logo
Now on Delhi's roads, buses that will drop and pick you up right near your home

Now on Delhi's roads, buses that will drop and pick you up right near your home

Indian Express2 days ago

Aarti (18) has been taking the new green buses on the Anand Vihar ISBT to Mayur Vihar Phase 1 route to work every day since they started operations on May 2. At 10 am, she boards the bus from the street outside her house in East Delhi's Khichripur and rides it to Jai Laxmi Apartments in IP Estate, where she works as a domestic help.
'I work there for two hours and then come back home to have lunch and rest. Then I go back again for three hours and return on the bus at 6 pm,' she says.
'Pehle rickshaw mein upar neeche karne mein 40 rupay lag jaate the, isliye kabhi din mein ghar jaati bhi nahi thi (Earlier, I used to take an e-rickshaw which cost me Rs 40 if I took it four times. That's why, sometimes, I didn't come back home to rest). Now, it is convenient for me as I pay nothing — bus rides are free for women — and get to sit in the AC.'
'Now, I tell everyone I know about the new buses,' she adds.
Aarti is excited about the newest solution to a problem that has long plagued the national capital: the lack of affordable and reliable first and last-mile connectivity options.
The Delhi government's answer to it was the mohalla bus scheme, now rechristened as the DEVI (Delhi Electric Vehicle Interconnector) scheme by the new BJP government.
Under this, 9-metre buses (as opposed to standard 12-metre buses) would ply on routes that can't be accessed by bigger buses at a high frequency.
Two weeks after 400 DEVI buses hit Delhi's streets at an inauguration event attended by Chief Minister Rekha Gupta and Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, The Indian Express hitched a ride on these buses and spoke to passengers.
Most were enthusiastic about the service; some voiced concerns, including a lack of awareness about such buses and uncertainty about timings, that hinder regular use.
On the ground
At 9 am on a Wednesday last month, on the Seelampur Metro station to Johri Enclave route (D-025), the bus driver is patient as the vehicle makes its way through narrow lanes and crowded streets, fighting its way at corners and intersections and honking at briskly moving e-rickshaws and wrongly parked cars.
At Mustafabad Gali No. 8, Aadil Malik, 17, hops onto the bus along with his friend and colleague Rahul Rajput.
'We generally take an e-rickshaw to our warehouse in Brijpuri,' says Aadil. The fare is the same for both modes of transport. But we don't know when the bus will come… today, the bus came at the appropriate time for us, so we took it,' he adds.
'We will be happy to take it daily if it comes at the same time… why won't we, it is air conditioned,' says Rajput, who works with Malik at a steel repair company.
These buses mostly ply on high-congestion roads, which leads to them frequently getting caught in traffic jams. 'We are not able to arrive at the same time every day at different stops because of traffic,' says bus conductor Sameer Khan.
Asked about this, Delhi Transport Minister Pankaj Kumar Singh says, 'To serve Delhi's public, we have to ply the buses on these routes. We will think of rerouting, but when a significant number [of buses] are plying on Delhi's roads. Where there's less need, we will decrease the numbers, where there's a requirement for more, we will increase the buses.'
It is 9.30 am, and the bus is mostly empty throughout the route, with only occasional passengers. At most stops, like Ghonda Chowk or Yamuna Vihar Depot, no one boarded the bus.
'When people head to work in the morning, buses from residential areas to metro stations and hubs like Seelampur are full. In the evening, when people are returning, it is the opposite,' says Khan.
Right then, Afreen Ansari, 23, who is taking the bus from Seelampur Metro station to Karawal Nagar along with two kids and sister-in-law, asks: 'Why are you taking such a long route?'
'This is the route of the bus, that's why. This is not a rickshaw that can go in any lane!' answers Khan.
Afreen and her family are heading home from their aunt's place. While taking a rickshaw would have cost them Rs 35, the bus ride is free for them.
Many people are still unaware of the routes, and at several stops, buses are often flagged down by commuters asking about their destinations.
But from conversations with commuters, it becomes clear that the DEVI buses are mainly competing with e-rickshaws, which are even quicker and more reliable, for passengers.
'Earlier, I used to take three buses and two e-rickshaws to reach Jal Vihar from Khadar. Now, with DEVI, I only need to change two buses and one e-rickshaw,' said Manju, 40, who is on the bus going from Nehru Place Terminal to Madanpur Khadar JJ Colony, which is chock-full at 7 pm on a Tuesday last week.
Other passengers say drivers of Eeco cars, RTV buses, and e-rickshaws have changed after this bus was introduced. 'Gramin seva tempos have brought down their rates in some areas,' a passenger chimes in.
Devansh Mittal is a trainee correspondent with The Indian Express. He studied political science at Ashoka University. He can be reached at devansh.mittal@expressindia.com. ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

11 new COVID cases across Gurgaon, Faridabad; 29 active cases in both districts
11 new COVID cases across Gurgaon, Faridabad; 29 active cases in both districts

Indian Express

time12 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

11 new COVID cases across Gurgaon, Faridabad; 29 active cases in both districts

Six new coronavirus cases were detected in Haryana's Gurgaon district Tuesday, with five recoveries and the number of active cases at 17. On Tuesday, 163 samples were tested in the district, and the cumulative number of cases detected this year is now 34. Five of the positive cases detected on Tuesday have no recent travel history and involve a 31-year-old male resident of Sector 42, a 29-year-old male resident of Sector 56, a 32-year-old female resident of Sector 49, a 32-year-old male resident of Sector 67, and a 35-year-old male resident of Sector 37C. A 50-year-old male resident of Hayatpur, who tested positive, had recently travelled to Haridwar. In Faridabad, 130 samples were tested, and five COVID-positive cases were detected. Three patients recovered from the disease, and the active and cumulative number of cases in the district stood at 12 and 26, respectively. There have been no deaths yet in Haryana, and all patients in Gurgaon are under home isolation. The health department had earlier stated that the situation was under control and that there was no cause for worry with the rise in mild symptomatic COVID-19 cases. 'All the pandemic-era precautionary measures and advisories, including mask-wearing, have been reissued and reiterated to hospitals. For now, we have made available 500 beds across isolation wards in government hospitals and other sites for any rise in serious cases. We will increase the number if and when the need arises. We have told hospitals to carry out tests for those showing symptoms. There is no reason to panic, the situation is well under control,' Dr Alka Singh, Chief Medical Officer, Gurgaon, told The Indian Express last month. 'There is no need to panic. It is an endemic (disease) now. Many people with symptoms are likely to test positive,' Dr Singh added. Following a recent spike in COVID-19 cases in Southeast Asia, India too has seen fresh cases, with a majority of them being reported from Kerala, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu. However, most of the cases are mild and not associated with severity or mortality. Around the time the second wave of COVID-19 peaked in India, the Haryana government launched a door-to-door screening programme in rural areas across the state on May 15, 2021. Till June 3 of that year, over 1.66 crore people were screened, which was roughly around 60 per cent of the state's 2.91 crore population. In May of that year, the transmission rate of the disease had been found to be rapidly increasing in rural areas. A survey conducted by the state's health department on COVID-19 patients admitted in various hospitals revealed that 68 per cent were from urban areas, while 32 per cent of the patients were from rural areas. During the second wave, Haryana had imposed a one-week lockdown on May 3, which was extended multiple times. However, as fresh cases continued to dip, the state government gradually relaxed various curbs.

Muslim Personal Law Board will not make Waqf Act an election issue but will take a call to intensify protests
Muslim Personal Law Board will not make Waqf Act an election issue but will take a call to intensify protests

The Hindu

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Muslim Personal Law Board will not make Waqf Act an election issue but will take a call to intensify protests

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has been organising demonstrations to protest against the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 in several parts of the country, including in Hyderabad, for several weeks. The Board has sought to include women, and people belonging to other faiths in the protests, even as its president Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, in an exclusive interview with Syed Mohammed, asserts that their struggle is not against Hindus, but against the government which is trying to wrest lands and properties from the control of Muslims. Edited excerpts from an interview: Q: What are your key contentions against the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025? It is our belief that the law was brought to grab the properties of Muslims. The law makes waqf properties vulnerable. The concept of waqf by user —meaning properties that have been historically used as mosques, dargahs, graveyards or madrasas — that are being used for a specific purpose, even if no documents are available, they will be considered waqf. Religious structures often predate documentation. For example, Delhi's Jama Masjid and Hyderabad's Mecca Masjid were built centuries ago. If masjid committees are now expected to produce ownership documents, it sets an impossible standard. As regards claims by the government, we believe they have a habit of lying. They can claim any land parcel. Most waqf cases are against the government. So, all waqf cases that are against the government will become disputed. Similarly, disputes were created over other Muslim places of worship, and to create them one does not need evidence. Second, the amendment says that any waqf property under the custody of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) will no longer be considered waqf. Many historic mosques that serve both religious and public, as sites of tourism, interests may now function only at the government's discretion, depending on whether and at what frequency they permit namaz (prayers). Thirdly, the law seeks to dilute protection under the law of limitation. Thousands of acres will stand risk of exclusion from waqf (due to adverse possession). Many land parcels are in unauthorised possession of the government, of Hindus and even Muslims. Given the BJP's usual firmness in passing laws, how do you plan to engage the public? Demonstrations such as 'lights off' and 'human chain' were largely symbolic. Will future protests take a different form? It's true that the BJP rarely backtracks. It believes in dictatorship. It does not listen to the public. As seen with the farm laws, these were withdrawn after several farmers died. The AIMPLB's protests will be within the bounds of law. They will be peaceful. Our fight is not against our Hindu brothers but against this government. If the government remains indifferent, our working committee will decide the next course. Whether it is courting arrest, a jail bharo movement, or peaceful roadblocks. We're encouraged by the support of many Hindu brothers, and civil rights groups who stand with us. Q: The BJP claims this law will ensure transparency and empower Muslim women. How do you respond to these claims? We say that let there be a public debate. Let the Prime Minister or Home Minister attend. We'll welcome them. If that's not possible, send the Law or Minority Affairs Minister to sit with an AIMPLB delegation. Let them explain how this law benefits Muslims, women, or Pasmandas. They won't be able to. They claim Pasmandas are being denied rights. Are they not praying in masjids, which are waqf? In Islam, all Muslims are equal. Q: But caste-based discrimination among Muslims, as is the case with Pasmandas, has been studied and documented. Those who are victims of discrimination know what they've been through. Yes, there are two aspects — economic and social. Economically, Muslims are among the most backward, as various government-appointed commissions have found. Socially, some refer to Ashraf, Ajlaf, and Arzal. But these words are not found in any Islamic texts on jurisprudence. In Islam, a Syed girl can marry a non-Syed man, and no aalim will declare the nikah invalid. If the imam of a masjid is an Ansari, whom some may look down upon, but we do not, a Syed will still pray behind him. It is possible that these negative practices have entered the Muslim community on account of shared experiences, or influences from others. But Islam rejects caste. We look at it as a social evil. Q: The government has contended in courts of law, including in the case of waqf, that of 'essential religious' practice. The government is presenting this in a wrong manner. Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) should not be interpreted by the government. The opinion of those who are experts of fiqh should be taken. Essential religious practice encompasses all that is proved by Quran and hadith (tradition of Prophet Muhammad). What ramification will Act have, especially when it comes to States that are soon going for elections as is the case with Bihar? AIMPLB does not have anything to do with politics. We neither support, or oppose any party. We will not make this an election issue.. As regards one party supporting (the then Bill), or another opposing it, it is unfortunate many political leaders do not have a conscience. The AIMPLB has stressed on unity among faiths as regards demonstrations, and called upon varied groups to fight against the Act. If you see, a Jain temple was demolished recently in Mumbai. Secondly Buddhists in Bodh Gaya have been demonstrating. They want members of their own faiths in the management. The problem will exacerbate. It began with minorities, including Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs. In fact, I am certain that it will eventually affect Hindus as well.

Govt Likely To Bring Impeachment Motion Against Justice Yashwant Varma In Parliament: Sources
Govt Likely To Bring Impeachment Motion Against Justice Yashwant Varma In Parliament: Sources

News18

time14 minutes ago

  • News18

Govt Likely To Bring Impeachment Motion Against Justice Yashwant Varma In Parliament: Sources

Last Updated: Government sources told CNN-News18 that they would take opposition parties into confidence before taking any step against Justice Yashwant Varma The Union government is likely to bring in Parliament an impeachment motion against Allahabad High Court judge Yashwant Varma, who was indicted by a Supreme Court-appointed probe panel after the discovery of a huge sum of burnt cash from his official residence in the national capital. Government sources told CNN-News18 that they would speak to all opposition parties before taking any step against Justice Varma, who faced criticism from political parties across the spectrum. Sources within the government have indicated that an impeachment proceeding could be considered during the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, with Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal moving the motion. Verma was recently transferred from the Delhi High Court back to the Allahabad High Court following the controversy. According to sources, Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had written to both the President and the Prime Minister recommending Justice Verma's impeachment, following an internal inquiry by a Supreme Court-appointed panel. While the inquiry reportedly indicted the judge, the panel's findings were not made public. CJI Khanna had also privately urged Justice Verma to resign, but he declined to do so, the sources said. An official, however, clarified that no formal proceedings have yet begun against the judge. Justice Verma has maintained his innocence and denied any involvement with the cash discovered after a fire at his outhouse. An impeachment motion against a judge can be introduced in either House of Parliament, but it must meet specific criteria to proceed. In the Rajya Sabha, the motion requires the backing of at least 50 members, while in the Lok Sabha, it needs the support of 100 members. If the motion secures a two-thirds majority in the House where it is introduced, the Speaker or the Chairman refers it to the Chief Justice of India (CJI). The CJI then nominates a sitting Supreme Court judge and a Chief Justice of a High Court to form part of a three-member investigation committee. The government nominates the third member—an 'eminent jurist"—to complete the panel. According to government sources, the motion will include findings from the committee that looked into the incident involving bundles of half-burnt cash discovered at the judge's residence during his tenure with the Delhi High Court. The government is expected to seek consensus across party lines and will consult the opposition before finalising the draft motion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store