US to impose visa restrictions on officials, alleging ties to Cuban labor program
The State Department revoked the visas of Brazilian Ministry of Health official Mozart Julio Tabosa Sales and former Pan American Health Organization official Alberto Kleiman, Rubio said in a statement.
Rubio did not name other officials who were affected but said they were from Africa, Cuba and Grenada.
The Cuban government has blasted U.S. efforts to stop the medical missions, calling them a cynical excuse to go after its foreign currency earnings.
Caribbean leaders have previously rejected U.S. accusations of Cuban labor exploitation.
"Cuba's medical cooperation will continue," Johana Tablada, Cuba's deputy director of U.S. affairs, said on X. "His (Rubio's) priorities speak volumes: financing Israel genocide on Palestine, torturing Cuba, going after health care services for those who need them most," Tablada wrote.
Brazilian Health Minister Alexandre Padilha said his government will not bow to what he called "unreasonable attacks" on Brazil's Mais Medicos, or "More Doctors," program mentioned by Rubio. The program was created in 2013. Cuba's contract in it was terminated in 2018.
President Donald Trump's administration in February expanded visa restrictions to target officials believed to be tied to the Cuban program, which has sent medics around the world since the Cuban revolution in 1959. The program provides hard cash to the island nation, which is enduring its latest economic crisis.
Trump has imposed a hard-line policy toward communist-run Cuba and reversed former President Joe Biden's measures.
Rubio labeled the Cuban program as one where "medical professionals are 'rented' by other countries at high prices and most of the revenue is kept by the Cuban authorities." He said it enriches Cuban officials and deprives Cuban people of essential medical care.
Washington will act "to bring an end to such forced labor," Rubio said, urging governments to pay doctors directly for their services.
In announcing restrictions on Brazil and ex-PAHO officials, Rubio accused the branch of the World Health Organization covering Caribbean, Central and South America of acting as an intermediary to implement the program without following Brazilian constitutional requirements, and dodging U.S. sanctions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Costco to not sell abortion pill mifepristone at its US pharmacy stores (Aug. 14)
Aug 14 (Reuters) - Costco Wholesale (COST.O), opens new tab said on Thursday it has decided to not sell abortion pill mifepristone across all its U.S. pharmacy stores, citing low demand. "Our position at this time not to sell mifepristone, which has not changed, is based on the lack of demand from our members and other patients, who we understand generally have the drug dispensed by their medical providers," Costco said. The decision comes amid campaigns against the pill by religious activist groups, including Inspire Investing and Alliance Defending Freedom. "Many retailers have become more cautious about taking overt political or social stances after recent controversies triggered boycotts, negative media coverage, and polarized consumer reactions," said Arun Sundaram, senior analyst at CFRA. Bloomberg reported earlier in the day that religious activist groups, which targeted retailers including Costco, Kroger (KR.N), opens new tab, Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab and Albertsons (ACI.N), opens new tab last year, will now focus on Walgreens (WBA.O), opens new tab and CVS Health (CVS.N), opens new tab that dispense the pill in states where abortion is legal. "The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on mifepristone access allows Walgreens to continue to dispense mifepristone under the FDA guidelines," Walgreens' website states. Kroger said it was reviewing the FDA's updated mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program, while CVS told Reuters that it fills "prescriptions for mifepristone in select states where legally permissible." Mifepristone was approved in combination with misoprostol in 2000 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to end a pregnancy within 10 weeks of gestation. Mifepristone blocks progesterone, the hormone that helps a woman's body maintain the lining of the uterus during pregnancy. Misoprostol is then taken to complete the abortion process. Danco Laboratories, which manufactures the abortion pill regimen, did not respond to a Reuters request for comment, while Walmart declined to comment.
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Putin begins journey to Alaska for Trump war talks – but keeps up Ukraine onslaught as Doomsday Radio bursts into life
Scroll down to read our live coverage of today's meeting TYRANT EN ROUTE Putin begins journey to Alaska for Trump war talks – but keeps up Ukraine onslaught as Doomsday Radio bursts into life VLADIMIR Putin is on his way to Alaska to hold crucial war talks with Donald Trump. The tyrant has continued to order barbaric attacks on Ukraine just hours before he is expected to be pressured into agreeing to a peace deal. 4 Vladimir Putin's huge team started their journey across to the US today as they sped through the shabby streets of Magadan Credit: East2West 4 Dozens of civilians in Sloviansk woke up to their homes being bombed in Russian drone strikes just hours before the meeting Credit: Getty 4 Ukrainian drones hit a residential building in Kursk in a last message to the Kremlin ahead of the talks Credit: East2West 4 Putin is on his way to Alaska to hold crucial war talks with Donald Trump Credit: Reuters Putin's huge team started their journey across to the US today as they sped through the shabby streets of Magadan before boarding a jet to Alaska. Trump is expected to leave Washington later today with the pair officially starting peace talks at around 8:30pm UK time. The US President has been adamant the bloodshed in Ukraine must end but a merciless Putin is yet to relent. He continued to launch aerial bombs in Dnipropetrovsk region overnight with his troops edging forwards on the frontline. Putin is expected to ask to keep hold of all the land he has managed to illegally seize since starting the conflict in February 2022. The continued assaults were met with the Kremlin's "Doomsday Radio" which blurted out strange coded messages as the despot started his travels. The station is known to send out strange messages during tense times for Russia with experts saying it is likely linked to the Kremlin's nuclear defence forces. Today the signals NZHTI 88751 MAREL 5057 6881 and NZHTI 03649 STOKOTON 2751 2830 were broadcasted with no explanation. The same mysterious codes were sounded only six weeks before the start of Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine. Kyiv launched their own warning shots at Russia as they sent a final message to the Kremlin ahead of the talks. They are believed to have downed Putin's £32 million Su-30SM fighter close to Ukrainian-controlled Snake Island in the Black Sea. Russia was also hit by heavy Ukrainian bombardment on the Olya port in Russia's Astrakhan region. The port has been used to import military goods for Putin's war machine from Iran via the Caspian Sea across the past three years. Ukraine also exploded Syzran Oil Refinery with a major drone swarm which triggered deafening explosions and sparked two major blazes.
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's space order risks environmental disaster while rewarding Musk and Bezos, experts say
A draft executive order from Donald Trump that aims to largely exempt space launches from environmental review is viewed as a gift to commercial space industry players such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and others who have long targeted the regulations. But its central components may be illegal and the US president 'is trying to do an end run around' the law, said Jared Margolis, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, which has litigated environmental issues around launches. If successfully implemented, the launches could create an environmental disaster, advocates say. Rocket launches create a huge amount of pollution that can contaminate local waterways and air with high levels of mercury, Pfas, particulate matter and other highly toxic substances. The vibration, sound waves, heat and explosions damage habitat and kill wildlife, some of which are protected by the Endangered Species Act. The executive order directs the US transportation department to 'use all available authorities to eliminate or expedite' environmental reviews. Among the few protections during space launches is the National Environmental Policy Act (Nepa) review that considers a wide range of impacts on the environment and human health, and the Coastal Zone Management Act, a federal law that allows states to decide how coastlines are used. The order targets both, and suggests the agency could attempt to circumvent the Endangered Species Act. 'The order is directing the transportation department to do whatever they can to avoid Nepa, but it doesn't mean that's possible, or that they have the authority to do so,' Margolis said. The executive order comes at a time when commercial space activity is spiking. Musk's SpaceX, the largest space company, did 96 launches in 2023, and is targeting 180 this year. That number is expected to continue growing, while other players, like Bezos's Blue Horizon, are quickly increasing launch rates. The US federal government's environmental oversight of the launches has always been weak, public health advocates say. The Trump administration quickly hobbled several of the few regulatory mechanisms that existed, and recently gutted funding for research into stratospheric pollution largely caused by Musk's SpaceX. 'We're accelerating the number of launches and blinding ourselves to the follow-up effects that they have on the environment – that spells disaster,' said a space industry employee who does work around Nepa issues, but requested anonymity to talk about the order without retribution. Space companies must obtain a launch permit from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which does a Nepa review as part of the process. The reviews are the framework by which federal agencies should assess a project's environmental or human health risks. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform. Finally, our guide at lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. They take into consideration air pollution, endangered species harms, water pollution, wildfire risk, noise pollution and potential human health risks, among other issues. The FAA has faced criticism from space companies for taking too long to review launch permits – about five months – while environmental groups have lambasted the agency for not using Nepa reviews to require more protections at launch sites. The executive order in part directs the department to classify the launches as 'categorical exclusions', which is the legal term for minor changes to a site that do not require a Nepa environmental review. Among other categorical exclusions are landscaping or lighting alterations. Legal experts who reviewed the order questioned the legality of the claim that a rocket launch has similar environmental impacts to landscaping changes. The plan 'fits with their overall desire to eliminate environmental considerations and reviews', said Dan Farber, an environmental law attorney with the University of California, Berkeley. 'Clearly what Trump wants to do is bulldoze through all this procedural stuff,' Farber added. However, there is a more legally plausible route. The Commercial Space Launch Act does include a provision that allows the transportation secretary to attempt to exempt requirements of environmental law if it is determined that the law is not necessary to protect the 'public health and the safety of property', Margolis said. That would be accomplished through a legal rulemaking process. But the provision is in conflict with Nepa, which applies to any federal action that has significant environmental impact, Margolis said. 'We would argue that review is necessary to protect public health and safety, and Nepa applies,' he added. The Nepa reviews provide a valuable legal avenue for challenges to the worst abuses, and Margolis said the order seems to be a response to arguments he made in which the Center for Biological Diversity sued several federal agencies and SpaceX over launches from the Boca Chica, Texas launch site on the Gulf of Mexico. The site sits next to a sensitive habitat for protected species, like the Kemp's ridley sea turtle, which is on the brink of extinction. SpaceX has launched the largest rockets ever made from the site, and several of those exploded, raining down particulate matter, metal and concrete across the region. The debris caused brush fires and covered homes six miles away in dust. Sound waves from launches have been known to kill birds and other animals, and SpaceX has been cited by state environmental regulators in Texas for spitting wastewater highly contaminated with mercury into adjacent waters. Still, the FAA has done little to mitigate the damage to the environment, and claimed the issues did not warrant an in-depth review. Margolis said SpaceX, with the FAA's blessing, had turned the ecologically sensitive area into a 'sacrifice zone', and the litigation is ongoing. The order also seems designed to aid Musk in his fight with California state regulators who have so far stopped SpaceX from expanding the number of launches along the coastline, in part using their authority under the Coastal Zone Management Act. Trump's order would give federal authorities more power to intervene, and restrict state agencies' decision-making powers. Margolis said this part of the order was also illegal because Trump was again attempting to change the law by decree. 'It's a talking point to show he's supporting industry, but at the end of the day it's not something that can happen the way he says it can happen,' Margolis said.
