Alleged people smuggling gang member ‘made millions while on Universal Credit'
Based between West Yorkshire and Greater London, the alleged scheme is said to have developed into a wide-scale, dangerous criminal network earning millions.
The main suspect is believed to have a turnover of more than £1.3 million in his bank account, despite claiming to only earn £35,000 a year working for a furniture manufacturing company.
Another suspect is thought to have made an alleged turnover of more than £1 million across two bank accounts, whilst simultaneously receiving Universal Credit.
Immigration enforcement officers carried out raids in Greater London and Batley, West Yorkshire and arrested seven suspects between the ages of 30 and 50 years old on Tuesday.
Of the seven arrested, four men and two women have been charged in connection with the investigation and have been remanded in custody.
Footage released by the Home Office showed one of the suspects being led away from a property by police.
The gang is said to have targeted Gambian nationals, including booking their flights, providing housing for the migrants on arrival, and setting them up with illegal work.
Operating across the country, they allegedly charged around £5,000 per person for the full service.
The five men and three women are believed to have sent fake documents to beneficiaries to evade detection from police.
At the various addresses visited, officers seized several counterfeit identity documents, which are thought to have been used in this alleged criminal scheme.
Members of the gang are also suspected of reusing fraudulent documents for different imposters hoping to make it to the UK illegally.
An ongoing investigation revealed a substantial quantity of images of passports found on the main suspect's mobile phone.
Minister for Border Security and Asylum Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This operation is a clear display that we will not stand by and let evil criminal gangs abuse our immigration system.
'This suspected gang promised their beneficiaries a better life here in the UK. Instead, they face heinous levels of exploitation, which is exactly why we are working with law enforcement to ensure survivors of modern slavery are supported and the criminal gangs face justice.'
Ben Ryan, chief operating officer at Medaille Trust – a charity that supports the victims of modern slavery and worked on the investigation – said: 'Medaille Trust is delighted to have collaborated on this operation and to have played a part in ensuring that victims were identified and supported to begin their recovery as survivors.
'We believe that collaborative efforts like this between the Home Office and civil society provide a model for confronting the evils of modern slavery; with a focus on both pursuing abusers and recognising and supporting survivors.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
5 hours ago
- ITV News
Councils consider legal action over asylum hotels after Epping ruling
Councils across England are considering launching their own legal actions after a district council in Essex secured a High Court victory, temporarily blocking asylum seekers from being housed in a hotel in the area. Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage indicated the 12 councils where Reform UK was the largest party would consider legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Farage said the local authorities would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead.' He added: 'The good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.' Writing on X, Farage also said: "This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets." "This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country." "Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported." "I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country." On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. The High Court ruling is said to have angered the Home Office who fear the verdict will interfere with immigration policy and their obligations to house asylum seekers. Migrants must be removed from hotel in Epping after council wins injunction Could the Epping asylum hotel injunction set a precedent for other councils? ITV News' Paul Brand said that sources within the Labour party feel that councils are going to waste taxpayers' money fighting a government that is already working to end the use of hotels by asylum seekers. The Home Office has insisted it has reduced the number of asylum seeker hotels from 402 to 210. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately,' while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town.' He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' The area saw thousands of people turn out in protest about the housing of migrants in the Bell Hotel. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. In a post on Facebook, Broxbourne Council said: 'Broxbourne Council will now take legal advice as a matter of urgency about whether it could take similar action.' Meanwhile, the leader of South Norfolk District Council, which covers the town of Diss where a hotel housing asylum seekers has also been the subject of protests, said the council would not go down the same route. Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to try to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult males. He said to do so, which would effectively convert the hotels into hostels, should require a change of use. Two men have been arrested and charged in connection with a protest in July outside the hotel in Diss, which houses more than 40 children. Cllr Elmer told the PA news agency: 'We make a big play about integration, and to replace families who have children in the local school system and have integrated into the local community would make no sense.' He added: 'If we can punish people who have put up sheds in their gardens without permission, then we can take action against hotels being converted into hostels without planning consent.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment.
STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
Police watchdog urges use of seized crime cash to fund fight against gangs
Scotland's police watchdog chief is calling for talks on allowing money seized from criminals to be reinvested directly into tackling organised crime in Scotland. The latest report from the HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland praised Police Scotland's response to recent increase in organised crime-related violence. But he warned that such efforts have come at a 'significant' financial cost. Mr Naylor said he would like discussions to begin about introducing an Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme in Scotland, which would allow Police Scotland and other approved bodies to keep a portion of proceeds seized from criminals to spend directly on fighting crime. Similar schemes are already in operation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Mr Naylor said: 'The early months of 2025 have seen a return of significant violence and disorder associated with serious organised crime groups. 'Police Scotland's operational activity has resulted in a significant number of arrests. 'However, the increasingly complex nature of such criminality reinforces the need to ensure policing continues to have the resources required to protect communities across Scotland from those who seek to cause the greatest harm. 'In England, Northern Ireland and Wales, Proceeds of Crime Act reporting agencies can and do receive money from the proceeds recovered from crime under the Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme (ARIS). 'The Home Office encourages agencies to invest ARIS funds into areas that will increase asset recovery or, where appropriate, to fund local crime fighting priorities. 'This process is not applicable in Scotland. 'At a time of increasing demand, I would be encouraged to see conversations to consider if some funding could be released from seized assets to bolster the fight against organised crime – and maintain Scotland's position as a top performer in this area.' iStock Proceeds of crime funding should go towards frontline policing efforts Mr Naylor's annual report states that during 2023-24 more than £10m was recovered in Scotland using Proceeds of Crime legislation. This money goes back into the Scottish Government's CashBack for Communities programme, which is funded by Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) seizure and provides free activities and programmes for young people. Elsewhere in the UK 'proceeds of crime' assets to the value of £243.3m were recovered from confiscation, forfeiture and civil recovery orders during 2023-24. From this, £98.1m of Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme money was distributed to Proceeds of Crime Act reporting agencies – including police forces, to fund local crime fighting priorities. In his 2024–2025 annual report, Mr Naylor said policing reform had clearly strengthened Scotland's ability to tackle organised crime compared to before the creation of a single national force. He said: 'These events are often contained within a limited geographical area, but on this occasion have stretched across the east and west regions of the country.' He added: 'These attacks also remind us of the transnational nature and risk posed by organised crime groups and the need for police and law enforcement agencies to work globally to target those involved in directing such activities.' Mr Naylor said that over the past 12 months, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) had carried out a number of detailed inspections, including a review of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), inspections of road policing, and the police response to missing persons. HMICS had also carried out joint inspections with other scrutiny partners, in areas including adult support and protection, children at risk of harm, and of police custody centres. Mr Naylor said work was underway on a joint review with HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland to look at the citation system in Scotland, and on a review with Audit Scotland to look at 'Best Value' arrangements across Scottish policing. He welcomed the recent passing of the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Act 2025 by the Scottish Parliament which strengthens officer vetting and disciplinary powers. However, he said further work was needed to address the financial impact of the new legislation. He said: 'Too little consideration has been given to the wider impact of the legislation – and how this could affect a number of organisations including Police Scotland, the SPA , the Police Investigations and Review Commission (PIRC), and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. 'As part of our scrutiny plan for the next three years, we will inspect how Police Scotland – and others – engage in the proactive work required to assess the likely cost – and other demands that this new legislation will bring.' Mr Naylor said Police Scotland had been on a reform journey since its creation in 2013, and opportunities remained to redesign the organisation to meet future budgetary challenges. He added: 'Policing in Scotland is a complex and multifaceted activity. 'The reform journey cannot simply be a further reduction of capability and capacity within policing. 'The work that is underway to improve the organisation even further will be challenging and it will take time to deliver outcomes. 'This has to be done while continuing to deliver the high quality of service that the people of Scotland demand and deserve.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Councils consider legal action over asylum hotels
Councils across England are considering taking legal action to remove asylum seekers from hotels in their areas. It follows the High Court granting a district council a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from lodging at The Bell Hotel in Epping, 12 councils controlled by Reform UK will "do everything in their power to follow Epping's lead", the party's leader Nigel Farage said. A Conservative-run council in Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, also said it is considering taking similar action. Border Security Minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government will "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns". Writing in the Telegraph, Farage urged people "concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels" to "follow the example of the town in Essex" in peaceful protest. Tory-run Borough of Broxbourne Council has since become the first to declare it is seeking legal advice "as a matter of urgency about whether it could take a similar action" over a hotel in the leader of South Norfolk District Council, also run by the Conservatives, said it will not go down the same route over a hotel housing asylum seekers in Diss which has been the subject of protest. Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult ministers say they are braced for other councils to follow Epping's Angela added: "Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament." Epping saw thousands of people protest against the hotel after an asylum seeker living there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Kebatu, 41, denies the charges against him while several other residents have been charged for disorder outside the hotel. The protests were also attended by those in support of asylum seekers. Conservative-run Epping Forest District Council was eventually granted an injunction to block migrants staying at the hotel after an eleventh-hour effort from Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to have the council's case dismissed was ignored. Similar cases in recent years have seen judges refuse to intervene but Epping Forest told the court its case was different as the hotel had become a safety risk, as well as a breach of planning the case, the government's lawyer said any injunction granted could act as "an impetus for further violent protests" and could "substantially interfere" with the statutory duty of the Home Office to avoid a breach of the asylum seekers' human seekers staying at the hotel will be removed from The Bell Hotel by 12 September.
