logo
Israel's striking economic boom is fuelled by war and built on injustice

Israel's striking economic boom is fuelled by war and built on injustice

Daily Maverick3 days ago
Here's a grim reality: if you had invested in the Israeli stock index on October 7, 2023 — the day of Hamas' deadly attack on Israel — you would now be enjoying the best financial return of any major equity market in the world. Since then, as Israel has systematically flattened Gaza in a devastating campaign that has killed tens of thousands — if not hundreds of thousands — of civilians and displaced millions, openly committing gross human rights violations in the process, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange has soared. By July 2025 the index was up almost 80% in dollar terms, buoyed by both domestic retail investors and foreign capital.
Yet this is not an anomaly — it is a feature of the system. As UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese outlines in her brave report 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide', Israel's economy is not just surviving amid conflict — it is thriving because of it.
The rampage unleashed by Netanyahu's government has been good for business in Israel. The occupation of Palestinian territory is deeply interwoven with corporate interests. Illegal settlements fuel a real estate boom. Military technologies developed through decades of occupation and surveillance are exported globally. Profits are being made from the devastation of Gaza. Those same ruins now promise lucrative reconstruction contracts, once the forced removal of Palestinians is complete.
Meanwhile, little appears in the mainstream financial media critical of this brutal Military/Tech/Industrial complex. Instead, commentators like Ruchir Sharma in the Financial Times marvel at its 'economic miracle', and firmly state that Israel is 'winning', while pointing out its scale of research and development spending and rate of productivity growth.
On such metrics, of course, they are right. Israel ranks third for companies in the field of generative AI. Its productivity growth outpaces most other developed economies. GDP per capita has tripled since 2000, surpassing $55,000 (about R956,000) — more than Germany and approaching that of the US.
But there are two problems with this reading. First, stock markets are never gauges of justice or legitimacy; they are short-term estimates of future profit streams, regardless of what odious activities occur or the context from which those may be generated. The TA-125 index is small, concentrated and heavily skewed to bank, insurance and finance stocks that have benefited from wartime interest rates and a hot domestic tech economy. Other large components are tech AI company Nova, as well as the now infamous Elbit Systems, which manufactures the attack drones, tanks and bulldozers that have flattened Gaza.
Narrow bull market
It looks like a narrow bull market, and not a more sustainable grind ever higher. The Tel Aviv outperformance may well not last. Israel's bond markets are already flashing warning signs. Credit rating agencies Moody's, S&P and Fitch downgraded its credit rating in 2024, and all have the sovereign on negative outlooks.
But there is a second, and more fundamental issue with this reading that a strong stock market and resilient economy in some way means that Israel is 'winning'. As Albanese points out, Israeli economic statistics cannot be seen independently of the violence that underpins them. The same state that supports world-leading tech innovation is also engaged in systematic and unrelenting human rights abuses, from collective punishment in Gaza to apartheid in the West Bank. The same government celebrating a record number of initial public offerings is also facing allegations of genocide at the International Court of Justice. Israel's economic success story is not despite its militaristic belligerence. It is, in many cases, because of it.
These contradictions play out, on a structural level, across the country's riven political economy. Israel today is not simply a divided society — it is increasingly an incoherent, socially unsustainable one. Five elections between 2018 and 2022 have failed to resolve deep tensions between dwindling numbers of largely tech sector secular liberals, ultra-Orthodox Jews who refuse to participate in military service, Zionist nationalists of the ilk of Netanyahu, and systemically marginalised Arabs.
The mainstream of Israeli political consensus has therefore moved sharply towards the extreme right. Polls now show that a growing majority of Israeli Jews oppose the formation of a Palestinian state and support the expulsion of Palestinians altogether, both from occupied territories in the West Bank and Gaza, and the deportation of Arab-Israeli citizens. This is not a fringe view, it is increasingly the political centre.
For decades the idea of a two-state solution served as a way of resolving the contradiction of a supposedly law-abiding democracy committing illiberal, illegal acts. It was a kind of diplomatic placeholder; while never realised, the illusion at least maintained hope and a semblance of legitimacy. That fantasy has evaporated. The West Bank has been Balkanised and largely annexed through settlements. Gaza has been levelled. Mass starvation has been inflicted; food and humanitarian aid have been instrumentalised as weapons of war. The dream of peaceful cohabitation has been buried beneath bulldozed homes and schools, and the growing sense that Jewish sovereignty is equivalent to Palestinian erasure.
No return to the 'old' Israel
Many in the international community lay the blame squarely on Benjamin Netanyahu. But like Trump in the US, Netanyahu is not the root of the problem. He is a product of the system. He reflects, rather than drives, the will of a large segment of Israeli society. His eventual departure, whenever that may be, will not reverse the current trajectory. There will be no return to the 'old' Israel that liberals nostalgically evoke. That there is widespread anger at Netanyahu in Israel is true. That those angry at Netanyahu want his successor to seek a Palestinian state, or even Palestinian rights, is false.
What does the future Israel look like? How will Israel's future be affected by its genocidal actions and the inevitable demolition of its incontestable morality, derived from its birth in the ashes of the Holocaust? Israel's founding promise was born out of unimaginable trauma. For much of the international community, especially those Europeans living in the shadow of a genocide, the state was a moral necessity. But that moral obligation cannot exist alongside the permanent subjugation and expulsion of other people. Israel cannot be both a rogue Jewish supremacist oppressor and a democracy. Its political leadership and citizenry must choose which one it will be.
One potentially viable future is where land is shared, in some way — either through two states, one state, or a type of confederation — and in which equal rights are guaranteed for all who live between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean. But that future is not currently on offer, and there is little pressure — either domestically or internationally — to force the issue.
Absent that, Israel will drift toward a full-fledged apartheid state, increasingly authoritarian at home and in the Middle East, and increasingly isolated abroad. That the markets are still bullish, and the economy resilient, should not give us cause to reassess. History is full of states, like apartheid South Africa, that prospered economically while being corrupted morally. None endured indefinitely. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid
USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid

TimesLIVE

timean hour ago

  • TimesLIVE

USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid

The organisations would 'redirect or pause' aid distributions if they learnt Hamas was in the vicinity, the source said. Aid organisations working in Gaza are required to vet their personnel, subcontractors and suppliers for ties to extremist groups before receiving US funds, a condition the state department waived in approving $30m (R532.2m) for the GHF last month. The slide presentation noted USAID partners tended to over-report aid diversion and theft by groups sanctioned or designated by the US as foreign terrorist organisations, such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, because they want to avoid losing US funding. Of the 156 incidents of loss or theft reported, 63 were attributed to unknown perpetrators, 35 to armed actors, 25 to unarmed people, 11 directly to Israeli military action, 11 to corrupt subcontractors, five to aid group personnel 'engaging in corrupt activities' and six to 'others', a category that accounted for 'commodities stolen in unknown circumstances', according to the slide presentation. The armed actors 'included gangs and other miscellaneous individuals who may have had weapons', said a slide. Another slide said 'a review of all 156 incidents found no affiliations with' US-designated foreign terrorist organisations, of which Hamas is one. 'Most incidents could not be definitively attributed to a specific actor,' said another slide. 'Partners often largely discovered the commodities had been stolen in transit without identifying the perpetrator.' It is possible there were classified intelligence reports on Hamas aid thefts, but BHA staff lost access to classified systems in the dismantlement of USAID, said a slide. However, a source familiar with US intelligence assessments told Reuters they knew of no US intelligence reports detailing Hamas aid diversions and Washington was relying on Israeli reports. The BHA analysis found the Israeli military 'directly or indirectly caused' 44 incidents in which US-funded aid was lost or stolen. These included the 11 attributed to direct Israeli military actions, such as air strikes or orders to Palestinians to evacuate areas of the war-torn enclave. Losses indirectly attributed to Israeli military included cases where they compelled aid groups to use delivery routes with high risks of theft or looting, ignoring requests for alternative routes, the analysis said.

US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burnt in France, sources say
US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burnt in France, sources say

TimesLIVE

time3 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burnt in France, sources say

US-funded contraceptives worth nearly $10m (R177.15m) are being sent to France from Belgium to be incinerated after Washington rejected offers from the UN and family planning organisations to buy or ship the supplies to poor nations, two sources told Reuters. A spokesperson for the US state department confirmed to Reuters on Wednesday that a decision had been taken to destroy the stock. The supplies have been stuck for months in a warehouse in Geel, a city in the Belgian province of Antwerp, after President Donald Trump's decision to freeze US foreign aid in January. They comprise contraceptive implants and pills as well as intrauterine devices to help prevent unwanted pregnancies, according to seven sources and a screengrab shared by an eighth source confirming the planned destruction. The US government will spend $167,000 (R2.95m) to incinerate the stocks at a facility in France that handles medical waste, the US state department confirmed. The spokesperson said a preliminary decision had been made to destroy certain products from terminated US Agency for International Development contracts (USAID). 'Only a limited number of commodities have been approved for disposal,' the spokesperson said via email, adding that no condoms or HIV medications would be destroyed. US legislators have introduced two bills this month to prevent the destruction of the supplies after Trump's decision to shut down USAID, but aid groups say the bills are unlikely to be passed in time to stop the incineration.

World reacts to France's move to recognise State of Palestine
World reacts to France's move to recognise State of Palestine

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

World reacts to France's move to recognise State of Palestine

French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France will officially recognise the Palestinian state, the French President Emmanuel Macron announced on July 24, 2025. France will formally recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September, President Emmanuel Macron announced Thursday. The moves takes to at least 142 the number of countries that now recognise or plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, according to an AFP tally, defying strong opposition from Israel and the United States. France would become the most significant European power to recognise a Palestinian state, and the first among the G7 wealthy democracies to do so. Here is how countries are reacting: United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded angrily to Macron's announcement, calling it a "reckless decision". "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th," Rubio wrote on X, alluding to the Hamas attack on Israel in 2023 that triggered the war in Gaza. Israel Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the move "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became." "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel — not to live in peace beside it," he said. Spain Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, whose country already recognises Palestinian statehood, welcomed Macron's announcement. "Together, we must protect what Netanyahu is trying to destroy. The two-state solution is the only solution," said the Socialist leader and outspoken critic of Israel's offensive in Gaza. Saudi Arabia The Saudi Foreign Ministry welcomed Macron's "historic decision". "The Kingdom reiterates its call for all countries that have not yet recognised the State of Palestine to take similar positive steps and adopt serious positions that support peace and the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people." Jordan Jordan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed appreciation for Macron's decision. "This is a step in the right direction toward the realisation of the two-state solution and the end of the occupation," ministry spokesperson Sufian Qudah said in a statement. Palestinian Authority Senior Palestinian Authority official Hussein al-Sheikh welcomed the move, saying it "reflects France's commitment to international law and its support for the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination and the establishment of our independent state." Hamas Palestinian militant group Hamas hailed Macron's pledge as a "positive step in the right direction toward doing justice to our oppressed Palestinian people and supporting their legitimate right to self-determination." "We call on all countries of the world - especially European nations and those that have not yet recognised the State of Palestine – to follow France's lead," it added. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store