logo
Indigenous leaders denounce Alberta's plans to alter water management

Indigenous leaders denounce Alberta's plans to alter water management

CTV News25-07-2025
The Suncor Energy Inc. Fort Hills mine is seen in this aerial photograph taken above the Athabasca oil sands near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, on Monday, Sept. 10, 2018.
Former Tthebatthie Denesuline (Smith's Landing) chief Gerry Cheezie is not mincing words about plans between the Alberta government and Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) to change the legal framework governing the watersheds of Northern Alberta that feed into the Northwest Territories.
'When we signed Treaty 8 on July 17, 1899, there was no talk about Alberta,' he said. 'Alberta just happened to be created in 1905. Then in 1930, under the Natural Resources Transfer Act, some old white guys in Ottawa and some old white guys in Alberta signed an agreement that stole all our land and resources.
'They don't pay for any of this water usage — they use all this water for free. To produce one barrel of oil, they have to use 17 barrels of water and that water can't be returned to the system — it sits in tailings ponds. The quality of the water is going down. We're doing water samples and air samples and we're getting all sorts of disturbing readings.'
Now co-chair of the Keepers of the Water, Cheezie is sounding the alarm over talks between CAPP and the Danielle Smith-led Alberta United Conservative Party government to modify the province's Water Act to allow oil companies to draw water from either the Athabasca River or the Peace River and transfer it up to 100 kilometres from either body of water.
Under the current legal framework, oil extractors need to apply to draw water from a specific body and that water cannot be moved to a separate operation.
'CAPP has been engaging with the Alberta government to advance various approaches that could enhance water management, including low-risk, inter-basin water transfers,' said CAPP vice-president of regulatory operations Richard Wong. 'While the proposal to merge the Peace/Slave and Athabasca river basins for the purposes of identifying inter-basin transfers did not originate with CAPP, our members support it as a practical solution.
'Current restrictions under the Water Act create unnecessary inefficiencies for oil and gas projects that span major basin boundaries. Allowing water transfers between the Peace/Slave and Athabasca river basins, which naturally converge within Alberta, would eliminate the need for redundant water infrastructure, allow companies to access the most suitable water sources based on availability and reduce environmental impact,' Wong stated.
Wong told NNSL Media there are roughly 122 oil and gas operations on the watershed. He said changing the management system would mean less water would have to be moved by truck in the area.
A spokesperson for the Alberta government confirmed talks were underway.
'Right now, we are looking at ways to strengthen and modernize Alberta's water management system,' said Kevin Lee, spokesperson for the Alberta Ministry of Municipal Affairs. 'Over the past year, we've been engaging with Albertans on proposed Water Act amendments that would help improve the province's water management system.
'One of the proposed changes that we are seeking feedback on is on the definition of major river basins and includes a proposed merging of the Peace and Athabasca river basins, which would only apply to inter-basin transfers. All applications submitted under the Water Act undergo a full review to assess potential impacts to other water users and the environment before a decision is made. This process would still be in place for all applications.
'Merging these basins under the Water Act would be comparable to how Alberta is already managing the Red Deer, Bow, Oldman and South Saskatchewan sub-basins as one major river basin for the purpose of inter-basin transfers,' Lee added.
'Nothing normal about it'
An arrangement similar to the inter-basin transfer system in southern Alberta is exactly what Keepers of the Water executive director Jesse Cardinal is fighting to stop.
She noted that since those changes were implemented — in spite of warnings from hydrologists — water scarcity in southern Alberta has been an ongoing problem.
'We've been in a drought consistently for several years,' she said, adding the Keepers of the Water only found out about the plan from listening to public meetings. 'Last year was extreme drought and Alberta was saying that if there wasn't enough precipitation by spring, they were going to restrict water use. So we were paying close attention because the oil and gas industry and big agriculture are the biggest consumers of water in Alberta.
'It was around the fall last year these suggestions were being made, so we attended a couple of their online sessions. They just casually threw it in these sessions conversationally, really trying to normalize inter-basin transfers — there is nothing normal about it. It's a huge decision with massive impacts.
'The only reason why it was allowed to happen in the south is that is where the mismanagement of water began. That's where the First in Time, First in Right licensing system began, where massive amounts of water were licensed out for big-scale farming — not thinking ahead towards population growth, economic development and all the other impacts to water. There's been municipalities that can't even allow more people in because they don't have the water to sustain growth.'
Water management in the province has always been flawed, added Cardinal, because water is seen as a renewable resource. But climate change is proving that may not always the case, with the glaciers that feed the watershed now melting twice as fast as they were a decade ago and entire summers with next to no rain.
Cardinal said the Keepers of the Water held a gathering in K'atl'odeeche First Nation last year and heard concerns of low water preventing hunting and transportation from chiefs across the Northwest Territories.
Noting the Alberta government has not properly consulted First Nation governments in the area and other stakeholders, Cardinal her organization is prepared to take the province to court to protect the watersheds.
The Alberta government did not respond to questions from NNSL Media about if and how it consulted First Nation governments on the proposed changes.
'What choice do we have?'
Highlighting other health concerns that have arisen from oil and gas development in the region, such as the contamination of country foods in Fort Chipewyan, Cardinal said there is little confidence in the oil and gas industry or the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) in managing people's drinking water.
'It's a corrupt system. There's an entire book written about it,' she said. 'Chief Alan Adam of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation has asked for the AER to be dismantled because they're taken over by industry. There's no environmental consideration.
'Water levels are already impacting people's lives. Last year, we had no blueberries, and the evergreen muskeg died. When we were in Hay River last year, you could walk across the river.'
She also pointed out if Alberta was to go forward with Premier Smith's stated goal of doubling oil sands production, that would mean its water requirements would also double, which would mean less water for everyone else.
Low water levels in the Northwest Territories in the past few years has resulted in skyrocketing prices for fuel and food in remote communities such as Norman Wells and Fort Good Hope, which rely on summer barges for resupply. The Town of Norman Wells declared a state of emergency last winter when Imperial Oil did not respond to notification of barge cancellations in time to ensure the town has enough fuel for the winter.
Non-Indigenous-governed communities in Northern Alberta are also struggling with the ongoing drought — the counties of Grand Prairie and Greenview and the Municipal District of Bonnyville have declared agricultural emergencies this summer, citing concerns the cattle ranching industry could be crippled by drought conditions.
Cardinal said Keepers of the Water is demanding a pause on water transfer discussions and open transparency through the entire process, but also noted the people of treaties 6, 7 and 8 never conceded rights to water to the Canadian government.
'We still have the right to govern water,' she said. 'Our treaties give us the right to hunt, fish and trap. You can't do that without water. Our ecosystems depend on clean water.'
Officials with the GNWT said they are aware of the proposed changes and are seeking more information, noting they have heard the concerns of First Nations downstream of the oilsands.
They noted communication between the Northwest Territories and Alberta governments has improved since the 2023 Imperial Oil Kearl River incident, where 5.3 million litres of tailings-contaminated wastewater leaked into the watershed, which was only shared with the GNWT after the fact.
Cheezie said if the oil industry wants to control Indigenous waterways, they are in for a fight.
'In our treaty, it says our way of life would not be impaired,' he said. 'Now they're messing around with the water. We're going to use whatever means we have to stop this blatant misuse of water resources.
'We can't allow them to run roughshod over people's rights and our treaty rights. These people don't want any court challenges because every day their project isn't happening, they lose money, and as soon as they lose money, they get worried. So we'll use that to delay everything, even if we lose, because what choice do we have?'
By Eric Bowling, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, NWT News/North
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ACFN Condemns Attempt to Silence First Nations in Alberta Secession Case: "We Will Not Be Erased"
ACFN Condemns Attempt to Silence First Nations in Alberta Secession Case: "We Will Not Be Erased"

Cision Canada

time4 days ago

  • Cision Canada

ACFN Condemns Attempt to Silence First Nations in Alberta Secession Case: "We Will Not Be Erased"

FORT CHIPEWYAN, AB, Aug. 6, 2025 /CNW/ - The Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) is demanding a halt to efforts to undermine constitutional rights and silence Indigenous voices as Alberta navigates a reckless and unlawful push toward secession from Canada. The Chief Electoral Officer has asked the Court of King's Bench in Edmonton to rule on whether a proposal for Alberta to secede from Canada violates the constitution. This process – which was made law to ensure that citizen petitions do not propose to violate rights – is now under direct attack by the Alberta Prosperity Project and its leadership. Mitch Sylvestre – one of the APP's leaders and the person who brought the secession petition on its behalf – is asking for the Chief Electoral Officer's case to be thrown out. Mr. Sylvestre is seeking to strike the stated case and shut down the process before it begins. This would scrap the constitutional review entirely and block interveners – including ACFN – from participating altogether. This follows statements last week from the Alberta Minister of Justice and Premier Danielle Smith which publicly pressured the Chief Electoral Officer to withdraw the stated case and abandon the constitutional review. The Minister of Justice called the process "red tape". "This is a blatant attempt to silence Treaty First Nations and bulldoze through a radical secessionist proposal without scrutiny," said ACFN Chief Allan Adam. "Let us be absolutely clear – Treaty 8 was signed with the Crown in right of Canada, not with Alberta and certainly not with any separatist fringe group. We will not allow our Treaty to be trampled by political extremists." Despite the public pressure from the Premier and Alberta Justice, the Chief Electoral Officer has persisted in referring the matter to the courts. The parties are due to appear in court on Thursday, August 7, at which time the Chief Electoral Officer will be proposing the Court order a public notice plan and timetable to allow interested parties to apply to intervene, and for amicus curiae to be appointed, so that the Court can have a comprehensive hearing on this fundamental issue at a later date. In stark contrast, the lawyers appearing for Mr. Sylvestre and the APP will argue that the case should be struck then and there, without hearing from any other impacted parties. ACFN's legal team will be in court on Thursday to oppose Mr. Sylvestre's motion and support the implementation of a public notice plan and schedule that would allow First Nations and other concerned parties to formally intervene. "It is a matter of natural justice that the First Nations of Alberta – who have lived here from time immemorial – have an opportunity to be heard on this proposal to secede from Canada" says Kevin Hille, legal counsel for ACFN. "ACFN is going to be there to support the Chief Electoral Officer in creating a process that will give First Nations a genuine opportunity to participate." To ACFN and other First Nations, the secession petition represents a grave threat to the foundational relationship between Treaty Peoples and the Crown in right of Canada. Treaty 8 was signed in 1899 – before Alberta even existed as a province – and guarantees ACFN's rights to hunt, fish, trap and live according to their traditional ways. These rights are protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and cannot be erased by provincial whim or populist politics. Alberta was not a signatory to Treaty 8 and did not gain provincial status until 1905. Even then, Canada retained ownership of natural resources in the province until 1930. Alberta's authority over resources was only constitutionally entrenched in 1982. These facts underscore that ACFN's primary Treaty relationship is – and always has been – with the federal Crown. "This is not just a courtroom battle – it's a fight for our people, our lands, and our future," said Chief Adam. "If Alberta secedes, we would see artificial borders cut across our Nation, our kin divided, and our Treaty protections stripped away. We will not stand by while others try to erase our rights in secret." ACFN has consistently defended federal jurisdiction and the constitutional framework that upholds its rights – including at the Supreme Court of Canada. That fight now extends to this courtroom, and this case. "We are not going anywhere – and we are not backing down," said Chief Adam. "Canada must uphold its constitutional promises. We will fight this petition with everything we have." ACFN urges all Albertans, legal advocates, and Indigenous Nations to stand in solidarity against this dangerous and unlawful attempt to hijack democracy, suppress Indigenous voices, and dismantle Canada's constitutional order.

Indigenous leaders denounce Alberta's plans to alter water management
Indigenous leaders denounce Alberta's plans to alter water management

CTV News

time25-07-2025

  • CTV News

Indigenous leaders denounce Alberta's plans to alter water management

The Suncor Energy Inc. Fort Hills mine is seen in this aerial photograph taken above the Athabasca oil sands near Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, on Monday, Sept. 10, 2018. Former Tthebatthie Denesuline (Smith's Landing) chief Gerry Cheezie is not mincing words about plans between the Alberta government and Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) to change the legal framework governing the watersheds of Northern Alberta that feed into the Northwest Territories. 'When we signed Treaty 8 on July 17, 1899, there was no talk about Alberta,' he said. 'Alberta just happened to be created in 1905. Then in 1930, under the Natural Resources Transfer Act, some old white guys in Ottawa and some old white guys in Alberta signed an agreement that stole all our land and resources. 'They don't pay for any of this water usage — they use all this water for free. To produce one barrel of oil, they have to use 17 barrels of water and that water can't be returned to the system — it sits in tailings ponds. The quality of the water is going down. We're doing water samples and air samples and we're getting all sorts of disturbing readings.' Now co-chair of the Keepers of the Water, Cheezie is sounding the alarm over talks between CAPP and the Danielle Smith-led Alberta United Conservative Party government to modify the province's Water Act to allow oil companies to draw water from either the Athabasca River or the Peace River and transfer it up to 100 kilometres from either body of water. Under the current legal framework, oil extractors need to apply to draw water from a specific body and that water cannot be moved to a separate operation. 'CAPP has been engaging with the Alberta government to advance various approaches that could enhance water management, including low-risk, inter-basin water transfers,' said CAPP vice-president of regulatory operations Richard Wong. 'While the proposal to merge the Peace/Slave and Athabasca river basins for the purposes of identifying inter-basin transfers did not originate with CAPP, our members support it as a practical solution. 'Current restrictions under the Water Act create unnecessary inefficiencies for oil and gas projects that span major basin boundaries. Allowing water transfers between the Peace/Slave and Athabasca river basins, which naturally converge within Alberta, would eliminate the need for redundant water infrastructure, allow companies to access the most suitable water sources based on availability and reduce environmental impact,' Wong stated. Wong told NNSL Media there are roughly 122 oil and gas operations on the watershed. He said changing the management system would mean less water would have to be moved by truck in the area. A spokesperson for the Alberta government confirmed talks were underway. 'Right now, we are looking at ways to strengthen and modernize Alberta's water management system,' said Kevin Lee, spokesperson for the Alberta Ministry of Municipal Affairs. 'Over the past year, we've been engaging with Albertans on proposed Water Act amendments that would help improve the province's water management system. 'One of the proposed changes that we are seeking feedback on is on the definition of major river basins and includes a proposed merging of the Peace and Athabasca river basins, which would only apply to inter-basin transfers. All applications submitted under the Water Act undergo a full review to assess potential impacts to other water users and the environment before a decision is made. This process would still be in place for all applications. 'Merging these basins under the Water Act would be comparable to how Alberta is already managing the Red Deer, Bow, Oldman and South Saskatchewan sub-basins as one major river basin for the purpose of inter-basin transfers,' Lee added. 'Nothing normal about it' An arrangement similar to the inter-basin transfer system in southern Alberta is exactly what Keepers of the Water executive director Jesse Cardinal is fighting to stop. She noted that since those changes were implemented — in spite of warnings from hydrologists — water scarcity in southern Alberta has been an ongoing problem. 'We've been in a drought consistently for several years,' she said, adding the Keepers of the Water only found out about the plan from listening to public meetings. 'Last year was extreme drought and Alberta was saying that if there wasn't enough precipitation by spring, they were going to restrict water use. So we were paying close attention because the oil and gas industry and big agriculture are the biggest consumers of water in Alberta. 'It was around the fall last year these suggestions were being made, so we attended a couple of their online sessions. They just casually threw it in these sessions conversationally, really trying to normalize inter-basin transfers — there is nothing normal about it. It's a huge decision with massive impacts. 'The only reason why it was allowed to happen in the south is that is where the mismanagement of water began. That's where the First in Time, First in Right licensing system began, where massive amounts of water were licensed out for big-scale farming — not thinking ahead towards population growth, economic development and all the other impacts to water. There's been municipalities that can't even allow more people in because they don't have the water to sustain growth.' Water management in the province has always been flawed, added Cardinal, because water is seen as a renewable resource. But climate change is proving that may not always the case, with the glaciers that feed the watershed now melting twice as fast as they were a decade ago and entire summers with next to no rain. Cardinal said the Keepers of the Water held a gathering in K'atl'odeeche First Nation last year and heard concerns of low water preventing hunting and transportation from chiefs across the Northwest Territories. Noting the Alberta government has not properly consulted First Nation governments in the area and other stakeholders, Cardinal her organization is prepared to take the province to court to protect the watersheds. The Alberta government did not respond to questions from NNSL Media about if and how it consulted First Nation governments on the proposed changes. 'What choice do we have?' Highlighting other health concerns that have arisen from oil and gas development in the region, such as the contamination of country foods in Fort Chipewyan, Cardinal said there is little confidence in the oil and gas industry or the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) in managing people's drinking water. 'It's a corrupt system. There's an entire book written about it,' she said. 'Chief Alan Adam of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation has asked for the AER to be dismantled because they're taken over by industry. There's no environmental consideration. 'Water levels are already impacting people's lives. Last year, we had no blueberries, and the evergreen muskeg died. When we were in Hay River last year, you could walk across the river.' She also pointed out if Alberta was to go forward with Premier Smith's stated goal of doubling oil sands production, that would mean its water requirements would also double, which would mean less water for everyone else. Low water levels in the Northwest Territories in the past few years has resulted in skyrocketing prices for fuel and food in remote communities such as Norman Wells and Fort Good Hope, which rely on summer barges for resupply. The Town of Norman Wells declared a state of emergency last winter when Imperial Oil did not respond to notification of barge cancellations in time to ensure the town has enough fuel for the winter. Non-Indigenous-governed communities in Northern Alberta are also struggling with the ongoing drought — the counties of Grand Prairie and Greenview and the Municipal District of Bonnyville have declared agricultural emergencies this summer, citing concerns the cattle ranching industry could be crippled by drought conditions. Cardinal said Keepers of the Water is demanding a pause on water transfer discussions and open transparency through the entire process, but also noted the people of treaties 6, 7 and 8 never conceded rights to water to the Canadian government. 'We still have the right to govern water,' she said. 'Our treaties give us the right to hunt, fish and trap. You can't do that without water. Our ecosystems depend on clean water.' Officials with the GNWT said they are aware of the proposed changes and are seeking more information, noting they have heard the concerns of First Nations downstream of the oilsands. They noted communication between the Northwest Territories and Alberta governments has improved since the 2023 Imperial Oil Kearl River incident, where 5.3 million litres of tailings-contaminated wastewater leaked into the watershed, which was only shared with the GNWT after the fact. Cheezie said if the oil industry wants to control Indigenous waterways, they are in for a fight. 'In our treaty, it says our way of life would not be impaired,' he said. 'Now they're messing around with the water. We're going to use whatever means we have to stop this blatant misuse of water resources. 'We can't allow them to run roughshod over people's rights and our treaty rights. These people don't want any court challenges because every day their project isn't happening, they lose money, and as soon as they lose money, they get worried. So we'll use that to delay everything, even if we lose, because what choice do we have?' By Eric Bowling, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, NWT News/North

Digital sovereignty is a means to an uncertain goal
Digital sovereignty is a means to an uncertain goal

Globe and Mail

time19-07-2025

  • Globe and Mail

Digital sovereignty is a means to an uncertain goal

Jamie Duncan is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies at the University of Toronto and a Digital Policy Hub doctoral fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation. Wendy H. Wong is a professor of political science, the Principal's Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, and the author of We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age, which won the 2024 Balsillie Prize for Public Policy. Canadians have been a bit touchy about sovereignty lately, and for good reason. The 'elbows up' attitude that swept the country in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive antics has inspired a newfound enthusiasm for Canadian nation-building. One of the more aspirational aspects of Prime Minister Mark Carney's vision for our country is the idea that we can achieve digital sovereignty while enhancing our effectiveness in other sectors, like energy and Arctic security. Canada has its first Minister of AI and Digital Innovation, who has a broad mandate to bring AI innovation home and promote Canada's digital sovereignty. But even if such a thing were possible, there is no clear vision of what we'd do with it. 'Digital sovereignty' has become a catchphrase in global politics. Essentially, the idea is that countries want more control over the many parts of the digital economy that affect them, including hardware, software and data. Lately, this has meant focusing on AI. Sovereignty typically means having control over a specific place. It's the ability to make and enforce rules (for the most part) without interference. In the physical world, it's easy to picture a country expanding control. For example, building a military base in the Arctic helps Canada protect the area and enforce laws. But sovereignty isn't just about defence; it also applies to daily life. Energy or food sovereignty means producing more of what we need at home, so others can't raise prices or cut off supply. Canada's $2-billion AI computing plan could wind up helping foreign tech giants But digital spaces are fundamentally different from Arctic territory or oil fields. Digital sovereignty means being able to control Canada's digital destiny – which is easier said than done. From access to endless educational resources to bingeable TV in every language, the internet has its perks. But to make our digital choices truly 'ours,' we must acknowledge how our connected world affects our national sovereignty. Nearly every part of our online lives is somehow enabled by foreign companies. Data from more than 30 million Canadian social media users pour through our physical borders and into the hands of multinational companies. Consider Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, all owned by U.S. company Meta. And from the military to the local corner store, almost every part of the Canadian government and economy relies on digital infrastructure and software provided by American tech companies. Nor is there much respect for Canada's physical border among cybercriminals. Ransomware or a cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme can affect anyone from Squamish, B.C., to Ingonish, N.S. – but the perpetrators could be almost anywhere in the world. Digital technologies comprise some combination of infrastructure (servers, cables and the grid), services (or apps) and data streams. Canada's digital sovereignty aspirations around AI hinge on our ability to set and enforce rules about the three major components of those systems: data, code and compute. Data – the lifeblood of the digital economy – are what make fancy large language models and the TikTok algorithm work so well. Data are also responsible for many of their biases and blind spots. Opinion: If a toaster burns you, you can sue. But if Big Tech burns you, you're out of luck Computer code instructs these tools to turn data into something useful or profitable. Code is the secret sauce that transforms an (often patented) idea into cash. And none of this could happen without computing power, or compute. While you can store data and write code on your laptop, most commercial services run in the cloud. And while that may sound dreamy and far away, the cloud is just a bunch of data centres: big buildings filled to the brim with computers designed to process and store enormous quantities of data. Digital sovereignty requires considering several trade-offs simultaneously. Building data centres gives us more capacity to process and store the massive volume of data being harvested daily, but this compute and this data don't do much without equally powerful algorithmic tools. And all the data, while potentially insightful, are of dubious value if we do not have a coherent rationale that justifies and regulates the collection, storage and use of data taken from mostly unaware people. Canada's digital policy efforts over the past decade have mostly failed to strike an effective balance. The pan-Canadian AI strategy has helped some of the world's top AI researchers advance their fields and train the next generation of innovators, but research breakthroughs are just a start. Canadian policy-makers and companies have been far less adept at keeping this taxpayer-subsidized intellectual property and talent at home. Much-needed updates to Canada's outdated privacy law were stuck in Parliament for more than two years, and in the end, they never passed. As a result, Canadians' sensitive data remain poorly protected, with few ways to enforce privacy rights. Worse still, the government gave up its ability to control cross-border data flows when it signed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Canada has also failed to recapture some of the spoils of the digital economy. The Online News Act's imposition of compensation requirements on companies linking to Canadian content online backfired. Rather than boosting the revenue of Canadian media outlets, the law undermined Canada's informational sovereignty when Meta decided to simply stop linking social media users in Canada to news outlets. More recently, the Carney government withdrew Canada's planned Digital Service Tax on digital service providers, after Mr. Trump threatened to terminate trade negotiations over its 'unfairness' to American companies. In its early days, the Carney government took a seemingly different tack. The Liberal election platform promised to use tax incentives to keep more intellectual property in Canada and promote homegrown innovation. The government is also supporting a Canadian Sovereign AI Compute Strategy to build data centres and subsidize Canadian companies' access to high-performance computing. A new approach is welcome, but there are drawbacks. Ideas that focus on building data centres – like Kevin O'Leary's proposed Wonder Valley in Alberta – can have environmental impacts. Tech giants such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon have all reported major increases in emissions owing to the fact that these facilities use huge amounts of energy and water, generate heat and noise, and often affect nearby communities. These largely automated centres would also likely fail to create many new jobs. Tax breaks that keep patents in Canada and support local business growth could help strengthen our digital economy. But it's important to understand that Silicon Valley owes much of its success to operating in a loose regulatory environment. There are Canadian alternatives in the works, but they might not offer real value if global reach – something our platforms may not easily achieve – is what makes social media so popular in the first place. Many companies have been allowed to profit from largely unregulated collection and analysis of data about people. The side effects are serious and well-known. They include rising mental health problems in teens and growing political divisions. Both are made worse by algorithms that aim to keep people hooked instead of helping them understand the world. Digital sovereignty is only useful if it is accompanied by a sensible digital policy agenda designed to address the many harms associated with data-driven technologies. As we have written before, data is harvested individually but has collective impacts. As long as our government ignores the contradiction between building AI with personal data and protecting basic democratic rights – like consent, equality, autonomy, privacy and dignity – there will be a disconnect between the promise of an AI-powered economy and the real social and political problems digital technology can create. Efforts to achieve digital sovereignty represent an important shift in policy. Leaders are starting to realize how much control over Canadians' online lives – and the wealth created by digital technologies funded with public money – has been handed over to foreign governments and Big Tech. But while it's a worthy goal, it will only happen if Canada has a clear plan for building a digital economy that works for all Canadians. That means carefully weighing both the benefits and the costs of relying on data-driven technologies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store