other factors.
Performance Since Inception
We analyzed the total return—including distributions—of YieldMax ETFs from their inception versus their respective underlying stocks. Some stocks surged, some declined, and others remained relatively flat—but in all cases except those tracking PayPal PYPL and Marathon Digital MARA, the ETF underperformed the stock.
For the four most popular products, the performance gap was substantial—showing that investors may be leaving a lot of money on the table in pursuit of yield.
YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY)
The most popular product in the suite celebrated its one-year anniversary in February and now boasts $4 billion in assets. It is also the highest-yielding single-stock ETF in the lineup, offering a distribution rate of 136%. Since inception, it has delivered a total return of 286%, while MSTR stock has surged 457% during the same period.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Once a little-known, money-losing software firm, Strategy MSTR has become the largest corporate holder of bitcoin and now trades like a leveraged bet on the cryptocurrency. Its stock commands a significant premium over the value of its bitcoin holdings.
Some experts believe the financial engineering behind MSTY—and the premium valuation—may be unsustainable. If you're bullish on bitcoin, why not consider the iShares Bitcoin Trust IBIT, which charges just 0.25% and closely tracks the price of the asset?
TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY)
The oldest product in the suite holds $1.2 billion in assets. Since its debut in November 2022, the ETF has gained approximately 22%—significantly underperforming Tesla TSLA shares, which are up about 102% over the same period. It has also lagged the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 indexes, which have gained 53% and 85%, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
For context, low-cost index funds like the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF SPLG and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF QQQM charge just 0.02% and 0.15% in fees, while most option income products charge close to 1%. TSLY currently boasts a striking yield of nearly 107%.
NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY)
The second most popular product in the family has generated a total return of about 187% since its inception in May 2023. However, shares of the AI darling NVIDIA NVDA have risen approximately 372% over the same period. Still, the ETF has attracted $1.3 billion in assets.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY)
CONY, which tracks Coinbase COIN—a major beneficiary of bitcoin's rise—has returned 120% since its debut in August 2023. Over the same period, COIN stock has gained about 209%. The ETF currently sports a yield of 97% and has about $1.1 billion in assets.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Single-Stock Option Income ETFs vs. Diversified ETFs
These ETFs sell one-month call options with strike prices slightly above the current stock price. In doing so, investors give up much of the upside if the stock rises while still bearing most of the downside if the stock falls—creating an asymmetric risk-reward profile.
By contrast, the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF JEPI—which helped launch the covered call trend—uses a bottom-up fundamental process to construct a diversified, defensive portfolio of about 125 stocks. (Read: What's Behind the Surge in Options Income ETFs?)
The fund then sells out-of-the-money S&P 500 index call options to generate monthly income. This portfolio doesn't experience the outsized moves seen in names like Strategy or Coinbase, which explains why the performance shortfall may not be too striking.
Bottom Line
You should only invest in a fund tied to a single stock if you're bullish on that specific name—in which case, you're generally better off owning the stock directly. If you expect the stock to decline, it's best to steer clear of any product linked to it.
These ETFs may outperform if the underlying stock remains range-bound. However, since they use market swings as an income-generating strategy, don't expect jumbo distributions.
If you're drawn to high monthly income and can accept an asymmetric risk-reward profile—as well as potentially unfavorable and inconsistent tax treatment—these funds may still appeal to you.
ETFs have democratized access to markets, and innovation in the space has been remarkable. But with complex products like these, it's essential for investors to fully understand how they work—and what outcomes are realistic.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR) : Free Stock Analysis Report
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG): ETF Research Reports
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI): ETF Research Reports
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM): ETF Research Reports
Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves braced for OBR forecasts to blow £20bn hole in tax and spending plans
Reeves braced for OBR forecasts to blow £20bn hole in tax and spending plans

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Reeves braced for OBR forecasts to blow £20bn hole in tax and spending plans

Rachel Reeves is braced for revised forecasts by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to blow a £20bn hole in her tax and spending plans before the autumn budget. Even without changing the totals the chancellor set out in her spending review on Wednesday, a weaker forecast from the the Treasury's independent watchdog could force her to find significantly more money at the budget to meet her 'non-negotiable' fiscal rules. Reeves has said repeatedly that flexing her fiscal rules – designed to provide certainty over UK public finances – is not an option even if the economic outlook deteriorates. At her spring statement, she left herself on course to meet those rules with less than £10bn of headroom to spare, on a total budget for day-to-day spending of more than £1.3tn. Amid trepidation at the Treasury, the OBR has kicked off its annual summer review of the 'supply side' of the economy – including productivity, which it has consistently overestimated. Sources with knowledge of the OBR's thinking told the Guardian that the watchdog was 'uncomfortable', with the fact its current forecast for productivity growth was more positive than the consensus from other economic forecasters, and wanted to 'rein it in'. Productivity is one of the key determinants of economic growth, and revising it down would have a significant knock on effect on the OBR's forecasts for gross domestic product. The consultancy Oxford Economics estimates that moving the productivity forecast back in line with the average independent projection, would knock 1.4% off forecast GDP at the end of the OBR's five-year forecast period. That would force Reeves to increase taxes or cut spending by an eye-watering £20bn, to meet her fiscal rules and maintain her slim £10bn of headroom. That would be roughly equivalent to raising both the main and higher rates of income tax by 2p. A more cautious approach, taking the middle path between two alternative 'scenarios' the OBR set out in its March economic and financial outlook, could still force the chancellor to make a £12bn correction. The OBR could send an early signal of its intention to revisit its productivity outlook as soon as 1 July, in its regular forecast evaluation report. Andy King, a former member of the OBR's budget responsibility committee, now at the consultancy Flint Global, said: 'The reason why anyone in the Treasury who cares about this will be worried, is that the OBR is currently more optimistic than everyone else. 'What can happen next? Either everyone else thinks, 'We're too pessimistic'; or the OBR thinks, 'We are too far away from the pack, there's been more bad news than good since March, we should revise down.' I think that's the expectation for many.' The Treasury is likely to point the OBR to policies it hopes will be positive for productivity growth in the long term, including infrastructure investment, though the scale of this was already known before the OBR's last forecast in March. Alongside weaker productivity, slower net migration as a result of the government's recent white paper could also prompt the OBR to be more pessimistic. James Smith an economist at ING, said: 'Further downgrades to trend productivity growth projections, as well as net migration, mean the chancellor is likely in the red, before even considering the mounting pressures on the public purse. 'The overall shortfall may amount to at least £20bn, and that means tax rises are highly likely.' Adrian Pabst, the deputy director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, said the prospect of another significant forecast revision underlined the current instability of tax and spend policy. 'We're in this vicious circle where we've got these fiscal rules, then the OBR have to take a view, because that's their remit, that's their mandate; and then we're constantly speculating about what is going to happen at the next fiscal event,' he said, adding: 'It's not a good place for fiscal policy to be.' In a recent speech, Reeves said: 'Strong and transparent fiscal rules are an indispensable safeguard for working people – and that is why my rules are non-negotiable.' The Treasury declined to comment on the prospect of an OBR growth downgrade but underlined Reeves's determination to stick to her fiscal rules. The OBR declined to comment.

The Israel-Iran conflict is shaking the markets — but nervous investors aren't panicking
The Israel-Iran conflict is shaking the markets — but nervous investors aren't panicking

New York Post

time15 hours ago

  • New York Post

The Israel-Iran conflict is shaking the markets — but nervous investors aren't panicking

Wall Street's myopia was on full display in the immediate aftermath of the Israeli airstrikes against Iran. Many of us were worried about the possibility of World War III as we saw the attacks almost in real time Thursday night. Many of my sources were trying to gauge impacts on the Dow, oil prices and interest rates. Advertisement You can make a good case that there is a place for such shortsightedness. Leave the far-reaching geopolitical analysis to those who are better equipped to game-plan those outcomes, and the investor class should stay in its lane. People still have to save for retirement, invest those savings, even if the Middle East is imploding. Advertisement That said, the Wall Street take on the contretemps is certainly worth dissecting. You can glean, if you look through the conflict's short-term impact on specific pieces of economic data and push the smart money on their meaning, some interesting broader conclusions about how the Israel-Iran conflict will ultimately shake out. The market's top-line response was muddled. Stocks initially sold off sharply, then came back only to tank into the close as Iran retaliated against Tel Aviv. Advertisement Oil prices — which are always sensitive to conflicts in the Middle East — jumped about 7%. But we've all seen worse on less existentially serious stuff. The Dow closed down less than 800 points; the rollout of the Trump tariff plan — before Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent began putting the old genie back in the bottle to prevent an economic meltdown — saw far more wild moves in all sorts of investments. When the trade war was raging, bond prices at one point tanked so much, you would think we were on the verge of the apocalypse. Advertisement On Friday, the 10-year bond yield rose but is still below 4.5%, meaning people weren't rushing to the safe haven of Treasuries to plan for the worst. Gold rallied, but it's been running hot for weeks amid the fears of tariff-induced inflation. Not panicking In other words, it seems like investors are nervous, but also they're not panicking because something good could follow something scary. Namely, Israel neutered not just a foe that is developing nukes and threatening its destruction. It also has degraded the world's most aggressively belligerent nation — the leading state sponsor of terrorism — by decapitating much of Iran's military leadership, key scientists that were on the verge of developing nukes, as well as large swaths of its armed forces. In saving itself, Israel did us all a favor — even the Arab world, much of which abhors Iran's destabilizing militarism. For investors, it could mean at the very least lower energy prices in the future. Rich Arab countries finally might agree to recognize Israel, and the investment opportunities that will bring. Advertisement I know saying the conflict could be long-term good for the markets sounds ignorant given what's at stake. But life isn't mostly binary. Fortunately in this case, what's good for stocks could be good for the world. Of course, one day in the market is just one day. Advertisement So much more will happen. Israel says it's not done with its military action. Iran retaliated, landing missiles in the heart of Tel Aviv after a first wave of deadly drones was largely swatted away by Israel's defenses. Advertisement I have family in Israel so I pray for their safety as I've done almost every day since Oct. 7. US military installations could be attacked. But some of my trading desk sources are pointing out that Israel seems to have its game plan down pretty solid, and the Iranian attack against us would be foolish since it already has its hands full. The Israelis knew who to take out — the generals and scientists — and it clearly knew how Iran could respond. It has already largely eliminated Iran's proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas. Advertisement Notice how Israel didn't take out Iran's oil infrastructure, at least not yet. If it did, oil prices would be higher and markets far more volatile. And maybe Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is betting on the Iranian people. I've never been to Iran, but I know plenty of Iranian Americans. They tell me the country is largely secular, run by a fanatical minority that Israel might be weakening significantly. This could be the push for regime change that we've been talking about for years. Trump kept in the loop President Trump here has been at his best, my Wall Street sources remind me, another reason they're not panic-selling. Israel kept him in the loop. He alerted the world that the attacks would happen Thursday. He then began distancing himself and our country from the direct conflict, while prodding Iran to get back to the negotiating table and end its nukes program. Who knows, they might finally listen. Wall Street is always looking for 'black swan' events — stuff most people don't see that could lead to catastrophic market results. Wars are terrible. It would be great if Iran chose peace, but maybe eliminating it as a threat to Israel and a lot more is a black swan that produces some long-term peace and prosperity. Let's hope so and pray for the peace dividend it should deliver.

DC's new $500K private club The Executive Branch launches
DC's new $500K private club The Executive Branch launches

New York Post

time16 hours ago

  • New York Post

DC's new $500K private club The Executive Branch launches

On Friday night, tech billionaires and cabinet secretaries celebrated the opening of Washington, DC's 'The Executive Branch' — the members-only club co-founded by Donald Trump Jr. and 1789 Capital partner Omeed Malik Trump Jr. and Malik hosted the party for founding members who paid a $500,000 initiation fee, with their co-founders: 1789 partner Christopher Buskirk and Alex and Zach Witkoff, the sons of Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. While the president was not in attendance, Witkoff was, along with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, PayPal mafia member Keith Rabois, crypto billionaires Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, New York Jets owner Woody Johnson and Dr. Oz. Advertisement 4 The Executive Branch's Omeed Malik and Donald Trump Jr. and their co-founders wanted to create a MAGA-friendly haven in Washington, DC AFP via Getty Images From the Trump administration, crypto and AI czar David Sacks, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent were spotted, as well as Attorney General Pam Bondi, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. In September, the Executive Branch will open to its new members with a $150,000 initiation fee and annual dues of $15,000. Advertisement Caviar, champagne and lobster were plentiful Friday, with one attendee describing it as a 'Gilded Age' experience. The club's menu is said to be MAHA-approved, with the chef using beef tallow in lieu of seed oils. I'm told several former Navy SEALs have been hired to handle security full-time. 4 Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attended the club's opening Friday along with a host of other cabinet members. REUTERS Advertisement Other opening-night guests included newly minted Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth Jacob Helberg, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, UAE ambassador to the US Yousef Al Otaiba, and Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer. Also on hand: Deputy Chiefs of Staff Taylor Budowich, Dan Scavino and James Blair; FHFA Director Bill Pulte; Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski; and Emil Michael, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. Notably absent were members of the media, whose presence is strictly forbidden. Adding to that layer of secrecy, no photos are allowed and stickers must cover phone cameras. 4 The Executive Branch is located in the former home of Georgetown's The Clubhouse, and the founders redesigned the space to include millions of artwork. Google Maps Advertisement Malik said he sees it as an extension of his existing work investing in the parallel economy. The club 'is the first of its kind in Washington, DC — there is nothing else like it,' Malik told me. 'It's consistent with our efforts at 1789 to invest in the parallel economy or, in this place, creating an entirely new experience.' He also said they want the Executive Branch to be a haven for members and are extremely cautious about not admitting members who may not be aligned with their values. 4 Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang attended the opening of the Executive Branch. Getty Images Private club The Ned also opened in DC earlier this year, albeit to a far less curated group who pay just $5,000 in initiation fees and $5,000 for membership. But while The Ned is near the Capitol and attracts an overwhelming group of politicos, The Executive Branch is Georgetown. Its Wisconsin Avenue address was formerly home to The Clubhouse, a bar that was a favorite of billionaires and world leaders. The co-founders renovated the space and added more than 10-million-dollars' worth of art, including 'a stunning array of original oil paintings and bronze sculptures celebrating US stories of bravery, service and politics,' as well as oil paintings of the club's founding class.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store